Participants
The sample size of our study was calculated using the G*Power (a standard effect size of 0.5 and a power of 0.8, with a error probability of 0.05) [28]. A total of 26 (13 females) healthy college students aged from 20 to 30 years (25.03 ± 1.72 years) and17.92 ± 1.38 years education duration were recruited from November 2020 to May 2021. The enrolled subjects must meet the criteria as follows: 1) Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) score < 5; 2) regular sleep without excessive morning or evening types; 3) right-handed; 4) no history of neurologic or psychiatric diseases; 5) no trauma stimuli; 6) no caffeine, smoking, alcohol or drug addictions; 7) no MRI contraindications. The Ethics Committee of Beijing Anding Hospital, affiliated with Capital Medical University, approved the study protocol (number of clinical registrations: ChiCTR2000039858). Informed consent was obtained from each enrolled patient prior to the study.
Study Procedure
In line with our previous study [15], each participant visited the laboratory twice. They had to sign an informed consent form while receiving a concise overview of the study. At the second visit, the participants had to get up at 7:00 am and return to the laboratory before 8:00 am for 24 hours SD. During the study, all recruited participants remained awake and did not consume tea, alcohol, or coffee. The researchers monitored turns to ensure that each participant was awake. Our researchers would wake them up if they showed any indications of falling asleep. Each subject completed two MRI scans before and after 24 h SD, respectively. We conducted the 250 s T1 and 490 s resting-state scans during the first MRI scan and the 490-s resting-state scan during the second MRI scan around 7:00 am the following day. All subjects were reminded to stay awake during scanning, and subjects who fell asleep during the fMRI scan were excluded.
Cognitive Assessment
The n-back task was utilized in the current study to assess WM performance both before and after 24 h SD. A series of letters appeared in the center of the computer screen at the 0-back, 1-back, and 2-back levels (Fig. 1) [8]. After a blank screen for 2000 ms, the letter was displayed for 500 ms. At the 0-back level, the participants were required to respond to each trial, which acted as a control condition to modify the task. In the 1-back task, subjects had to click the mouse button on the left or right when the letters of the two consecutive trials were the same. In the 2-back task, the subjects responded if the letter was displayed two trials earlier. There were nine blocks with 270 trials in this task for 11 min using E-prime 2.0. The reaction time (RT) and accuracy of each subject in this task were estimated by a certified neuropsychologist in accordance with the standardized protocols.
MRI Acquisition
MRI was performed using a Siemens 3.0 Tesla Prisma at Beijing Anding Hospital in Beijing, China. During the MRI scan, the subjects had to remain still, keep their eyes closed, and resist falling asleep. In addition, participants were required to freeze their foam head support to avoid head movement. A single-shot, gradient-recalled echo-planar imaging sequence was used for the resting-state fMRI data. These parameters were set in accordance with previously published studies [29]. A rapid gradient-echo sequence with T1-weighted multiecho magnetization preparation was used to acquire high-resolution structural images.
Data Processing
Image processing was performed using DPABISurf developed by Yan et al [30]. A surface-based image preprocessing pipeline was used, as previously described [31], which included anatomical data preprocessing, custom methodology of fMRIPrep, bregister, slice-time corrected, resampling into standard space, and component-based noise correction. The quality control of images was screened using participants' head motion within 0.5 mm framewise displacement or 1.5 standardized DVARS.
The automated anatomical atlas 3 (AAL3) was used to extract blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signals for 166 regions of interests (ROIs), including the 26 sub-regions (95-120 labels) of the cerebellum and 140 sub-regions of the cerebrum (1-94 and 121-166 labels) [32]. FC between any two ROI pairs was estimated using Pearson’s correlation coefficient of the BOLD signals. Next, Fisher’s z-score was used to convert the FC values.
Statistical Analysis
Repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to analyze WM performance in the RW and SD conditions. Moreover, we conducted Pearson’s correlations between the changes in RT and accuracy of one-back and two-back tasks and the altered cerebro-cerebellar FC in the RW and SD states. The false discovery rate (FDR) was used to account for multiple comparisons (corrected to p < 0.05).