In our study, prematurity was positively related to the future development of asthma and AR in the pediatric population, while being protective against the development of AD. These results are consistent with findings from other nationwide databases or reviews on asthma and AD, with a stronger correlation observed as gestational age decreases6,15–17. Although beyond the scope of this study, the possible etiology of prematurity-associated asthma is multifactorial. Factors may include the underdevelopment of the airway, antibiotic use, increased risks for viral respiratory infections, decreased breastfeeding, and altered microbiota18. On the other hand, the cause for the association of prematurity with a lower risk of AD was proposed to be the increased permeability of their immature skin, early antigen exposure in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), and altered skin microbiota17.
Adversely, the association between prematurity and the development of AR is controversial in relation to previous studies. Some studies describe that prematurity is associated with AR development in certain gestational ages during childhood but becomes protective in young adults19,20. While it is possible that AR was only associated with prematurity in certain population, we speculated that the inconsistency in observations were due to follow-up period. The development of atopic diseases takes years to complete, and differences become visible after antigen exposure as these children grow up. However, the effects may not last into adulthood due to medical interventions and the complexity of other exposures. Studies revealed that asthma and AR share symptoms and etiology with histologic evidence. Even for those AR patients without asthma, eosinophilic infiltration could be identified in bronchial mucosa21. The ”one airway, one disease” concept underscores the similarity between the two conditions, supporting our results and emphasizing the need for simultaneous evaluation and treatment22.
In our study, SGA was not associated with the development of atopic diseases in term infants of both sexes. Weak association found between SGA and AR in preterm infants, lacking statistical significance. Several studies have reported the association between fetal growth restriction and atopic diseases. For example, a cohort study based on national registers in Denmark, Sweden, and Finland found that SGA was associated with a slightly increased risk of hospitalization for asthma in term infants8. Additionally, a cohort survey in the UK revealed prenatal faltering of linear growth prior to the onset of atopic eczema in infancy23. It is worth noting that these correlations were modest despite a large sample size and conflicting with other research24. Fetal growth alterations can manifest in a wide variety of forms for SGA infants, ranging from asymmetrical intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), which is often caused by extrinsic exposure such as placental insufficiency, to symmetrical IUGR, driven by intrinsic factors such as early intrauterine infections, aneuploidy, and the risk of preterm birth. SGA alone may not adequately describe the developmental exposures. Furthermore, IUGR fetuses tend to be born prematurely, often before the condition of SGA can be identified at birth25. Maternal complications, including preeclampsia and gestational hypertension, can also contribute to fetal growth alterations26,27. Concurrently, both conditions were related to the future development of atopic diseases in their offspring28,29. Mothers of SGA infants in our cohort had a higher incidence of preeclampsia and gestational hypertension, especially among those of preterm infants, which may significantly impact our results despite statistical adjustment. Finally, mothers with atopic disorders are prone to have SGA or preterm babies, which are themselves risk factors for the future development of atopic diseases in their children30. Thus, we speculate that the findings were caused by weak correlations between SGA and the development of atopic diseases, a dilution effect of preterm birth prior to fetal growth restriction, and other factors correlating with fetal growth that are more related to the development of atopic diseases.
Our study has several strengths. It is the first nationwide cohort study depicting atopic risks for preterm and SGA infants in Taiwan, and the results have higher confidence levels due to the large number of participants covered by the NHI. The provided data is suitable for further study on atopic diseases in preterm and SGA infants as a reference, aiding in the development of prevention or screening strategies. Based on the high coverage rate of NHI in Taiwan and multiple linked health-related databases, including the TMCHD, the association between perinatal exposures and other immune-related disorders could be further explored.
The limitations of the current study mainly lie in the nature of the database. Several confounding factors could not be fully adjusted due to unavailable information such as the severity of SGA and maternal atopic diseases. Second, data acquired did not consider the moving and time-activity patterns of the participants. Exposure of the children and mothers to environmental factors such as air pollution, which is closely linked to atopic diseases, was only partially reflected in the urbanization level of birth locations. Third, although we managed to include the entire pediatric period, the optimal follow-up length remained unknown. It takes years for prenatal or perinatal exposure to show an association with chronic disorders like atopic diseases. Yet, as the follow-up period increases, the association would be theoretically diluted by other exposures, which is impossible to be fully calculated.
In summary, our study suggests that prematurity increases the risk of asthma and AR but reduces the likelihood of AD in Taiwanese children. Integrated prevention and screening strategies are crucial for this population. While SGA shows no association with atopic diseases in full-term infants, it may modestly increase the risk of AR in premature infants. Exploring alternative fetal growth indicators like the Ponderal Index could provide deeper insights. Further research is needed to elucidate underlying mechanisms and establish causal relationships.