Prevalence of Chronic Back Pain among Health Workers at Bashir Teaching Hospital - 2022

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4366254/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

Prevalence of Chronic Back Pain among Health Workers at Bashir Teaching Hospital - 2022

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4366254/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

You are reading this latest preprint version

Introduction

: Chronic back pain is defined as pain that continues for 12 weeks or longer is the second most pain reported after headache. It is a very common symptom affecting nearly everyone at certain time in their lives. Chronic back pain is a significant problem for healthcare workers as it contributes to missed participation time, disability and serious emotional issues.

Objectives

The purpose was to measure the prevalence of chronic back pain and prevalence related with speciality, gender, time spent in work and the effect on daily activities and performance among health care workers in Bashir teaching hospital.

Method

A cross sectional study using self-administered closed ended online questionnaire by google form, stratified random sampling was conducted among Bashir hospital health workers. The questionnaire collected data regarding having chronic back pain, Specialty, duration of working, working hours and affection of daily activities.

Results

Out of 171 participants, the overall prevalence of chronic back pain amounted to 72 (42.1%), prevalence in males was 38.3% while in females was 63.7%. Prevalence in doctors was 59.1%, nurses 28.7%, lab doctors 5.8%, midwifes 4.1% and pharmacist 2.3%. participants less than 24years was 24%, between 24 and 35 years was 56.1%, more than 35years 19.9%.

Conclusions

The prevalence of chronic back pain is more than 40% of the participants, doctors mostly affected while the nurses come second. female higher involved than male. CBP had rule on reduction of daily activities and psychological health aspects although most of participants had mild to moderate back pain.

Chronic back pain

Bashir hospital

health workers

Sudan

1.1. Background:

Chronic back pain (CBP) is defined as pain that continues for 12 weeks or longer is the second most pain reported after headache. It is a very common symptom affecting nearly everyone at certain time in their lives [1]. It occurs in high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries and all age groups from children to the elderly population mainly because of population increase and ageing, with the biggest increase seen in low-income and middle-income countries. CBP is now the leading cause of disability worldwide [2]

It is an important public health issue, being of widespread and of a considerable negative social, psychological, and economic influence. It is being one of the main causes of seeking medical help worldwide with high treatment cost and association with feeling sick and suffering [3, 4]. CBP is common global problem that affect both work and quality of life, it's a one of the leading causes of disability worldwide.

In sever form it may lead to missing of working days with negative impact on individual and community productivity [5]Frequently, it is more common among individuals with exhausting occupations; in the world, 37% of CBP is related to occupations in which professionals are exposed to vibrations or prolonged periods of standing, such as miners, health care workers (HCWs) cause working with patients often involves excessive strain on low back resulting from the need to maintain a forced body position [2]

The systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Diseases suggested that among 369 diseases and injuries, low back pain (LBP) is one of the top four causes of disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) in the 25-year to 49-year age group, Chronic Back Pain has also become a major cause of productivity loss [6].

There has been a rapid increase in the number of published papers investigating the prevalence and risk factors of chronic back pain across different categories of health workers in different parts of the world. With studies reporting a wide range of chronic back pain prevalence rates.

CBP is a significant problem for healthcare workers as it contributes to missed participation time, disability and serious emotional issues.

To the best of our knowledge, no research has yet been conducted on CBP in the health professional sector in Sudan. As health professionals are individual workers who work for patients from different settings, it is difficult to envision that Sudan medical counsel laws alone would suffice to protect their health issues. Instead, introducing health guidelines along with laws and promoting those guidelines among health workers could be an effective strategy to tackle the burden of chronic back pain among this group. Therefore, the present study focused on quantifying the prevalence of chronic back pain and identifying the associated individual and occupational factors among health workers in Bashir hospital in Sudan.

1.2. Objectives:

General Objectives:

To assess prevalence of chronic back pain among health workers.

Specific objectives:

To assess the prevalence of chronic back pain among different health workers in Bashir hospital.

