3.1 Structure characterization
Table 1 displays the results of the elemental analysis of C, N, O as well as S of BWT and BTC. The contents of N and S in BTC were 10.65% and 7.282% respectively, which far exceeded the contents of N and S in BWT. In addition, the C value of BTC decreased after chemical modification, due to the lower C content of TC. These findings confirmed that TC had been successfully attached onto BWT.
Table 1
Elemental analysis of BWT and BTC
Sample | Element content (%) |
C | H | N | S |
BWT | 49.19 | 4.938 | 0.36 | 0.718 |
BTC | 44.88 | 4.934 | 10.65 | 7.282 |
Figure 2 presents the FT-IR spectra of BWT, TC and BTC. In the spectrum of BWT, the adsorption band at 3412 cm− 1 corresponded to O–H stretching vibration, the peaks at 1617, 1508 and 1452 cm− 1were characteristic adsorption band of benzene ring, the peaks at 1343 cm− 1 were related to O–H bending vibration, and 1201 and 1029 cm− 1 were attributed to the C = C-O stretching vibration and C-O-C stretching vibration [45, 46]. For TC, the adsorption peaks at 3369, 3264 and 3179 cm− 1 were corresponding to N-H stretching vibration, and 1644 and 1620 cm− 1 corresponding to NH2 bending vibration. The stretching vibration bands of N-C = S(Ⅰ), N-C = S(Ⅱ) and N-C = S(Ⅲ) were observed at 1532 and 1483 cm− 1, 1316, 1285 and 1163 cm− 1, and 1001 cm− 1, respectively [47, 48]. The peaks at 800 and 600 cm− 1 were attributed to out-plane vibration and wagging vibration of N-H. After chemical modification, the spectral structures of BTC and BWT were similar but had a slight shift in wavenumbers, which demonstrated that the core structure of BWT remained unchanged. In addition, the spectrum of BTC presented new peaks approximately at 1291 and 1092 cm− 1, which were assigned to –(C = S)–N–of TC moiety [49, 50]. It was also observed that the peaks of N-H out-plane vibration and wagging vibration appeared at 801 and 606 cm− 1, respectively [51]. These observations revealed that BTC adsorbent was successfully prepared.
The thermal stabilities of BWT, TC and BTC were conducted and compared, and the results are shown in Fig. 3. The BTC showed three major steps transient of weight loss at temperature (1) 85, (2) 210 and (3) 307°C, corresponding to (1) moisture evaporation, (2) decomposition of TC moiety on BTC and (3) BWT degradation, respectively [52]. Comparatively, the BWT exhibited higher the residue weight than BTC. These results indicated that TC was successfully anchored on BWT.
The surface morphology of the prepared BTC adsorbent was characterized by SEM and the result is shown in Fig. 4(a). It was seen that BTC had a spherical porous structure with rough surface and uneven size. The pore structure and morphology are crucial parameters for adsorbent to adsorb metal ions [53, 54], so BET test was carried out and the nitrogen adsorption–desorption curve is presented in Fig. 4(b). The curve indicated BTG exhibit typical type-IV curve as defined by IUPAC [55]. The BET surface area, total pore volume and average pore size were 67.34 m2/g, 8.069 nm and 0.1358 cm3/g, respectively, suggesting that BTG was not a totally porous adsorbent.
3.2 Influence of pH on Ag+ adsorption on BTC resin
It is widely known that pH value is a dominant parameter for the metal ions adsorption, because it not only affects the metal species, but also influences the surface charge of adsorbent [56]. The influences of pH on adsorption capacity and zeta potential of BTC were investigated at 2 mmol/L of AgNO3 for 24 h. The pH values were regulated over the range of 1.0 to 7.0 to avoid the possibility of silver precipitation [57], and the results are presented in Fig. 5(a). The adsorption capacity of Ag+ increased first and then trended to be stable with the increase of pH value, and the maximum removal rate is more than 95% at pH 4–7. The pHZPC of BTC was measured to be 2.5, indicating that the surface of BTC was positively charged at pH below 2.5 due to protonation of functional groups. The positively charged BTC was unfavorable for the adsorption of cationic silver because of electrostatic repulsion. When the pH value increased from 3.0 to 4.0, the functional groups on the surface of BTC dissociated and the surface was mainly negative charged, which was conductive to the Ag+ adsorption, thus increasing capacity. However, with further increasing pH, the Ag+ adsorption capacity changed insignificantly even if the zeta potential continued to decrease.
