G6PD mutations are distributed worldwide (25) and particularly widespread in malaria endemic regions. A high prevalence of G6PD deficiency has been reported in Africa, Southern Europe, the Middle East, Southeast Asia and the central and southern Pacific islands. However, deficiency alleles are currently quite prevalent in North and South America and in parts of Northern Europe because of fairly recent migration (15). Knowledge of the prevalence of G6PD variants among different ethnic groups is limited. The present study is the first to report the prevalence of G6PD deficiency and G6PD mutations in the Mon-Khmer or Lao Theung ethnic group. The prevalence of G6PD deficiency reported in this study (8.73%) is higher than that previously reported for unspecified ethnic Lao populations (6.21% and 4.40%) (26, 27) (Table 2). However, the prevalence of G6PD deficiency in Lao populations was lower than that reported in neighboring Southeast Asian populations, including Mon (12%) (17), Karen and Burman (13.7%) (28), Thai (11.1%) (18), and Cambodian (26.1%) (19) populations. The prevalence of G6PD deficiency in Laotians had previously been reported in an unspecified ethnic population, and it was suspected that the majority of the studied subjects were Lao Loum, which are the main Laotian ethnic group. In the beginning of G6PD mutation screening, the study of G6PD mutations focused only on the detection of the G6PD Viangchan mutation or identified the G6PD mutation only in males that presented with severe hemolytic anemia (20, 26, 29). Only six previous studies (Table 2) have revealed that the prevalence of G6PD deficiency in the Lao population ranges from 3.30-21.98% in males and 2.50-11.24% in females (20, 26, 27, 29–31). Our study revealed severe G6PD deficiency more frequently in males than in females, whereas moderate and mild G6PD deficiencies were more common in females than in males. Although the females with heterozygous G6PD mutation have sufficient enzyme activity, they can pass an X-linked G6PD mutation to all of their sons along with a risk of developing the symptoms associated with a severe G6PD deficiency.
Table 2
Prevalence and molecular characteristics of G6PD deficiency in Lao PDR.
| This study | Hsia et al.,1993 (13) | Iwai et al., 2001 (14) | Kanchanavithayakul et al., 2017 (15) | Lover et al., 2018 (18) | Bancone et al., 2019 (16) | Ong et al., 2019 (17) |
Sex | | | | | | | |
Male % | 5/78 (6.41%) | 15/74 (20.3%) | 21/291 (7.2%) | 31/141 (21.98%) | 30/910 3.30% | 106/1211 (8.8%) | 63/964 (6.53%) |
Female % | 17/174 (9.77%) | ND | ND | 10/89 (11.24%) | ND | 79/1764 (4.5%) | 27/1079 (2.50%) |
Total % | 22/252 (8.73%) | 15/74 (20.3%) | 21/291 (7.2%) | 41/230 (17.8%) | 30/910 3.3% | 185/2978 (6.2%) | 90/2043 (4.4%) |
G6PD mutation | | | | | | | |
Gaohe 95A > G | ND | - | - | ND | ND | ND | ND |
Aures 143T > C | 17 (6.75%) | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
Asahi 202 G > A | ND | - | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
A 376 A > G | ND | - | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
Vanua Lava 383T > C | - | ND | - | ND | ND | ND | ND |
Mahidol 487G > A | 2 (0.79%) | 2 (2.7%) | - | - | 1 (0.11%) | 4 (0.1%) | ND |
Chinese-3 493 A > G | ND | - | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
Mediterranean 563C > T | - | ND | ND | ND | - | ND | ND |
Coimbra 592C > T | - | ND | - | - | - | ND | ND |
Chinese-1 835 A > T | ND | - | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
Viangchan 871G > A with nt1311T | 1 (0.40) %) | 5 (6.8%) | 9 (3.1%) | 15 (6.5%) | 11 (1.21%) | 115 (3.9%) | 90 (4.4%) |
Jammu 871G > A with nt1311C | 2 (0.79%) | ND | ND | - | ND | ND | ND |
Chatham 1003 G > A | ND | - | - | ND | ND | ND | ND |
Chinese-5 1024 C > T | ND | ND | ND | - | ND | ND | ND |
Surabaya 1291G > A | ND | ND | - | ND | ND | ND | ND |
Union 1360C > T | 3 (1.19%) | 1 (1.4%) | - | 1 (0.4%) | 14 (1.54%) | 9 (0.3%) | ND |
Canton 1376G > T | 1 (0.4%) | - | - | 4 (1.7%) | 4 (0.44%) | 1 (0.03%) | ND |
Kaiping 1388G > A | 2 (0.79%) | 1 (1.4%) | - | 2 (0.9%) | ND | 4 (0.1%) | ND |
Quing Yan 392G > T | 1 (0.4%) | ND | ND | - | ND | 6 (0.2%) | ND |
ND: Not done |