To determine the difference in prevalence of chronic back pain according to gender.

To Test the association between time spent in work and chronic back pain.

To estimate the effect of chronic back pain on daily activities and performance at work.

2.1. Study design and setting:

A Descriptive, cross sectional, hospital-based study conducted in Bashair teaching hospital, Khartoum, Sudan. Targeting health care workers including doctors, nurses, pharmacists, laboratory doctors and midwives. With exclusion criteria include: have back pain before working, known to have history of trauma, known to have rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis, have any disorder of the back, health workers who are not hospital staff.

2.2. Sample size and technique:

Calculated using Yamane formula found to be 170. Collected through stratified random sampling

n = N/(1 + N(e)2)

Where:

n is the sample size to be computed

N is the population size = 592

e is the accepted marginal error (0.05)

n = 592/1 + 592(0.05)2

n = 238

we used adjusted sample size equation to minimize of small population.

n = n0/(1+(n0-1/N)

n = 238/(1+(238-1/529)) = 170

2.3. Data collection and analysis:

The data collected through structured, self-administered, closed ended online questionnaire by google form. Then analysed using Statistical package of social services (SPSS). Version22

2.4. Ethical considerations:

Ethical approval and permission obtained from Al Neelain institutional review board and Bashir teaching hospital. Also inform consent written from participants was obtained.

171 participants were recruited into this study. Most of them were female (63.7%) and aged 24–35 (56.1%) Table.1

Table 1

Individual factors of participants
Variable		NO.	Present %
Gender	Male	62	36.3%
Gender	Female	109	63.7%
Age	Less than 24	41	24.0%
	24–35	96	56.1%
	35–45	13	7.6%
	45–55	8	4.7%
	55–65	8	4.7%
	More than 65	5	2.9%
What is your specialty	Doctor	101	59.1%
	Nurse	49	28.7%
	Laboratory doctor	10	5.8%
	Midwife	7	4.1%
	Pharmacist	4	2.3%

The prevalence of back pain was found to be 72 (42.1%) Table 2.

Table.2 prevalence of back pain

Variable		NO.	%
Are you Complain from back pain	Complain of back pain	72	42.1%
Are you Complain from back pain	Not complaining of back pain	99	57.9%

Cross tabulation between prevalence of back pain and demographic characteristic showed that there is no significant difference between male and female. Participant with age ranged between 24–25 years are the most affected one with significant association (P = 0.001). another significant association was found between speciality and back pain with doctors being the most affected speciality.

Table.3 prevalence of back pain among participants and demographic characteristic

		Are you Complain from back pain				P value
		Complain of back pain		Not complaining of back pain
		NO.	%	NO.	%
Gender	Male	28	38.9%	34	34.3%
Gender	Female	44	61.1%	65	65.7%	P = .326
	Total	72	100%	99	100%	P = .326
Age	Less than 24	12	16.7%	29	29.3%
	24–35	37	51.4%	59	59.6%
	35–45	5	6.9%	8	8.1%	P = 0.001
	45–55	6	8.3%	2	2.0%
	55–65	8	11.1%	0	0.0%
	More than 65	4	5.6%	1	1.0%
	Total	72	100%	99	100%
What is your specialty?	Doctor	45	62.5%	56	56.6%
	Nurse	13	18.1%	36	36.4%	P = .010
	Laboratory doctor	5	6.9%	5	5.1%
	Midwife	5	6.9%	2	2.0%
	Pharmacist	4	5.6%	0	0.0%
	Total	72	100%	99	100%

Most of the participants had back pain for less than 3 months. With confined pain to the back.

