1. Beauchemin, K.A., et al., Review: Fifty years of research on rumen methanogenesis: lessons learned and future challenges for mitigation. Animal, 2020. 14(S1): p. s2-s16.
2. Pluske, J.R., D.L. Turpin, and J.C. Kim, Gastrointestinal tract (gut) health in the young pig. Anim Nutr, 2018. 4(2): p. 187-196.
3. Camarillo-Guerrero, L.F., et al., Massive expansion of human gut bacteriophage diversity. Cell, 2021. 184(4): p. 1098-1109 e9.
4. Lourenço, M., et al., The Spatial Heterogeneity of the Gut Limits Predation and Fosters Coexistence of Bacteria and Bacteriophages. Cell Host & Microbe, 2020. 28(3): p. 390-401.e5.
5. Mizrahi, I., R.J. Wallace, and S. Morais, The rumen microbiome: balancing food security and environmental impacts. Nat Rev Microbiol, 2021. 19(9): p. 553-566.
6. Xie, F., et al., An integrated gene catalog and over 10,000 metagenome-assembled genomes from the gastrointestinal microbiome of ruminants. Microbiome, 2021. 9(1): p. 137.
7. Schwab, C.G. and G.A. Broderick, A 100-Year Review: Protein and amino acid nutrition in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci, 2017. 100(12): p. 10094-10112.
8. Pitta, D.W., et al., The effect of 3-nitrooxypropanol, a potent methane inhibitor, on ruminal microbial gene expression profiles in dairy cows. Microbiome, 2022. 10(1).
9. Wang, F., et al., Technologies and perspectives for achieving carbon neutrality. Innovation (Camb), 2021. 2(4): p. 100180.
10. Wang, R., et al., China's low-emission pathways toward climate-neutral livestock production for animal-derived foods. Innovation (Camb), 2022. 3(2): p. 100220.
11. Yan, M., et al., Interrogating the viral dark matter of the rumen ecosystem with a global virome database. Nat Commun, 2023. 14(1): p. 5254.
12. Medvedeva, S., et al., A compendium of viruses from methanogenic archaea reveals their diversity and adaptations to the gut environment. Nature Microbiology, 2023. 8(11): p. 2170-2182.
13. Cahill, J. and R. Young, Chapter Two - Phage Lysis: Multiple Genes for Multiple Barriers, in Advances in Virus Research, M. Kielian, T.C. Mettenleiter, and M.J. Roossinck, Editors. 2019, Academic Press. p. 33-70.
14. Howard-Varona, C., et al., Phage-specific metabolic reprogramming of virocells. ISME J, 2020. 14(4): p. 881-895.
15. Wang, C., et al., Gut microbiome-based strategies for host health and disease. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr, 2023: p. 1-16.
16. Johansen, J., et al., Centenarians have a diverse gut virome with the potential to modulate metabolism and promote healthy lifespan. Nat Microbiol, 2023.
17. Paez-Espino, D., et al., Uncovering Earth's virome. Nature, 2016. 536(7617): p. 425-30.
18. Shkoporov, A.N., et al., Viral biogeography of the mammalian gut and parenchymal organs. Nat Microbiol, 2022. 7(8): p. 1301-1311.
19. Feiner, R., et al., A new perspective on lysogeny: prophages as active regulatory switches of bacteria. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2015. 13(10): p. 641-650.
20. Chen, X., et al., Revisiting marine lytic and lysogenic virus-host interactions: Kill-the-Winner and Piggyback-the-Winner. Sci Bull (Beijing), 2021. 66(9): p. 871-874.
21. Correa, A.M.S., et al., Revisiting the rules of life for viruses of microorganisms. Nat Rev Microbiol, 2021. 19(8): p. 501-513.
22. Chen, T., et al., Virus-pathogen interactions improve water quality along the Middle Route of the South-to-North Water Diversion Canal. ISME J, 2023.
23. Knowles, B., et al., Lytic to temperate switching of viral communities. Nature, 2016. 531(7595): p. 466-70.
24. Zheng, X., et al., Organochlorine contamination enriches virus-encoded metabolism and pesticide degradation associated auxiliary genes in soil microbiomes. ISME J, 2022. 16(5): p. 1397-1408.
