Compression garments (CG) have emerged as a focal point in the world of sports, finding widespread use across various disciplines, be them individual or team oriented. Their significance lies in the diverse range of potential effects they offer, primarily centered around two key aspects: performance enhancement and expedited recovery for athletes[1, 2]. These specialized garments, mostly used on the lower limbs, are supposed to be purposefully crafted to apply targeted pressure to specific areas with the overarching goal of optimizing blood circulation, bolstering muscle support, and elevating overall athletic prowess. In the realm of sports science, CG has garnered considerable attention as a promising tool for athletes seeking a competitive edge[2, 3]. By promoting heightened blood flow[4] and mitigating muscle vibration[5] during physical activities, CG holds the potential to augment muscle performance and endurance, culminating in elevated athletic output. Moreover, the post-exercise application of CG has been linked to reduced muscle soreness[1, 6] and swifter recovery times[2], making them an enticing asset for athletes committed to refining their training regimens and maximizing their potential[1].
During physical activity, the use of these garments could promote an increase in the production of nitric oxide (NO). When released, NO acts as a chemical signal that induces relaxation of the smooth muscle cells present in the walls of blood vessels, allowing them to dilate. It has been shown that intermittent pneumatic compression not only affects venous blood flow in the compressed area but also produces systemic effects on circulation. Variations in central venous pressure, pulmonary artery pressure, and pulse pressure have been identified, thanks to the increase in venous return induced by leg compression[7, 8]. Additionally, intermittent pneumatic compression of the foot has been found to have significant local effects on microcirculation, increasing blood flow measured with laser Doppler and transcutaneous oxygen tension[9]. Although evidence of local and systemic effects is associated with this compression, the exact mechanism is not yet fully understood, and whether intermittent pneumatic compression of the legs has an effect on the microcirculation of distant tissues is yet to be determined. Studies have demonstrated a notable increase in the diameter of arterial and venous vessels in distant skeletal muscles during intermittent pneumatic compression, suggesting a potential link between its effectiveness and increased NO release caused by hemodynamic changes during compression. This vasodilatory effect observed in distant skeletal muscle indicates that intermittent pneumatic compression may be a useful option for improving microcirculation, especially in ischemic and reperfused tissues[4].
Furthermore, the application of compression has been long-established in therapeutic medicine for the prevention and management of various conditions such as lymphedema, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, wounds, scars, and venous leg ulcers[1]. Subsequently, the use of compression has been extended to the field of sports, with the introduction of CG marketed as a tool to improve various aspects of physical performance. While some evidence suggests that CG can reduce muscle oscillation, improve joint awareness, influence oxygen use during low-intensity exercise, modify local blood flow, reduce swelling, and alleviate muscle pain during post-exercise recovery, scientific consensus on their performance-enhancing effects in different forms of exercise remains limited[1]. Studies have analyzed the effects of compression on hemodynamic parameters, such as blood vessel diameter and blood flow, as well as on athletic performance and the reduction of muscle fatigue[1].
Determining the optimal compression level for different muscle groups is a complex process, with recommended pressures varying depending on the muscle group. For instance, the pressure on the leg should be 17 mmHg, while that on the thigh should be 15 mmHg[10]. However, the effectiveness of ready-to-use compression garments, commercially available, may be affected by the lack of individual body dimension information, leading to the use of generalized sizing systems that do not adequately account for the variability of body shapes and sizes.
While studies have shown promising results regarding the positive effects of CG on muscle recovery, the effectiveness may vary based on factors such as duration of usage, applied pressure, and the type of exercise performed[11]. It is essential to consider these variables and tailor the use of compression garments to individual needs and physiological responses.
CG have garnered considerable attention in the sports community for their potential to enhance athletic performance and expedite post-exercise recovery. By delving deeper into the literature and exploring the ideal materials and design elements, we aim to establish a gold standard for lower limb CG that maximizes their potential benefits. This collaborative effort between sport scientists and material engineers seeks to empower athletes, coaches, and sports practitioners with valuable insights to optimize the use of CG in their training and recovery strategies. Furthermore, the investigation into the effects of compression on NO release and its potential role in enhancing microcirculation and physical performance provides valuable directions for future research in this dynamic field.