1. Compano, R., L. Molenkamp, and D. Paul, Roadmap for nanoelectronics. European Commission IST programme, Future and Emerging Technologies, 2000.
2. Eshaghian-Wilner, M.M. and S. Navab, Efficient parallel processing with spin-wave nanoarchitectures. The Journal of Supercomputing, 2009. 49(2): p. 248-267.
3. Csaba, G., et al., Simulation of power gain and dissipation in field-coupled nanomagnets. Journal of Computational Electronics, 2005. 4(1-2): p. 105-110.
4. Varga, E., et al. Programmable nanomagnet-logic majority gate. in 68th Device Research Conference. 2010. IEEE.
5. Stamps, R.L., et al., The 2014 magnetism roadmap. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 2014. 47(33): p. 333001.
6. Siddiq, M.A., et al., A nanomagnet logic field-coupled electrical input. IEEE transactions on nanotechnology, 2013. 12(5): p. 734-742.
7. Niemier, M., M. Crocker, and X.S. Hu. Fabrication variations and defect tolerance for nanomagnet-based QCA. in Defect and Fault Tolerance of VLSI Systems, 2008. DFTVS'08. IEEE International Symposium on. 2008. IEEE.
8. Shah, F.A., et al., Error analysis for ultra dense nanomagnet logic circuits. Journal of Applied Physics, 2015. 117(17): p. 17A906.
9. Spedalieri, F.M., et al., Performance of magnetic quantum cellular automata and limitations due to thermal noise. IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology, 2011. 10(3): p. 537-546.
10. Fredkin, E. and T. Toffoli, Conservative logic. International Journal of theoretical physics, 1982. 21(3-4): p. 219-253.
11. Dadjouyan, A.A., et al., Design and evaluation of clocked nanomagnetic logic conservative Fredkin gate. Journal of Computational Electronics, 2019: p. 1-11.
12. Thapliyal, H., C. Labrado, and K. Chen, Design procedures and NML cost analysis of reversible barrel shifters optimizing garbage and ancilla lines. The Journal of Supercomputing, 2016. 72(3): p. 1092-1124.
13. Csaba, G. and W. Porod, Simulation of field coupled computing architectures based on magnetic dot arrays. Journal of Computational Electronics, 2002. 1(1-2): p. 87-91.
14. Imre, A., et al., Majority logic gate for magnetic quantum-dot cellular automata. Science, 2006. 311(5758): p. 205-208.
15. Bernstein, G.H., et al., Magnetic QCA systems. Microelectronics Journal, 2005. 36(7): p. 619-624.
16. Vacca, M., M. Graziano, and M. Zamboni, Majority voter full characterization for nanomagnet logic circuits. IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology, 2012. 11(5): p. 940-947.
17. Alam, M.T., et al., On-chip clocking for nanomagnet logic devices. IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology, 2010. 9(3): p. 348-351.
18. Graziano, M., A. Chiolerio, and M. Zamboni. A technology aware magnetic QCA NCL-HDL architecture. in Nanotechnology, 2009. IEEE-NANO 2009. 9th IEEE Conference on. 2009. IEEE.
19. Graziano, M., et al., An NCL-HDL snake-clock-based magnetic QCA architecture. IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology, 2011. 10(5): p. 1141-1149.
20. Vacca, M., et al., Virtual clocking for nanomagnet logic. IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol., 2016. 15(6): p. 962-970.
21. Swaminathan, G., J. Aylor, and B. Johnson. Concurrent testing of VLSI circuits using conservative logic. in Computer Design: VLSI in Computers and Processors, 1990. ICCD'90. Proceedings, 1990 IEEE International Conference on. 1990. IEEE.
22. Thapliyal, H. and N. Ranganathan. Conservative QCA gate (CQCA) for designing concurrently testable molecular QCA circuits. in 2009 22nd International Conference on VLSI Design. 2009. IEEE.
23. Bruce, J., et al. Efficient adder circuits based on a conservative reversible logic gate. in Proceedings IEEE Computer Society Annual Symposium on VLSI. New Paradigms for VLSI Systems Design. ISVLSI 2002. 2002. IEEE.
24. Niemier, M.T., et al., Shape engineering for controlled switching with nanomagnet logic. IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology, 2012. 11(2): p. 220-230.
25. Carlton, D.B., et al., Simulation studies of nanomagnet-based logic architecture. Nano letters, 2008. 8(12): p. 4173-4178.
26. Niemier, M., et al., Nanomagnet logic: progress toward system-level integration. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 2011. 23(49): p. 493202.
27. Donahue, M. and D. Porter, OOMMF User’s Guide, Version 1.2 a3 (2002).
28. Landau, L. and E. Lifshitz, On the theory of the dispersion of magnetic permeability in ferromagnetic bodies, in Perspectives in Theoretical Physics. 1992, Elsevier. p. 51-65.
29. Gilbert, T.L., A phenomenological theory of damping in ferromagnetic materials. IEEE transactions on magnetics, 2004. 40(6): p. 3443-3449.
30. Lemcke, O., Implementation of temperature in micromagnetic simulations. Interdisciplinary Nanoscience Center Hamburg, Univ. Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.[Online]. Available: http://www. nanoscience. de/group_r/stmspstm/projects/temperature/download. shtml, 2004.