25. Luo, X.Q., et al., Viral community-wide auxiliary metabolic genes differ by lifestyles, habitats, and hosts. Microbiome, 2022. 10(1): p. 190.
26. Bickhart, D.M., et al., Generating lineage-resolved, complete metagenome-assembled genomes from complex microbial communities. Nat Biotechnol, 2022.
27. Roux, S., et al., Minimum Information about an Uncultivated Virus Genome (MIUViG). Nat Biotechnol, 2019. 37(1): p. 29-37.
28. Camargo, A.P., et al., IMG/VR v4: an expanded database of uncultivated virus genomes within a framework of extensive functional, taxonomic, and ecological metadata. Nucleic Acids Res, 2022.
29. Gregory, A.C., et al., Marine DNA Viral Macro- and Microdiversity from Pole to Pole. Cell, 2019. 177(5): p. 1109-1123 e14.
30. Ter Horst, A.M., et al., Minnesota peat viromes reveal terrestrial and aquatic niche partitioning for local and global viral populations. Microbiome, 2021. 9(1): p. 233.
31. Schulz, F., et al., Giant virus diversity and host interactions through global metagenomics. Nature, 2020. 578(7795): p. 432-436.
32. Al-Shayeb, B., et al., Clades of huge phages from across Earth's ecosystems. Nature, 2020. 578(7795): p. 425-431.
33. Dion, M.B., F. Oechslin, and S. Moineau, Phage diversity, genomics and phylogeny. Nat Rev Microbiol, 2020. 18(3): p. 125-138.
34. Gulyaeva, A., et al., Discovery, diversity, and functional associations of crAss-like phages in human gut metagenomes from four Dutch cohorts. Cell Rep, 2022. 38(2): p. 110204.
35. Yutin, N., et al., Analysis of metagenome-assembled viral genomes from the human gut reveals diverse putative CrAss-like phages with unique genomic features. Nat Commun, 2021. 12(1): p. 1044.
36. Dos Santos Oliveira, J., et al., Structure and physiology of giant DNA viruses. Curr Opin Virol, 2021. 49: p. 58-67.
37. Chelkha, N., et al., Host-virus interactions and defense mechanisms for giant viruses. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2020.
38. Nayfach, S., et al., Metagenomic compendium of 189,680 DNA viruses from the human gut microbiome. Nat Microbiol, 2021. 6(7): p. 960-970.
39. Pu, X.X., et al., Comparison of in situ ruminal straw fiber degradation and bacterial community between buffalo and Holstein fed with high-roughage diet. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2023. 13.
40. Piccioni, A., et al., Familial Hypercholesterolemia and Acute Coronary Syndromes: The Microbiota-Immunity Axis in the New Diagnostic and Prognostic Frontiers. Pathogens, 2023. 12(4).
41. Li, Z., et al., Deep sea sediments associated with cold seeps are a subsurface reservoir of viral diversity. ISME J, 2021. 15(8): p. 2366-2378.
42. Palomino, A., et al., Metabolic genes on conjugative plasmids are highly prevalent in Escherichia coli and can protect against antibiotic treatment. ISME J, 2023. 17(1): p. 151-162.
43. Li, Q.S., et al., Dietary selection of metabolically distinct microorganisms drives hydrogen metabolism in ruminants. ISME J, 2022.
44. Lin, L., et al., The gastrointestinal microbiome in dairy cattle is constrained by the deterministic driver of the region and the modified effect of diet. Microbiome, 2023. 11(1): p. 10.
45. Pourhasanzade, F., et al., Individual-based model highlights the importance of trade-offs for virus-host population dynamics and long-term co-existence. PLoS Comput Biol, 2022. 18(6): p. e1010228.
46. Zaccaria, E., et al., Endogenous small intestinal microbiome determinants of transient colonisation efficiency by bacteria from fermented dairy products: a randomised controlled trial. Microbiome, 2023. 11(1): p. 43.
47. Seekatz, A.M., et al., Spatial and Temporal Analysis of the Stomach and Small-Intestinal Microbiota in Fasted Healthy Humans. mSphere, 2019. 4(2).
48. Fogg, P.C.M., et al., New Applications for Phage Integrases. Journal of Molecular Biology, 2014. 426(15): p. 2703-2716.
49. Aframian, N., et al., Dormant phages communicate via arbitrium to control exit from lysogeny. Nature Microbiology, 2021. 7(1): p. 145-153.