Regarding the mutation characteristic of the G6PD gene, eight G6PD mutations were detected in this Lao Mon-Khmer group. A comparison of the G6PD mutation data collected in this and previous studies of non-specified Lao ethnic populations is summarized in Table 2. The most common G6PD mutation in the Mon-Khmer population was G6PD Aures c.143T > C (6.75%); this result is different from that in a previous report, which found that the G6PD Viangchan mutation was the most common mutation in the Laotian population (1.21–6.76%) (20, 26, 27, 29–31). The G6PD Jammu mutation is an 871G > A mutation identical to the G6PD Viangchan mutation but different from the polymorphism at nucleotide 1311 (nt1311C) detected in this study, whereas the previous report found only G6PD Viangchan in the Laotian population (30). The polymorphisms nt1311C and IVS11 nt93T were randomly detected in this group, different from those reported in other Lao populations (30), the Thai population (nt1311T) (18) and the Chinese population (nt1311T) (32). These data imply that the Mon-Khmer or Lao Theung and Lao Loum groups have different origins. For neighboring Southeast Asian countries, G6PD Mahidol is commonly found in Burmese (18.21%) (27), while G6PD Viangchan is commonly found in Thais (6.0%) (18), Cambodians (17.72%) (27) and Vietnamese (26.7%) (33) but not in the Mon-Khmer population. In addition, we rarely detected the G6PD Canton, G6PD Kaiping and G6PD Union mutations, which are prevalent in South China (34). The G6PD Mediterranean, G6PD Vanua Lava and G6PD Coimbra mutations were not found in this population. The G6PD mutation was not identified in four G6PD-deficient Lao Mon-Khmer participants. The mutation site of those 4 cases may exist in the intron region, which could not be analyzed by our method.
Previous studies showed that the severe G6PD deficiency was caused by nucleotide mutation at or close to the NADP + or G6P binding site (3, 35), which promoted the structural instability of G6PD and resulted in less NADPH production and oxidative stress sensitivity. The G6PD Aures mutation is commonly detected in Mediterranean populations, such as the Saudi Arabian (11.2–20%) (36–38), United Arab Emirates (11.9%) (39) and Kuwaiti (3.73%)(40). The G6PD Aures was detected in 0.7–4.3%of Thai populations (41, 42). This mutation results in the substitution of amino acid 48 from isoleucine to threonine. The WHO has classified the G6PD Aures mutation as a class III mutation (43). The G6PD Aures was located between the sites of G6PD Vietmam-1 and Vietmam-2/Bahia, near G6PD Rignano, which was distant from the protein domain for NADP-1 binding (3, 35). The mutation was predicted to affect the mini-instability of protein domain structure for binding with NADP-1 and to subsequently cause mild G6PD deficiency. A previous report described the person who carried this mutation as having mild G6PD deficiency (44). Our study found that hemizygous males or homozygous females for the G6PD Aures mutation presented with a significant severe G6PD deficiency, whereas the heterozygous females for G6PD Aures had normal G6PD enzyme activity. In contrast to the hemizygous and homozygous groups, the phenotype of G6PD Aures heterozygous females varied from normal to moderately G6PD deficient.
The G6PD Aures mutation is associated with favism, which is a primary clinical manifestation related to acute hemolysis due to G6PD deficiency; however, favism has never been reported in the Lao population, probably because of underestimation or because the fava bean is not a staple food for the Lao people. Our study detected the G6PD Aures mutation in both male and female participants. As the inheritance of G6PD is X-linked, it is very important to address that both homozygous and heterozygous G6PD females can pass the abnormal gene to their male child, leading to the risk of clinically presenting the G6PD Aures mutation. The knowledge about the effect of the G6PD Aures mutation is now still limited, and it is very important to test the hemolytic risk of antimalarial drugs and other oxidative damage related to the G6PD Aures mutation in further studies as the Lao Mon-Khmer people stay around the forest area and have a risk of malaria infections.
The diagnosis of G6PD Aures by PCR sequencing performed during routine molecular testing might be problematic as the G6PD gene flanking the G6PD Aures mutation site must be amplified by PCR, purified and sent for sequencing analysis. To shorten the detection step, we developed ARMS-PCR, which can detect G6PD Aures in one PCR-electrophoresis step. By using the ARMS-PCR method developed in this study, the heterozygous G6PD Aures mutation was additionally detected in 8 female participants. This developed method should be generally applicable to the detection of G6PD Aures.