The research sites included wetland ecosystems, natural plantations, terrestrial ecosystems, and irrigating canals. Considering that this environment supplies food and habitat in its natural state and favorable conditions, it can sustain a diverse number of mammals. For the first time, mammals were identified and distributed in this study along the Sutlej River. Overall, 266 individuals belonging to 12 different species, 4 orders and 7 families were recorded (Table 4). The most diverse order in this study area was Rodentia, which contained a total of 141 individuals at all three study sites, and Lagomorpha, the most uniform order, which contained only nine individuals in all three study areas (Figure 7); however, the Muridae family consisted of a maximum number of individuals (n = 107), and the Leporidae family consisted of a minimum number of individuals (n = 09), but Herpestidae only families reported from Head Islam and Panjnad (Figure 6). The greatest number of wild boar individuals and the lowest number of small Indian mangoose individuals were recorded from different research sites (Figure 8). On the basis of feeding habit patterns, the most common pattern observed in this study was omnivorous, which had 212 specimens, and the least common habit was carnivorous, which had 13 mammls, which were observed only by Head Islam and Panjnad (Figure 8). According to the IUCN Red List, all the recorded individuals were of least concern (Table 4). The Shannon‒Wiener indices for the mammalian species Sulmanki, Islam and Panjnad head were 2.200177, 2.136116 and 2.453746, respectively, while the species richness index was 1.61189 at all three sites. Overall, 83 individuals were recorded at the Sulmanki waterhead, 79 at Islam and 104 at the head of Panjnad. The species evenness at the head of Sulmanki was 0.955525, that at the head of Islam was 0.927703, and that at the head of Panjnad was 1.065648 (Table 5). Most of the area along the research site was agricultural land, which fargmented the land and contributed to greater evenness in the mammal community. According to the results of this research, the Sutlej River has a stable and balanced ecosystem due to its high evenness and medium level of species diversity, but it has a less complex or simplified ecosystem due to its low level of species richness.
Table 4. Table of recorded data of the study area.
Sr. No
|
Common Names
|
Scientafic Name
|
Family
|
Order
|
IUCN Status
|
Feeding Habit
|
N
|
Head Sulmanki
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
Indian hare
|
Lepus nigricollis dayanus
|
Leporidae
|
Lagomorpha
|
Least Concern
|
Herbivorous
|
3
|
2
|
Short tailed bandicoot rate
|
Nesokia indica
|
Muridae
|
Rodentia
|
Least Concern
|
Herbivorous
|
4
|
3
|
Five-striped Palm Squirrel
|
Funnambulus pennantii
|
Sciuridae
|
Rodentia
|
Least Concern
|
Omnivorous
|
5
|
4
|
Indian crested porcupine
|
Hystrix indica
|
Hystricidae
|
Rodentia
|
Least Concern
|
Herbivorous
|
7
|
5
|
House rat
|
Rattus rattus
|
Muridae
|
Rodentia
|
Least Concern
|
Omnivorous
|
8
|
6
|
Golden/Asiatic jackal
|
Canis aureus
|
Canidae
|
Carnivora
|
Least Concern
|
Omnivorous
|
8
|
7
|
House mouse
|
Mus musculus
|
Muridae
|
Rodentia
|
Least Concern
|
Omnivorous
|
9
|
8
|
Indian gerbil
|
Tatera indica
|
Muridae
|
Rodentia
|
Least Concern
|
Omnivorous
|
10
|
9
|
Indian/Bengal fox
|
Vulpes bengalensis
|
Canidae
|
Carnivora
|
Least Concern
|
Omnivorous
|
14
|
10
|
Indian wild boar
|
Sus scrofa
|
Suidae
|
Artiodactyla
|
Least Concern
|
Omnivorous
|
15
|
Head Islam
|
1
|
Indian crested porcupine
|
Hystrix indica
|
Hystricidae
|
Rodentia
|
Least Concern
|
Herbivorous
|
3
|
2
|
Indian hare
|
Lepus nigricollis dayanus
|
Leporidae
|
Lagomorpha
|
Least Concern
|
Herbivorous
|
4
|
3
|
Small Indian mongoose
|
Herpestes auropunctatus
|
Herpestidae
|
Carnivora
|
Least Concern
|
Carnivorous
|
5
|
4
|
Five-striped Palm Squirrel
|
Funnambulus pennantii
|
Sciuridae
|
Rodentia
|
Least Concern
|
Omnivorous
|
6
|
5
|
Indian/Bengal fox
|
Vulpes bengalensis
|
Canidae
|
Carnivora
|
Least Concern
|
Omnivorous
|
6
|
6
|
Golden/Asiatic jackal
|
Canis aureus
|
Canidae
|
Carnivora
|
Least Concern
|
Omnivorous
|
8
|
7
|
Short tailed bandicoot rate
|
Nesokia indica
|
Muridae
|
Rodentia
|
Least Concern
|
Herbivorous
|
9
|
8
|
House rat
|
Rattus rattus
|
Muridae
|
Rodentia
|
Least Concern
|
Omnivorous
|
10
|
9
|
Indian wild boar
|
Sus scrofa
|
Suidae
|
Artiodactyla
|
