Epiploic appendagitis also known as “appendicitis epiploica” or “appendagitis,” results from an inflammation of the epiploïc appendix and is usually characterized by acute abdominal pain with localized defense. This symptomatology is due to the torsion-necrosis of an epiploïc fringe [5], which is a small (0.5 to 5 cm length, 1 to 2 cm wider) sub peritoneal fat formation composed of a duplication of the visceral peritoneum covering the colon. It involves the entire colon, including 50 to 100 appendixes which are distributed in order of frequency as follows: recto sigmoid (57%), ileocaecal area (26%), ascending colon (9%), transverse colon (6%), and descending colon (2%) [8].
The vascularization of an epiploic fringe is provided by 1 or 2 small arteries. The pedicular and mobile nature of these epiploic fringes leads to torsion on their axis, resulting to vessel thrombosis, ischemia and necrosis. Thrombosis of the own vessels can also occur and induce the same ischemic and necrotic effects [5, 6, 8].
In pathophysiology, a distinction is made between primary appendagitis when torsion or thrombosis occurs spontaneously and secondary appendagitis when it results from the spread of inflammation from nearby organs, especially in cases of diverticulitis, appendicitis or pancreatitis [7].
It is a rare pathology frequently diagnosed by laparotomy or laparoscopy [5]. The mean age of appearance is 35 years with a sex ratio close to 1. The clinical signs are not specific. The anamnesis reports constant pain, which may be of the grinding or colic type. Diarrhea is found in 25% of cases, moderate fever in 15% of cases [4]. Clinical examination reveals intense pain on palpation or even localized defense as we seen in our case [3]. In most cases, this clinical presentation may mimic other pathological conditions, such as acute appendicitis and diverticulitis (16).
Atypical signs such as respiratory symptoms can be found in cases of appendagitis on the transverse colon as observed in our study or at the angles of the colon, and exceptionally may simulate clinical forms of cholecystitis [4, 5].
Biologically, appendagitis is not associated with biological changes such as hyperleukocytosis or inflammatory syndrome, however changes in these parameters may not necessarily mean that the diagnosis is excluded, but they may suggest complications such as an epiploic abscess, as in the current case [4,8].
Our patient was obese with a body mass index (BMI) of 30 kg/m2, so the ultrasound examination was difficult, however, we visualized a pseudo-mass, ovoid, non-compressible in the painful area, surrounded by a hyperechoic peripheral halo, and these aspects were compatible with those described in the literature [5].
CT scan is still the key modality for diagnosis, avoiding unnecessary surgery, by showing on unenhanced CT images a solitary mass adjacent to the colon, ovoid in a "shuttle" shape, with a higher density than normal peritoneal fat, surrounded by a high-density border [1 mm thik ] that shows inflammation of the visceral peritoneum covering the epiploic appendage, a peripheral fat infiltration is usualy associated with the mass.
A central high density focus can be seen as a "dot sign" appearance, which is highly suggestive of venous thrombus within an inflamed epiploic appendage [ 7, 8]. Post-contrast CT images do not show any enhancement of the epiploic appendagitis or adjacent peritoneum.
Generally, the treatment of uncomplicated forms is conservative, and requires an observation for 24 hours , analgesic and hypocaloric diet. However, some authors have suggested that the surgical method of ligation and excision of inflamed epiploid appendages is the only way to prevent recurrence (16) .
Complications of primary epiploic appendagitis have rarely been described in the literature (14,15) . In fact, the inflammatory process can sometimes cause adhesions and lead to obstruction of the small bowel and therefore require surgical treatment. Another more rare complication is appendagitis with associated abscess, in this condition the diagnosis of epiploic appendagitis secondary to complicated diverticulitis should be sought. For therapeutic management of this complication, there has been much interest in the use of minimally invasive techniques such as percutaneous drainage to minimize the morbidity and mortality that is associated with surgery. However, no clear guidance is currently available to suggest which patients should undergo percutaneous drainage versus surgery (12). Although, laparoscopy or midline laparotomy are necessary on unexpected diagnosis if acute appendicitis or diverticulitis were suspected such as in our case [8, 16, 17].
An anatomo-pathological study of the operating epiploic appendagitis with abscess usually reveals inflammatory changes, the presence of fibrin and neutrophil polynuclear cells, with associated peritoneal reaction including congestion, oedema, and bleeding in the peripheral fat area; also some fibrinoleukocyte exudates on the surface of abcess. (10)
The diagnosis of epiploic appendagitis is still uncommon, however, it is important that a clinician can consider it based on the different imaging modalities available especially abdominal CT scan, which allows to eliminate other conditions presenting as acute abdominal pain such as diverticulitis and appendicitis. It also allows the diagnosis of the rare complicated forms such as abscesses associated with epiploic appendagitis.
The treatment of typical forms is usually conservative, while the complicated form requires surgery because of the potential associated pathology
