We investigated the genotype-phenotype associations for susceptibility genes and their genotypes in the population-based KLoSHA/KLOSCAD cohort, followed by validation in the Bundang AMD cohort. We revealed that the SNPs rs1916762 and rs7587019 between the FAM124B and CUL3 genes (intergenic) affected choroidal structure, and the SFCT was significantly related to the genotypes.
Genetic analysis of pachychoroid spectrum diseases presenting with thickened choroid and choroidal vascular hyperpermeability has been conducted.[24] GWAS investigations have reported ARMS2/HTRA1, CFH, COL4A3, and B3GALTL as strong susceptibility genes for PCV and CSC.[16, 17, 19] In our study with discovery and validation cohorts, the FAM124B and CUL3 genes were associated with the SFCT.
FAM124B is a protein-coding gene, and only a few studies have explored its role in human diseases. Li et al. demonstrated that FAM124B has a higher DNA methylation level in ER+/PR + breast cancer compared with ER-/PR- breast cancers.[25] One GWAS revealed that the SNP rs1523921 (intergenic between CUL3 and FAM124B) is associated with anorexia nervosa.[26] Another study reported that in patients with acute myeloid leukemia, FAM124B is associated with AML prognosis.[27] At the molecular level, FAM124B was identified as a potential interacting partner of CHD7 and CHD8 (chromodomain helicase DNA binding domain) containing complex, and thus related to the pathogenesis of CHARGE syndrome and neurodevelopmental disorders.[28]
To the best of our knowledge, the FAM124B gene has not been directly associated with ocular diseases. In our study, we observed a potential association between the FAM124B gene and choroidal structure. To further investigate this hypothesis, we conducted an experiment using HUVEC. The results revealed that siFAM124B significantly reduced the expression of the proliferation marker Ki67, indicating the potential role of the FAM124B gene in enhancing the proliferation of vascular endothelial cells in the choroid. Overall, it appears plausible that individuals with alternative/alternative alleles (AA) in CUL3 and FAM124B exhibit thinner subfoveal choroidal thickness than those with reference/reference alleles (GG), considering that the two SNPs (rs1916762 and rs7587019) function as FAM124B cis-regulatory elements both in silico and experimentally.
CUL3 (E3 ubiquitin ligase Cullin 3) regulates cellular protein composition by providing target recognition and specificity to the ubiquitin-dependent proteasomal degradation pathway.[29] Moreover, CUL3 mutations cause familial hyperkalemic hypertension by affecting vascular tone and renal sodium transport.[30] CUL3 ubiquitin ligase maintains normal cardiovascular and renal physiology, and thus regulates blood pressure.[31] Furthermore, patients with diabetes and CUL3 dysfunction exhibit vasoconstriction by increased abundance of WNK3, RhoA/ROCK activity, and phosphodiesterase 5, thereby enhancing sodium reabsorption, leading to increased risk of diabetic nephropathy.[32]
In clinical settings, previous studies have yielded conflicting findings regarding the association between choroidal thickness and systemic vascular diseases. Xu et al. highlighted that patients with diabetes mellitus presented with a slightly significant thickening of the subfoveal choroid, while those diagnosed with diabetic retinopathy were not characterized by choroidal thickness.[33] Meanwhile, other studies did not reveal significant differences in the SFCT in cardiovascular patients.[34–36] The Montrachet population-based study suggested that the SFCT is not an appropriate biomarker for cardiovascular diseases.[37] In our study, we propose that the vascular proliferation of FAM124B, known to affect systemic vascular diseases, is likely to affect choroidal thickness. Moreover, choroidal thickness in neovascular AMD or geographical atrophy is known to be significantly reduced compared to normal individuals.[38–40] Therefore, our study results are potentially useful for clinicians and researchers in targeting choroidal vascular proliferation as a mechanism of AMD treatment.
This study had certain limitations. We focused on SNPs with p-values < 1.0 × 10− 4 identified in the GWAS, a threshold that is typically not accepted as a level of significance in standard GWAS investigations. However, we only selected SNPs that were significant in both the right and left eyes. Additionally, the discovery cohort consisted solely of individuals without retinal disease, whereas the validation cohort comprised patients with AMD. This distinction indicates that a direct comparison of the SFCTs between the discovery and validation datasets may not be perfectly aligned. Moreover, our investigation included an in vitro HUVEC experiment targeting the FAM124B gene, conducting siRNA transfection with the proliferation marker Ki67. Additional proliferation markers, such as CD34 and, if necessary, CUL3 siRNA transfection, could be employed for further in vitro studies to elucidate the role of both genes in choroidal thickness.
In conclusion, FAM124B has been identified as a potential contributor to subfoveal choroidal thickness. The genotypes of the identified SNPs may be linked to variations in subfoveal choroidal thickness. Further studies are warranted to investigate the effect of genetic factors on choroidal thickness.