Least Concern
|
Omnivorous
|
13
|
10
|
House mouse
|
Mus musculus
|
Muridae
|
Rodentia
|
Least Concern
|
Omnivorous
|
15
|
Head Panjnad
|
1
|
Indian hare
|
Lepus nigricollis dayanus
|
Leporidae
|
Lagomorpha
|
Least Concern
|
Herbivorous
|
2
|
2
|
Five-striped Palm Squirrel
|
Funnambulus pennantii
|
Sciuridae
|
Rodentia
|
Least Concern
|
Omnivorous
|
4
|
3
|
Indian gry mongoose
|
Herpestes edwardsii
|
Herpestidae
|
Carnivora
|
Least Concern
|
Carnivorous
|
8
|
4
|
Indian crested porcupine
|
Hystrix indica
|
Hystricidae
|
Rodentia
|
Least Concern
|
Herbivorous
|
9
|
5
|
Golden/Asiatic jackal
|
Canis aureus
|
Canidae
|
Carnivora
|
Least Concern
|
Omnivorous
|
10
|
6
|
Indian/Bengal fox
|
Vulpes bengalensis
|
Canidae
|
Carnivora
|
Least Concern
|
Omnivorous
|
11
|
7
|
Indian gerbil
|
Tatera indica
|
Muridae
|
Rodentia
|
Least Concern
|
Omnivorous
|
12
|
8
|
House rat
|
Rattus rattus
|
Muridae
|
Rodentia
|
Least Concern
|
Omnivorous
|
14
|
9
|
House mouse
|
Mus musculus
|
Muridae
|
Rodentia
|
Least Concern
|
Omnivorous
|
16
|
10
|
Indian wild boar
|
Sus scrofa
|
Suidae
|
Artiodactyla
|
Least Concern
|
Omnivorous
|
18
|
∑=266
|
Shannon‒Wiener diversity index:
The diversity (H’) index showed that the research sites had a medium level of diversity, with H’= 2.200177 (Sulmanki), H = 2.136116 (Islam), H = 2.453746 (Panjnad) and H’>1, but H’<3 = medium diversity.
Index of richness:
The R index showed that the research area had a low richness of mammals because R = 1.61189 (Sulmanki, Islam and Panjnad) and R<2.5 = low richness.
Index of evenness:
The evenness (E) index indicates that the research area has a high evenness of mammals because E = 0.955525 (Sulmanki), E = 0.927703 (Islam), E = 1.065648 (Panjnad) and E approaches 1 = within species, and the individuals are uniformly distributed.
The overall outcomes of the studies are shown in Table 5.
Study Sites
|
Diversity
|
Richness
|
Evenness
|
Head Sulamnki
|
2.200177
|
1.61189
|
0.955525
|
Head Islam
|
2.136116
|
1.61189
|
0.927703
|
Head Panjnad
|
2.453746
|
1.61189
|
1.065648
|
Threats:
Durring research, habitat degradation, pollution, and conflicts between humans and wildlife are common threats. These factors disturb species richness and diversity as well as the ability to degread wetland areas at study sites, and in the future, species richness and diversity will both be disrupted if appropriate action is not taken promptly (Table 6).
Habitat destruction:
Humen poulation, which leads to more infrastructure such as traffic roads or highways, the counstraction of public parks and buildings and railway lines near the study area, eventually causes habitate loss and reduces the available space and resources for mammalian species. If timely measures are not taken, populations of certain mammal species may decline or become locally extinct in the future.
Humen–Wildlif conflict:
Only 14% of residents at all three waterhead sites had an initial level of education, although the majority of residents (86%) were uneducated. Due to a high rate of uneducation, the locals were unaware of the importance of wild mammalian species and were ignorant about sustainable management techniques. Moreover, species such as the Indian wild boar and Bengal fox can conflict with humans over resources such as crops or livestock. This can lead to revengeful killings and habitat disturbance, impacting the populations of these species. Due to poverty in all research areas, the ilegle hunting or pouching of mammals, such as the Indian crested porcupine, Indian wild boar, and Asiatic jackal, is targeted by poachers or hunters either for their meat or fur or as pests. Unsustainable hunting practices can lead to a decline in the population, species richness, and diversity of wild mammals.
Pollution:
Due to the lack of sustainable management and the lack of an agricultural waste management system, all the waste released in rivers increases the toxic chemical level, heavy metal level, and pH (alkalinity) level from agricultural fertilizers and pesticides, which directly or indirectly affects mammal species through their aquatic food sources. Chemical pollutants and heavy metals bioaccumulate in mammalian species through the environment, causing health diseases and decreasing species richness.
Table 6. Threats noted within research sites.
Threats
|
High
|
Medium
|
Low
|
Habitat destruction
|
●
|
|
|
Humen-Wildlif conflict
|
●
|
|
|
Pollution
|
|
●
|
|