Animals
All female adult Sprague-Dawley rats (eight weeks old, weighing 180–220 g) were purchased from the Animal Experimental Center (Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China). All experimental procedures were approved by the Guangxi Medical University Ethics Committee (approval No. 202105013) in May 2021 and were performed in strict accordance with the National Institutes of Health guidelines for laboratory animal care and safety. Following SCI, many animals suffer from urination dysfunction. The urethra of female rats is wide and short, which is convenient for squeezing urine out of the bladder. Thus, female rats were chosen for this experiment. All rats were housed in an Specefic Pathogen Free (SPF) environment at 22–24℃ under a 12-hour light-dark cycle, with food and water consistently available. The rats were randomized into the following five groups: the sham group, the SCI group, the SCI + tDCS group, the SCI + tDCS + miR-negative control (NC) group, and the SCI + tDCS + miR-agomir group.
Establish SCI animal model
The SCI rat model was implemented on the basis of a modified version of Allen’s method. Briefly, pentobarbital (1%, 50 mg/kg) was used to anesthetize each rat, which was then immobilized in the prone position. Then, the rat underwent a laminectomy at the thoracic vertebra level to expose the T10 spinal segment. Afterward, a stereotaxic apparatus (Ruiwode Life Science Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China) was used to secure the rat, and the dorsal surface of the spine was submitted to weight-drop injury using a 10-g impact rod with a diameter of 3 mm that was released from a 5-cm vertical height through a glass tube[15, 30, 31].The striking force on the dura mater and spinal cord measured 50 g (Fig. 1a and Fig. 1b). The rats with signs of hyperaemia and edema on the surface of the spinal cord surrounding T10, spasmodic tail-wagging reflection, retraction flutter of the body and lower limbs, and flaccid paralysis of both hind limbs represented a successful application of the model[10, 17, 32]. In the sham group, the rats underwent laminectomy without further spinal cord contusion. Finally, for all of the rats, the muscles and skin were disinfected and sutured separately. After the operation, each rat received an intraperitoneal injection of penicillin daily for three consecutive days. Their bladders were checked and manually massaged twice a day to help in urinating.
Motor function evaluation
According to the Basso–Beattie–Bresnahan (BBB) scale, the hind limb function of the rats was evaluated blindly before and one, three, five, and seven days after each operation in an open field by two trained independent observers. The evaluation time for each rat was 5 min, and the scores ranged from 0 to 21 points (0 points indicated complete paralysis, and 21 points meant normal locomotion)[33]. Rats with BBB scores higher than 3 on the first postoperative day were excluded due to modeling failure, and backup rats were then supplemented in the model.
The swim test is another scoring system for assessing functional recovery. One week before surgery, all the rats were trained to swim from one end of the glass-filled tank to the other for five consecutive days. The rats in each group were then scored by the Louisville Swimming Scale (LSS)[34], which evaluates forelimb dependence, hindlimb movement and alternation, trunk instability, and body angle. Mean scores were calculated when tested more than twice for each ra
tDCS-protocol
Twenty-four hours after the SCI, the rats underwent a tDCS procedure (1 m A, 20 min, 10 min per side) each day for seven days[35-37]. First, the fur around the bregma was shaved to ensure the tight attachment of the electrodes. Then, the anode and cathode electrodes—both pediatric electrocardiogram electrodes with conductive hydrogel—were trimmed to a contact area of 1.5 cm2 for a better fit [38].The anode was then fixed to the skin with an adhesive tape over the M1 area (3 mm to the left of the bregma, and 2 mm in front of the interaural line) and then connected to a battery-driven stimulator. (ActivaTek lnc., Gilroy, CA, USA). The cathode electrode was placed over the supraorbital area (midpoint between the lateral angles of both eyes)[39]. The rats were restrained by a soft cloth during stimulation[40, 41](Fig. 2).
High-throughput miRNA sequencing
To assess possible changes of miRNA in response to tDCS after SCI, rats were anesthetized at seven days post-tDCS, and a 10-mm long spinal cord segment (at a distance of approximately 0.5 cm from the injury epicenter) was harvested. The total RNA was extracted using Trizol (Invitrogen, CA), and the concentration was quantified. Regarding microarray detection, hybridization and analysis were performed using mirDeep2 software based on the miRBase database. The miRNA sequencing was performed by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China). The threshold set for upregulated and downregulated genes was a p-value < 0.05 and a |log2 fold change (FC)| > 1.
