See the published version of this preprint at BMC Public Health.
This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research article
Na Wang
Fudan University School of Public Health
Corresponding Author
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Background: The impact of COVID-19 related quarantine on quality of life was expected and unclear for enterprise workers. We investigated the quality of life during the epidemic in enterprise workers just returned to work and assessed its potential influencing factors to get a better understanding of the impact of COVID-19 epidemic.
Methods: This was a cross-sectional study among enterprise workers in Deqing and Taizhou, Zhejiang Province, China. Chinese version of EQ5D to assess life quality, and information about general characteristics and COVID-19 related information was collected by a structured questionnaire online distributed through the social application “Wechat”.
Results: A total of 2435 participants were enrolled, 59.5% of which worked in Deqing. About 50% reported worries about the COVID-2019 epidemic and 40.1% of participants performed centralized or home quarantine during the epidemic. The mean EQ-5D score and VAS were 0.990 and 93.5. Multiple logistic regression suggested that physical activities (ORad=0.46) and keeping home ventilation (ORad=0.04) was related with life quality in Deqing, while for participants in Taizhou, wearing a mask when going out (ORad=0.35), keeping home ventilation (ORad=0.16), unmarried status (ORad=2.38) and experienced centralized or home quarantine (ORad=1.64) was related with quality of life.
Conclusions: Enterprise workers in two areas with different risk of COVID-19 experienced different life quality during the epidemic of COVID-19. Physical activity, marital status, worry about epidemic of COVID-19, keeping home ventilation, wearing a mask and quarantine were related with quality of life.
Keywords
public health; epidemiology
This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.
Loading...
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Published
View the published article at BMC Public Health.
No community comments so far
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 18 Jan, 2021
Review #1 received
Received 13 Jan, 2021
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 06 Jan, 2021
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 08 Dec, 2020
Editor assigned
On 05 Dec, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 05 Dec, 2020
Editor invited
On 05 Dec, 2020
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 15 Nov, 2020
Review #2 received
Received 11 Nov, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 28 Oct, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 28 Oct, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 27 Oct, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 27 Oct, 2020
Editor assigned
On 26 Oct, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 25 Oct, 2020
Editor invited
On 25 Oct, 2020
Version 1
Posted 28 Jul, 2020
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 25 Sep, 2020
Review #3 received
Received 19 Sep, 2020
Reviewer #4 agreed
On 31 Aug, 2020
Review #4 received
Received 31 Aug, 2020
Reviewer #3 agreed
On 29 Aug, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 28 Aug, 2020
Review #2 received
Received 28 Aug, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 18 Aug, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 27 Jul, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 27 Jul, 2020
Editor assigned
On 19 Jul, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 18 Jul, 2020
Editor invited
On 18 Jul, 2020
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Learn more about our company.
See the published version of this preprint at BMC Public Health.
This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research article
Na Wang
Fudan University School of Public Health
Corresponding Author
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Published
View the published article at BMC Public Health.
No community comments so far
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 18 Jan, 2021
Review #1 received
Received 13 Jan, 2021
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 06 Jan, 2021
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 08 Dec, 2020
Editor assigned
On 05 Dec, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 05 Dec, 2020
Editor invited
On 05 Dec, 2020
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 15 Nov, 2020
Review #2 received
Received 11 Nov, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 28 Oct, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 28 Oct, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 27 Oct, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 27 Oct, 2020
Editor assigned
On 26 Oct, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 25 Oct, 2020
Editor invited
On 25 Oct, 2020
Version 1
Posted 28 Jul, 2020
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Major revision
On 25 Sep, 2020
Review #3 received
Received 19 Sep, 2020
Reviewer #4 agreed
On 31 Aug, 2020
Review #4 received
Received 31 Aug, 2020
Reviewer #3 agreed
On 29 Aug, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 28 Aug, 2020
Review #2 received
Received 28 Aug, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 18 Aug, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 27 Jul, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 27 Jul, 2020
Editor assigned
On 19 Jul, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 18 Jul, 2020
Editor invited
On 18 Jul, 2020
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
View the published article at BMC Public Health.
Background: The impact of COVID-19 related quarantine on quality of life was expected and unclear for enterprise workers. We investigated the quality of life during the epidemic in enterprise workers just returned to work and assessed its potential influencing factors to get a better understanding of the impact of COVID-19 epidemic.
Methods: This was a cross-sectional study among enterprise workers in Deqing and Taizhou, Zhejiang Province, China. Chinese version of EQ5D to assess life quality, and information about general characteristics and COVID-19 related information was collected by a structured questionnaire online distributed through the social application “Wechat”.
Results: A total of 2435 participants were enrolled, 59.5% of which worked in Deqing. About 50% reported worries about the COVID-2019 epidemic and 40.1% of participants performed centralized or home quarantine during the epidemic. The mean EQ-5D score and VAS were 0.990 and 93.5. Multiple logistic regression suggested that physical activities (ORad=0.46) and keeping home ventilation (ORad=0.04) was related with life quality in Deqing, while for participants in Taizhou, wearing a mask when going out (ORad=0.35), keeping home ventilation (ORad=0.16), unmarried status (ORad=2.38) and experienced centralized or home quarantine (ORad=1.64) was related with quality of life.
Conclusions: Enterprise workers in two areas with different risk of COVID-19 experienced different life quality during the epidemic of COVID-19. Physical activity, marital status, worry about epidemic of COVID-19, keeping home ventilation, wearing a mask and quarantine were related with quality of life.
This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.
Loading...