UB-DNA aptamers targeting each DEN-NS1 serotype and the ELISA format. We previously developed an ELISA format of aptamer−antibody sandwich systems (Figure 1b), using UB-DNA aptamers targeting each serotype or sub-serotype of DEN-NS1 (Figure 2), for diagnostics in the early stage of dengue infection (Figure 1a)49. These high-affinity UB-DNA aptamers (KD = 30−182 pM) were generated from five-letter Ds-DNA libraries by ExSELEX, involving the Ds−Px pair as a third base pair in PCR. In the aptamer generation, we used each DEN-NS1 serotype purchased from The Native Antigen Company. Three aptamers, AptD1, AptD3, and AptD4 targeting DEN1-NS1, DEN3-NS1, and DEN4-NS1, respectively, contained two Ds bases, while the isolated aptamer, AptD2, exhibiting the highest affinity to DEN2-NS1, contained two Ds and one Px bases. These three UBs in AptD2 are essential for the tight binding to DEN2-NS1. This Px base was incorporated into the aptamer by a mutation during PCR amplification of the DNA libraries in ExSELEX. Since the Px nucleoside is unstable and thus not suitable for chemical DNA synthesis, instead of the Px nucleoside, we used the Pa nucleoside, in which the nitro group is replaced with the aldehyde group (Figure 2a)49,52,53, for the chemical synthesis of AptD2. Each of these four aptamers contains an extraordinarily stable mini-hairpin sequence54-56 at the 3′-terminus, in which the loop region is useful as a modification site with biotin for aptamer immobilization48,57-59.
For the ELISA format with aptamer and antibody sandwich systems, we employed an anti-DEN-NS1 monoclonal antibody (Ab#D06), which binds to all four serotypes of DEN-NS1 with 27–107 pM KD values49. In the ELISA format, the mixtures of DEN-NS1 samples and the antibody Ab#D06 were incubated on an aptamer-immobilized plate, and then the signal was detected by the colorimetric output, using a secondary anti-IgG HRP-conjugated antibody. We determined the limits of detection (LOD) in buffer, which were 1.19–2.36 ng/mL for the DEN-NS1 samples purchased from The Native Antigen Company49.
Development of serotype-specific anti-DEN-NS1 IgG detection by a competitive ELISA format. We next tested this ELISA format in the presence of human serum purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, for the direct detection of each DEN-NS1 from The Native Antigen Company (Figure 3). Unexpectedly, we found that the NS1 detection was significantly inhibited in the serum (Figure 3b), relative to that in buffer (Figure 3a). One of the plausible causes is the presence of anti-DEN-NS1 IgG antibodies in the serum, which inhibited the binding of the aptamer to the additional NS1 proteins. To validate this IgG contamination theory, we removed the total IgG antibodies from the serum by treating it with protein A-immobilized resin, and confirmed the absence of inhibition with the treated serum (Figure 3c). We also performed an ELISA using a serum sample from a Singaporean who was currently not infected with dengue, to determine whether the serum inhibited the detection. Interestingly, the serum showed the serotype-specific inhibitions in the detection of DEN2-NS1, as well as DEN1-NS1 to some extent (Figure 3d), suggesting that the person might have previously been infected with the dengue serotype 2 and/or serotype 1 viruses. Therefore, we obtained two other serum samples from volunteers from a dengue non-endemic country, and performed an ELISA. As expected, the two serum samples did not inhibit the DEN-NS1 detection in our ELISA format (Figure 3e and 3f). For further studies, we used these serum samples as a control without anti-DEN-NS1 IgGs. These results inspired us to develop a new method using the competitive ELISA format with each DEN-NS1 serotype sandwiched with each aptamer and Ab#D06, for the serotype-specific detection of anti-DEN-NS1 IgG antibodies in human serum samples (Figure 1c).
