3.1 Mechanical properties
As detailed in Table 1, The relationship between the penetration force and the adsorption time of the fish mucus film was investigated using a nano-scratch tester. As shown in the Figure. 2 , the penetration forces of the mucus film follow the sequence of SAF4 > SAF3 > SAF2> SAF1. And its thickness exhibits a consistent trend, upon increasing the adsorption time, the mucus film thickness progressively increases from 27.5nm to 105.5nm (Table 1).
The results, clearly demonstrate an upward tendency in the penetration force required to penetrate the mucus film as the adsorption time increases. This trend suggests that the mucus film becomes more difficult to penetrate as proteins gradually accumulate on its surface over time. To ascertain the statistical significance of the observed differences in penetration forces across various adsorption times, we subjected the nano-scratch test data to rigorous statistical analysis. Both One-way ANOVA and paired t-tests were employed to evaluate the significance of variations in penetration forces and film thickness among the different groups. The statistical tests revealed a significant difference (P < 0.05) in both penetration forces and film thickness between the groups treated with differing adsorption times. This finding underscores that as adsorption time increases, both the thickness of the mucus film and its resistance to penetration grow significantly.
Table 1 Thickness of the mucus film with different adsorption time.
Saliva sample
|
SAF1
|
SAF2
|
SAF3
|
SAF4
|
Thickness/nm
|
27.5±3.8
|
53.2±4.9
|
92.4±10.2
|
105.5±12.6
|
As depicted in Figure 3, the adhesion force exerted by the mucus film on a bare fish scale (MF-BF) was the strongest, measuring approximately 1380 nN. This high adhesion force suggests a strong interaction between the mucus film and the bare fish scale, likely due to the specific biochemical properties of the mucus that facilitate adhesion. When the mucus film adhered to another mucus film (MF-MF), the adhesion force decreased to 750 nN. This reduction could be attributed to the similar biochemical composition of the interacting surfaces, which might have resulted in a lesser adhesive force compared to the interaction with a dissimilar surface like the bare fish scale [16]. Nevertheless, the adhesion force between mucus films was still higher than that between a bare tip and a bare scale, which was approximately 341 nN. This finding implies that the mucus film possesses inherent adhesive properties that enhance its sticking ability, even when interacting with surfaces of similar composition.
Furthermore, as the adsorption time increased, the adhesion forces between the mucus films became more comparable. This observation suggests that over time, the adhesive properties of the mucus films might undergo changes, possibly due to the interaction with the environment or the rearrangement of mucin molecules within the film. A paired t-test analysis revealed no significant differences between these group pairs (P>0.05), indicating that the adhesion forces between different mucus films tend to converge as time passes. The high adhesion force observed in the mucus film on a bare fish scale could have important implications for the understanding of how fish adhere to various surfaces in their natural habitat. This strong adhesive ability might play a crucial role in their locomotion, feeding, and reproduction behaviors. Future studies could explore the biochemical composition of the mucus film and its interaction with different surfaces to gain a deeper understanding of its adhesive properties. Additionally, the convergence of adhesion forces over time suggests a dynamic nature of the mucus film's adhesive abilities. This finding could have implications for the design of biomimetic adhesives inspired by the mucus film, particularly in terms of their durability and sustained adhesive strength.
3.2 Lubrication performance
The friction coefficients of samples coated with various mucus films are presented in Figure 4. The bare fish scale sample, serving as a control, displays substantial variations in its friction curve and possesses the highest average friction coefficient. This high friction coefficient of the bare scale sample suggests that the absence of a mucus layer leaves the surface more prone to friction, which may explain its wear-prone nature. In contrast, all mucus-treated scale surfaces exhibit lower surface friction coefficients compared to the untreated surface. This reduction in friction is likely due to the lubricating properties of the mucus film, which creates a slippery layer that minimizes direct contact between surfaces. An interesting observation from our study is that the friction-reducing properties of the mucus film decline as adsorption time increases, following the order of SAF4 > SAF3 > SAF2 > SAF1. The nano-lubrication properties exhibited by biofilms are not infrequent occurrences [14], and their presence does not indicate a diminution in lubrication effectiveness.. Instead, the accumulation of adsorbed proteins over time increases the lateral resistance of needle movement.
The experimental results, depicted in Figure 5, further support the beneficial effects of the mucus coating. The mucus-coated samples demonstrate a significant reduction in wear compared to the control group. Obviously, the mucus film acts as a protective layer, reducing friction and wear on the surface. However, our statistical analysis using the paired t-test indicates no significant difference in wear volume among the SF2, SF3, and SF4 groups, suggesting that extending the adsorption time beyond a certain point does not further enhance the wear-reducing effect. This implies that there may be a saturated adsorption time within 5 min for achieving the best lubricating properties of the mucus film.
3.3 Zeta potential
Table 2 presents the zeta potential values measured on the surface of various samples subjected to different adsorption treatments. The control group, consisting of fish scales that did not undergo any adsorption treatment, exhibited a surface potential of -41.2 mV, clearly indicating strong electronegativity. This baseline measurement provides a valuable reference for comparing the effects of subsequent adsorption treatments. Upon adsorbing SF1, a significant increase in the surface zeta potential to -22.5 mV was observed. This shift suggests the occurrence of electrostatic interactions between the mucus and the fish scales. Such interactions are crucial in various biological processes, including adhesion, and their study can lead to a better understanding of the mechanisms involved. Interestingly, the duration of adsorption did not significantly impact the electrostatic effect. As the adsorption time progressed from 1 minute to 30 minutes, the zeta potential of the adsorption surface gradually increased from -22.5 mV to -15.9 mV. This gradual increase indicates that the electrostatic interaction becomes stronger over time, albeit at a slow rate. Thus, the adsorption process might involve multiple stages or mechanisms, with the initial stages having a more significant impact on the zeta potential than the later stages.
Table 2 Zeta potential values on the surface of samples adsorbed with different mucus films
Saliva sample
|
Control
|
SAF1
|
SAF2
|
SAF3
|
SAF4
|
Zeta potential/mV
|
-41.2±3.3
|
-22.5±2.5
|
-18.3±2.9
|
-16.6±1.2
|
-15.9±1.6
|
3.4 Vibration attenuation performance
Figures 6 and 7 clearly depict the variations in acceleration and energy dissipation rates during the impact process, comparing samples before and after the adsorption treatment. Notably, the control group without any mucus film demonstrated the highest peak acceleration accompanied by a narrow pulse width upon impact. This suggests that in the absence of the mucus layer, the impact force is more concentrated and intense. As the adsorption time increases, there is a gradual decrease in peak acceleration and a broadening of the pulse width. This trend indicates that the mucus layer acts as a shock absorber, dispersing the impact force over a longer period, thereby reducing the peak force experienced by the sample. This finding has important implications for materials science and engineering, as it suggests that incorporating a similar viscous layer could enhance the impact resistance of materials.
Furthermore, the significant influence of adsorption time on energy dissipation is striking. Short-term adsorption of 1 and 5 minutes had minimal effects on energy dissipation, likely due to the insufficient formation of a stable mucus layer. However, as the adsorption time increases to 10 and 30 minutes, there is a substantial increase in energy dissipation rates. This suggests that a more extended adsorption period allows for a thicker and more uniform mucus layer to form, which in turn enhances its energy-absorbing capabilities.