Modular architecture of Laccases from Streptomyces and Aspergillus genera
For the exploration of the laccase modular architecture, sequence datasets of laccases from Streptomyces and Aspergillus were retrieved from Uniprot database, accessed on December 2023 (Additional file 1). In Aspergillus, to date a comprehensive analysis revealed 716 sequences identified as three-domains of multicopper oxidases / laccases. A parallel investigation in Streptomyces identified 281 sequences predicted to be three-domain laccase as well. In addition, for Streptomyces, 392 sequences were specifically classified as two domain multicopper oxidases, also called small-laccases, which are absent from Aspergillus and any other filamentous fungi. The modular-domain architecture represented by the different laccases found in the genome of A. niger CBS 513.88 and S. leeuwenhoekii C34 is shown in Fig. 1.
Three-domain laccases typically consist of three cupredoxin domains, of which according to Pfam protein family database are defined as Cu-oxidase_3, Cu-oxidase, and Cu-oxidase_2, respectively (Fig. 1). Based on the crystal structure the Cu-oxidase_3 and Cu-oxidase_2 domains are responsible for the catalytic function (36). Within these domains, two catalytic copper sites have been identified, a tri-nuclear cluster consisting of a single type-2 (T2) and a pair of type-3 (T3) copper ions located at the interface of Cu-oxidase_3 and Cu-oxidase_2 and a mono-nuclear center containing type-1 (T1) copper ion in the Cu-oxidase_2 domain (6, 7). Previous studies have indicated that the T1 copper ion plays a role in the initial substrate oxidation process, hence receiving electrons from the reducing substrate. Subsequently, these electrons are transferred from T1 copper ion to the tri-nuclear copper cluster, facilitating dioxygen reduction into water (36, 37). Moreover, several amino acid residues close to the T1 copper center have been implicated in substrate binding (5–7). Additionally, the middle Cu-oxidase domain of three-domain laccase plays a role in bridging the other two domains, facilitating the proper 3-dimentional structure for the formation of the tri-nuclear cluster (7, 36).
On the other hand, SLAC is characterized by its reduced size lacking one of Cu-oxidase domains compared to the typical three-domain laccases (Fig. 1). Despite their smaller size, the SLAC still maintains the essential cupredoxin-like domains and copper centers, contributing to their catalytic activity (38–40). The mono-nuclear copper site of SLAC from S. coelicolor resides in the Cu-oxidase_2 domain as is the case in the three domain laccases (7, 41). To form a catalytically active structure with a tri-nuclear site, SLAC needs to form a dimeric or trimeric structure where this catalytic site is at the interface between the N-terminal domain of one monomer and the C-terminal domain another monomer (7, 41). Moreover, the type-1 copper site of the Cu-oxidase_2 of SLAC is important for substrate binding, suggesting different substrate interaction compared to that of three domain laccases (42). The smaller size and enzymatic characteristics of the SLAC such as broad pH and temperature range, wide substrate acceptance, and inhibitor resistance, make them interesting enzymes for biotechnological applications such as lignin degradation (8–10, 14, 43, 44).
Both Aspergillus and Streptomyces have been well documented as laccase-producing organism (14, 23, 45). However, as SLAC encoding genes were absent in the A. niger genome (Fig. 1), we explored Streptomyces leeuwenhoekii SLAC expression in A. niger, whereby we also engineered a SLAC variant containing CBM1 domain. CBM1 has been known for its ability to bind specifically to crystalline cellulose, a component found alongside lignin in complex lignocellulosic substrates (16). The C-terminal CBM attachment to fungal laccase has been effective in improving pulp bio-bleaching (20). Incorporating CBM1 into SLAC was expected to guide the SLAC to anchor more effectively towards complex lignocellulosic substrate, thereby increasing SLAC proximity to lignin which facilitating lignin degradation.
The design of SLAC variants and screening of co-transformants
Two variants of SLAC encoding genes were generated, one with and one without CBM1 encoding domains, defined as CBM-SLAC and SLAC, respectively (Fig. 2). For the design of SLAC minus CBM1 (Fig. 2A), the SLAC sequence originated from S. leeuwenhoekii C34 (WP_029383517) and the native signal peptide was substituted with that from A. niger CBS 513.88 laccase (Uniprot accession: A2QGL7) that is known to be secreted (23) (Additional file 2: Fig.S1A, for the sequence). For the chimeric SLAC encoding gene with two CBM1s (Fig. 2B), the design was inspired by the modular domain of a yeast laccase carrying two CBM1 domains at the N-terminus (EMS24156) (Additional file 2: Fig.S1B, for the sequence). The yeast signal peptide along with its two CBM1s encoding sequence was retrieved from Rhodotorula toruloides NP11 (EMS24156), while the gene encoding the SLAC was obtained from S. leeuwenhoekii C34 (WP_029383517). The coding sequences for both SLAC variants were obtained by gene synthesis and cloned in plasmid pMA351 in between the constitutive gpdA promoter and trpC terminator as described in the Methods section.
