Observations during growth
The static formation route was used to fabricate BC in this study. The BC structure was developed by the intertwining of the cellulosic fibrillar structures forming uneven surfaces. It was observed that the growth of BC was quite slow at the beginning despite the high concentration of ingredients due to a lesser number of bacteria. As the time elapses, the bacterial quantity increases, and the growth process is faster. After some time, the concentration of ingredients starts to decrease, which leads to slower growth of BC and eventually to a stagnant phase. The BC samples grow as a floating membrane at the surface, which separates the air-liquid interface.
Surface morphology (SEM results)
The surface morphology of BC samples is shown in Fig. 4. The morphological structures are different due to the use of different ingredients. The presence of distinct particulate matter (of size 5 micron and 6 micron) was observed in the sample images of S4 and S5, respectively. This particulate matter can be attributed to the use of sugar (such as dragon fruit) and tea type (such as Cape Jasmine fruit) used for BC preparation. In samples S1, S2, S3 and S6, the particulate matters were not distinctly visible and were smaller in size as the nitrogen and carbon sources were well mixed. The distinct cellulosic structure was not visible in the SEM images due to insufficient purification process used during the washing of the BC to remove fermentation residues (Costa et al., 2021).
Thickness values
The thickness of textile materials is important in determining the types of applications as it influences draping behavior. The thickness results of dried BC specimens are shown in Fig. 5. It can be observed that the thickness of the BC sample fabricated with black tea, white sugar, and sugar cane (i.e., S2) is the highest. Similarly, the thickness of the samples produced with blue peas and white sugar (i.e., S6) is the lowest. The highest and lowest values of thickness values were 1.26 and 0.21 mm, respectively. The thickness order from highest to lowest was S2 > S3 > S5 > S1 > S4 > S6. The thickness result for the textile specimen (SS), that was used as a reference for comparison of bursting strength for textile applications, was collected from the research by Uyanik (Uyanik, 2020). The thickness result for sample ‘SS’ is indicative whether the BC samples can meet the desired results for textile applications.
The reason for the greater thickness of S2 can be attributed to the richer carbon source, due to the mixture of white sugar and sugar cane juice in addition to a rich nitrogen source. The richer carbon and nitrogen sources led to a sample with higher thickness. On the other hand, sample S6 showed the lowest thickness which might be due to the poor nitrogen source derived only from the blue peas. As there was no nitrogen source used in this experiment, the amount of nitrogen was insufficient for the growth of BC leading to the lowest thickness. Further it can be observed that the black tea samples produced higher thickness than that of the other sources. The difference between the thickness were statistically significant across the six BC samples (F = 4.21, at p < 0.05).
In general, several studies have established that the higher the number of days to grow BC, the higher is the thickness when keeping other parameters constant (Eslahi et al., 2020). However, factors such as the type of carbon and nitrogen sources greatly impact the thickness results. Sample S6 with blue peas as a nitrogen source showed the minimum thickness due to weaker source for nitrogen despite higher growing time.
pH results
The growth of BC samples also depends on the pH level of the culture medium. A lower pH (i.e., acidic medium) is favored for the microorganisms to grow. It was reported that a pH range of 4.0 to 5.0 produces the best result for the growth of BC (Verschuren et al., 2000). Klemm et al. (2001) had earlier reported that a pH of 3.5 was the optimum value for the growth of BC. Further, the pH value is important in relation to the application of BC in fashion and textiles. A neutral pH (pH value of 7) is needed for many applications that come in direct contact with the skin. The pH values of all the samples before the growth started and after the samples were harvested were measured, with the results shown in Fig. 6.
The results show that the pH of the samples before the fabrication of BC lie between 3.0-4.4. The pH values had decreased producing a more acidic medium when the samples were harvested, ranging from 2.6 to 3.6. Several publications have reported that the pH values decreased below 4.0 after the formation of BC (Lin et al., 2013). The formation of different types of organic acids such as ethanoic acid and gluconic acid has also been reported by several researchers. These acids are responsible for the lowering of the pH values. However, for fashion and textile applications, the low pH values of the harvested BC are not suitable. The samples would need to be treated with an alkaline solution such as calcium carbonate (CaCO3) to raise the pH to a neutral value of 7 (Wang et al., 2019).
