Table 1 displays the characteristics of the study sample, segmented by sex. The cohort consisted of 497 children aged 4.0 to 10.9, comprising 288 boys and 209 girls. Notably, anthropometric parameters (except for BMI) and Our analysis revealed boys exhibited significantly higher PF components and echo-intensity levels compared to girls. Future studies could explore intervention strategies that consider EI's mediating role to enhance physical fitness equally across sexes.
Table 1
Descriptive characteristics of full sample, boys and girls participating in the study.
Variables | Full sample (n = 497) | Boys (n = 288) | Girls (n = 209) | P value |
Anthropometric parameters | |
Age (years) | 7.39 (7.22; 7.56) | 7.64 (7.41; 7.88) | 7.03 (6.80; 7.27) | < 0.001 |
Height (cm) | 124.82 (123.65; 126.00) | 126.61 (125.02; 128.21) | 122.37 (120.69; 124.05) | < 0.001 |
Weight (kg) | 27.21 (26.48; 27.93) | 28.16 (27.19; 29.14) | 25.89 (24.83; 26.96) | 0.002 |
Body mass index (kg) | 17.08 (16.87; 17.28) | 17.18 (16.92; 17.45) | 16.93 (16.61; 17.25) | 0.225 |
Waist circumference (cm) | 58.27 (57.65;58.90) | 58.88 (58.05; 59.70) | 57.45 (56.50; 58.39) | 0.026 |
Physical fitness components | |
CRF (laps) | 40.23 (38.36; 42.11) | 46.59 (43.90; 49.29) | 31.72 (29.74; 33.70) | < 0.001 |
Absolute HGS (kgf) | 11.44 (11.11; 11.76) | 12.14 (11.69; 12.59) | 10.47 (10.02; 10.92) | < 0.001 |
SLJ (cm) | 119.26 (116.74; 121.78) | 125.79 (122.24; 129.34) | 110.25 (107.15; 113.34) | < 0.001 |
Speed agility (s) | 13.52 (13.37; 13.68) | 13.19 (12.98; 13.40) | 13.97 (13.75; 14.20) | < 0.001 |
Overall fitness (z-score) | 0.01 (-0.07; 0.09) | 0.23 (0.12; 0.34) | -0.28 (-0.37; -0.19) | < 0.001 |
Echo-intensity | 44.82 (43.61; 46.03) | 43.13 (41.45; 44.81) | 47.15 (45.48; 48.82) | 0.001 |
The prevalence of EI estimated through US, and PF components measured by HGS, SLJ, speed-agility, cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), and overall fitness, were significantly higher in boys than in girls. Specifically, HGS was significantly greater in boys than in girls (mean [SD], 12.14 [3.86] vs. 10.47 [3.32] kg; difference, 1.67 kg; P < 0.001) (Fig. 1A). Similarly, SLJ was longer in boys than in girl (mean [SD], 125.79 [30.58] vs. 110.24 [22.61] cm; difference, 15.55 cm; P < 0.001) (Fig. 1B). Likewise, speed agility (mean [SD], 13.19 [1.75] vs. 13.97 [1.62] sec; difference, 0.78 sec; P < 0.001) and CRF (mean [SD], 46.59 [22.79] vs. 31.71 [14.47] laps; difference, 32.12 laps; P < 0.001) were significantly higher in boys than in girls (Fig. 1, C and D). Overall PF (z-score) was also significantly greater in the boys than in girls (mean [SD], 0.23 [0.90] vs. -0.28 [0.64]; difference, 1.67; P < 0.001) (Fig. 2).
A mediation analysis was conducted to estimate the effect of the sex on PF. The results of the mediation analysis indicated that a significant portion of the total effect of boys on HGS (1.70 kg; 95% CI, 1.05, 2.36 kg) could be attributed to an indirect effect mediated by EI (0.33 kg; 95% CI, 0.13, 0.56 kg; 19.10% mediation). Even after accounting for the EI association, a statistically significant direct effect of sex on HGS remained at 1.37 kg (95% CI, 0.74, 1.99 kg) (Fig. 1A). Similarly, the analysis revealed that a substantial portion of the total effect of sex on SLJ (15.57 cm; 95% CI, 10.61, 20.53 cm) was mediated by EI (2.74 cm; 95% CI, 0.99, 4.80 cm; 17.43% mediation), leaving a statistically significant direct effect of sex on SLJ at 12.82 cm (95% CI, 8.14, 17.50 cm) (Fig. 1B).
Furthermore, mediation analysis indicated that the total effect of sex on speed-agility (-0.76 sec; 95% CI, -1.07 to -0.45 sec) was partially mediated by EI (-0.13 sec; 95% CI, -0.23 to -0.04 sec), with a remaining direct effect of -0.63 sec (95% CI, -0.93, -0.33 sec; 15.11% mediation) (Fig. 1C). Similarly, the total effect of sex on CRF (15.13 laps; 95% CI, 11.55 to 18.71 laps) was mediated in part by EI (1.87 laps; 95% CI, 0.61 to 3.31 laps), leaving a statistically significant direct effect of sex on CRF at 13.26 laps (95% CI, 9.86, 16.66 laps; 12.30% mediation) (Fig. 1D).
In summary, the mediation analysis indicated that a significant portion of the total effect of sex on overall fitness (z-score) of 0.51 (95% CI, 0.36 to 0.66) was mediated by EI (0.07; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.13), with a remaining direct effect of overall fitness (z-score) at 0.44 (95% CI, 0.30, 0.58; 15.68% mediation) (Fig. 2).