The Relationship Between Social Support Perceived by Infertile Couples and Their Mental Status

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-487754/v1

Download PDF

Research

The Relationship Between Social Support Perceived by Infertile Couples and Their Mental Status

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-487754/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

Background: Infertility is a difficult process that affects couples psychologically. Providing adequate social support is important in terms of reducing the psychological problems experienced by infertile couples by facilitating compliance with the treatment.

Aim/ Objective: This study evaluated the relationship between the mental status of couples receiving infertility treatment and their perceived social support.

Methods: The study was descriptive study consisted of 148 infertile couples who received infertility treatment at the InVitro Fertilisation Center between January and April 2018 in a university hospital in Antalya. 148 infertile couples who received infertility treatment at the data of the research were gathered through a questionnaire for determining socio-demographic and infertility related characteristics of the couples receiving infertility treatment, Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, Brief Symptom Inventory.

Results: In the study, the average age of infertile women was 31.4±5.6 and that of men was 34.5±5.2. The mean Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support score of the women was determined to be 62.6±14.2, whereas that of the men 59.2± 14.2. The mean score received by the women from depression subscale of Brief Symptom Inventory was determined to be 10.2±8.9, and the mean score received by the men 6.7±6.6. A strong negative relationship between the total Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Supportscore and the Brief Symptom Inventory subscale mean scores (p<0.01).

Conclusions: As a result of the research, as the social support levels perceived by couples receiving infertility treatment increased, their symptoms of anxiety, depression, negative self-perception, somatization, and hostility was determined to decrease.

Psychology

Infertility treatment

İnfertile couples

Mental status

Social support

Nursing

Infertility is defined as the absence of pregnancy or the inability to continue pregnancy, although couples who want to have children have regular sexual intercourse (at least three or four times a week) for at least one year without using any contraception method [1]. Infertility is a life crisis with cultural, religious, and class aspects that brings psychological, sexual, and social problems along with itself for couples [2]. This crisis affects 10-15% of couples at reproductive age in the world and 10-20% of married couples in Turkey [3]. Infertility diagnosis and treatment process is a difficult and long process that affects couples physically, psychologically, and financially. In this process, couples may experience stress, panic, and intense emotional pressure. However, in societies where femininity is seen as equivalent to motherhood and man as equivalent to productivity, fertility is accepted as the indicator of the individual's sexual identity. The society's exclusion of women who do not have children and questioning the masculinity of their husbands can negatively affect the mental health and quality of life of the couples, leading them to face problems such as depression, anxiety, decrease in sexual desire and deterioration in marital relations [5-10]. Studies show that both couples experience psychological problems in the treatment of infertility, but women experience more stress, guiltiness, and responsibility than men [11-13].

In the treatment process, where couples' anxiety levels are very high, social support is also very important for couples and the success of the treatment. Providing adequate social support facilitates the adjustment of infertile couples to treatment and can reduce the psychological problems they experience [6,14]. In the study of Slade et al. (2007), it was found that stigma perception was associated with low social support for both genders. In the same study, it is stated that as social support decreases, anxiety, depression, and infertility stress increase [8]. In a study conducted by Dilek and Beji (2012) with 80 couples who received infertility treatment at least once, it was determined that 75.0% of women and 43.8% of men believed that psychological support would increase the performance of the procedures [4]. In a study conducted by Martins et al. (2014) with couples receiving infertility treatment, it was found that infertility stress factor was caused by low spousal support for women and men, and low family support for women was also effective in experiencing stress [7]. Determining the stress levels of the couples and the problems they experience in all stages of infertility treatment and determining the solution suggestions will make important contributions to the couples to have a healthier treatment process and to increase the success of the treatment [12]. The purpose of care in the infertility treatment process is to evaluate the physical, psychological, and social conditions of the spouses, to determine the problems and needs in this area, and to provide appropriate care according to these needs [15]. Nurses are the most important health professionals who will detect changes in couples' needs and provide information and social support [1]. Along with the role of infertility nurses in medical care, they have the roles such as psychological support, quality assurance, coordinator, trainer/consultant, patient rights advocate, supporter, manager, and researcher [15]. The fact that nurses take a holistic approach and activate their social support systems in the treatment process of the infertile couple is very important for both members of the couples struggling with infertility problems.

As far as obtained from the literature, it is noteworthy that there is limited number of studies on the social support and mental states of infertile couples where they are dealt with together. In this context, in the research; it was aimed to determine the relationship between mental states and social support of couples who are in the process of infertility treatment and to draw attention to the importance of this issue. Thus, this information to be added to the literature will guide nurses, who are health professionals, in education and consultancy services. In addition, by raising the awareness of infertile couples and their relatives and by mobilizing social support systems, the mental problems of the couples can be reduced.

Study design, setting and ethics

The study was a descriptive design. This research was carried out to determine the relationship between the mental status of couples receiving infertility treatment and their perceived social support. The study, all the participants were couples who applied to the IVF center of the university hospital in Antalya, Turkey between January and April 2018. The sample of the study consisted of 148 infertile couples who received infertility treatment in the IVF Center of a University Hospital in Antalya, Turkey between January - April 2018 and volunteered to participate in the research. The aims and the methods used in our study were explained to the couples before they participated in the study, and they were assured that the results of the study would be used only for to intended purposes. The research was approved by the ethical committee of MEUSB (2017/57). Institutional permit was obtained with the decision number 15618811-302.14.04.

Measurement

Socio-demographic Data Form

The data collection form which was titled “Socio-demographic Data Form” was developed in the light of the literature [1,4,5,12].

Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support

The MSPSS (Zimet et al., 1988) is a 12-item scale with a seven point scale (from 1=strongly disagree to 7=strongly agree) measuring three sources of support, namely, Family, Friends, and Significant Other. Zimet et al. (1988) have reported excellent psychometric properties, especially considering the number of items in the scale. In terms of internal reliability, an alpha coefficient of 0.88 for the total scale has been reported. Subscale reliability estimates are quite high, with reported alphas of 0.81, 0.85, and 0.91 for Family, Friend, and Significant Other subscales, respectively. Additionally, test-retest reliability of 0.85 has also been obtained. The Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale was conducted by Eker and Arkar in 2001. The high score indicates that perceived social support is high. The low score points to the absence of perceived support, a scarcity of support, or deprivation of support [12]. Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the total score was found to be 0.89 in this study.

Brief Symptom Inventory

Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) is a Likert type scale comprising 23 items graded between 0 to 4. The high value of the total scoreobtained from the scale shows the increase of mental symptoms (Şahin et al., 2002). In our study, the coefficients calculated for the subscales regarding the internal consistency of the scale were found to be between 0.73 and 0.85.

Data collection

Data collection tools were applied to 148 infertile couples who received infertility treatment at a University Hospital between January and April 2018 and accepted to participate in the research. The purpose of the research was explained to the couples. The data collection tools were applied to the couples, by visiting the IVF center everyday.

Statistical analysis

The data were analyzed using SPPS V 20 software. Prerequisites such as variables, homogeneity of variances, and normality were evaluated using Shapiro-Wilk test and Levene’s test. Two groups were compared using the Student’s t-test and three or more groups were compared using the Tukey test. The value of p<0.05 was accepted for the significance level of the tests. Frequency, percentage, median (maximum-minimum), mean, and standard deviation values were used as descriptive statistics. The relations between the scales were evaluated through the Pearson Correlation Coefficient.

The mean age of women participating in the study was 31.4±5.6 and that of men was 34.5±5.2. It was found that approximately half of the women (41.2%) were university graduates and 39.9% were working and 35.8% of the men were high school graduates and almost all of them (91.2%) were working. It was determined that 70.9% of the women and 70.3% of the men participating in the study stated that their incomes were equal to their expenses. It was determined that the majority of the couples (96.6%) participating in the study had nuclear family structure (Table 1).

Within the scope of the study, the average duration of infertility of couples, who wanted to have children, was 4.4±3.1, and it was determined that 51.4% of them could not have children in 1-3 years. However, the mean duration of treatment was 2.9±3.0, and it was found that 53.4% of them had been treated for 1-3 years. When the causes of infertility of the couples are examined, it is seen that approximately half (47.3%) are caused by other (unexplained) causes, 23.0% from sperm failure, 17.6% from Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, and 12.2% from ovarian failure.

In our study, it was found that women's anxiety subscale mean score was 7.9±8.3, that men's anxiety subscale mean score was 5.3±5.4, that women's depression subscale mean score was 10.2±8.9 that men's depression subscale mean score was 6.7±6.6, that negative personality subscale mean score of women was 6.6±7.0, that negative personality subscale mean score of men was 5.7±6.0 (Table 2).

The MSPSS total score average of the women participating in the study is 62.6±14.2, the total score average of the men is 59.2±14.2. Mean scores of MSPSS sub-dimensions of women receiving infertility treatment; were found to be 24.2±4.6 in the family sub-dimension, 20.1±6.4 in the friend sub-dimension, and 18.3±6.8 in the special person sub-dimension. Mean scores of the MSPSS sub-dimensions of men were found to be; 23.3±5.1 in family subscale, 19.3±5.8 in friend subscale, and 16.6±6.6 in special person subscale (Table 3).

The relationship between the Brief Symptom Inventory and its sub-dimensions and the total mean scores obtained from MSPSS is given in Table IV. It was found that as the perceived social support levels of the couples increased, the symptoms of anxiety, depression, negative self, somatization, and hostility decreased. It was found that as the mean scores of MSPSS increased, their score from the Brief Symptom Inventory was strongly and negatively affected (r=-0.766, p<0.01) (Table 4).

Infertility treatment process, situations such as uncertainty, anxieties for the future, hopelessness, and insufficient social support can cause mental problems in couples. Perceived social support is very important for couples to cope with this difficult process. Many studies emphasize that as the level of social support perceived by infertile couples increases, their psychological problems decrease and treatment success increases [15-17]. In this context, considering that social support given to couples may reduce mental problems and positively affect the success of treatment, it is thought that it is important to address the mental problems and social support of the couples together.

In our study, it was found that the anxiety, depression, and negative personality scores as SSI subscales of women, who received infertility treatment were higher compared to their husbands. As a result of the study conducted by Patel et al. done with infertile couples, it was found that women were more stressed, anxious, and depressed than their husbands [18]. In the study conducted by Omani et al., it was observed that women experienced more moderate level anxiety, depression, and stress than men [19]. In a similar study conducted by Aldemir et al., it was reported that women experienced more anxiety than men [20]. In the study of Keramat et al., it was found that infertile men had a better mental state than their spouses [21]. In the study conducted by El Kissi et al., it was determined that women experienced more anxiety, worry, and depression compared to their husbands [5]. In the study conducted by Çoban and Dinç, it was found that infertile women showed more depressive symptoms than men [22]. In the study conducted by Boadi and Asenta, it was determined that infertile women had high anxiety, somatization, and depression scores [16].

In the study conducted by Moghadam et al., it was found that depression is seen as more common in women compared to men [23]. In the study of Dilek and Beji, it was found that infertile couples participating in the study were emotionally affected by this situation during the treatment process, and that women experienced more emotional problems than their husbands [4].

Similar results were found in our study and it is an eye-catching finding that is in parallel with the literature. This situation can be explained by the fact that the social pressure and stigmatization, with which women are exposed, is higher than men, regardless of the fact that the cause of this infertility is stemming from whom. At the same time, it is thought that women's mental conditions' being worse than men might stem from the facts that women's bodies are exposed to more severe invasive and traumatic procedures than their husbands in the treatment of infertility, and from the hormonal drugs used by women during the treatment process.

Infertility is a difficult process in which individuals face an unexpected situation and disruption in future plans. The social support they perceive from their relatives is very important for couples to cope with this difficult process [24]. In our study, it was found that infertile women had a total MSPSS score of 62.6±14.2, and that infertile men had 59.2±14.2 (Table 3). As a result of our research, it was determined that the perceived social support level of women is higher than men. In the study conducted by Aldemir et al. with couples who received infertility treatment, it was found that the mean MSPSS total score was 71.91±12.17 in women and 70.38±11.71 in men [20]. In the study conducted by Martins et al. (2014), it was found that the perceived social support levels of women were higher [7]. In the study done by Sreshthaputra et al., it was determined that women have better social support than men [25]. These studies show similarity to the findings of our study. This situation can be explained by the fact that women share their feelings with their husbands, family, or friends more than men, that they are more social and that they can use social support systems well.

Infertility is a complex life crisis for couples. The perceived social support levels by couples may affect their coping with infertility problems. It is thought that sharing feelings, thoughts, and problems experienced by infertile couples with family members, friends or a counselor reduces the experienced stress [24]. As a result of the statistical analysis performed in our study, it was found that there was a negative weak and severe relationship between all sub-dimensions of SSI and all sub-dimensions of MSPSS and total score (p<0.01). It was found that as the perceived social support levels of the couples increased, the symptoms of anxiety, depression, negative self, somatization, and hostility decreased. In the study conducted by Altıntop and Kesgin, it was found that as the level of social support in infertile couples increased, their state/trait anxiety levels decreased [11]. The study conducted by Patel et al. found that low social support projected infertility stress in couples receiving infertility treatment [18]. In the research conducted by Malina and Pooley; it has been found that as the social support decreases, the happiness of the couples and the realization of pregnancy as a result of the treatment are negatively affected [17]. As a result of 12 studies examined by Chow et al., it was found that psychosocial interventions generally improved the mental state, marital relations, and pregnancy rates of infertile couples [15]. In the study of Yazdani et al., a positive relationship was found between the use of different coping strategies by infertile couples and their perceived social support systems [26]. In the study conducted by Aldemir et al., it was found that as couples' perceived social support increased, anxiety and depressive symptoms decreased [20]. In the study done by Ilerisoy, it was found that family support was the most important coping mechanism in which couples share the difficulties they experience when diagnosed with infertility and their negative feelings they experienced during the treatment process [27]. In the study conducted by Martins et al in Portugal with an infertile couple, it was found that the stress factor of infertility was caused by low spousal support for women and men, and that low family support for women was also effective in experiencing stress. In the study conducted by Martins et al. with women who received infertility treatment, it was found that perceived family support may have a strong effect on women coping with infertility stress [7]. In the study conducted by Slade et al., it was found that the perception of stigma was associated with low social support for both genders, and it was determined that anxiety, depression, and infertility stress increased as social support decreased [8].

The importance of social support in coping with psychological problems experienced by infertile couples during the treatment process has been emphasized in many studies. In studies conducted with infertile couples, it was found that as the perceived level of social support increases, the psychological problems they experience decrease. The result of our research is similar to the literature. In this context, the fact that infertile couples, who are in a crisis period of their lives, receive social support from their spouses, families, and friends has an important place in order to be able to overcome the difficult treatment process in a healthy way. As a result of our research, it can be thought that people use social support resources in stressful situations and get positive effects. In addition, the positive perception of social support during the treatment process can be explained with the fact that they do not feel the fear of abandonment thanks to the social support they receive from their spouses, that the couples regain confidence and belief in themselves, that they feel themselves well and valuable, that they experience a sense of deficiency less or none, that they ignore stigmatization and loss of status and that they apply appropriate coping strategies.

In line with the results obtained from the research, the following recommendations have been developed to improve the mental state of infertile couples and to increase their social support systems during the treatment process.

It is recommended the fact that the nurse determines the perceived social support factors of the couples during the treatment process and provides the necessary emotional support,
The fact that nurse evaluates the changes in the mental state of the couples during the treatment process and takes steps to improve them,
Explaining the importance of social support to the family, spouse, and friends of couples receiving infertility treatment and helping to develop the perceived social support systems of the couples in this process,
Examining the perceived social support levels of infertile couples and the affecting factors with qualitative studies.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the research stafs and respondents in our survey.

Author Contributions: Concept: BA,TGE; Design: BA,TGE; Supervision: TGE Data Collection: BA; Data Processing: BA; Analysis and Interpretation: BA,TGE; Resource: BA; Literature Search: BA, TGE; Materials: BA,TGE Preparation of the manuscript: BA,TGE; Critical Reviews: BA,TGE. All authors read and approved the fnal manuscript.

Funding

The authors declared that this study has received no financial support.

Availability of the data and material

The dataset generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to privacy but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

The research can be generalized to couples who received infertility treatment between 17 January - 27 April 2018 in Akdeniz University IVF Center outpatient clinic. Data are based on participant reports. Institutional permit was obtained with the decision number 15618811-302.14.04. Interviewers informed respondents of the nature and purpose of each survey, voluntary participation, and anonymity as well as confdentiality of information collected at the beginning of the interview. Respondents were asked to give verbal consent before proceeding, and verbal consent was obtained before conducting interview with

