Breastfeeding stands as the gold standard for infant and young child feeding, playing a pivotal role in shaping the long-term health of newborns and infants. The study specifically targeted the knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding breastfeeding and weaning among mothers with children aged two years and below in a low socio-economic area where low income, education and marginal occupation domains were expected.
The average age of mothers in this study was 28.8 years with a standard deviation of 5.81, a figure quite similar to that observed in Egypt by Mohammed et al. in 2016, which reported an average age of 28.4 years with a similar standard deviation. Interestingly, in the current study, 93% of participants had at least primary education, a significantly higher proportion compared to Egypt where only 44.3% of mothers were literate. [15] Conversely, in Ethiopia, the percentage of mothers with primary education and above was much lower at 31.3%.[16] In terms of employment status, 83.2% of mothers in the current study were housewives, slightly lower than the figure reported in El-Minia, Egypt (93.2%). Conversely, in the United Arab Emirates, the percentage of unemployed mothers was lower than both the current study and that of El-Minia, Egypt, standing at 60.4%.[17]
In this study, the proportion of children delivered by caesarean section was five times higher compared to Ethiopia, with rates of 13.3% and 2.5% respectively. Furthermore, concerning the number of children, 62.8% of participants in the current study had more than two children, whereas in Ethiopia, this figure was higher at 79.2%. However, it's essential to note that this difference could be attributed to the methodology employed in data collection. This research gathered data on the number of alive children, while the study in Ethiopia focused on the number of parities, which includes both alive and deceased children. [16]
Ninety-four percent of interviewed mothers in this study acknowledged breastfeeding as the best nutrition for children under 2 years. However, this percentage was lower compared to findings in a rural area in El-Minia governorate, Egypt, where it was reported as 100%. Furthermore, in the current study, a significant proportion (62.2%) of participants failed to accurately identify the specific benefits of breastfeeding for the child. Only 34.7% mentioned that breastfeeding strengthens immunity and prevents diseases, contrasting sharply with the findings in El-Minia, Egypt, where 97.7% of participants recognized the impact of breastfeeding on immunity and disease prevention. [15]
Regarding the benefits of breastfeeding for the mother, a noteworthy percentage (77.6%) of study participants in this research were unaware of any advantages. Moreover, only a small fraction (9.2%) of participants recognized the benefit of breastfeeding in fostering mother-child bonding, which sharply contrasts with the findings in El-Minia, Egypt, where 95.8% of participants acknowledged this advantage. On the other hand, concerning the protective effect of breastfeeding on breast cancer, a higher percentage of participants in this study (12.2%) mentioned it compared to the research in Egypt (4.6%). [15]
Ninety-three percent of participants in this study were aware of the optimal time for initiating breastfeeding within the first hour of delivery, which is higher than the figures reported in the study by Mohammed et al. in Egypt (83.7%) [15], and the study by Chavan et al. in India (79.1%).[18] Regarding the duration of exclusive breastfeeding (EBF), 41.8% of participants knew that EBF should be continued until 6 months of age, which is higher compared to the findings in El-Mina, Egypt (32.2%).[15] Furthermore, the awareness of the duration of EBF in this study was even higher than that of respondents from France, Britain, and the United States (35.5%, 29.8%, and 23.4% respectively) in the study by Wei Chun Wang, 2017, [19] nonetheless lower when compared to the findings in Italy where 71% of participants responded correctly to the optimum duration of breastfeeding. [20].
In this study, 79% of participants recognized colostrum feeding as important, which is lower compared to a study in India where all participants (100%) were aware of its importance. [21] Furthermore, the figure is even lower in a systematic review in East Africa, which found that only 52.1% of participants agree that colostrum is important. [22]
These discrepancies could be attributed to cultural differences across the countries, which are geographically distant from each other. Cultural beliefs and practices regarding infant feeding may vary widely, influencing levels of awareness and understanding regarding colostrum feeding.
