Leadership Training Programs in Graduate Medical Education: A Systematic Review
Background : With the increasing recognition that leadership skills can be acquired, there is a heightened focus on incorporating leadership training as a part of graduate medical education. However, there is considerable lack of agreement regarding how to facilitate acquisition of these skills to resident, chief resident, and fellow physicians.
Methods : Articles were identified through a search of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, ERIC, PsycNet, Cochrane Systemic Reviews, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1948 to 2019. Additional sources were identified through contacting authors and scanning references. We included articles that described and evaluated leadership training programs in the United States and Canada. Methodological quality was assessed via the MERSQI (Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument).
Results : 15 studies, which collectively included 639 residents, chief residents, and fellows, met the eligibility criteria. The format, content, and duration of these programs varied considerably. The majority focused on conflict management, interpersonal skills, and stress management. Twelve were prospective case series and three were retrospective. Seven used pre- and post-test surveys, while seven used course evaluations. Only three had follow-up evaluations after six months to one year. MERSQI scores ranged from 6 to 9.
Conclusions : Despite interest in incorporating structured leadership training into graduate medical education curricula, there is a lack of methodologically rigorous studies evaluating its effectiveness. High-quality well-designed studies, focusing particularly on the validity of content, internal structure, and relationship to other variables, are required in order to determine if these programs have a lasting effect on the acquisition of leadership skills.
Figure 1
This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.
Posted 19 May, 2020
On 07 May, 2020
On 06 May, 2020
On 03 Sep, 2019
On 03 May, 2020
Received 30 Apr, 2020
On 09 Mar, 2020
On 21 Feb, 2020
Received 21 Feb, 2020
Invitations sent on 18 Feb, 2020
On 17 Jan, 2020
On 16 Jan, 2020
On 16 Jan, 2020
On 09 Oct, 2019
Received 08 Oct, 2019
Received 08 Oct, 2019
On 23 Sep, 2019
Received 23 Sep, 2019
On 22 Sep, 2019
On 19 Sep, 2019
On 16 Sep, 2019
Invitations sent on 16 Sep, 2019
On 03 Sep, 2019
On 03 Sep, 2019
On 30 Aug, 2019
Leadership Training Programs in Graduate Medical Education: A Systematic Review
Posted 19 May, 2020
On 07 May, 2020
On 06 May, 2020
On 03 Sep, 2019
On 03 May, 2020
Received 30 Apr, 2020
On 09 Mar, 2020
On 21 Feb, 2020
Received 21 Feb, 2020
Invitations sent on 18 Feb, 2020
On 17 Jan, 2020
On 16 Jan, 2020
On 16 Jan, 2020
On 09 Oct, 2019
Received 08 Oct, 2019
Received 08 Oct, 2019
On 23 Sep, 2019
Received 23 Sep, 2019
On 22 Sep, 2019
On 19 Sep, 2019
On 16 Sep, 2019
Invitations sent on 16 Sep, 2019
On 03 Sep, 2019
On 03 Sep, 2019
On 30 Aug, 2019
Background : With the increasing recognition that leadership skills can be acquired, there is a heightened focus on incorporating leadership training as a part of graduate medical education. However, there is considerable lack of agreement regarding how to facilitate acquisition of these skills to resident, chief resident, and fellow physicians.
Methods : Articles were identified through a search of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, ERIC, PsycNet, Cochrane Systemic Reviews, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1948 to 2019. Additional sources were identified through contacting authors and scanning references. We included articles that described and evaluated leadership training programs in the United States and Canada. Methodological quality was assessed via the MERSQI (Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument).
Results : 15 studies, which collectively included 639 residents, chief residents, and fellows, met the eligibility criteria. The format, content, and duration of these programs varied considerably. The majority focused on conflict management, interpersonal skills, and stress management. Twelve were prospective case series and three were retrospective. Seven used pre- and post-test surveys, while seven used course evaluations. Only three had follow-up evaluations after six months to one year. MERSQI scores ranged from 6 to 9.
Conclusions : Despite interest in incorporating structured leadership training into graduate medical education curricula, there is a lack of methodologically rigorous studies evaluating its effectiveness. High-quality well-designed studies, focusing particularly on the validity of content, internal structure, and relationship to other variables, are required in order to determine if these programs have a lasting effect on the acquisition of leadership skills.
Figure 1