Subsequently, each SLAC gene variant was transformed into A. niger MGG029. To identify the best performing transformants, an activity-based screen was conducted on around twenty putative co-transformants of SLAC (Additional file 2: Fig. S2A) and CBM-SLAC (Additional file 2: Fig. S2B). The activity screen used DMPPDA as substrate and culture medium collected from submerged fermentation of the co-transformants as enzyme source. Several transformants showed laccase activity (Additional file 2: Fig. S2). One Co-transformant from each laccase variant showing the most intense activity, CBM-SLAC#22 and SLAC#14, was selected for further research (Fig. 3). Moreover, colony PCR was carried out to confirm the presence of the SLAC gene variants introduced in A. niger transformants (Additional file 2: Fig. S3).
Zymogram, SDS-PAGE and Western Blot analysis
The presence of heterologous SLAC variants in the culture medium of PCR- and DMPPDA activity-validated co-transformants were further investigated through a series of rigorous protein gel analysis. The SDS-PAGE showed different banding pattern for the CBM-SLAC and SLAC co-transformants culture medium (Fig. 4). Both CBM-SLAC and SLAC transformants revealed a protein band estimated around 70 kDa, while an additional band around 95 kDa was detected in the SLAC co-transformant (Fig. 4). As expected, these bands were not present in the culture medium of transformants with empty vector, A. niger MGG029. Notably, the 70 and 95 kDa bands appeared to have molecular weights approximately two and three times larger than the expected size of monomeric CBM-SLAC and SLAC, which is 45 kDa and 35 kDa, respectively. This showed that these SLAC variants did not migrate according to their molecular weight on this protein gel analysis, indicating the SLAC protein as produced in Aspergillus remained non-denatured when running un-boiled samples on SDS-PAGE. Previous studies confirmed the resilience of the SLAC to denaturation by SDS thus retaining laccase activity under these conditions (8, 14). Therefore, zymogram analysis was carried out to further confirm and explore if the proteins observed on SDS-PAGE corresponded to active SLAC protein.
The Zymogram analysis using DMPPDA substrate was conducted in the presence of SDS without boiling the samples similar to that performed on SDS-PAGE in panel A and the Western blot in panel C (Fig. 4), as detailed in the methods section. The results revealed enzymatic activity corresponding to the protein bands identified in the SDS PAGE gel (Fig. 4B). Specifically, the active CBM-SLAC displayed a single band, while the active SLAC exhibited double bands, indicative of the typical di- and tri-meric state of active SLAC, in accordance with previous reports (7, 41). Our result suggests that CBM-SLAC is present as an active dimer, and not capable of forming a trimer probably due to structural hindrance attributed to the presence of two CBM’s at the N-terminus. For further confirmation, a Western blot using specific SLAC antibody was conducted. As expected, the western blot analysis showed a consistent result with those of SDS-PAGE and zymogram (Fig. 4C). CBM-SLAC exhibited a single band, while SLAC displayed double bands (Fig. 4C).
The fact that we detected protein bands in the gel analysis corresponding to putative dimeric and trimeric conformations of SLAC is in line with previous crystal structure analysis and the conclusion that functional SLAC requires multimerization (42, 46–48). The dimeric forms of active Streptomyces SLACs have been documented for the SilA from Streptomyces ipomoea, SvSL from Streptomyces viridochromogene, and SLAC from Streptomyces coelicolor (8, 40, 44), while the trimeric structures have been reported for EpoA from Streptomyces griseus and Ssl1 from Streptomyces aviceus (12, 13), all expressed in Escherichia coli. Moreover, an active SLAC from S. coelicolor exhibited trimeric and dimeric conformation when expressed in different hosts (8, 41, 48). In our study, SLAC expressed in A. niger displayed both the putative dimeric and trimeric conformation in a Zymogram with DMPPDA as substrate. The difference in reported multimeric forms of SLAC could be attributed to the use of different substrates (49).