Table.4 The prevalence of back pain and questions related to back pain

Variable		NO.	Present %
If yes for how long	Less than 3 months	21	29.2%
	3 months - year	17	23.6%
	Year − 5 years	19	26.4%
	More than 5 years	15	20.8%
Total		72	100%
The origin of pain	Confined to the back " localized "	63	87.5%
The origin of pain	Radiated to the leg "referred"	9	12.5%
Total		72	100%
Severity of pain	Mild	39	54.9%
	Moderate	27	38.0%
	Severe	3	4.2%
	Very severe	1	1.4%
	Worst	1	1.4%
Total		72	100%

A negative correlation was found between years spend working and complaining of back pain (r=-.363, n = 72, P < 0.001) as the health workers who were working in the medical filed for less than a year were the most complaining of back pain. [Table.5] [Figure.10]. Meanwhile no correlation between days the participants worked and complaining of back pain (r=-.058, n = 72, P = .453) [Table.5]

Most of the participants who complained from back pain worked between 8–12 hours' shifts 33(45.8%). This finding was found to be statistically significant (P = .017). but didn’t indicate a correlation between working hours a shift and back pain (r=-.182, n = 72, P = .017) [Table.5]

Table.5 the relationship Occupational factors and back pain

		Are you Complain from back pain				Correlation	P value
		Complain of back pain		Not complaining of back pain
		NO.	%	NO.	%
How many years you have been working	0–1	28	38.9%	76	76.8%
	1–5	18	25.0%	8	8.1%
	5–10	8	11.1%	11	11.1%	r=-.363	P < 0.001
	More than 10 years	18	25.0%	4	4.0%
Total		72	100%	99	100%
How many days per week are you working	1–3	38	52.8%	58	58.6%
How many days per week are you working	4–7	34	47.2%	41	41.4%	r=-.058	P = .453
Total		72	100%	99	100%	r=-.058	P = .453
How many hours you are working per day	Less than 8	8	11.1%	22	22.2%
	8–12	33	45.8%	50	50.5%	r=-.182	P = .017
	More than 24	31	43.1%	27	27.3%
Total		72	100%	99	100%

A statistically significant finding found (P < 0.001) in regard to the effect of back pain in the daily activity of participants with only 21(29.2%) claimed that the pain was sever enough to get absence from work in compare to 51(70.8%) absence of work due to pain.

[Table.6]

Table.6 the effect of back pain on daily activity and performance at work.

		back pain		P value
		No,	%	P value
Did you get absence from work due to back pain before	Yes	21	29.2%	P < 0.001
Did you get absence from work due to back pain before	No	51	70.8%
Total		72	100%
Did you change the specialty or reduce the number of working hours due to back pain	Yes	18	25.0%
	No	54	75.0%	P < 0.001
Total		72	100%	P < 0.001
Did back pain affect your psychological health	Yes	41	56.9%	P < 0.001
Did back pain affect your psychological health	No	31	43.1%
Did back pain affect your daily activities and performance	Yes	52	72.2%
Did back pain affect your daily activities and performance	No	20	27.8%	P < 0.001
Total		72	100%	P < 0.001

After through literature review back pain clearly demonstrate one of the most complain that affect health workers worldwide with percentage differ from one nation to another. Statistical analysis of the collected data demonstrated that 42.1% of the health workers at Bashir Teaching Hospital were suffering from chronic back pain. The geographical location of the hospital as being the nearest public hospital for many citizens habit in that area is considered important factor for this high percent of chronic back pain as this associated with increasing effort of working since the health workers will be busy through all the working hours.

The reported percentage goes in line with many studies conducted in different countries. This finding is attributed to similarity of work setting and health delivery system [7–9]. However, many other studies reported higher incidence of chronic pain [10–12]. Which is justified by differences in methods used, socio-economic status and socio-demographic distribution in these countries.

Female rather than male were found to have a significant association with chronic back pain this variation could be related to the anatomical, physiological, and structural differences between both gender and females tended to do extra professional activities in the household. This association is reported in the previous studies conducted in Egypt, Italy, Saudi Arabia and Turkey [11–13]

The doctors were found to be the most complaining of chronic back pain as they represent 62.5% among health worker. Nurses come the second as they represent 18.1%. This might be because doctors and nurses had direct patient contact with manual handling, transferring, prolonged standing, frequent bending and twisting. Similar finding is reported by another study [14]. Nurses is also found to be the most affected health workers by back pain in another studies [15, 16].

