UUTO is a frequent and common disease in urology. Clinically, patients often miss the best period for treatment due to the lack of obvious symptoms in the early stage, and the renal function of the affected side has been seriously damaged when seeking medical treatment[15]. Among them, patients with severe unilateral renal function caused by upper urinary tract obstruction often relapse multiple times after treatment, resulting in prolonged course of the disease, which is more difficult to treat than ordinary mild upper urinary tract obstruction, and clinicians urgently need to clarify the efficacy factors before treatment[16]. This study concluded that the GFR value of the affected kidney obtained by 99mTc-DTPA dynamic renal scintigraphy and serum C-reactive protein were effective factors affecting GFRd before and after treatment in patients with severe renal impairment caused by unilateral upper urinary tract obstruction, which was basically consistent with previous studies.
The risk of kidney infection in UUTO patients comes from failure to receive prompt treatment without obvious clinical symptoms[17]. Studies have shown that even if a patient's infection is well controlled before treatment, its treatment effect may be greatly reduced, suggesting that infection may be a factor in the patient's efficacy [18, 19]. C-reactive protein is the main indicator of systemic infection, and although patients in this study were treated with anti-infection before surgery, C-reactive protein is still the most significant influencing factor among all factors. This result suggests that once infection develops, efficacy is compromised. However, whether the effect of C-reactive protein can exceed the GFR value of the kidney needs to be further clarified after prospective studies control other influencing factors in patients.
It is worth noting that multiple linear regression analysis suggested that eGFR values did not guide the prediction of renal function recovery after treatment in patients with severe renal impairment caused by unilateral upper urinary tract obstruction. It is well known that preoperative eGFR level is the main indicator for clinical evaluation of renal function level, but 64% of patients with severe renal impairment caused by unilateral upper urinary tract obstruction included in this study did not have abnormal serum eGFR. This is mainly due to the compensatory increase in renal function on the unaffected side, which does not truly reflect the patient's impaired renal function (Fig. 3). In order to further evaluate the clinical value of serum estimated GFR, this study divided serum GFR before treatment into normal and functional decline groups, and found that the average GFRd value after treatment in the group of patients with normal eGFR before treatment was slightly higher than that in the hypofunctional group, but the difference was not significant. In clinical practice, many patients may have long-term asymptomatic state, and the course of the patient's disease cannot be determined by asking the medical history. Therefore, serum eGFR values are less significant when unilateral renal function is impaired or it is necessary to understand unilateral renal function. This further proves that 99mTc-DTPA dynamic renal scintigraphy has considerable advantages in evaluating renal function in patients with severe renal insufficiency, and that 99mTc-DTPA dynamic renal scintigraphy is irreplaceable in the evaluation of unilateral renal function. In addition, 30% of the patients in this study had a GFRd value of more than 5 ml (min•1.73 m2), indicating improvement in renal function. This result is defined by the level of eGFR change before and after treatment. According to the results of this study, the GFR value of the affected kidney obtained by 99mTc-DTPA dynamic renal scintigraphy may be more intuitive as a predictor of renal function recovery. However, more clinical data is needed to support this in order to gain the trust of clinicians to perform 99mTc-DTPA dynamic renal scintigraphy to dynamically assess the real-time renal function of the patient's unilateral kidney both before and after treatment.
For the location and sex of obstruction, there were significantly more male patients than women, and significantly more patients with ureteral obstruction than patients with obstruction due to kidney stones. Changes in renal function after treatment showed a higher mean GFRd in men and patients with ureteral obstruction than in the other group, suggesting that we may need to focus on women and patients with renal stones in the clinic. However, after statistical analysis, the difference between gender and obstruction site caused by GFRd was not significant, and it is necessary to prospectively include a larger sample size to further explore the influence of obstruction site and sex. In addition, the course of the disease and the surgical level of the surgeon were not analyzed, because the course of the disease is long and the onset is insidious and the time of disease cannot be calculated, and the surgical level of the surgeon is difficult to qualitatively or quantitatively. Secondly, this study is retrospective, resulting in incomplete records of some data.
In summary, this study found that the GFR value obtained by 99mTc-DTPA dynamic renal scintigraphy and serum C-reactive protein in patients with severe renal impairment caused by unilateral upper urinary tract obstruction were significant influencing factors for the recovery of GFR after treatment, and the role of 99mTc-DTPA dynamic renal scintigraphy was irreplaceable when unilateral renal function was impaired or it was necessary to understand unilateral renal function.