Luciferase Reporter Assay
A bioinformatics analysis was then performed using TargetScan (http://www.targetscan.org/vert_72/) to identify the favorable binding site between miR-298-5p and LC3. A wild-type (WT) LC3 3’UTR fragment containing the putative miR-298-5p binding sequence, along with the mutant version (MU), was ordered from Sangon Biotech. (Shanghai, China). The above sequences were cloned into a psiCHECK-2 dual-luciferase vector (Promega, USA) to generate LC3-WT and LC3-MU recombinant vectors. PC-12 cells were plated in 96-well plates for co-transfection with LC3-WT/LC3-MU plasmids and rno-miR-298-5p mimic or NC. Quantification of luciferase activity after 48 hours of transfection was determined using a luciferase detection system (Madison, USA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
Lentivirus (LV) Construction and Intrathecal Injections
To further explore the function of miR-298-5p, miR-298-5p lentiviral vectors were constructed using GeneChem Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). In the SCI + tDCS + miR-agomir group, the rats were intrathecally injected with LV-rno-miR-298-5p-agomir; in contrast, the rats in the SCI + tDCS + miR-NC group were intrathecally injected with LV-rno-miR-298-5p-NC. The original titers of the lentiviral vector were 6×108 transduction units (TU) / mL. Before injection, lentiviral vectors (6×108 TU/mL) were mixed with 0.01 M phosphate buffer solution (PBS; Servicebio, Wuhan, China) on ice to obtain a final lentiviral vector concentration of 4×108 TU/mL. Subsequently, intrathecal injections of agomir or NC were performed daily for three consecutive days in these rats[42-44]. Experiments were performed one week later.
Haematoxylin & Eosin (H&E) and Nissl Staining
The 10-mm spinal cord segments centered at the injury epicenter were carefully harvested, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde immersion for 24 hours, and then embedded with paraffin.A cross-section (5μm thick) was then placed on a glass slide coated with poly-L-lysine for analysis of the diseased tissue after deaffinity and rehydration. H&E staining was employed to examine the tissue histopathology. After being stained with toluidine blue (1%) for Nissl bodies, the spinal tissue sections were visualized under an optical microscope. (BX53, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
Immunofluorescence analysis
The paraffin-embedded sections were added and incubated with the primary antibodies for an entire night at 4°C. Then, dewaxing was performed to ensure transparency, after which hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) was applied to repair the antigen. Finally, the sections were incubated with a secondary antibody at 37°C for 30 min, incubated with diaminobenzidine (DAB) for 10 min, counterstained with hematoxylin for 3 min, and attached to coverslips. The results were visualized and photographed under an optical microscope. (BX53, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
Transmission electron microscope (TEM)
The tissue segments were then dissected and fixed in glutaraldehyde (2.5%) in sodium phosphate buffer (0.1 M) for 24 hours. After rinsing with PBS, the tissues were post-fixed with osmium tetroxide (1%) in a sodium phosphate buffer. The specimens of spinal tissues were then dehydrated with gradient ethyl alcohol solutions and embedded in epoxy resin. Ultrathin sections were prepared and stained with 2% uranyl acetate and 2.6% lead citrate, which were later visualized using a transmission electron microscope (7800; Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan).
Cell culture and cell model establishment
PC-12 cell lines are often selected as research tools for in vitro SCI studies.[93,59] In line with this approach, PC-12 cells purchased from the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China) were cultured at 37°C with 5% CO2 in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (Gibco, CA, USA) supplemented with 8% fetal bovine serum (Gibco) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin solution mixture (Gibco) .The PC-12 cells were randomly divided into the following six groups: a control group, H2O2 group, H2O2 + miR-mimics group,H2O2 + miR-mimics-NC group, H2O2 + miR-inhibitors group, and H2O2 + miR-inhibitors-NC group. An application of H2O2 (100 µM for six hours) was used to mimic neuronal injury, according to the results of the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values (additional files 1). The PC-12 cells were then transiently transfected with Lipofectamine™ 6000 (Invitrogen, USA), as directed by the manufacturer. The miR-298-5p mimics and inhibitors, along with their corresponding NC mimics and NC inhibitors, were purchased from Jikai Co. (Shanghai, China).
Cell Viability Assay
Cell viability was detected using a Cell Counting Kit-8 assay (CCK-8; Meilun, China). Cells were seeded at a density of 1.5×104 cells/well on the 96-well plate, and then 10 µL of CCK-8 reagent in 90 µl of the medium was added to each well. After 30 min, cell viability was evaluated under a microplate reader (Synergy H1, BioTek, USA) at a wavelength of 450 nm.
