1. Department of Social Policy and Intervention. University of Oxford. Surveys | Oxford Supertracker. The Global Directory for COVID Policy Trackers and Surveys [Internet]. [cited 2021 Mar 25]. Available from: https://supertracker.spi.ox.ac.uk/surveys/
2. MRC C for GIDA. COVID-19 reports | Faculty of Medicine | Imperial College London [Internet]. [cited 2021 Mar 14]. Available from: http://www.imperial.ac.uk/mrc-global-infectious-disease-analysis/covid-19/covid-19-reports/
3. ISCIII. EpiGraph – COVID-19 simulator [Internet]. [cited 2021 Mar 14]. Available from: https://www.arcos.inf.uc3m.es/epigraph/
4. IECA. Portal IECA sobre el COVID19 en Andalucía. Datos Sanitarios | Instituto de Estadística y Cartografía de Andalucía [Internet]. [cited 2021 Mar 14]. Available from: http://www.juntadeandalucia.es/institutodeestadisticaycartografia/salud/datosSanitarios.html
5. Prieto-Alhambra D, Balló E, Coma E, Mora N, Aragón M, Prats-Uribe A, et al. Hospitalization and 30-day fatality in 121,263 COVID-19 outpatient cases [Internet]. medRxiv. medRxiv; 2020 [cited 2021 Mar 14]. p. 2020.05.04.20090050. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.04.20090050
6. Burn E, You SC, Sena AG, Kostka K, Abedtash H, Abrahão MTF, et al. Deep phenotyping of 34,128 patients hospitalised with COVID-19 and a comparison with 81,596 influenza patients in America, Europe and Asia: An international network study [Internet]. Vol. 21, medRxiv. medRxiv; 2020 [cited 2021 Mar 14]. p. 26. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.22.20074336
7. Xiong J, Lipsitz O, Nasri F, Lui LMW, Gill H, Phan L, et al. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in the general population: A systematic review. Vol. 277, Journal of Affective Disorders. Elsevier B.V.; 2020. p. 55–64.
8. Orte C, Sánchez-Prieto L, Domínguez DC, Barrientos-Báez A. Evaluation of Distress and Risk Perception Associated with COVID-19 in Vulnerable Groups. Int J Environ Res Public Health [Internet]. 2020 Dec 9 [cited 2021 Mar 14];17(24):9207. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/24/9207
9. Rose TC, Mason K, Pennington A, McHale P, Buchan I, Taylor-Robinson DC, et al. Inequalities in COVID19 mortality related to ethnicity and socioeconomic deprivation [Internet]. medRxiv. medRxiv; 2020 [cited 2021 Mar 14]. p. 2020.04.25.20079491. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.25.20079491
10. González-Sanguino C, Ausín B, Castellanos MÁ, Saiz J, López-Gómez A, Ugidos C, et al. Mental health consequences during the initial stage of the 2020 Coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) in Spain. Brain Behav Immun [Internet]. 2020 Jul 1 [cited 2020 Nov 6];87:172–6. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC7219372/?report=abstract
11. Ministerio de la Presidencia R con las C y MD. Real Decreto 463/2020 [Internet]. BOE. 2020 [cited 2021 Mar 3]. Available from: https://boe.es/buscar/pdf/2020/BOE-A-2020-3692-consolidado.pdf
12. Brooks SK, Webster RK, Smith LE, Woodland L, Wessely S, Greenberg N, et al. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. Vol. 395, The Lancet. Lancet Publishing Group; 2020. p. 912–20.
