3.1. Land use surface classification
The land use type in Urban Zone 1, 2, and 3 was mapped to classify and quantify the land use class (water, built-up, shrubland, underbrush, remnants of vegetation, bare land, concrete, and asphalt) (Fig. 3).
Urban Zones 1, 2, and 3 exhibited similar land use type with variation in percentages. Urban Zone 1 recorded low urbanisation and high vegetation and water cover due to the Cuiabá river’s permanent preservation area (Figs. 3 and 4).
Urban Zone 2 recorded a higher percentage of bare land (24.7%), contributing to the encroachment of the remnants of natural vegetation and urban expansion. This zone did not have all roads paved (Figs. 3 and 4). Urban Zone 3 recorded a high demographic growth and a higher percentage of built-up and urban areas (29.6%), as well as a higher percentage of asphalt pavement (Figs. 3 and 4).
Four categories of land use types in urban zones were identified: waterproof surfaces (buildings and asphalt and concrete pavements), vegetation cover (remnants of natural vegetation, underbrush, and shrubland), bare land, and water surface. Urban Zone 3 recorded the highest percentage of waterproof surfaces, Urban Zone 1 exhibited the highest percentage of vegetation and water surface, and Urban Zone 2 recorded the highest percentage of bare land (Table 1).
Table 1
Percentages of land use type (waterproof surface, vegetation cover, bare land, and water surface) in Urban Zone 1, 2, and 3 in Cuiabá, MT, Brazil.
Urban Zone
|
Waterproof surface
|
Vegetation cover
|
Bare land
|
Water Surface
|
1
|
23.5%
|
50.6%
|
8.2%
|
17.7%
|
2
|
45.3%
|
29.7%
|
24.7%
|
0.3%
|
3
|
74.4%
|
20.0%
|
5.0%
|
0.6%
|
Urban Zone 3 recorded 74.4% of waterproof surface (Table 1) due to the presence of construction materials such as concrete and asphalt, which do not allow water to penetrate and absorb a large amount of heat, thereby increasing the urban temperatures. However, Urban Zone 1 exhibited the largest area under the vegetation cover and water surface (Table 1), which triggered the latent heat transfer process and contributed significantly to attenuating the urban heat.
3.2. Micrometeorological analysis during the hot-dry and hot-humid periods
During the daily cycle, the air temperature tended to be lower from 0 to 5 a.m., which is in contrast to the relative humidity of the air; during the first hours of the day (from 0 to 5 a.m.), it reached its maximum value (Fig. 5).
The maximum air temperature was observed for approximately 14 h, while the relative humidity was recorded at minimum value and was found to be inversely proportional. Similarly, the lowest value of air temperature was recorded at approximately 6 a.m., while the relative humidity was at its peak.
In Urban Zone 1, the difference between the maximum and minimum air temperatures was 8°C during the hot-humid and hot-dry periods, whereas the differences between the maximum and minimum humidity during the hot–humid and hot–dry periods were 28% and 35%, respectively. In Urban Zone 2, the difference between maximum and minimum temperature during the hot-dry and hot-humid periods was 11.5°C and 8.5°C, respectively, whereas the difference between the maximum and minimum humidity during the hot-humid and hot-dry periods was 40% and 32%, respectively. In Urban Zone 3, the difference between the maximum and minimum air temperatures during the hot-dry and hot-humid periods was 11.2°C and 7.4°C, respectively, whereas the difference between the maximum and minimum humidity during the hot-humid and hot-dry periods was 27% and 35%, respectively.
Urban Zone 1, with the highest percentage of vegetation cover and area under water cover, recorded the lowest air temperature. According to Estoque et al. (2017), vegetation cover reduces the land surface temperature due to its low thermal inertia, as it provides shade against sun radiation and generates cool island effects owing to evapotranspiration and emissivity.
Our results of air temperature and relative humidity corroborated the results of climate studies in Cuiabá, MT (Franco 2010; Maciel et al. 2011; Gomes 2012; