2.1 Ethical approval
All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. The study received approval from the ethics committee of Iran University of Medical Sciences in Tehran, Iran (IR.IUMS.FMD.REC.1401.314). Written consent was acquired from all participants involved in this research.
2-2 Patients selection
The research was carried out at the Infertility Center of Fatemieh Hospital in Hamedan, spanning from November 2021 to August 2023. A total of 438 GV oocytes were obtained from 163 patients with PCOS referred to the Infertility Center. Patients were selected based on the Rotterdam criteria 19. The age range and body mass index (BMI) were 20–35 years and 20–27 kg/m², respectively, with no male factor infertility (total volume > 1.5 cc, concentration > 15 million/ml, total motility > 40%, and normal morphology > 4%, according to the WHO 2010 criteria). Uterine disorders, diabetes background, endometriosis background, as well as endocrine and inflammatory disorders, including congenital adrenal hyperplasia, Cushing’s syndrome, hyperprolactinemia, and thyroid gland diseases, were considered as exclusion criteria. The inclusion criteria for oocytes were limited to those that were morphologically normal. Oocytes with cytoplasmic or extra cytoplasmic abnormalities, such as irregular shape, dark cytoplasm, diffuse granulation, perivitelline space, central cytoplasmic granulation, or oocytes at stage of MI, were excluded from the study.
2-3 Ovarian stimulation protocol
The patients underwent controlled ovarian stimulation, according to gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol. Prior to the onset of menstruation, the patients received a daily dose of 4 mg of estradiol valerate for a duration of 10 days. The stimulation was initiated using recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH: Gonal-F® by Merck, Geneva, Switzerland) at a dose of 150 IU on day 2 or 3 of the menstrual cycle. When the largest follicle reached a size of 14 mm, GnRH antagonist (Cetrotide, Merck Serono, Germany) was administered via subcutaneous injection (0.25 mg/day), and continued until the oocyte trigger was administered. Daily monitoring of follicle growth was conducted through transvaginal sonography. We induced ovulation by administering a 0.2 mg GnRH agonist decapeptide (Ferring, Copenhagen NV) when at least two follicles reached a size of 18–20 mm. Subsequently, the ovum pickup was scheduled 36 hours later, under the guidance of vaginal ultrasound. Importantly, we did not encounter any instances of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome 20.
2-4 Retrieval of immature oocytes
After aspiration, the cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) were carefully extracted from the collection fluid using a sterile pipette. Afterward, they were placed in a culture medium (G-IVF; Vitrolife, Kungsbacka, Sweden), covered with paraffin oil (MediCult), and incubated at 37 °C with 6% CO2 for a duration of 3 hours. The cumulus cells (CCs) were efficiently removed enzymatically using 80 IU/mL of hyaluronidase (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) and mechanical manipulation with glass pipettes. Following denudation, the oocytes are carefully washed in G-Mops-V1 (Vitrolife) and subsequently transferred to a petri dish containing culture medium. Then, they are meticulously classified into germinal vesicle (GV), metaphase I (MI), or Metaphase II (MII) stages based on their respective meiotic maturation stage under a stereomicroscope (Olympus Co., Tokyo, Japan).
2-5 Preparation meiosis activating sterol (FF-MAS)
FF-MAS was purified from human follicular fluid using Byskov's laboratory procedure 21. Briefly, 1 ml of follicular fluid (FF) was mixed with a 75% n-heptane and 25% isopropanol solution. Subsequently, 0.1 ml of 0.3 M NaH2PO4 (pH 1.0) was added, which was vigorously shaken for 2 hours. The resulting solution was then centrifuged for 10 minutes at 2000 rpm to separate the organic phase containing sterols. This phase was collected, dried, and flushed with 2 ml of n-heptane, followed by centrifugation for 5 minutes at 2000 rpm. Supernatants obtained were dried and reconstituted in 150 mg of HPLC eluent. These reconstituted samples were subsequently loaded onto a straight-phase HPLC column (ChromspherSi, 5 m, 250 mm × 4.6 mm) using a mixture of 99.5% n-heptane and 0.5% isopropanol (v:v), running at a flow rate of 1.00 ml/min. Specific sterols (lanosterol and T-MAS) were collected from the HPLC column. Reversed-phase separation was conducted by reconstituting the collected samples in acetonitrile and loading them onto a LiChrospher RP-8, 5 mm, 150 mm × 3.0 mm HPLC column. This column was run with a mobile phase consisting of 93% acetonitrile and 7% water (v/v) at a flow rate of 1.00 ml/min and at room temperature. Quantification was done by comparing the eluted peaks from the samples with runs of standards (lanosterol, cholesterol, FF-MAS, and T-MAS) using known concentrations of these standards.