13. Jeong H, Yim HW, Song YJ, Ki M, Min JA, Cho J, et al. Mental health status of people isolated due to Middle East Respiratory Syndrome. Epidemiol Health [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2021 Mar 14];38:e2016048. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC5177805/
14. Ricci-Cabello I, Meneses-Echavez JF, Serrano-Ripoll MJ, Fraile-Navarro D, de Roque MAF, Moreno GP, et al. Impact of viral epidemic outbreaks on mental health of healthcare workers: A rapid systematic review [Internet]. Vol. 4, medRxiv. medRxiv; 2020 [cited 2021 Mar 3]. p. 2020.04.02.20048892. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.02.20048892
15. Armitage R, Nellums LB. COVID-19 and the consequences of isolating the elderly [Internet]. Vol. 5, The Lancet Public Health. Elsevier Ltd; 2020 [cited 2021 Mar 14]. p. e256. Available from: www.thelancet.com/public-health
16. Luo M, Guo L, Yu M, Wang H. The psychological and mental impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on medical staff and general public – A systematic review and meta-analysis [Internet]. Vol. 291, Psychiatry Research. Elsevier Ireland Ltd; 2020 [cited 2021 Mar 14]. p. 113190. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC7276119/
17. Pappa S, Ntella V, Giannakas T, Giannakoulis VG, Papoutsi E, Katsaounou P. Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and insomnia among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis [Internet]. Vol. 88, Brain, Behavior, and Immunity. Academic Press Inc.; 2020 [cited 2021 Mar 14]. p. 901–7. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC7206431/
18. Drosten C. Entrevista Christian Drosten. eldiario.es [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Mar 14]; Available from: https://www.eldiario.es/internacional/theguardian/christian-drosten-principal-coronavirus-hundiendo_128_5948822.html
19. Fundación Secretariado Gitano. Encuesta impacto social de la COVID-19 [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Mar 14]. Available from: https://www.gitanos.org/actualidad/archivo/131067.html
20. Federación de Asociaciones de Mujeres Gitanas. Informe antigitanismo y COVID 19. [Internet]. [cited 2021 Mar 14]. Available from: https://fakali.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Informe-FAKALI-Antigitanismo-y-Covid-19.pdf
21. Vallejo-Slocker L, Fresneda J, Vallejo MA. Psychological wellbeing of vulnerable children during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psicothema [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Mar 14];32(4):501–7. Available from: http://www.psicothema.com/pdf/4628.pdf
22. Prats-Uribe A, Paredes R, Prieto-Alhambra D. Ethnicity, comorbidity, socioeconomic status, and their associations with COVID-19 infection in England: A cohort analysis of UK Biobank data [Internet]. medRxiv. medRxiv; 2020 [cited 2021 Mar 14]. p. 2020.05.06.20092676. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.06.20092676
23. Guijarro C, Pérez-Fernández E, González-Piñeiro B, Meléndez V, Goyanes MJ, Renilla ME, et al. Differential risk for COVID-19 in the first wave of the disease among Spaniards and migrants from different areas of the world living in Spain. Rev Clin Esp. 2020 Nov 20;
24. Platt L, Warwick R. Are some ethnic groups more vulnerable to COVID-19 than others? Inequality: the IFS Deaton Review [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Apr 11]; Available from: https://www.ifs.org.uk/inequality/chapter/are-some-ethnic-groups-more-vulnerable-to-covid-19-than-others/
25. Ruiz-Azarola A, Escudero Carretero M, López-Fernández LA, Gil García E, March Cerdà JC, López Jaramillo D. The perspective of migrants on access to health care in the context of austerity policies in Andalusia (Spain). Gac Sanit [Internet]. 2020 May 1 [cited 2021 Mar 14];34(3):261–7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.09.006
26. Holt E. COVID-19 lockdown of Roma settlements in Slovakia. Lancet Infect Dis [Internet]. 2020 Jun 1 [cited 2021 Apr 11];20(6):659. Available from: www.thelancet.com/infection
27. Conde Blanco E, Manzanares I, Centeno M, Khawaja M, Betrán O, Donaire A, et al. Epilepsy and lockdown: A survey of patients normally attending a Spanish centre [Internet]. Vol. 143, Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2021 [cited 2021 Mar 14]. p. 206–9. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32990951/