For the serotype-specific IgG detection, we developed a simple quantification method for the anti-DEN-NS1 IgG activities (Supplementary Figure 2). To this end, we performed competitive-inhibition in ELISA using a series of different volumes (0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, and 5 μL) of patient serum, in the presence of a certain amount of each DEN-NS1 serotype (The Native Antigen Company). After the absorbance measurement at 450 nm (OD450) in the ELISA format, the OD450 values were plotted against the volume of serum, and we calculated the serum volume required to give an OD450 of 1.0. We then defined the relative IgG activity (Activity), by the following formula: Activity = 5 / (the serum volume required for an OD450 of 1.0). To equalize the sensitivities of the DEN-NS1 detection among the four serotypes, we adjusted the amounts of immobilized aptamers and spiked DEN-NS1 for each serotype (Supplementary Figure S1).
Serotype-specific detection of anti-DEN-NS1 IgG antibodies in patient samples. Using this competitive ELISA format and the IgG quantification method, we measured the longitudinal changes in the IgG production and the serotype specificities of the archived blood samples from eleven Singaporean patients (PD1-1 to PD4-1) with acute DENV infection (Figure 4). The dengue serotype of the current infection in each sample was also identified by an FTD dengue differentiation RT-qPCR test from Fast Track Diagnostics and by sequencing the RT-PCR amplicons of the clinical samples obtained within 3‒5 days after fever onset. In addition, we performed the DEN-NS1, IgM, and IgG detections in these samples with the commercially available LFA kits from SD BIOLINE for DEN-NS1 detection and from Panbio for IgM/IgG detection.
Our competitive ELISA format successfully detected the IgGs even after one year in the recovered patients, as shown in the samples PD2-3, PD3-1, and PD3-3. The samples can be categorized into two groups by the IgG detection: one group included PD1-1, PD1-2, PD1-3, PD2-1, PD2-2, PD3-1, and PD3-2, in which the IgG was not detected within a week after fever onset, and the other group included PD2-3, PD3-3, PD3-4, and PD4-1, in which the IgG was detected within 3‒5 days after fever onset. These data suggested that the latter patients were previously infected by dengue (Figure 1a). Thus, the first group most likely represented the primary infection, and the second group was a secondary or higher infection.
There were some discrepancies in PD1-1, PD3-2, and PD3-3 between our IgG detection and the conventional LFA method for IgM/IgG detection. The visual judgement using the LFA format was often ambiguous, and all of the longitudinal IgG detection data supported the higher accuracy of our method over that of the LFA format. The sensitivity and specificity of the LFA kit reported in the literature are 71.9% and 95%, respectively.8 Thus, our IgG detection might faithfully identify the primary or secondary infection of patients within 3‒5 days after fever onset.
Our data indicate that the inhibition of the aptamer binding to each DEN-NS1 serotype resulted from the anti-NS1 IgG, rather than the anti-NS1 IgM. In the samples from the patients with the primary infection, IgM was detected in PD1-1, PD2-1, PD3-1, and PD3-2 by the LFA (Figure 4). In contrast, no inhibition of the DEN-NS1 detection in our competitive ELISA occurred within the primary infection samples in the first week after fever onset, and the inhibition became detectable at 17 days or thereafter in longitudinal studies. Thus, the IgMs might not inhibit the UB-DNA aptamer binding to DEN-NS1, and our competitive ELISA format specifically detected only IgGs.
Using the four samples (PD1-2, PD1-3, PD2-2, and PD3-1) collected 17 or more days after fever onset in the primary infection, our competitive ELISA format identified the serotype of the current infection from the highest serotype-specific activity of each detected IgG. Our results were identical with those obtained by RT-qPCR and sequencing. In the samples obtained six months later (PD1-2 and PD2-2), our data indicated that the serotype-specificity of IgGs broadened to other serotypes.
In the secondary infection samples (PD2-3, PD3-3, PD3-4, and PD4-1), the initial IgG level was not identical to the serotype-specificity of IgGs in the current infection, which might mainly reflect the serotypes of the past infection26,27,60. Even after one week, the production of the IgG antibodies that predominantly recognized the serotype resulting from the presumable past infection increased sharply, as compared to the IgGs produced from the current secondary infection. Although the predominance of the past infection varied depending on the patients, the PD2-3 and PD3-3 patient samples revealed the massive production of the IgG antibodies to the past serotype infection, and thus the competitive ELISA format might identify the dengue serotype of the past infection.