Health workers that worked for less than a year were the most complaining of back pain. Maybe due to matter of less experience and skills which results in bad deal and poor knowledge of safety behaviors. The majority of the participants who complained from back pain worked between 8–12 hours’ and more than 24 hours' s shifts. This could be due to sustained sitting as compared to those who had not sustained sitting (sitting more than two hours). Working for more than 8 hours also found to be a significant factor associated with back pain a reported in other study [8]

In regard to the effect of back pain in the daily activity. 29.2% of the participants mentioned that the pain was severe enough to get absence from work which is quite similar to study conducted in Denizli reported that 21% of their participants were become off work due to severe back pain [14]

On addition chronic back pain affect the psychological health of most participants as they represented 56.9% of the participants who complaining of back pain. The highly working demanded and critical situations of this field made a more psychological load for each single individual regardless the specialty and with chronic back pain it might be double.

Limitations

This Study was cross sectional reported just a piece of time and when compared to the annual prevalence may be underestimated or overestimated. The study conducted only on Bashair teaching hospital and if it was including additional hospitals would give more comprehensive results.

The study conclude that the prevalence of chronic back pain is more than forty percent of the participants. The study focused on different specialties doctor, pharmacist, nurse, midwife and laboratory technician. The doctors were found at the higher line to stuck with complaining of back pain while the nurse at the second line. And according to the gender the female was more affected than male.

The influence of back pain has rule on reduction of daily activities especially if we add the psychological aspects which most of participants were getting affected although most of participants had mild to moderate pain.

It could be checkable that the study reported no relationship found between duration spend working and complaining of back pain it's maybe due to limitations of conducting area of study.

Recommendations

Chronic back pain negatively affects health and economical status through reduction of activity performance and decreased work hours. Therefore, it is better to equip the hospital with appropriate assistive devices to decrease the frequent bending and twisting of healthcare workers.

Ethical considerations: Ethical approval and permission obtained from Al Neelain institutional review board and Bashir teaching hospital. Also inform consent written from participants was obtained

Consent for publication: Not applicable

Data Availability Statement: The data used in this study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request

Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding: This research received no external funding

Author Contributions: A.A. and M.M.; conceptualization and methodology, A.A. and A.Abu.; software, H.A.; validation, M.M.; formal analysis, F.S. and A.O; resources, F.S. and A.O.; data curation, A.A. and A.Abu; writing—original draft preparation, M.M.; writing—review and editing, M.H.; supervision.

Acknowledgments: We acknowledge all the the participants who participat in this study and helping us achive this stage

ndersson GB. Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain. Lancet. 1999;354(9178):581-5. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(99)01312-4 [PubMed]Andersson GB. Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain. 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)01312-4Lancet. 1999;354(9178):581–585.
Manzini F, Cesana G, Manzini C, Riva MA. A pioneering patient lift: prevention of low back pain in health care workers in the 18th century. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Jan 15;40(2):126-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000688. PMID: 25575088.
Melloh M, Röder C, Elfering A, Theis JC, Müller U, Staub LP, et al. Differences across health care systems in outcome and cost-utility of surgical and conservative treatment of chronic low back pain: a study protocol. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;9:81. DOI:10.1186/1471-2474-9-81
David GC. Ergonomic methods for assessing exposure to risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Occup Med (Lond) 2005;55:190–9. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqi082
PMeucci RD, Fassa AG, Faria NM. Prevalence of chronic low back pain: systematic review. Rev Saude Publica. 2015;49 doi: 10.1590/S0034-8910.2015049005874.
Carregaro RL, Tottoli CR, Rodrigues DDS, Bosmans JE, da Silva EN, van Tulder M. Low back pain should be considered a health and research priority in Brazil: Lost productivity and healthcare costs between 2012 to 2016. PLoS One. 2020 Apr 1;15(4):e0230902. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230902. PMID: 32236113; PMCID: PMC7112211.
Awosan KJ, Yikawe SS, Oche OM, Oboirien M. Prevalence, perception and correlates of low back pain among healthcare workers in tertiary health institutions in Sokoto, Nigeria. Ghana Med J. 2017 Dec;51(4):164-174. PMID: 29622830; PMCID: PMC5870785.
Tanzil S, Jamali T, Inam SNB, Abbas A (2019) Frequency and Severity of Low Back Pain among Healthcare Providers and Associated Factors in a Tertiary Care, Public Hospital in Karachi. Occup Med Health Aff 7:285. DOI: 10.4172/2329-6879.1000285
Wang HY, Feng YT, Wang JJ, Lim SW, Ho CH. Incidence of low back pain and potential risk factors among pharmacists: A population-based cohort study in Taiwan. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Mar 5;100(9):e24830. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024830. PMID: 33655945; PMCID: PMC7939216.
Abdulmujeeb AB, Olaniyan LT (2017) Prevalence and Factors Associated with Low Back Pain among Healthcare Workers in Kibuli Muslim Hospital Kampala, Uganda. Epidemiology (Sunnyvale) 7:287. Doi: 10.4172/2161-1165.1000287
Almaghrabi A, Alsharif F. Prevalence of Low Back Pain and Associated Risk Factors among Nurses at King Abdulaziz University Hospital. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 7;18(4):1567. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041567. PMID: 33562299; PMCID: PMC7914573.
Alemam, D. Prevalence and Occupational Risk Factors of Low Back Pain among Health Care Workers in Operating Rooms at Mansoura University Main Hospital. The Egyptian Journal of Community Medicine, 2023; 41(1): 3-10. doi: 10.21608/ejcm.2022.139768.1222
Latina R, Petruzzo A, Vignally P, Cattaruzza MS, Vetri Buratti C, Mitello L, Giannarelli D, D'Angelo D. The prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders and low back pain among Italian nurses: An observational study. Acta Biomed. 2020 Nov 30;91(12-S):e2020003. doi: 10.23750/abm.v91i12-S.10306. PMID: 33263343; PMCID: PMC8023105.
Houngbedji GM, Abathan MS, Alagnide E, Kpadonou TG. Prevalence of low back pain inand nurses. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. 2017 Sep 1;60:e20-1.2. Şimşek Ş, Yağcı N, Şenol H. Prevalence of and risk factors for low back pain among healthcare workers in Denizli.
Çınar-Medeni Ö, Elbasan B, Duzgun I. Low back pain prevalence in healthcare professionals and identification of factors affecting low back pain. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2017;30(3):451-459. doi: 10.3233/BMR-160571. PMID: 27858698.
Al-Hadidi F, Bsisu I, Haddad B, AlRyalat SA, Shaban M, Matani N, Dehidi S, Khater Y, Shahrouri R, Al Muzayen T, Al Hawamdeh H. The prevalence of low back pain among female hospital staff at childbearing age. PeerJ. 2020 May 15;8:e9199. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9199. PMID: 32607279; PMCID: PMC7315438.

No competing interests reported.

Download PDF

Editor assigned by journal
06 May, 2024
Submission checks completed at journal
05 May, 2024
First submitted to journal
03 May, 2024

You are reading this latest preprint version

Prevalence of Chronic Back Pain among Health Workers at Bashir Teaching Hospital - 2022

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Introduction

Objectives

Method

Results

Conclusions

Figures

1. Introduction

1.1. Background:

1.2. Objectives:

2. Methodology

2.1. Study design and setting:

2.2. Sample size and technique:

2.3. Data collection and analysis:

2.4. Ethical considerations:

3. Results

4. Discussion

Conclusions

Declarations

References

Additional Declarations

Status:

Version 1