3.3 Influence of contact time and adsorption kinetics
The influence of contact time on Ag+ adsorption capacity is presented in Fig. 5(b). The adsorption capacity increased rapidly in the first 60 min, then slowed down and reached equilibrium at 180 min. Pseudo-first order, pseudo-second order and intraparticle diffusion models [35] were employed to fit the experimental data, and the fitting results and calculated kinetics parameters are shown in Fig. 5(b) and Table 2, respectively. In contrary to the pseudo-first-order model, which overestimated the adsorption capacity of Ag+ in the initial stage and underestimated at the equilibrium stage, the pseudo-second order model was more suitable to describe Ag+ adsorption kinetic behavior onto the BTC, because of higher correlation coefficient and closer equilibrium adsorption capacity between fitting value and experimental value, revealing that chemisorption was the rate control step. The adsorption kinetic data was also described by intraparticle diffusion model and the adsorption process was separated into three steps as presented in Fig. 5(c). The first initial fast step corresponds to the external surface adsorption within the initial 60 min, the subsequent slow step represented the intraparticle diffusion during the adsorption time ranging from 60 to 180 min, and the final equilibrium step after 240 min reflected the equilibrium adsorption. Obviously, the fitting result of the first linear was off the origin, indicating that Ag+ adsorption on BTC was not completely governed by the intraparticle diffusion [35, 58].
Table 2
Kinetics parameters for the Ag+ adsorption on BTC.
Kinetic models | qe (mmol/g) calculated | Constant | R2 |
\({q}_{\text{t}}={q}_{\text{e}}(1-{\text{e}}^{-{k}_{1}t})\) (Pseudo-first-order) | 2.8375 | k1 = 0.05145 (min− 1) | 0.981 |
\({q}_{\text{t}}=\frac{{q}_{\text{e}}^{2}{k}_{2}t}{1+{q}_{\text{e}}{k}_{2}t}\) ( Pseudo-second-order) | 3.0177 | k2 = 0.03146 (mmol/g min) | 0.999 |
\({q}_{\text{t}}={k}_{3}\sqrt{t}+C\) ( Intraparticle diffusion) | — | k3(1) = 0.9815 (mmol/g min0.5) | C1 = 0.2138 | 0.982 |
k3(2) = 2.3822 (mmol/g min0.5) | C2 = 0.0360 | 0.986 |
k3(3) = 2.8323 (mmol/g min0.5) | C3 = 0.0049 | 0.848 |
3.4 Influence of Ag+ initial concentration and adsorption isotherm
To evaluate the maximum adsorption capacity, the change of adsorption capacity with different initial concentration of Ag+ had investigated. As seen in Fig. 5(d), the adsorption amount of Ag+ rose with the increase of initial concentration of Ag+. Langmuir and Freundlich models [35] were applied for describing the experimental data of Ag+ on the BTC, and the fitting curves and calculated parameters obtained from two models are presented in Fig. 5(d) and Table 3. The Langmuir model was not appropriate for describing the adsorption isotherm according to the correlation coefficient (R2). In contrast, the Freundlich model offered better description to the adsorption isotherm data. In addition, the value of n lied between 1 and 10, indicating that the adsorption was favorable throughout the entire concentration range under research.
Table 3
Parameters calculated from Freundlich and Langmuir models for Ag+ adsorption on the BTC.
Langmuir model: (\({q}_{\text{e}}=\frac{{Q}_{\text{e}}{k}_{\text{L}}{C}_{\text{e}}}{1+{k}_{\text{L}}{C}_{\text{e}}}\)) | Freundlich model: (\({q}_{\text{e}}={k}_{\text{F}}{C}_{\text{e}}^{1/\text{n}}\)) |
Qe (mmol/g) | kL (L/mmol) | R2 | kF (mmol/(g (L/mmol)1/n)) | n | R2 |
3.1825 | 15.1236 | 0.839 | 2.8553 | 6.2890 | 0.992 |
3.5 Influence of ionic strength on adsorption capacity
The effect of ionic strength on Ag+ adsorption was investigated with the concentrations of NaNO3 ranging from 0.005 to 0.5 mol/L. As presented in Fig. 6(a), the adsorption capacity of Ag+ gradually increased with the increase of NaNO3 concentration. Generally, if an outer-sphere surface complex is formed between adsorbent and adsorbate by ion exchange or electrostatic force, the adsorption capacity decreases with increasing ionic strength, while for inner-sphere surface complex, the adsorption capacity increases with the increase of ionic strength or is independent of ionic strength [59, 60]. Therefore, the positive influence of ionic strength suggested that Ag+ adsorption onto BTC was an inner-sphere adsorption mechanism through coordinate-covalent bond between ligand and Ag+, which was consistent with earlier research reported by Dong et al [56].
3.5 Adsorption selectivity
Considering the complexity of the real aquatic environment, the selectivity of BTC resin for Ag+ adsorption was evaluated in a mixture solution containing Ag+, Pb2+, Ca2+, Ni2+, and Cd2+ with the same concentration. Figure 6(b) showed the Ag+ removal rate of BTC resin was more than 95%, while the removal rate of other metal ions was less than 10%, revealing that BTC exhibited high selectivity to the Ag+ adsorption from the mixed solution.