FTIR spectroscopy results
FTIR spectroscopy was used to understand the chemical composition of BC fabric. The transmittance peak analyses of the spectra were performed to check the appearance, disappearance and shifting of peaks to find the functional groups. The FTIR spectrographs of the BC samples are shown in Fig. 7. The major component of BC sample is cellulose, hence, one of the functional groups of cellulose is hydroxyl group (-O-H stretching), which was observed in the wave number region from 3240–3340 cm− 1. The other functional group found in the spectra of cellulosic fiber is -C-H vibrations, observed in the wave number region of 2850–2920 cm− 1.
The cellulosic peak for -C-O vibrations was observed in the region of 980–1060 cm− 1. The presence of carboxylic acids was identified from the -C = O vibrations present at 1630 and 1730 cm− 1. The -C-H vibrations of carboxylic acid were also identified from the peak vibrational peak present in the region 2850–2920 cm− 1. Some of the spectrographs show lower intensity peaks, which might be due to the presence of some fruit residues in the BC structure. The characteristic peaks of all the six BC samples are identical, indicating the cellulosic structure across the BC specimens.
Table 2
FTIR results showing the functional groups present in BC samples (Berthomieu and Hienerwadel, 2009)
Wave number | Vibrations | Functional group |
---|
3240–3340 | Stretching | -O-H (broad peak from alcohol or water) |
2850–2920 | Vibrations | -C-H (medium to strong peak from cellulose and carboxylic acid) |
1730 | Vibrations | -C = O (weak to strong peak from carboxylic acid) |
1630 | Vibrations | -C = O (weak peak from carboxylic acid) |
980–1060 | Vibrations | -C-O (from cellulose) |
Mechanical properties (Bursting strength)
The mechanical properties of BC can be better evaluated by the bursting strength as the samples can break through multi-directional force rather than a unidirectional tensile force. The bursting strength is a measure of durability of the fabric or similar textile materials. The bursting strength results of BC samples are shown in Fig. 8. It can be observed that the bursting strength of sample S4 is the lowest (234.2 kPa) and the bursting strength of the sample S2 is the highest (671.3 kPa). The bursting strength of the samples are in the decreasing order of S2 > S3 > S5 > S6 > S1 > S4.
The bursting strength of a fabric (as shown by SS in the graph) used for clothing application was used to compare the values of BC samples. It can be observed that the BC samples showed lower bursting strength values compared to the SS fabric (100% cotton fabric), except the sample, S2. The thickness values (Fig. 5) for S2, S3 and S5 BC samples are higher than the reference cotton fabric (SS). However, the bursting strength of S3 and S5 are lower than the SS fabric. This shows that there is not a direct relationship between thickness and bursting strength. The difference among the bursting strength values were statistically significant among all the six BC samples (F = 6.7, at p < 0.05).
The textile fabric SS has higher bursting strength than the BC samples (except S2) due to intermeshing of yarns in the knitted fabric structure in the form of loops. The bursting strength of S2 is higher than SS, which might be due to the significantly higher thickness of the sample. The lower bursting strength of BC samples can be attributed to the uneven surface with thick and thin places. The presence of a thin place or a weak spot on the surface will lead to premature failure leading to lower bursting strength. It can be concluded that BC samples can be grown to the required thickness for achieving bursting strength results that are equivalent to the real textile fabrics made from 100% cotton.