2-6 Microfluidic chip
The design principles behind this microfluidic device are grounded in simulating the natural growth conditions of the oocyte and embryo in vivo 22. The device was manufactured at the Mizan Microchip Technology Laboratory in Tehran, Iran. Utilizing CAD (AutoCAD) software, the 3D geometry of the microfluidic device was meticulously designed. To make it, a soft lithography method was used. Polymer polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) was used to fabricate this microfluidic device, sterilized with ethylene oxide gas and following each usage, placed in a clean plastic bag. Because of its favorable mechanical characteristics, elasticity, optical transparency, biocompatibility, and straightforward manufacturing procedure, PDMS was selected for the fabrication of this microfluidic device.
The microfluidic device channel had dimensions of 200 μm width, 150 μm depth, and a total length of 8 mm. The microfluidic device chamber had a diameter of 1300 µm. This microfluidic device comprises two inlets: Inlet A, designed for the input of culture medium flow, and Inlet B, designated for the input of FF-mas. Additionally, it features an outlet for the exit of culture medium flow and FF-mas. The chamber is specifically designed for the collection of mature oocytes.
2.7 Evaluating the cellular toxicity of the microfluidic device
In this study, conducted the Human Sperm Survival Assay (HSSA) to evaluate the device's cytotoxicity. Semen samples were obtained from twelve individuals with normal sperm parameters. These samples were processed in HEPES-buffered medium, and the resulting sperm suspensions were utilized in the HSSA. In the experimental group, the device was aseptically placed in a conical tube containing 1 ml of sperm suspension. In contrast, the control group involved a conical tube with only 1 ml of spermatozoa. The tubes were maintained at room temperature, and sperm suspension samples were gathered at different time intervals: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 24, 48, and 72 hours. With a sterile pipette, 10 μl of the suspension was dispensed onto a glass slide. Subsequently, a coverslip was positioned over the slide, and scrutinized under a microscope. The Survival Index (SI) was computed by assessing the percentage of progressive motile spermatozoa in the experimental samples. The SI was calculated by dividing the percentage of progressive motile spermatozoa in the experimental group by the corresponding percentage in the control group at the specified time intervals. SI values below 85% indicate potential toxicity. In this study, this cutoff value was utilized to identify potential sperm toxicity 23.
2-8 Experimental design
In this experimental study, GV oocytes were divided into five groups for culture (Figure 1). In the first group, GV oocytes were cultured in 25 μL drops of culture medium for 24 h at 37°C, 5% O2, and 6% CO2, with high humidity, under paraffin oil, and without medium renewal. In the second group, GV oocytes were cultured using the same drop culture method as in the first group, with the addition of a 10 µM FF-MAS supplement to the culture medium. In the third group, GV oocytes were cultured under dynamic microfluidic conditions for 24 h at 37°C, 5% O2, and 6% CO2, with high humidity. In this scenario, the GV oocyte was cultured in a device chamber. Inlet A of the microfluidic device, connected to a syringe pump (Mizan Micro Tech model: MMT-SP-102-Iran) via a silicone tube and connector, supplied the culture medium at a flow rate of 6.5 µl/min into the device, while Inlet B remained closed. In the fourth group, GV oocytes were also cultured under dynamic microfluidic conditions, following the same design as in the third group. Additionally, at the beginning of the culture, FF-MAS supplement was supplied to the oocytes at a flow rate of 6.5 µl/min for a duration of 2 h from input B. The fifth group closely mirrors the fourth group in terms of dynamic microfluidic culture and the presence of the FF-MAS supplement (10 µM). However, there is a significant distinction in this group's experimental approach. Instead of a 2 h exposure as in the fourth group, in the fifth group, the FF-MAS supplement is continuously supplied to the oocytes through input B for a prolonged duration of 24 h.