3.6 Regeneration and Reuse study for the BTC
To regenerate and reuse the BTC, the desorption experiment was carried out by immerging the BTC-Ag in 0.5 mol/L thiourea–0.1 mol/L HNO3 mixed solution for 1 h and washed with ultrapure water for five times [48, 51]. The regeneration BTC was reused for the next cycle. After three cycles of regeneration and reuse, the adsorption capacities were 1.91, 1.82 and 1.68 mmol/g, corresponding to 95.5, 91.1 and 84.1% of removal efficiency. Therefore, BTC adsorbent possessed good stability and reusability for the Ag+ recovery from wastewater.
3.7 Adsorption mechanism
The variation of surface morphology and elements distribution on the BTC after the Ag+ uptake were characterized by SEM-EDS. As shown in Fig. 7(a), the spherical morphology of BTC remained unchanged after Ag+ adsorption. The elements on BTC after Ag+ uptake were examined by EDS (Fig. 7(b)), and the EDS spectrum exhibited that the main constituents were C, O, N, S and Ag, demonstrating the successful Ag+ adsorption on the BTC surface. The corresponding atomic percentages were 56.47%, 18.11, 9.06%, 7.54% and 8.82%, respectively. The atomic percent ratio of S and Ag is less than 1, indicating other functional groups involved in the Ag+ adsorption. The distributions of the C, O, N, S and Ag on the BTG-Ag surface were also explored and are displayed in Fig. 7 (c-g). Elemental Ag exhibited consistency with S, providing evidence that S atom on the BTC played important role in Ag+ adsorption. Based on the soft and hard acid-basic (SHAB) theory, Ag+ (soft metal ion) exhibited higher affinity to hard bases with donor atoms as O < N < S [37, 49, 61, 62].
To further examine the adsorption mechanism, the TF-IR spectrum of BTC after Ag+ adsorption (BTC-Ag) was explored. As shown in Fig. 2, compared with the spectrum of the BTC, a new peak at 1384 cm− 1 related to Ag-S stretching vibration was observed in the spectrum of BTC-Ag [63]. In addition, the peak attributed to phenolic hydroxyl groups became narrow and shifted from 3375 to 3404 cm− 1. The peaks caused by N-H out-plane vibration and wagging vibration moved from 801 and 606 cm− 1 to 824 and 620 cm− 1, respectively. These observations indicated that the atoms of O, S and N on the BTC involved in the Ag+ adsorption.
XRD analysis of the BTC before and after Ag+ adsorption was performed and the result is presented in Fig. 8(a). BTC exhibited an amorphous structure with a broad hollow peak at 2θ = 22°, which represented the presence of polar functional groups [64]. After Ag+ adsorption, not only no new adsorption peak was observed, but also the intensity of the peak at 2θ = 22° substantially decreased. This could be ascribed to formation of complexes between the phenolic groups on the BTC and silver ions, which reduces the polarity of the functional group [64].
For better assessing the mechanism by which the Ag+ could chelate with the functional groups onto the BTC, XPS measurement of the BTC before and after Ag+ adsorption was studied. Figure 8(b) shows the XPS survey spectra of the raw BTC and BTC loaded Ag+ (BTC-Ag). Before Ag+ adsorption, four peaks at 284.8, 533.07, 400.58 and 162.93 eV corresponded to C 1s, O 1s, N 1s and S 2p were observed in fresh BTC, respectively, further illustrating the success introduction of TC on the BWT. After Ag+ adsorption, a new peak at binding energy of 368.7 eV related to the representative peak of Ag 3d appeared. The strong signals in deconvolution of Ag 3d orbital (Fig. 8(c)) provided the evidence of Ag+ adsorption on the BTC, which was well consistent with the SEM-EDS results. In addition, the shift of electron binding energy in high-resolution XPS spectra deduces the change of bonding around an atom. Figure 8(d), (e) and (f) exhibited S 2p, O 1s and N 1s XPS spectra of BTC and BTC-Ag. The S 2p XPS spectra were deconvoluted into two different component peaks, which were attributed to S = O and C = S. The binding energies of C = S found at 162.82 and 164.01 eV in the pristine BTC shifted to 162.65 and 163.83 eV after Ag+ adsorption, respectively, suggesting a possible chemical change of the S once Ag+ was adsorbed on the BTC [53]. Similar phenomena were further confirmed by the shift of binding energies of O 1s and N 1s before and after Ag+ adsorption, revealing that N, O and S participated in the Ag+ adsorption, which was well consistent with the FT-IR results.
As described in this section, the adsorption mechanism of Ag+ on the as-prepared BTC resin as shown in Fig. 1 was attributed to the chelation between Ag+ and multi-electron- rich atoms ( N, O, and S),in which S atom played the most important role.