Microbial Analysis Results
The results obtained from Bruker Daltonik MALDI tests of BC samples are shown in Table 3. It can be observed that Acetobacter Indonesiensis, a gram-negative bacterium, is found in all the three samples tested for bacterial analysis. The bacteria species Acetobacter Indonesiensis has also been used in several other research for growing BC (Jie et al., 2023, Tran et al., 2021, Yetiman and Kesmen, 2015). The bacteria of the genus Acetobacter are rod-shaped and elongated and belong to the group of acetic acid bacteria. This genus is the most widely used commercial bacteria and provides maximum growth of BC during the fermentation process. The bacteria of genus Acetobacter are purple, non-photosynthetic bacteria that can convert various sugar sources such as glucose, fructose, glycerol, and other organic substances into BC.
The other bacterial group found in the samples included Bacillus subtilis, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Agrobacterium rubi, and Staphylococcus hominis. Bacillus subtilis is a rod-shaped and gram-positive bacteria, which was found in some BC (Savitskaya et al., 2019); Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a single-celled yeast, widely used in baking, brewing and wine making; Agrobacterium rubi is a mesophilic plant pathogen; and Staphylococcus hominis is a gram positive bacteria with round-shape. Hence, various types of bacteria and yeast were present in the samples, which originated from the parent SCOBY. The total bacterial count in colony forming unit per milliliter (CFU/ml) has been shown in Table 4. It can be observed that the number of CFUs in sample S6 was the highest and S4 was the lowest, with values of 2.16*107 CFUs and 3.65*106 CFUs, respectively. From the results it can be concluded that the thickness of the samples does not depend on the bacterial count, rather the type of carbon and nitrogen sources. Despite the highest CFU values for S6, the thickness was not the highest due to weaker carbon and nitrogen sources available for bacterial growth.
Table 3: Results obtained for bacterial type from Bruker Daltonik MALDI tests
Sample code
|
Test Type
|
Result
|
Gram positive or gram negative
|
MALDI Scores*
|
S1
|
Bruker Daltonik MALDI
|
Acetobacter indonesiensis
|
Gram negative
|
1.78
|
Acetobacter indonesiensis
|
Gram negative
|
2.48
|
Bacillus subtilis
|
Gram positive
|
1.82
|
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
|
Yeast
|
2.20
|
S4
|
Bruker Daltonik MALDI
|
Acetobacter indonesiensis
|
Gram negative
|
2.02
|
Agrobacterium rubi
|
Yeast
|
1.87
|
Acetobacter indonesiensis
|
Gram negative
|
2.35
|
Staphylococcus hominis
|
Gram positive
|
2.08
|
S6
|
Bruker Daltonik MALDI
|
Acetobacter indonesiensis
|
Gram negative
|
1.81
|
Acetobacter indonesiensis
|
Gram negative
|
2.03
|
Bacillus subtilis
|
Gram positive
|
2.12
|
Acetobacter indonesiensis
|
Gram negative
|
1.18
|
*MALDI scores 2.00-3.00 means high-confidence identification of the bacterial species (symbol: +++ & level: green); a score of 1.70-1.99 means low-confidence identification (symbol: +, level: yellow); and scores between 0.00-1.69 are considered indicative results (symbol: -, level: red)
|
Meaning of Score Values
|
Range
|
Interpretation
|
Symbols
|
Color
|
2.00 - 3.00
|
High-confidence identification
|
(+++)
|
green
|
1.70 - 1.99
|
Low-confidence identification
|
(+)
|
yellow
|
0.00 - 1.69
|
No Organism identification possible
|
(-)
|
red
|
Table 4
Results showing bacterial count from Bruker Daltonik MALDI tests
Parameter | Sample code | Results (CFU/ml) | Average (CFU/ml) |
---|
Total bacteria | S1 | 1.38*107 | 5.51*106 |
Total bacteria | S1 | 2.73*106 |
Total bacteria | S1 | 1.28*102 |
Total bacteria | S4 | 8.90*106 | 3.65*106 |
Total bacteria | S4 | 2.06*106 |
Total bacteria | S4 | 9.60*101 |
Total bacteria | S6 | 5.60*107 | 2.16*107 |
Total bacteria | S6 | 8.90*106 |
Total bacteria | S6 | 3.22*102 |