In the study period, 288 patients completed the scales. Most patients were female (67%) with a mean age of 15.25 years. The median time since diagnosis was 12 months and median duration of drug usage was 27.42 months. Additionally, 55.56% of the patients used a single medication and 1.46 drugs were prescribed per patient (Table 1). Moreover, 28.13% of the patients were experienced side effects. A total of 107 side effects were reported, with an average of 1.32 side effects per patient. Among them, the most commonly observed side effect was drowsiness (25.24%).
Table 1. Descriptive parameters of patients (n=288)
Age (years), mean (standart deviation)
|
15.25 (1.59)
|
Duration of diagnoses (months), median (range)
|
12 (2-120)
|
Duration of medication use (months), median (range)
|
27.42 (2-120)
|
Stages of adolescents, n (%)
|
Early adolescence (12-14 years)
|
110 (38.19)
|
|
Mid-late adolescence (15-18 years)
|
178 (61.81)
|
Sex, n (%)
|
Male
|
95 (33.0)
|
|
Female
|
193 (67.0)
|
Number of medications, n (%)
|
1
|
160 (55.56)
|
|
≥2
|
128 (44.44)
|
Presence of side effect, n (%)
|
Yes
|
81 (28.13)
|
|
No
|
185 (64.24)
|
|
Unknown
|
22 (7.64)
|
Among the patients included in the study, the majority of them were diagnosed with hyperkinetic disorders (adhd?) (n=119; 30.13%), anxiety disorders (n=100; 25.32%), depressive episodes (n=87; 22.03%), eating disorder (n=33; 8.35%) followed by obsessive-compulsive disorder (n=23; 5.82%) as their primary psychiatric diagnoses. Upon analyzing the groups of medications used by the patients, it was determined that the patient mostly use antidepressants (34.72%) followed by antidepressant - antipsychotic combinations (21.53%), stimulants (20.14%), and stimulants-antipsychotic combinations (8.68%). Regarding the specific medications utilized, the most commonly prescribed antidepressant was sertraline (n=112; 26.60%), antipsychotic was risperidone (n=46; 10.93%), and psychostimulant was methylphenidate (n=105; 24.94%) (Table 2).
Table 2. Drug Groups and Medications Used by Patients (n=288).
Classes of Medications
|
Medications
|
n (%)
|
Antidepressant
|
Sertraline
|
112 (26.60)
|
Fluoxetine
|
68 (16.15)
|
Escitalopram
|
8 (1.90)
|
Venlafaxine
|
7 (1.66)
|
Antipsychotic
|
Risperidone
|
46 (10.93)
|
Aripiprazole
|
38 (9.03)
|
Quetiapine
|
12 (2.85)
|
Olanzapine
|
8 (1.90)
|
Haloperidol
|
3 (0.71)
|
Psychostimulant
|
Methylphenidate
|
105 (24.94)
|
Atomoxetine
|
9 (2.14)
|
Anxiolytic
|
Alprazolam
|
3 (0.71)
|
Medazepam
|
1 (0.24)
|
Hydroxyzine
|
1 (0.24)
|
TOTAL
|
|
421 (100.00)
|
PMAS and PAMS Scores Associations Between Descriptive Parameters
Despite the observed significant correlation between the scores of PMAS and PAMS, it is important to note that the Pearson correlation coefficient indicates a weak relation between the two variables. However, the total score of the PAMS exhibits a noteworthy correlation with both the necessity and concern scores (Table 3). The patients were categorized into two groups based on their age either early or mid-late adolescence. The PMAS and PAMS scores did not indicate any significant difference between the two groups (p>0.05). However, the PMAS score tended to increase with increasing anxiety scores and negative approaches to drug treatment as age increased. Although this association was statistically significant, the correlation was found weak. When comparing scale scores based on gender, there was a significant difference observed in the total PAMS score and anxiety dimension scores (p<0.01). Women had higher mean (standard deviation, SD) total PAMS scores [2.51 (0.69)] and anxiety scores [2.77 (0.92)] than men [2.25 (0.60) and 2.31 (0.80), respectively] (p<0.05).
Table 3. Correlation coefficients of Pediatric Medication Adherence Scale and Pediatric Attitudes toward Medication Scale scores
Scales (n=288)
|
PMAS
|
PAMS-N
|
PAMS-C
|
PAMS-T
|
PMAS
|
1
|
0,332**
|
-0,206**
|
-0,326**
|
PAMS-N
|
0,332**
|
1
|
-0,124*
|
-0,571**
|
PAMS-C
|
-0,206**
|
-0,124*
|
1
|
0,886**
|
PAMS-T
|
-0,326**
|
-0,571**
|
0,886**
|
1
|
* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level. ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level, PAMS-C: Pediatric Attitudes toward Medication Scale-Concern, PAMS-N: Pediatric Attitudes toward Medication Scale-Necessity, PAMS-T: Pediatric Attitudes toward Medication Scale-Total, PMAS: Pediatric Medication Adherence Scale.
Patients' observation of side effects was significantly negatively correlated with the PMAS scores (p<0.05). Furthermore, presence of side effects was significantly and positively correlated with anxiety and PAMS total scores (p<0.05). Although no significant correlation was found with the number of medications, the PAMS total scores [monotherapy vs. polypharmacy; 2.33 (0.66) and 2.54 (0.67), respectively] and concern scores [monotherapy vs. polypharmacy; 2.46 (0.88) and 2.82 (0.90), respectively] of patients who received monotherapy were significantly lower than those who received more than one medication (p<0.01). However, there was no significant correlation with adherence and necessity scores (p=0.067).
Significant differences were observed among the PAMS scores of patients with different primary psychiatric diagnoses, indicating that there were variations between the groups (p<0.05). Specifically, significant differences were found between hyperkinetic disorders-eating disorders and eating disorders-obsessive-compulsive disorder and PAMS scores. This indicates that patients diagnosed with eating disorders showed a more negative attitude towards drug treatment compared to patients diagnosed with hyperkinetic disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Moreover, patients with eating disorders revealed greater anxiety in approaching medication compared to those with hyperkinetic disorders (p=0.028). However, no significant difference was detected between the adherence scores of patients with different primary diagnoses (p>0.05).
This study analyzed the association between drug combination types of patients and their PMAS, PAMS, and relevant factors. The results revealed that patients taking an antidepressant-antipsychotic combination (n=62) showed significantly higher PMAS scale scores than those solely taking stimulants (n=58) (p<0.005). Furthermore, the group receiving the drug combination also demonstrated higher anxiety scores (p<0.001) (Figure 1).