In the present study, the prevalence of S.aureus among students of HUCHMS was 8% (20/250, 95% CI: 4.6%, 11.3%). Bhatta et al. (2018) reported a prevalence of 35% among medical students at Manipal College in Nepal, which is significantly higher than the 8% prevalence observed in the present study. Similarly, Zakai (2015) found a prevalence of 25.3% among medical students at King Abdul Aziz University in Saudi Arabia, and Mekuriya et al. (2022) reported a prevalence of 27.1% among students at Arbaminch University in Ethiopia, both of which are considerably higher than the prevalence observed in the present study. These differences could be due to due to variation in Variations in sample size and sampling strategy. in addition, the carriage rate might be influenced by Variations in study populations, including demographics, geographical locations, and environmental factors, which could contribute to differences in prevalence rates.
The prevalence of MRSA in this study was found to be 4.8% (95% CI: 2.1%, 7.4%). Comparing this finding to previous studies, it aligns closely with the MRSA prevalence reported in a study where 5.19% of the isolates were identified as MRSA. However, it is notably higher than the reported rates in Jordan (2.8%) and Saudi Arabia (3.3%). Conversely, it is substantially lower than the MRSA prevalence reported in Nigeria (61.8%) and Malaysia (13.9%). Further research, including larger-scale epidemiological studies and comparative analyses, may help elucidate the underlying factors driving differences in MRSA prevalence among student populations in diverse geographical regions.
The total prevalence of MRSA in this study was 4.8% (95% CI: 2.1%, 7.4%). This finding is higher than, 2.8% of Jordan (Alzoubi et al., 2020) 3.3% in Saudi (Albusayes et al., 2019), less than 61.8%, Nigeria (Alli et al., 2022), 13.9% Malaysia (Anbazhagan et al.).
In current study, the habit of nose picking and living in a dormitory environment with more than four students, Like (Mekuriya et al., 2022b) but Unlike (Abdelmalek et al., 2022), were found to be potential contributing factors to MRSA nasal carriage. This is due to the fact that nose picking can introduce bacteria from the nasal mucosa into the hands, which may subsequently contaminate surfaces and contribute to the spread of MRSA. Similarly, Dormitories often entail communal living arrangements, where close quarters and shared facilities increase the likelihood of MRSA transmission. Factors such as limited personal space and frequent social interactions provide ample opportunities for MRSA to spread among residents.
The findings regarding antibiotic resistance patterns in the MRSA isolates also present important insights into the susceptibility and resistance levels to commonly used antibiotics. The data indicates a concerning 100% resistance rate to both Ampicillin and Penicillin, which are commonly prescribed antibiotics. This highlights a critical issue in the region concerning the effectiveness of these medications against MRSA.
The resistance rates for other antibiotics such as Tetracycline, Erythromycin, Ciprofloxacin, and Co-trimoxazole show varying degrees of resistance ranging from 16% to 66.7%. This variability suggests that different antibiotics may still be effective against certain strains of bacteria while others exhibit higher levels of resistance.
A study conducted at Jimma University (Efa et al., 2019b) observed the similar resistance rates to Erythromycin and Tetracycline to our study. whereas, another study at Arba Minch University reported similar resistance rates for Tetracycline, Ampicillin and Penicillin but lower resistance to Ciprofloxacin compared to the current findings (Mekuriya et al., 2022c). These discrepancies underscore the dynamic nature of MRSA resistance and the influence of regional variations, antibiotic usage patterns, and genetic factors.
In our findings, a resistance rate of 16% was observed for both Co-trimoxazole and Gentamicin. Interestingly, while the resistance to Co-trimoxazole remains consistent with previous findings from a study conducted at Jimma (Efa et al., 2019b), the resistance to Gentamicin appears to be higher in this study. This difference in resistance levels may stem from factors like genetic mutations or horizontal gene transfer among bacteria. Discrepancies in the accessibility and utilization of alternative antibiotics can impose selective pressure on bacterial communities, resulting in fluctuations in resistance patterns to specific antibiotics over time.
Notably, Chloramphenicol and Clindamycin displayed full susceptibility across all cases tested; indicating their efficacy in treating the MRSA isolates under study and this is in contrast to the results of other works reported by (Kitti et al., 2011) and (Neela et al., 2008). This information is crucial when selecting appropriate antibiotic treatments to ensure effective patient care and combat the challenge of antibiotic resistance. Unlike the study where all MRSA isolates were resistant to clindamycin, in this study Clindamycin displayed full susceptibility across all cases tested.