28. López-Bravo A, García-Azorín D, Belvís R, González-Oria C, Latorre G, Santos-Lasaosa S, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on headache management in Spain: an analysis of the current situation and future perspectives. Neurologia [Internet]. 2020 Jul 1 [cited 2021 Apr 11];35(6):372–80. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nrl.2020.05.006
29. Lara B, Carnes A, Dakterzada F, Benitez I, Piñol‐Ripoll G. Neuropsychiatric symptoms and quality of life in Spanish patients with Alzheimer’s disease during the COVID‐19 lockdown. Eur J Neurol [Internet]. 2020 Sep 24 [cited 2021 Mar 14];27(9):1744–7. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ene.14339
30. Elbarbary NS, dos Santos TJ, de Beaufort C, Agwu JC, Calliari LE, Scaramuzza AE. COVID-19 outbreak and pediatric diabetes: Perceptions of health care professionals worldwide. Pediatr Diabetes [Internet]. 2020 Nov 1 [cited 2021 Mar 14];21(7):1083–92. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32686287/
31. Pleguezuelos E, Del Carmen A, Moreno E, Ortega P, Vila X, Ovejero L, et al. The experience of COPD patients in lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J COPD [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Mar 14];15:2621–7. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC7591044/
32. Beisani M, Vilallonga R, Petrola C, Acosta A, Casimiro Pérez JA, García Ruiz de Gordejuela A, et al. Effects of COVID-19 lockdown on a bariatric surgery waiting list cohort and its influence in surgical risk perception. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg [Internet]. 2020 Mar 1 [cited 2021 Mar 14];1. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC7690848/
33. Hartmann-Boyce J, Mahtani KR. Supporting people with long-term conditions (LTCs) during national emergencies - The Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine [Internet]. [cited 2021 Mar 14]. Available from: https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/supporting-people-with-long-term-conditions-ltcs-during-national-emergencies/
34. Prieto M, March J, Martín A, Escudero M, López M, Luque N. Repercusiones del confinamiento por COVID-19 en pacientes crónicos de Andalucía [Internet]. Comprender el COVID-19 desde una perspectiva de Salud Pública. Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública. 2020 [cited 2021 Apr 11]. Available from: https://www.easp.es/web/coronavirusysaludpublica/pacientes-cronicos-en-casa-la-experiencia-del-confinamiento-como-se-cuidan-que-necesitan-como-apoyarles/
35. Cabrera-León A, Sánchez-Cantalejo C. Características y resultados de encuestas sobre el impacto de la enfermedad COVID-19 | Comprender el COVID-19 desde una perspectiva de salud pública [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Mar 15]. Available from: https://www.easp.es/web/coronavirusysaludpublica/caracteristicas-y-resultados-de-encuestas-sobre-el-impacto-de-la-enfermedad-covid-19/
36. Mansilla Domínguez JM, Font Jiménez I, Belzunegui Eraso A, Peña Otero D, Díaz Pérez D, Recio Vivas AM. Risk Perception of COVID−19 Community Transmission among the Spanish Population. Int J Environ Res Public Health [Internet]. 2020 Dec 2 [cited 2021 Apr 11];17(23):8967. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/23/8967
37. Kim JK, Wang Z. Sampling Techniques for Big Data Analysis. Int Stat Rev [Internet]. 2019 May 31 [cited 2021 Mar 15];87(S1):S177–91. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/insr.12290
38. Pollán M, Pérez-Gómez B, Pastor-Barriuso R, Oteo J, Hernán MA, Pérez-Olmeda M, et al. Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in Spain (ENE-COVID): a nationwide, population-based seroepidemiological study. Lancet [Internet]. 2020 Aug 22 [cited 2020 Nov 6];396(10250):535–44. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32645347/
39. Pastor-Barriuso R, Pérez-Gómez B, Hernán MA, Pérez-Olmeda M, Yotti R, Oteo-Iglesias J, et al. Infection fatality risk for SARS-CoV-2 in community dwelling population of Spain: Nationwide seroepidemiological study. BMJ [Internet]. 2020 Nov 27 [cited 2021 Mar 15];371. Available from: https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4509
40. ISCIII. ESTUDIO ENE-COVID: INFORME FINAL ESTUDIO NACIONAL DE SERO-EPIDEMIOLOGÍA DE LA INFECCIÓN POR SARS-COV-2 EN ESPAÑA [Internet]. [cited 2021 Mar 15]. Available from: http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736