In order to prepare for ICSI insemination, oocyte maturity was evaluated 24 h later by observing the presence of PB1 using an inverted microscope (Nikon Co, Japan) 24.
Figure 1.
2-9 Fertilization and embryo culture
Fertilization and embryo formation rates were assessed and compared across the different groups. The fertilization rate was determined by calculating the ratio of normally fertilized oocytes to injected oocytes, while the embryo formation rate was defined as the proportion of cleaved embryos formed to the total number of fertilized oocytes. After ICSI, the embryos were cultured under similar conditions as the oocytes, with the exception that FF-MAS supplement was omitted from the culture medium, and only static and dynamic culture conditions were applied to the embryos. Fertilization status was evaluated 16–18 h after ICSI in each of the five groups, and the fertilized oocytes were subsequently cultured in cleavage medium for 72 h. The development of the embryos was assessed based on grading criteria 25.
2-10 RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis
RNA extraction was carried out using a RNeasy Micro Kit (Qiagen, Germany) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. The purity of samples was evaluated using A260/A280 nm ratio with expected value between 1.8 to 2.0. The purified RNAs were employed for cDNA synthesis using a RevertAid™ H Minus First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo, Lithuania) and random hexamer primers, following the manufacturer's instructions. The reverse transcription was conducted in 20 μL reactions for 60 min at 42 °C, followed by 70 °C for 5 min to deactivate the reverse transcriptase.
2-11 Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
Gene expression was assessed using quantitative Realtime PCR. Primer design of nuclear maturation genes (CDC20-UBA52-TP53-BRCA1), cytoplasmic maturation genes (PAD6-TLE6) and housekeeping gene (GAPDH) was conducted using Primer Design Software (version 6.24; Primer Biosoft, Palo Alto, USA) (Table 1). The PCR run was conducted according the Quanti Tect SYBR Green RT-PCR (Applied Biosystems, UK) kit on an Applied Biosystems Step One (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Paisley, UK), following a three-stage protocol: Stage 1: 95 ˚C for 10 min, stage 2: 95 ˚C for 15 sec (by 40 cycles) and stage 3: 60 ˚C for 1 min. The reaction was carried out in triplicates for each sample, with a concurrent run of a no template control alongside the original sample. The Applied Biosystems Step One software (version 2.1; Thermo Fisher Scientific) was utilized to obtain the relative expression of each gene.
Table 1.
2-12 Electron microscopy
A total of 20 oocytes were prepared for transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Among these oocytes, 4 were in immature state (GV), while the remainder were matured using in vitro maturation (IVM) technology within our study groups. Following the methodology outlined by Nottola et al., we processed the oocytes for TEM 26. Initially, we initiated the fixation process by immersing the oocytes in a solution containing 1.5% glutaraldehyde (Sigma, Mo, USA) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). This fixation was conducted for a period ranging from 2 to 5 days at a temperature of 4°C. Subsequently, the oocytes underwent a thorough PBS rinse to eliminate any excess fixative. In the subsequent step, we subjected the samples to post-fixation with 1% osmium tetroxide (Agar Scientific, Stansted, UK) in PBS, followed by another round of rinsing in PBS. The oocytes were subsequently gently embedded in small blocks composed of 1% agar (Sigma, Mo, USA). These embedded samples were progressively dehydrated through exposure to an ascending ethanol series and immersed in propylene oxide for solvent substitution. The final step involved embedding the samples in Araldite resin (Merk, Germany). Afterwards, the samples were sectioned, producing slices ranging from 0.5 to 1 µm in thickness, which were subsequently stained with Toluidine blue. These stained sections were examined under a light microscope (Zeiss Axioskop). ultrathin sections, were cut between 60-80 nm, mounted on copper grids, and subjected to contrast enhancement using uranyl acetate and lead citrate. Finally, these ultrathin sections were scrutinized and photographed utilizing a TEM operating at 80 kV (Zeiss, Germany).
2-13 Statistical Analysis
The data are presented as mean ± SD. Fisher’s exact test and One sample t test were used appropriately. To assess the distribution of the data, the D'Agostino-Pearson test was employed. All hypotheses were two sided and the significant level was defined as p < 0.05. Also, Statistical analysis was carried out using GraphPad Prism version 8.4.2 (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA).