We report on a small series of 5 infants with concurrent high-grade CNS tumor and hydrocephalus, treated by IT CT injections to a programmable valve with a “virtual off” mode. Our results show that the technique is simple and safe. The most significant complication was 1 instance of the valve being "stuck" on one specific setting, with no ability to reprogram it. Despite the fact that the valve was stuck on a high-pressure setting, the child did not develop hydrocephalus. Although not of clinical significance in this case, and although we are unable to state the reason for this complication, it is important to note since it may pose significant risks. Possible causes of this malfunction may include being secondary to the external effect of an MRI system, or secondary to an internal effect, such as a small blood clot introduced during injection. The Certas valves are intended to withstand external electromagnetic fields up to (and including) 3 Tesla. Nevertheless, these children often undergo repeated MRI scans, and thus, despite the safety profile of the valve, we cannot exclude this as a cause.
Burger et al. described 2 cases of children with an “on-off” valve who were undergoing injection of CT5. They closed the valve for 24 hours following the injection, to maximize CSF distribution of the drugs. Their system consisted of 1 intracranial catheter, with several parts, including a Rickham reservoir, in addition to the valve system. Czech et al. described 8 cases using an “on-off” system, which was closed for 2 hours following the IT injection10. Kramer et al. increased a programmable valve setting for 6 hours following injections of radioimmunotherapy8. Zada et al. increased the valve pressure for 4 hours following injection, and measured the distribution of a tracer injected concurrently with the chemotherapy6. Lin et al. have published a series on IT CT injection using an Ommaya connected to an “on-off” shunt system7. They closed the system for 2-6 hours following the injection. However, one of the limitations of the “on-off” valves is the inadvertent closure of the valve, which may lead to life threatening conditions10,11.
Over recent years, use of an “on-off” valve has decreased, replaced by magnetic programmable valves. McThenia et al. reported on 15 cases using 6 different magnetic programmable valve models, evaluating drug distribution to the peritoneum at 2-4 hours and 24 hours after injecting In-111-DTPA3. In their model, McThenia et al. increased the valve pressure to the maximal setting for about 4-5 hours, and compared the distribution of the marker at 2-4 hours and 24 hours after IT injection. Their findings suggest that there does exist some peritoneal spread, although the number of cases per valve model, as well as heterogeneity in pathology, valve settings, ages, and other variables, does not enable identification of any clear advantage of one model over another.
The current series describes using the valve as a port of injection, with no need for an additional Ommaya reservoir. As stated, most prior series have placed a separate injection port.
Limitations
Our series is small and heterogenous; therefore we are unable to statistically prove efficacy or safety of the proposed technique. The time period of valve closure was chosen arbitrarily (3-4 hours); the pharmacokinetics of the drugs was not studied. It is therefore unknown how much of the drug level in the CSF was effective over time. Despite virtually closing the valve, drug distribution may not resemble that of IT drug distribution via a lumbar tap or an Ommaya injection, as these children have CSF pathway obstruction, or malabsorption. Thus, the CSF bulk flow is not equal to that of a child with no hydrocephalus.