41. Ministerio de Sanidad. Centro de Coordinación de Alertas y Emergencias Sanitarias. Actualización no 96. Enfermedad por el coronavirus (COVID-19). 05.05.2020 (datos consolidados a las 21:00 horas del 04.05.2020). SITUACIÓN EN ESPAÑA. [Internet]. [cited 2021 Mar 15]. Available from: https://www.mscbs.gob.es/profesionales/saludPublica/ccayes/alertasActual/nCov/documentos/Actualizacion_96_COVID-19.pdf
42. Verity R, Okell LC, Dorigatti I, Winskill P, Whittaker C, Imai N, et al. Estimates of the severity of coronavirus disease 2019: a model-based analysis. Lancet Infect Dis [Internet]. 2020 Jun 1 [cited 2021 Mar 15];20(6):669–77. Available from: www.thelancet.com/infectionVol
43. Garg S, Kim L, Whitaker M, O’Halloran A, Cummings C, Holstein R, et al. Hospitalization Rates and Characteristics of Patients Hospitalized with Laboratory-Confirmed Coronavirus Disease 2019 — COVID-NET, 14 States, March 1–30, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep [Internet]. 2020 Apr 17 [cited 2021 Mar 15];69(15):458–64. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6915e3.htm?s_cid=mm6915e3_w
44. Yang J, Zheng Y, Gou X, Pu K, Chen Z, Guo Q, et al. Prevalence of comorbidities and its effects in coronavirus disease 2019 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Infect Dis [Internet]. 2020 May 1 [cited 2021 Mar 15];94:91–5. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32173574/
45. Vardavas CI, Nikitara K. COVID-19 and smoking: A systematic review of the evidence [Internet]. Vol. 18, Tobacco Induced Diseases. International Society for the Prevention of Tobacco Induced Diseases; 2020 [cited 2021 Mar 15]. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC7083240/
46. Pinazo-Hernandis S. Psychosocial impact of COVID-19 on older people: Problems and challenges. Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol [Internet]. 2020 Sep 1 [cited 2021 Mar 15];55(5):249–52. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC7266768/
47. Losada-Baltar A, Martínez-Huertas J, Jiménez-Gonzalo L, Pedroso-Chaparro M, Gallego-Alberto L, Fernandes-Pires J, et al. Longitudinal Correlates of Loneliness and Psychological Distress During the Lockdown Situation due to COVID-19. Effects of Age and Self-Perceptions of Aging. Journals Gerontol Ser B Psychol Sci Soc Sci [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2021 Mar 15]; Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33438002/
48. Arpino B, Pasqualini M, Bordone V, Solé-Auró A. Older People’s Nonphysical Contacts and Depression During the COVID-19 Lockdown. G Castle N, editor. Gerontologist [Internet]. 2021 Feb 23 [cited 2021 Apr 11];61(2):176–86. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/gerontologist/article/61/2/176/5911810
49. Durán JC et al. Atención al mayor, abordaje multidisciplinar de su complejidad. (SAGG) SA de G y G, editor. 2019.
50. Cabrera-León A, Daponte Codina A, Mateo I, Arroyo-Borrell E, Bartoll X, Bravo MJ, et al. Indicadores contextuales para evaluar los determinantes sociales de la salud y la crisis económica española. Gac Sanit. 2017 May 1;31(3):194–203.
51. Hernán M, Robins J. Causal Inference: What If. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC [Internet]. Chapman & Hall/CRC, editor. 2020. Available from: https://cdn1.sph.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/1268/2021/01/ciwhatif_hernanrobins_31jan21.pdf
52. Beaumont J. Are probability surveys bound to disappear for the production of official statistics? [Internet]. Statistics Canada. 2020 [cited 2021 Apr 11]. Available from: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/12-001-x/2020001/article/00001-eng.htm
53. Burgelman J-C, Pascu C, Szkuta K, Von Schomberg R, Karalopoulos A, Repanas K, et al. Open Science, Open Data, and Open Scholarship: European Policies to Make Science Fit for the Twenty-First Century. Front Big Data [Internet]. 2019 Dec 10 [cited 2021 Mar 15];2:43. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fdata.2019.00043/full
54. Kalton G, Citro CF. Panel Surveys: Adding the Fourth Dimension. Innov Eur J Soc Sci Res [Internet]. 1995 [cited 2021 Mar 25];8(1):25–39. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13511610.1995.9968429
55. Junta de Andalucía. Junta de Andalucía - Zonas desfavorecidas [Internet]. [cited 2021 Apr 30]. Available from: https://www.juntadeandalucia.es/organismos/igualdadpoliticassocialesyconciliacion/areas/inclusion/zonas-transformacion.html
56. Merlo J, Viciana-Fernández FJ, Ramiro-Fariñas D. Bringing the individual back to small-area variation studies: A multilevel analysis of all-cause mortality in Andalusia, Spain. Soc Sci Med. 2012 Oct;75(8):1477–87.
