There was a good distribution of males and females over this sample and a relatively equal representation of right and left eyes. The mean (SD) age of 10.1 (2.8) represents an age group more likely to understand and cooperate for eye examinations. Selection bias likely accounted for the narrow range of refractive errors that were included.
Our study found a mean (SD) average RNFL thickness of 107.31um (8.1). The superior and inferior quadrants were the thickest, with almost similar values (135.6um and 135.1um respectively), followed by the nasal (83.2um) and temporal quadrants (75.4um). Our results followed the “double hump pattern”, which represents a normal pattern where the superior and inferior quadrants are thicker (16).
The RNFL thickness distribution did not follow the “ISNT rule” where the inferior quadrant is the thickest followed by the superior quadrant; however, variability in the distribution of the RNFL thickness has been shown in a systematic review of RNFL normative data in children. Deviation from the “ISNT rule” may not always infer pathology. There is variability in the average and quadrant RNFL thickness even amongst normal children. The average RNFL thickness ranged from 92–117.3um in this systematic review that included 74 studies of varying methodologies and OCT devices and comparisons are therefore not feasible (17).
Commercially available OCT devices use different scanning patterns to measure this layer. The RNFL thickness is calculated as the distance from the internal limiting membrane to the outer limits of the RNFL. Most OCT devices calculate the RNFL thickness along a circle of predefined diameter (usually between 3.4 and 3.5mm) centered on the optic disc. One of the reasons OCT devices cannot be used interchangeably is the RNFL measurement along circles of different diameters (16). Various inter-and intraoperator agreements exist amongst different OCT devices (18). OCT devices have a similar ability to detect glaucoma. However, different acquisition rates, resolution, and RNFL detection algorithms are different in each device and should not be used interchangeably (19, 20).
The RNFL thickness can also be affected by age, sex, axial length, refractive error, and ethnicity.
There was no correlation between the RNFL thickness and age in our study, and other studies had similar findings; however, we did not have a good representation of each age group (21, 22, 23, 24, 25). A population-based study by Li Chen et al. reported that in children older than 11 years, the RNFL thickness decreased significantly with age (26).
In our study, male children had a slightly thicker mean (SD) average RNFL (109um [8.52]) when compared to female children (106um [7.41]); however, this was not statistically significant (p-value 0.106). Our findings were supported by a systematic review, which stated that RNFL is not influenced by sex in the paediatric population (17).
A normal range of axial length and a narrow range of refractive errors were selected; therefore, we did not expect a correlation with the RNFL thickness. This was also found in a study by Turk et al., which included a normal range of axial length and a narrow range of refractive errors (-0.27 ± 0.99D) (21).
Axial length and refractive error can affect the RNFL thickness, with a thicker RNFL reported in hyperopic children and a thinner RNFL in myopic children. Studies report that ocular magnification associated with the axial length and refractive error is attributed to the changes in the RNFL thickness seen in myopes and hyperopes, and these differences disappear after applying the Litmann formula (27, 28, 29, 30).
There are no studies published on the RNFL thickness in South African children for comparison. The single Kenyan study that investigated the RNFL thickness reported the RNFL thickness in 128 Kenyan children and compared the findings to 130 children from Bhutan (Asia). The mean age (SD) was 6.4 (1.5), and the average (SD) RNFL thickness in Kenyan and Bhutanese children in the right eye was 108.3um (10) using the iScan™ OCT device (Optovue Inc). There was no statistical difference found between the two groups (9).
We compared our data to a population-based study by Li Chen et al. on an Asian paediatric population between the ages of 6–17. The study included 4648 eyes of 2324 Chinese students, and the RNFL thickness was scanned using the iVue100™ SD-OCT (26). Our study had a small sample size, however, with a similar methodology. The average RNFL thickness in both groups was similar (106.89um and 107.32um). South African children of black ethnicity had thicker inferior and nasal quadrants (p < 0.001), and Chinese children had a thicker temporal quadrant (p < 0.001) (Table 2). This finding, together with the above-mentioned Kenyan study, may imply a similar average RNFL thickness in children of African and Asian descent.
Research outside Africa that included children of black ethnicity is also limited. Most paediatric studies on RNFL normative databases included mostly Caucasian and Asian ethnic groups (17). Yanni et al. reported the RNFL thickness in 83 children from North America using the Spectralis™ SD-OCT. The average RNFL thickness was 107.6um, which included only 5 African-American children, with non-Hispanic white ethnicity being the majority ethnic group (23). El-Dairi et al. reported a thicker RNFL in children of black ethnicity compared to children of white ethnicity (110.7um versus 105.9um) from North Carolina using the Stratus OCT-3™ (Carl Zeiss Meditec). The study included 114 children of black ethnicity and 154 children of white ethnicity with a mean (SD) age of 8.5 (3.1) (10).
Our sample of children had a statistically significant thicker average (107.32um versus 103.9um), superior, and inferior quadrant RNFL when compared to a Caucasian ethnic paediatric population in Turkey (Table 3). This study by Kiziloglu O, Yabas et al. investigated the RNFL thickness of 202 children between the ages of 5 to 17 using the iVue100™ SD-OCT. The mean age (SD) of 10.4 (3.4) was similar to our study. This finding supports an ethnic variation of the RNFL in children and implies that children of black ethnicity have thicker RNFL when compared to children of Caucasian ethnicity.
