[1] John MT, Sekulić S, Bekes K, et al. Why patients visit dentists – A study in all WHO regions. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2020;20(3):1-12.
[2] Isiekwe GI, Sofola OO, Onigbogi OO, Utomi IL, Sanu OO, daCosta OO. Dental esthetics and oral health-related quality of life in young adults. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop.2016;150(4):627–36.
[3] Larsson P, John MT, Nilner K, Bondemark L, List T. Development of an orofacial esthetic scale in prosthodontic patients. Int J Prosthodont. 2010;23(3):249–56.
[4] Simancas-Pallares M, John MT, Prodduturu S, Rush WA, Enstad CJ, Lenton P. Development, validity and reliability of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale - Spanish version. J Prosthodont R. 2018;62(4):456–61.
[5] Kerosuo H, Hausen H, Laine T, Shaw WC. (1995). The influence of incisal malocclusion on the social attractiveness of young adults in Finland. Eur J Orthod.1995;17(6):505-12.
[6] Mittal H, John MT, Sekulić S, Theis-Mahon N, Rener-Sitar K. Dental patient-reported outcome measures for adults: A systematic review. J Evid Based Dent Pr. 2019;1(19):53-70.
[7] Rener-Sitar K, John MT, Truong V, Tambe S, Theis-Mahon N. Nonmalignant oral disease-specific dental patient-reported outcome measures for adult patients: A systematic review. J Evid Based Dent Pr. 2021;1(21):1-21.
[8] Palaiologou A, Kotsakis GA. Dentist-patient communication of treatment outcomes in periodontal practice: A need for dental patient-reported outcomes. J Evid Based Dent Pr. 2020;20(2):101443.
[9] John MT. Health outcomes reported by dental patients. J Evid Based Dent Pr. 2018;18(4): 332–35.
[10] Listl S. Value-based oral health care: Moving forward with dental patient-reported outcomes. J Evid Based Dent Pr. 2019;19(3):255-59.
[11] Persic S, Milardovic S, Mehulic K, Celebic A. Psychometric properties of the Croatian version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale and suggestions for modification. Int J Prosthodont. 2011;24(6):523–33.
[12] Zhao Y, He SL. Development of the Chinese version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale. J Oral Rehabil.2013;40(9):670-77.
[13] Bimbashi V, Čelebić A, Staka G, Hoxha F, Peršić S, Petričević N. Psychometric properties of the Albanian version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale: OES-ALB.BMC Oral Health. 2015;15(1):1-8.
[14] Reissmann DR, Benecke AW, Aarabi G, Sierwald I. Development and validation of the German version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale. Clinical Oral Investigations.2015;19(6): 1443–50.
[15] Wetselaar P, Koutris M, Visscher CM, Larsson P, John MT, Lobbezoo F. Psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale (OES‐NL) in dental patients with and without self‐reported tooth wear. J Oral Rehabil.2015;42(11):803–9.
[16] Reissmann DR, John MT, Enstad CJ, Lenton PA, Sierwald I. (2019). Measuring patients’ orofacial appearance: Validity and reliability of the English-language Orofacial Esthetic Scale. J Am Dent Assoc.2019;150(4):278–86.
[17] Campos LA, Marôco J, John MT, Santos-Pinto A, Campos JADB. Development and psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale: OES-Pt. PeerJ.2020;8:e8814.
[18] Babakus E, Mangold WG. Adapting the SERVQUAL scale to hospital services: an empirical investigation. Health Serv Res. 1992;26(6):767–86.
[19] Gries K, Berry P, Harrington M, Crescioni M, Patel M, Rudell K, Safikhani S, Pease S, Vernon M. Literature review to assemble the evidence for response scales used in patient-reported outcome measures. Journal of patient-reported outcomes. 2018;2(41):1-14.
[20] John MT, Larsson P, Nilner K, Bandyopadhyay D, List T. Validation of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale in the general population. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012;10(135):1-7.
[21] Slade GD, Spencer AJ. Development and evaluation of the Oral Health Impact Profile. Community Dent Health. 1994;11(1):3-11.
[22] Locker D. Measuring oral health: A conceptual framework. Community Dent Health. 1988;5:3–18
[23] PROMIS Cooperative Group. (2013). PROMIS® instrument development and validation scientific standards version 2.0. 0(May), 1–72. https://www.healthmeasures.net/images/PROMIS/PROMISStandards_Vers2.0_Final.pdf Accessed 28 Feb 2021.
[24] Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika.1951;16: 297-334.
[25] Yang FM, Kao ST. Item response theory for measurement validity. Shanghai Arch Psychiatry.2014;26(3):171–77.
[26] Samejima F. Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph Supplement.1969;34:1-97.
[27] Embretson SE. Item response theory for psychologists. 1st ed. Psychology Press;2000.
[28] Hays RD, Morales LS, Reise SP. Item response theory and health outcomes measurement in the 21st Century. Medical Care. 2000;38(9):28-42.
[29] Bock RD, Mislevy R J. Adaptive EAP estimation of ability in a microcomputer environment. Appl Psychol Meas. 1982;6(4):431–44.
[30] Chalmers RP. MIRT: A multidimensional item response theory package for the R environment. J Stat Softw. 2012;48(6):1–29.
[31] DeMars C. Item response theory. 1st ed. New York:Oxford University Press;2010.
[32] Matell MS, Jacoby J. Is there an optimal number of alternatives for Likert-scale items? Educational and Psychological Measurement. 1972;31(3):657–74.
[33] Bendig AW. Reliability and the number of rating-scale categories. J Appl Psychol. 1954;38(1):38–40.
[34] Garner WR. Rating scales, discriminability, and information transmission. Psychol Rev. 1960;67(6):343–52.
[35] Symonds PM. On the loss of reliability in ratings due. J Exp Psychol.1924;7:456–61.
[36] Maydeu-Olivares A, Kramp U, García-Forero C, Gallardo-Pujol D, Coffman D. (2009). The effect of varying the number of response alternatives in rating scales: Experimental evidence from intra-individual effects. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41(2):295–308.
[37] Hendriks AAJ, Vrielink MR, van Es S, De Haes HJ, Smets EM. Assessing inpatients’ satisfaction with hospital care: Should we prefer evaluation or satisfaction ratings? Patient Educ Couns. 2004;55(1):142–46.
[38] Garratt AM, Helgeland J, Gulbrandsen P. Five-point scales outperform 10-point scales in a randomized comparison of item scaling for the Patient Experiences Questionnaire. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(2):200–207.
[39] Peršic̈ S, Palac A, Bunjevac T, Čelebic̈ A. Development of a new chewing function questionnaire for assessment of a self-perceived chewing function. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2013;41(6):565–73.
[40] Leao A, Sheiham A. The development of a socio-dental measure of dental impacts on daily living. Community Dent Health. 1996;13(1):22–26.
[41] Krosnick JA, Berent MK. Comparisons of party identification and policy preferences: The impact of survey question format. Am J Pol Sci. 1993;37(3):941-64.
[42] Hua F. Increasing the value of orthodontic research through the use of dental patient-reported outcomes. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2019;19(2):99-105.
[43] Reissmann DR. Dental patient-reported outcome measures are essential for evidence-based prosthetic dentistry. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2019;19(1):1-6.
[44] Miller GA. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev. 1956;63(2):81-97.
[45] Dawes J. Do data characteristics change according to the number of scale points used? An experiment using 5-point, 7-point and 10-point scales. Int J Mark Res. 2008;50(1):61–77.