This is a notably rare complication of urinary catheter placement however of the small number of known cases the identified risk factors tend to be female sex and neurogenic bladder (1).
On review of the literature, we have found five other cases documented in pregnant or immediately postpartum patients (2–6). Physiological changes in pelvic anatomy in pregnancy such as hydronephrosis may contribute to the risk of this complication (2, 4). Of these cases, majority in pregnancy are involving the right ureter rather than the left. Dilation of the right ureter in pregnancy is a known phenomenon and may explain the higher incidence of accidental instrumentation however interestingly the contralateral side was instrumented in this case (7, 8). Furthermore, females are deemed at higher risk due to a shorter urethra (9). The gravid uterus in the setting of twin pregnancy may have caused protrusion of the ureteric orifices in line with the urethral orifice thus leading to the accidental instrumentation. Proposed methods of identification include recognition of increased length of catheter inside the patient, reduced urine output non-responsive to fluid resuscitation and acute kidney injury (2, 9). Our patient also had pain secondary to bladder distension despite a draining catheter. A significant proportion of patients also developed pyelonephritis however of this group none were pregnant or postpartum, presumably due to need for longer term catheterisation in order to predispose them to this complication than typically seen in the post-operative or postpartum population (7).
Whilst this is an exceedingly rare complication practitioners should consider this in addition to other causes in patients who are oliguric post caesarean section and further investigate with thorough examination, biochemical analysis and imaging if indicated.