57. Ieca I de E y C de A. Base de Datos Longitudinal de Población de Andalucía [Internet]. 2018. Available from: https://www.juntadeandalucia.es/institutodeestadisticaycartografia/metodologias/IME010101.pdf LB - AyKB
58. Junta de Andalucía C de S y F. Base de Datos de Usuarios del Sistema Sanitario Público de Andalucía [Internet]. 2018. Available from: https://www.juntadeandalucia.es/organismos/saludyfamilias/servicios/estadistica-cartografia/actividad/detalle/175259.html LB - AxE8
59. Consorcio Fernando de los Ríos. Guadalinfo [Internet]. [cited 2021 Mar 15]. Available from: http://www.guadalinfo.es/
60. Junta de Andalucía. ESTRATEGIA REGIONAL ANDALUZA PARA LA COHESIÓN E INCLUSIÓN SOCIAL.
61. IECA. Clasificación del Grado de Urbanización | Instituto de Estadística y Cartografía de Andalucía [Internet]. [cited 2021 Mar 15]. Available from: http://www.juntadeandalucia.es/institutodeestadisticaycartografia/gradourbanizacion/index.htm
62. Singh S. Advanced sampling theory with applications. Springer, editor. Science & Business Media; 2003.
63. Yves Tillé A, Matei A, Alina Matei M. Package “sampling” Title Survey Sampling. 2021.
64. INE. La encuesta continua de hogares [Internet]. 2019. Available from: https://www.ine.es/dyngs/INEbase/es/operacion.htm?c=Estadistica_C&cid=1254736176952&menu=ultiDatos&idp=1254735572981 LB - sijq
65. Plewis I. Non-response in a birth cohort study: The case of the millennium cohort study. Int J Soc Res Methodol [Internet]. 2007 Dec [cited 2021 Mar 15];10(5):325–34. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13645570701676955
66. Chen T, Guestrin C. XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining [Internet]. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery; 2016 [cited 2021 Apr 11]. p. 785–94. Available from: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2939672.2939785
67. Kott PS, Liao D. One step or two? Calibration weighting from a complete list frame with nonresponse. Stat Canada [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2021 Mar 15];41(1):165–81. Available from: www.statcan.gc.ca
68. Kott PS, Liao D. Calibration Weighting for Nonresponse that is Not Missing at Random: Allowing More Calibration than Response-Model Variables. J Surv Stat Methodol [Internet]. 2017 Jun 1 [cited 2021 Mar 15];5(2):159–74. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/jssam/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/jssam/smx003
69. Ferri-García R, Del Mar Rueda M. Efficiency of propensity score adjustment and calibration on the estimation from non-probabilistic online surveys. SORT [Internet]. 2018 Jul 1 [cited 2021 Mar 15];42(2):159–82. Available from: https://ddd.uab.cat/record/200758
70. Ferri-García R, Rueda M del M. Propensity score adjustment using machine learning classification algorithms to control selection bias in online surveys. Marchetti S, editor. PLoS One [Internet]. 2020 Apr 22 [cited 2021 Mar 15];15(4):e0231500. Available from: https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231500
71. Servicio Andaluz de Salud. Base poblacional de salud | Servicio Andaluz de Salud [Internet]. [cited 2021 Mar 15]. Available from: https://www.sspa.juntadeandalucia.es/servicioandaluzdesalud/profesionales/sistemas-de-informacion/base-poblacional-de-salud
72. Consejeria De Medioambiente. Junta de Andalucía. REDIAM | IDEAndalucia [Internet]. [cited 2021 Mar 25]. Available from: https://www.ideandalucia.es/portal/nodo-rediam
73. Consejería de Salud y Familias. Junta de Andalucía. Programas de Vigilancia de Enfermedades Transmisibles [Internet]. [cited 2021 Mar 25]. Available from: https://www.juntadeandalucia.es/organismos/saludyfamilias/areas/salud-vida/vigilancia/paginas/vigilancia-transmisibles.html
74. Servicio Andaluz de Salud. Documento de identificacion de patologias crónicas de la BPS [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2021 Mar 15]. Available from: https://www.sspa.juntadeandalucia.es/servicioandaluzdesalud/sites/default/files/sincfiles/wsas-media-mediafile_sasdocumento/2019/patologias_bps.pdf