50. Hackl, T., et al., Novel integrative elements and genomic plasticity in ocean ecosystems. Cell, 2023. 186(1): p. 47-62 e16.
51. Badel, C., V. Da Cunha, and J. Oberto, Archaeal tyrosine recombinases. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 2021. 45(4).
52. Gilbert, R.A., et al., Rumen Virus Populations: Technological Advances Enhancing Current Understanding. Front Microbiol, 2020. 11: p. 450.
53. Shah, S.A., et al., Expanding known viral diversity in the healthy infant gut. Nat Microbiol, 2023.
54. Pratama, A.A., et al., Expanding standards in viromics: in silico evaluation of dsDNA viral genome identification, classification, and auxiliary metabolic gene curation. PeerJ, 2021. 9: p. e11447.
55. Li, Q., et al., Distinct microbial hydrogen and reductant disposal pathways explain interbreed variations in ruminant methane yield. The ISME Journal, 2024.
56. Yan, X., et al., Integrated multi-omics of the gastrointestinal microbiome and ruminant host reveals metabolic adaptation underlying early life development. Microbiome, 2022. 10(1).
57. Bolger, A.M., M. Lohse, and B. Usadel, Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics, 2014. 30(15): p. 2114-20.
58. Li, H. and R. Durbin, Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics, 2009. 25(14): p. 1754-60.
59. Tao, Y., et al., Improved Assembly of Metagenome-Assembled Genomes and Viruses in Tibetan Saline Lake Sediment by HiFi Metagenomic Sequencing. Microbiology Spectrum, 2023. 11(1): p. e03328-22.
60. Li, D., et al., MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics, 2015. 31(10): p. 1674-1676.
61. Peng, Y., et al., IDBA-UD: a de novo assembler for single-cell and metagenomic sequencing data with highly uneven depth. Bioinformatics, 2012. 28(11): p. 1420-1428.
62. Treangen, T.J., et al., Next generation sequence assembly with AMOS. Current Protocols in Bioinformatics, 2011. 33(1): p. 11.8. 1-11.8. 18.
63. Kolmogorov, M., et al., metaFlye: scalable long-read metagenome assembly using repeat graphs. Nat Methods, 2020. 17(11): p. 1103-1110.
64. Feng, X., et al., Metagenome assembly of high-fidelity long reads with hifiasm-meta. Nat Methods, 2022. 19(6): p. 671-674.
65. Roux, S., et al., IMG/VR v3: an integrated ecological and evolutionary framework for interrogating genomes of uncultivated viruses. Nucleic Acids Res, 2021. 49(D1): p. D764-D775.
66. Ren, J., et al., VirFinder: a novel k-mer based tool for identifying viral sequences from assembled metagenomic data. Microbiome, 2017. 5(1): p. 69.
67. Ren, J., et al., Identifying viruses from metagenomic data using deep learning. Quant Biol, 2020. 8(1): p. 64-77.
68. Guo, J., et al., VirSorter2: a multi-classifier, expert-guided approach to detect diverse DNA and RNA viruses. Microbiome, 2021. 9(1): p. 37.
69. Kieft, K., Z. Zhou, and K. Anantharaman, VIBRANT: automated recovery, annotation and curation of microbial viruses, and evaluation of viral community function from genomic sequences. Microbiome, 2020. 8(1): p. 90.
70. Nayfach, S., et al., CheckV assesses the quality and completeness of metagenome-assembled viral genomes. Nat Biotechnol, 2021. 39(5): p. 578-585.
71. Paez-Espino, D., et al., Nontargeted virus sequence discovery pipeline and virus clustering for metagenomic data. Nature Protocols, 2017. 12(8): p. 1673-1682.
72. Camargo, A.P., et al., Identification of mobile genetic elements with geNomad. Nat Biotechnol, 2023.
73. Peng, Y., et al., Viruses in deep-sea cold seep sediments harbor diverse survival mechanisms and remain genetically conserved within species. ISME J, 2023.
74. Bin Jang, H., et al., Taxonomic assignment of uncultivated prokaryotic virus genomes is enabled by gene-sharing networks. Nat Biotechnol, 2019. 37(6): p. 632-639.
75. Bastian, M., S. Heymann, and M. Jacomy. Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. in Proceedings of the international AAAI conference on web and social media. 2009.