Overall, the protein gel analysis conducted through above electrophoresis techniques (Fig. 4) provided confirmation that these SLAC variants were expressed and exhibited activity. On SDS-PAGE, the band corresponding to CBM-SLAC exhibited higher intensity compared to that of SLAC, suggesting a higher expression level of CBM-SLAC (Fig. 4A). However, on the zymogram, the levels of active bands were comparable between CBM-SLAC and SLAC, while the same amount of sample was loaded into the gel. This suggested that SLAC was more active than CBM-SLAC toward the DMPPDA substrate (Fig. 4B).
Proteomic analysis for identification of SLAC variants
In further attempt to characterize the secreted SLAC in A. niger culture medium, mass-spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)-based proteomics analysis was conducted with the two protein samples obtained for SLAC and CBM-SLAC. Through meticulous peptide matching, peptide fragments corresponding to most of the SLAC protein variants were successfully identified with high reliability (Additional file 3). A total of 228 and 121 amino acids (aa) were identified based on the peptide fragments referred to the sequence from SLAC and CBM-SLAC, respectively (Fig. 5). These numbers represent a protein coverage of 75% for SLAC and 31% for CBM-SLAC sequences (Fig. 5).
The identified peptides are in agreement with the effective expression of SLAC from Streptomyces leeuwenhoekii in A. niger, highlighting the robustness of the heterologous expression system. However, the absence of peptide fragments corresponding to the N-terminal region containing the CBM1 domain as depicted in Fig. 5, precluded conclusions on the presence of this N-terminal domain of the CBM1-SLAC protein. Therefore, N-terminal processing of the CBM-SLAC variant cannot be excluded. More detailed analysis of the amino acid sequence of the CBM1 suggests that specific interactions or structural properties of the domain hinders its detection in (LC-MS/MS)-based proteomics analysis. This could be attributed to the challenges associated with the trypsin fragmentation and identification of peptides containing disulfide bonds (50) and the fact that the CBM1 region is rich in Cysteine residues (Additional file 2: Fig. S4) which are involved in forming disulfide bonds in the CBM1 domains (22). Overall our results lay the groundwork for investigation of their impact on degradation of lignocellulosic material, as laccases are known to play a role in the efficient degradation of lignin (10, 51).
Effect of SLAC on lignocellulose degradation
The functional significance of the SLAC variants in lignocellulose degradation was explored using lignocellulosic biomass derived from rice straw. Crude enzyme samples containing recombinant SLAC were supplemented with commercial cellulases to evaluate the impact of SLAC on enhancing cellulase access and subsequent release of reducing sugars from rice straw. Previously it has been reported that the degradation of lignin by laccase in lignocellulose substrates, such as rice straw, enhance the accessibility of cellulase onto the cellulose chain to release reducing sugars (52). In our analysis, the amount of reducing sugars released was quantified using the DNS assay as described in method section and reflects the effect of SLAC activity on the lignocellulose degradation.
A notable increase in reducing sugar concentration was observed following 24- and 48- hours incubation of rice straw with crude enzyme containing SLAC alongside with cellulase (Fig. 6). At 24 hours, the sample treated solely with commercial cellulase displayed 8 mM of reducing sugars, whereas with SLAC variants added, the amount rose to 10 mM, marking a 20% increase in released reducing sugars. Moreover, a substantial enhancement in reducing sugar release was detected after 48 hours, with approximately a 30% rise observed in samples containing each SLAC variant alongside commercial cellulase compared to cellulase treatment alone (Fig. 6). This suggests that cellulase gains better access to cellulose degradation, likely due to reduced hindrance from lignin post degradation by laccase, implying SLAC addition enhances rice straw degradation into reducing sugars.
Furthermore, a similar amount of reducing sugars was observed for the reactions with the addition of SLAC with and without CBM1 in supporting the cellulase action, suggesting that addition of CBM1 N-terminally did not significantly further enhance rice straw degradation. Typically, in most cases, a CBM domain augments enzymatic hydrolysis by facilitating recognition and adsorption of the enzyme onto the substrate surface (15, 53, 54). However, it is noteworthy that in certain cases, CBM did not catalyse reactions of particular enzymes (55, 56). Furthermore, CBM1 can exhibit irreversible binding to cellulose (16), suggesting a constrained mobility of the SLAC in such circumstances. Moreover, the data presented in Fig. 4, suggest the addition of CBM could affect intermolecular interactions between CBM-SLAC monomers, which may affect the folding kinetics or stability of specific structural elements critical for catalytic activity and enzyme-substrate interactions of multi-domain proteins (57).