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Deka PK, Sarma S. Psychological aspects of infertility. British Journal of Medical Practitioners.2010; 3(3):336-8.
Beji NK. İnfertility. İstanbul: İletişim, 2015,113-8.
http: //www.who.int/reproductivehealth/topics/infertility/ definitions /en/. E.T: 10.05.2018.
Dilek N, Beji KN. Determining the emotional reactions of couples undergoing assisted reproductive procedures. Journal of Education and Research in Nursing 2012;9(1):24-9.5.
El Kissi Y, Romdhane AB, Hidar S, Bannour S, Ayoubi IK, Khairi H, et al. General psychopathology, anxiety, depression and self- esteem ın couples undergoing ınfertility treatment: a comparative study between men and women. European Journal Of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Peproductive Biology.2013;167(2):185-9.
Karaca A, Ünsal G. The effects of infertility on women’s mental health and role of psychiatric nursing. Psikiyatri Hemşireliği Dergisi.2012;3(2):80-5.
Martins MV, Peterson BD, Almeida V, Mesquita-Guimaraes J, Costa ME. Dyadic dynamics of perceived social support in couples facing infertility. Human Reproduction.2014;29(1):83-9.
Slade P, O’Neill C, Simpson AJ, Lashen H. The relationship between perceived stigma, disclosure patterns, support and distress ın new attendees at an ınfertility clinic. Human Reproduction. 2007;22(8):2309-17
Yanıkkerem E, Kavlak O, Sevil Ü. Infertile couple’s problems and nursing aproach. Atatürk Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi.2008;11(4):112-21.10.
Yusuf L. Depression, anxiety and stress among female patients of infertility; a case control study. Pakistan Journal Of Medical Sciences.2016;32(6):1340-43.
Altıntop İ, Kesgin B. Level of anxiety, resilience and coping strategies of infertile individual in treatment. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi.2018;11(55):755-68.
Eker D, Arkar H, Yaldız H. Factorial structure, validity, and reliability of revised form of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi.2001;12(1):17-25.
Şahin NH, Batıgün DA, Uğurtaş S. Brief symptom inventory (BSI), validity, reliability and factor structure of its use for adolescents. Turkish Journal of Psychiatry.2002;13(2):125-35.
Zare Z, Amirian M, Golmakani N, Mazlom R, Ahangar ML. Sexual dysfunction in infertile women. International Journal of Reproductive Bio Medicine.2016;14(2):89-94.
Chow KM, Cheung MC, Cheung IK. Psychosocial ınterventions for infertilecouples: a critical review. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2016;25(15):2101-13.
Boadi MO, Asante KO. Psychological health and religious coping of Ghanaian women with infertility. Bio PsychoSocial Medicine.2017;11,20.
Malina A, Pooley JA. Psychological consequences of ıvf fertilization - review of research. Ann Agric Environ Med.2017; 24(4):554–8.
Patel A, Sharma PSVN, Kumar P, Binu VS. Sociocultural determinants of ınfertilitystress in patients undergoing fertility treatments. Journal Of Human Reproductive Sciences.2018;11(2):172-9.
Omani SR, Vesali S, Navid B, Vakiliniya B, Mohammadi M. Evaluation on hope and psychological symptoms in ınfertile couples undergoing assisted reproduction treatment. International Journal of Fertility and Sterility.2017; 11(2):123-9.
Aldemir S, Eser A, Öztürk TN, Dalbudak E, Topcu M. Relation of anxiety and depressive symptoms with perceived social support according to gender within infertile couples. The Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences.2015;28:328-36.
Keramat A, Masoomi SS, Mousavi SA, Poorolajal J, Shobeiri F, Hazavhei SM. Quality of life and ıts related factors in infertilecouples. Journal of Research in Health Sciences.2014;14(1):57-63.
Çoban TK, Dinç A. Studying the effects of ınfertility on sexual life. Uluslararası Klinik Araştırma Dergisi.2013;1(2):46-53.
Moghadam MHB, Aminian AH, Abdoli AM, Seighal N, Falahzadeh H, Ghasemi N. Short communication evaluation of the general of the infertile couples. Iranian Journal of Reproductive Medicine.2011;9(4):309-14.
Kaplan C. Approaches to coping with stress and stress in infertile individuals. Androloji Bülteni.2018;20, 61−64.
Sreshthaputra O, Sreshthaputra R, Vutyavanich T. Gender differences in infertility-related stress and the relationship between stress and social support in Thai infertile couples. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand.2008;1(12):1769–73.
Yazdani F, Kazemi A, Fooladi MM, Samani HR. The relations between marital quality, social support, socialacceptance and coping strategies among the infertileIranian couples. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology.2016; 200:58-62.
İlerisoy M. Emotional experiences and coping strategies of individuals undergoing IVF treatment. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimleri Dergisi.2015;28:143-64.