Regarding weaning, approximately 80% of mothers in this study had a misconception of weaning as complete cessation of breastfeeding, which is similar to the findings of a study by Kiran Bala et al., in India where 80.3% of participants also falsely defined weaning. [21] This misconception was even more prevalent among Egyptians, with as high as 92% defining weaning as complete cessation of breastfeeding in the study by El-Minia. [15]
In terms of attitude, 35% of participants in this study agreed that breastfeeding should be stopped during the mother's sickness, whereas in Egypt, this figure was as high as 83%.[15] Additionally, around 10% of participants in this study found breastfeeding embarrassing, while 80% of Egyptians found it embarrassing. [15] This difference could be attributed to the relative normalization of breastfeeding in the daily lives of Sudanese women. Furthermore, participants in this study showed a more positive attitude towards continuing breastfeeding for a sick child compared to their Egyptian counterparts [15], with 94% and 80% respectively.
Regarding breastfeeding practice, 94% of participants initiated breastfeeding during the first hour, which is high in relation to 81.8% in Ethiopia, [16] and approximately 60% in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. [17] Pre-lacteal feed was not common and only 8% of participants gave pre-lacteal feed to their children which is low compared to about two third 66% in the study of Kiran Bala et al.[21]
Colostrum feeding was done by 86.7% which is high compared to many other studies like that in Pakistan by Moazzam Ali Khan et al, 2016 in which colostrum feeding was 73% [23] and of El-Minia Egypt which was 74%.[15] Only 21.9% of women fed their child from one side until the whole breast is emptied out so that the baby gets hind milk which is important for the brain development. This was relatively high compared to 17.3% in the study of Mohammed et al. [15] Breastfeeding on demand was rather unpopular in our study with around 41% of mothers practicing it, unlike the research of Mohammed et al, Egypt in which almost 96% breastfed on demand. This could be due to that there were a higher percentage of employed mothers in this study, hence less availability to breastfeed on demand. Prolactin is secreted after feed to produce next feed. As secretion of prolactin is more at night, suckling at night is encouraged. In the current study 99% of mother’s night-fed their children which is high compared to 72%in. Mohammed et al. study. [15]
Furthermore, in this study, 45% of the respondents had practiced or were currently practicing exclusive breastfeeding, which is lower (81.7%) compared to a study conducted in Brazil by Morais et al. in 2016, [24]. This rate was very close to that found in Abu Dhabi, UAE, where 44% of children < 6 months were exclusively breastfed. [17] Conversely, in a study in Italy by Cascone et al, approximately 33% of mothers breastfed exclusively [19], while in Western Saudi Arabia, the rate was 28%.[25]
Moreover, in the current study, only 29% introduced complementary feed after the age of six-months. Unfortunately, this rate was even lower in the research conducted by Bala et al. in 2020 in India, where only 18% of mothers introduced complementary food after this age. [21]
The most common types of complementary food introduced were boiled vegetables (94%) which was similar to that of Panting Lu et al in China (98%) for cereals and potatoes.[26] Furthermore, cow milk was introduced to 40% of children as complimentary feeding. Whereas in Brazil, an increased cow milk consumption from (31.1%) during the first 6 months of age to (81.7%) during the second year of life. [24]
Regarding occupation, mothers on independent jobs(marginal business) were 7.9 times more likely to have poor knowledge when compared to employed women at p-value of 0.034, Housewives showed a 5 times less knowledge than women employed p-value 0.043.This could be due to that employment in the formal sector requires that employees to be of a certain minimum level of education.
Those of primary education and below were 4.8 times likely to have poor knowledge than those with education level higher than primary school, at p-value 0.000. This could be due to the exposure to breastfeeding and nutrition lessons during their education journey whereas; those younger than 25 years were 2 times more likely to have poor knowledge than older women with a p-value 0.026 this could be explained by the years of cumulative knowledge gained by elder women. Mothers who delivered at home had 2 times lower knowledge levels than those who gave birth in a health institute this could be explained by the possible exposure of those who delivered at institute to instruction and counseling by a trained health personnel on the importance of breastfeeding.
With respect to attitude, the only significant attributable factor was education and income level; and when these variables were tested using multinomial regression model none of them was a significant predicator of attitude.