Comparative studies of the RNFL thickness between children and adults are poorly documented. Our children had a similar average RNFL when compared to our adult population of black ethnicity (107.32um and 106.97um), with children having a thicker superior quadrant (p = 0.008) and adults having a thicker nasal quadrant (p = 0.013) (Table 4). This study by Mashige et al. included 600 participants with a mean (SD) age of 28.15 (13.09) and an age range of 10–60. The iVue100™ SD-OCT was used, and the mean average RNFL thickness was reported as 110.01um. An average RNFL value of 106.97um was recalculated by summating the reported quadrant values. The number of children included in this study was not reported (31).
Ismail et al. have shown that South African adults of black ethnicity have a thicker global RNFL (108.7um) when compared to the European database (97.1um) on the Spectralis™ SD-OCT.
We compared our data to this study, taking into consideration that a different OCT device was used. Our children had an average RNFL thickness of 107.32um, which may suggest that children of black ethnicity also have a thicker RNFL than the European database on the Spectralis™ SD-OCT. Adults had thicker superior quadrants (p = 0.017), and children had thicker nasal quadrants (p = 0.005) (Table 5) (32).
Despite the higher prevalence of glaucoma and poorer visual outcomes in individuals of African descent, studies establishing normative databases in Africa are few. In Ghana, West Africa, the prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma is 8.5%, which is reported to be the highest in Africa and second in the world. The average RNFL thickness in a normal Ghanaian black ethnic population is 102.37um (Cirrus™ HD-OCT 500) (33). In normal Nigerian adults, the RNFL thickness was 104.17um (Stratus OCT™, Carl Zeiss Meditech) (34).
African-American adults were reported to be at a higher risk of developing glaucoma. The Baltimore Eye survey reported that the prevalence rates of primary open-angle glaucoma were 4–5 times higher in black ethnic individuals compared to white ethnic individuals (35). In a population-based multiethnic study, African-American adults had an average value of 90.87um and were reported to have the thinnest RNFL thickness compared to Latino Americans and Chinese Americans (Cirrus™ HD-OCT 4000) (36).
Both South African studies on adults of black ethnicity report higher values than adults of black ethnicity in other African countries, African Americans, as well as other ethnic groups, including Indian, Nepalese, and Brazilian individuals (31, 32).
The application of OCT in other paediatric optic neuropathies as an objective measure of the RNFL thickness can help determine disease severity and visual prognosis. Optic neuritis can occur as part of a Relapsing Demyelinating Syndrome (RDS) that includes conditions such as multiple sclerosis and aquaporin-4 antibody neuromyelitis optical spectral disorders. The long-term visual impairment in children with RDS is inversely correlated with the RNFL thickness (37). Thinning of the RNFL is related to decreased visual function in conditions such as optic nerve hypoplasia and congenital glaucoma (38, 39). Paediatric tumours such as craniopharyngiomas and pituitary adenomas can cause compression of the optic nerve. This can cause progressive RNFL thinning which can be detected with serial OCT measurements.
Optical coherence tomography can be used as an objective measure of the structure of the optic nerve and indirectly helps us assess visual function in young children. Therefore, a normative, age- and ethnic-specific database is needed to ensure the best representation of the normal distribution of the RNFL.
Strengths and Limitations
Our hospital-based study with a small sample size involved a single ethnic group. Therefore, the results cannot be generalized to other ethnic groups. Information bias, such as self-reported ethnicity and history in the context of exclusion factors, must be considered. Cycloplegic refraction was not performed on all children, and hyperopia may have been missed. Reche et al. reported no statistically significant differences in RNFL thickness in children with strabismus, and we did not consider this to affect our results (40).
The influence of corticosteroids on raised intraocular pressure is well documented in the literature. A study by Cingu et al. reported a thinner RNFL in children with vernal keratoconjunctivitis on long-term topical corticosteroid use (41). The direct effect of topical corticosteroids and the RNFL thickness needs more research and until strong evidence suggests that topical corticosteroids affect the RNFL, we do not consider short-term use of fluoromethalone 0.1% as a major confounding factor. The association between the retinal nerve fibre layer and allergic conjunctivitis also requires further research as a single study reported a slightly thinner RNFL in Chinese children with allergic conjunctivitis (42). We did not consider the influence of other optic nerve head parameters on the RNFL thickness. There are ethnic differences in optic disc size and cup-disc ratios. African American adults are reported to have larger disc areas and cup-disc ratios (43, 44), and studies have reported a positive correlation between optic disc size and RNFL thickness; however, this is controversial (45, 46).
The investigator performed all clinical examinations and investigations and therefore eliminated inter-observer bias. Study methodologies and different OCT devices and software versions make comparison studies challenging.
Recommendations
Interestingly, our paediatric population had a similar average RNFL with differences in the quadrant values when compared to our adult population of the same ethnicity using the same OCT device. Further research on South African children and adults is required to establish normative databases in our predominantly black ethnic population. This should ideally be a multi-center study with identical protocols.
Research in Africa is neglected and may be partly attributed to a lack of resources, financial support, and other systemic barriers. Current OCT devices do not allow input from local normative databases, and it is the responsibility of the clinician in a resource-constrained environment to be aware of the normative database in their OCT device and to research their own ethnically diverse population for comparison. OCT manufacturers must consider paediatric and ethnic-specific normative databases and allow input of this data into their device to allow for better representation of the normal values of the RNFL across diverse population groups.