75. Bericat E. EXCLUIDOS DE LA FELICIDAD. Las desigualdades de bienestar emocional en España y Europa. [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2021 Mar 15]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287814426_EXCLUIDOS_DE_LA_FELICIDAD_Las_desigualdades_de_bienestar_emocional_en_Espana_y_Europa
76. Bellón J, Delgado A, Luna J, Lardelli P. Validez y fiabilidad del cuestionario de apoyo social funcional Duke-UNC-11. Aten Primaria [Internet]. 1996 [cited 2021 Mar 15];18:153–63. Available from: https://www.elsevier.es/es-revista-atencion-primaria-27-articulo-validez-fiabilidad-del-cuestionario-apoyo-14325
77. Broadhead WE, Gehlbach SH, de Gruy F V., Kaplan BH. The Duke-UNC functional social support questionnaire: Measurement of social support in family medicine patients. Med Care [Internet]. 1988 [cited 2021 Mar 15];26(7):707–21. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3393031/
78. OMS. 10 datos sobre la obesidad [Internet]. [cited 2021 Mar 15]. Available from: https://www.who.int/features/factfiles/obesity/facts/es/
79. Domingo-Salvany A, Bacigalupe A, Carrasco JM, Espelt A, Ferrando J, Borrell C. Propuestas de clase social neoweberiana y neomarxista a partir de la Clasificación Nacional de Ocupaciones 2011. Gac Sanit. 2013 May 1;27(3):263–72.
80. Chilet-Rosell E, Álvarez-Dardet C, Domingo-Salvany A. Utilización de las propuestas espã nolas de medición de la clase social en salud Use of Spanish proposals for measuring social class in health sciences. Gac Sanit. 2012;26(6):566–9.
81. R Core Team. R: The R Project for Statistical Computing [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2021 Mar 15]. Available from: https://www.r-project.org/
82. Rue H, Martino S, Chopin N. Approximate Bayesian inference for latent Gaussian models by using integrated nested Laplace approximations. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Statistical Methodol [Internet]. 2009 Apr 1 [cited 2021 Mar 15];71(2):319–92. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2008.00700.x
83. Rue H, Riebler A, Sørbye SH, Illian JB, Simpson DP, Lindgren FK. Bayesian Computing with INLA: A Review. Annu Rev Stat Its Appl [Internet]. 2017 Mar 7 [cited 2021 Mar 15];4(1):395–421. Available from: http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-statistics-060116-054045
84. Simpson D, Rue H, Riebler A, Martins TG, Sørbye SH. Penalising model component complexity: A principled, practical approach to constructing priors. Stat Sci [Internet]. 2017 Feb 1 [cited 2021 Mar 15];32(1):1–28. Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/1403.4630
85. R-INLA Project [Internet]. [cited 2021 Mar 15]. Available from: https://www.r-inla.org/home
86. Welcome to Python.org [Internet]. [cited 2021 Mar 15]. Available from: https://www.python.org/
87. Agencia Española de Protección de Datos. Guía práctica para LAS Evaluaciones de Impacto en la Protección de LOS datos sujetas al RGPD [Internet]. [cited 2021 Mar 15]. Available from: https://www.aepd.es/sites/default/files/2019-09/guia-evaluaciones-de-impacto-rgpd.pdf
88. European Commission. Horizon 2020 Programme Guidance How to complete your ethics self-assessment [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2021 Mar 15]. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/grants_manual/hi/ethics/h2020_hi_ethics-self-assess_en.pdf
89. Agencia Española de Protección de Datos. Herramienta GESTIONA EIPD [Internet]. [cited 2021 Mar 15]. Available from: https://gestiona.aepd.es/
90. Consejería de Salud y Familias. Junta de Andalucía. Sistema Integrado de Epidemiología Genómica de Andalucía [Internet]. [cited 2021 Mar 26]. Available from: https://www.juntadeandalucia.es/organismos/saludyfamilias/areas/seguridad-alimentaria/salud-alimentos/paginas/siega.html