Comparison with the typical conventional serologic test. To evaluate the competitive ELISA format, we compared the specificity and sensitivity of the format with a conventional serologic test reported in the literature50,61. There are several available kits for the direct DENV IgM and IgG detections by ELISA formats, which cannot identify the serotype, and their sensitivities and specificities for IgG detection are 45−56% and 93−95%, respectively, with Panbio Dengue Virus IgG Capture ELISA, and 55−89% and 64−99% with SD BIOLINE Dengue IgG ELISA8,62,63. Thus, we performed the conventional serologic test by incubating clinical samples on the plate immobilized with each serotype DEN-NS1 (The Native Antigen Company), followed by detection with a secondary anti-IgG HRP-conjugated antibody (Figure 1d).
First, we compared the inhibition specificity by the competitive ELISA (Figure 5a) and the IgG detection by the conventional method (Figure 5b), using various volumes (0.05−5 μL) of a Singaporean clinical plasma sample, PD2-4. Although the IgGs in the sample were not detected by the LFA kit, our method and the conventional methods clearly detected anti-DEN-NS1 IgGs. In our competitive ELISA, the aptamer binding to serotype 3 of DEN-NS1 (DEN3-NS1) was mainly inhibited with the clinical sample (0.1−5 μL of PD2-4), indicating that the IgGs in the sample specifically bind to DEN3-NS1. However, in the conventional method, the IgGs equally bound to all four DEN-NS1 serotypes and the serotype-specificity of the IgGs was unobservable.
Next, we extensively tested the IgG detections using 23 Singaporean clinical samples (PD1-1 to PD4-1) obtained within 3−5 days after fever onset (Supplementary Table 2). The serotypes of the current infection of each sample were initially determined by RT-qPCR and sequencing, and the IgM and IgG detections were also performed with the LFA Panbio kit. The LFA tests detected anti-DEN-NS1 IgGs in the PD1-1, 1-9, 1-14, 1-19, 2-3, 3-2, 3-4, and 4-1 samples, suggesting that these patients had secondary infections. However, there are some discrepancies (including PD2-4, as shown in Figure 5) among the results obtained using the LFA Panbio kit and our conventional and competitive ELISA methods (Figure 6). The conventional and/or competitive ELISA methods detected IgGs in the samples of PD1-5, 1-10, 1-11, 1-18, 2-4, and 3-2, which were not detected by the LFA Panbio kit. In addition, the PD1-1, 1-10, 1-18, and 3-2 samples were IgG-positive by the conventional method, but the competitive ELISA detected no IgGs in these samples. Therefore, further extensive research is necessary to assess the sensitivity and specificity of our method by comparisons to those of the conventional method.
Comparison of the competitive ELISA formats between aptamer−antibody and antibody−antibody sandwich systems. Competitive or blocking ELISA formats using the inhibition between protein−protein or protein−antibody interactions are well-known methods6,64,65. Theoretically, the DENV-serotype-specific IgG detection by the competitive ELISA format is also possible by using an antibody−antibody sandwich system, even if these antibodies have no specificity to each DEN-NS1 serotype (Figure 7a). We tested this antibody−antibody system using Ab#D06 and Ab#D25, which do not compete with each other for the DEN-NS1 binding, and compared the longitudinal changes of the IgG detections with the aptamer−antibody system in the PD1-3, 2-2, 2-3, 3-4, and 4-1 samples (Figure 7 and Supplementary Figure 3−6). The anti-DEN-NS1 IgG in the patient serum also inhibited the DEN-NS1 ternary complex formation with the antibody‒antibody sandwich pair, and the test exhibited similar patterns to those obtained by the aptamer‒antibody sandwich pair. However, the antibody‒antibody pair could not detect the IgG activities in the early stage of infection, such as the day 5 sample of PD2-3 and the day 3 sample of PD4-1. Thus, the sensitivity of the aptamer‒antibody system is superior to than that of the antibody‒antibody system.