Terminal Deoxynucleotidyl Transferase-Mediated dUTP Nick-End Labeling (TUNEL) Staining
A TUNEL kit (Meilun, China) was used to determine the apoptosis of the neurons. The cells were first immobilized using 4% paraformaldehyde. The previously generated tissue sections and cells were then dipped into a TUNEL reaction mixture (50 μL) at 37°C for one hour; after this, the nuclei were stained for 3 min with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) solution. The fluorescence density was observed under a fluorescence microscope (EVOS™ FL Auto 2, Thermo Fisher).
Immunohistochemical
The cell slides and tissue sections were permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 (Solarbio, China) and blocked with 5% goat serum (Gibco) for 30 min at room temperature. Afterward, these samples were incubated at 4°C overnight with primary antibodies against Bcl2-associated X protein (Bax; 1:100, mouse), p62 (1:100, rabbit), and anti-light chain 3 (LC3; 1:100, rabbit). Tissue sections were also stained with neurofilament protein-200 (NF-200; 1:200, rabbit) and cluster of differentiation 31 (CD31;1:200, mouse). These primary antibodies were all obtained from Proteintech (Wuhan, China) . After washing with PBS, the samples were subsequently stained for two hours with the appropriate secondary antibody (1:400, goat anti-rabbit conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488; 1:200 rat anti-rabbit conjugated to Alexa Fluor 549; UElandy Suzhou, China) at room temperature. Finally, the samples were counterstained using DAPI (1 μg/mL) and covered with coverslips. Images were captured via fluorescence microscopy (BX51, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
Western blot analysis (WB)
The total protein in each of the samples was extracted using RIPA buffer (89900, Thermo Fisher, USA). Proteins per sample were resolved by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). After that, the separated samples were transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA). The membranes were subsequently blocked by 5% skimmed milk in Tris-buffered saline and 1% Tween 20 (TBST, Thermo Fisher, USA) at room temperature for one hour and incubated at 4°C overnight with the primary antibodies, which included rabbit β-Actin, rabbit LC3, rabbit beclin1, rabbit p62, mouse Bax, and rabbit Bcl2 (all diluted 1:2000, Proteintech, China); with rabbit β-Actin serving as an internal control. After washing with TBST, the membranes were incubated in the secondary antibody (goat anti-rabbit IgG, 1:15000, Proteintech, China) for another hour at room temperature. The LiCor Odyssey Scanner was used for blot scanning, and the Odyssey 3.0 software package (LiCor, USA) was used for the analysis.
Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR)
Total RNA in the samples was extracted with the NucleoZol RNA reagent (Macherey–Nagel, Düren, Germany) and then reversely transcribed into cDNAs through a PrimeScript RT reagent kit with a gDNA eraser (code no. RR047A, Takara, Japan) or PrimeScript RT Master Mix (code no. RR036Q/A/B, Takara, Japan). TB GreenprexExTaqII (code number. RR820Q/A/B, Takara, Japan) and the Applied Biosystems 7500 real-time PCR instrument (Applied Biosystems, USA) were used to evaluate the PCR reactions. U6/β-actin was employed as the internal control for miRNA and mRNA, respectively. The relative gene expression levels were calculated by the 2-ΔΔCt methods. The primer sequences are listed in Table1.
Table 1. Primer sequence for quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction
|
Forward (5’-3’)
|
Reverse (3’-5’)
|
rno-miR-298-5p
|
GGAGGGCTGTTCTTCCCAA
|
mRQ 3’primer (Takara, Japan)
|
Bcl-2
|
GACTGAGTACCTGAACCGGCATC
|
CTGAGCAGCGTCTTCAGAGACA
|
Bax
|
TGGCGATGAACTGGACAACAA
|
GGGAGTCTGTATCCACATCAGCA
|
LC3
|
AGCTCTGAAGGCAACAGCAACA
|
GCTCCATGCAGGTAGCAGGAA
|
p62
|
TGAAGGCTATTACAGCCAGAGTCAA
|
CCTTCAGTGATGGCCTGGTC
|
U6
|
GGAACGATACAGAGAAGATTAGC
|
TGGAACGCTTCACGAATTTGCG
|
β-actin
|
TGTCACCAACTGGGACGATA
|
GGGGTGTTGAAGGTCTCAAA
|
Statistical Analysis
The statistical tests of all the data were completed by SPSS software (version 25.0, USA) and GraphPad Prism software (version 8.0, USA), Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation from at least three independent experiments in this study. The measurement data were first analysed for normal distribution. One-way ANOVA was performed, followed by Tukey's post-hoc test for Comparisons among multiple groups. Comparisons between the two groups were conducted using Student’s t-tests. For comparisons of motor scores, repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed. Statistical significance was denoted as follows: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.