Table 1.Sociodemographic characteristics of the participants (n=296)

Socio demographic characteristics	Women (n=148)		Men(n=148)
Age	X̅±SD		X̅±SD
	31.4±5.6		34.5±5.2
	n	%	n	%
20-25 years 26-32 years 33-39 years 40 years and older	20 69 49 10	13.5 46.6 33.1 6.8	2 53 65 28	1.4 35.8 43.9 18.9
Educational status
Illiterate	2	1.4	-	-
Primary school	26	17.6	21	14.2
Secondary school	28	18.9	25	16.9
High school	31	20.9	53	35.8
University	61	41.2	49	33.1
Employment status
Working	59	39.9	135	91.2
Not working	89	60.1	13	8.8
Perceived income level
Lower than the expenses	21	14.2	20	13.5
Equal to the expenses	105	70.9	104	70.3
More than the expenses	22	14.9	24	16.2
Social security status
Insured	142	95.9	139	93.9
Not insured	6	4.1	9	6.1
Family Type
Nuclear family	143	96.6	143	96.6
Extended family	5	3.4	5	3.4

Table 2.The Distribution of Brief Symptom Inventory Subscale Mean Scores of Couples

SSI Scales		Women (n=148)		Men (n=148)
		X ±SD	Min-Max	X±SD	Min-Max

Anxiety Depression Negative self-perception Somatization Hostility	7.9±8.3 10.2±8.9 6.6±7.0 5.0±4.5 5.7±4.7		0-45 0-39 0-40 0-24 0-22	5.3±5.4 6.7±6.6 5.7±6.0 2.7±3.2 5.9±4.7	0-29 0-40 0-36 0-19 0-24

Table 3. The Distribution of Brief Symptom Inventory Subscale Mean Scores of Couples

MSPSS Score	Women (n=148)		Men (n=148)
MSPSS Score	X ±SD	Min-Max	X ±SD	Min-Max

Family Support Friend Support Special Person Support MSPSS Total Score	24.2±4.6 20.1±6.4 18.3±6.8 62.6±14.2	4-28 4-28 4-28 12-84	23.3±5.1 19.3±5.8 16.6±6.6 59.2±14.2	4-28 4-28 4-28 12-84

Table 4. The Relationship Between the Mean Short Symptom Inventory Subscale Scores and The Mean Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support Scores of The Couples Receiving Infertility Treatment

BSI Score	Gender	Statistical values	MSPSSScore
BSI Score	Gender	Statistical values	Family support	Friend support	Special person support	Total points
Anxiety	women	r	-0.201*	-0.196*	0.008	-0.151
	women	p	0.014	0.017	0.924	0.068
	men	r	-0.244**	-0.122	-0.088	-0.177*
	men	p	0.003	0.140	0.290	0.032
Depression	women	r	-0.189*	-0.262**	-0.079	-0.218**
	women	p	0.022	0.001	0.338	0.008
	men	r	-0.338**	-0.238**	-0.148	-0.286**
	men	p	<0.001	0.004	0.073	<0.001
Negative self-perception	women	r	-0.176*	-0.271**	-0.076	-0.217**
	women	p	0.033	0.001	0.356	0.008
	men	r	-0.305**	-0.250**	-0.132	-0.271**
	men	p	<0.001	0.002	0.110	0.001
Somatization	women	r	-0.241**	-0.179*	0.055	-0.134
	women	p	0.003	0.029	0.510	0.106
	men	r	-0.234**	-0.080	-0.049	-0.138
	men	p	0.004	0.336	0.557	0.094
Hostility	women	r	-0.135	-0.240**	-0.067	-0.185*
	women	p	0.101	0.003	0.416	0.024
	men	r	-0.332**	-0.210*	-0.177*	-0.285**
	men	p	<0.001	0.010	0.032	<0.001

Pearson Corelation Coefficient *p<0.05

**p<0.01

Download PDF

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

The Relationship Between Social Support Perceived by Infertile Couples and Their Mental Status

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusions

Declarations

References

Tables

Status:

Version 1