76. Uritskiy, G.V., J. DiRuggiero, and J. Taylor, MetaWRAP—a flexible pipeline for genome-resolved metagenomic data analysis. Microbiome, 2018. 6(1).
77. Sieber, C.M.K., et al., Recovery of genomes from metagenomes via a dereplication, aggregation and scoring strategy. Nat Microbiol, 2018. 3(7): p. 836-843.
78. Chklovski, A., et al., CheckM2: a rapid, scalable and accurate tool for assessing microbial genome quality using machine learning. Nature methods, 2023. 20(8): p. 1203-1212.
79. Stewart, R.D., et al., Compendium of 4,941 rumen metagenome-assembled genomes for rumen microbiome biology and enzyme discovery. Nat Biotechnol, 2019. 37(8): p. 953-961.
80. Chaumeil, P.A., et al., GTDB-Tk v2: memory friendly classification with the genome taxonomy database. Bioinformatics, 2022. 38(23): p. 5315-5316.
81. Shi, L.D., et al., A mixed blessing of viruses in wastewater treatment plants. Water Res, 2022. 215: p. 118237.
82. Bland, C., et al., CRISPR recognition tool (CRT): a tool for automatic detection of clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeats. BMC Bioinformatics, 2007. 8: p. 209.
83. Chan, P.P., et al., tRNAscan-SE 2.0: improved detection and functional classification of transfer RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res, 2021. 49(16): p. 9077-9096.
84. Olm, M.R., et al., dRep: a tool for fast and accurate genomic comparisons that enables improved genome recovery from metagenomes through de-replication. ISME J, 2017. 11(12): p. 2864-2868.
85. Dion, M.B., et al., Streamlining CRISPR spacer-based bacterial host predictions to decipher the viral dark matter. Nucleic Acids Res, 2021. 49(6): p. 3127-3138.
86. Roux, S., et al., iPHoP: an integrated machine-learning framework to maximize host prediction for metagenome-assembled virus genomes. bioRxiv, 2022: p. 2022.07.28.501908.
87. Minh, B.Q., et al., IQ-TREE 2: New Models and Efficient Methods for Phylogenetic Inference in the Genomic Era. Mol Biol Evol, 2020. 37(5): p. 1530-1534.
88. Letunic, I. and P. Bork, Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Research, 2021. 49(W1): p. W293-W296.
89. Hyatt, D., et al., Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics, 2010. 11(1): p. 119.
90. Aramaki, T., et al., KofamKOALA: KEGG Ortholog assignment based on profile HMM and adaptive score threshold. Bioinformatics, 2020. 36(7): p. 2251-2252.
91. Kanehisa, M., et al., KEGG for linking genomes to life and the environment. Nucleic Acids Res, 2008. 36(Database issue): p. D480-4.
92. Zheng, J., et al., dbCAN3: automated carbohydrate-active enzyme and substrate annotation. Nucleic Acids Res, 2023. 51(W1): p. W115-W121.
93. Cantarel, B.L., et al., The Carbohydrate-Active EnZymes database (CAZy): an expert resource for Glycogenomics. Nucleic Acids Res, 2009. 37(Database issue): p. D233-8.
94. Li, H., et al., The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics, 2009. 25(16): p. 2078-9.
95. Shaffer, M., et al., DRAM for distilling microbial metabolism to automate the curation of microbiome function. Nucleic Acids Res, 2020. 48(16): p. 8883-8900.
96. Sigrist, C.J., et al., New and continuing developments at PROSITE. Nucleic Acids Res, 2013. 41(Database issue): p. D344-7.
97. Waterhouse, A., et al., SWISS-MODEL: homology modelling of protein structures and complexes. Nucleic Acids Res, 2018. 46(W1): p. W296-W303.
98. Mirdita, M., et al., ColabFold: making protein folding accessible to all. Nat Methods, 2022. 19(6): p. 679-682.
99. Jumper, J., et al., Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature, 2021. 596(7873): p. 583-589.
100. Sullivan, M.J., N.K. Petty, and S.A. Beatson, Easyfig: a genome comparison visualizer. Bioinformatics, 2011. 27(7): p. 1009-10.
101. Dixon, P., VEGAN, a package of R functions for community ecology. Journal of vegetation science, 2003. 14(6): p. 927-930.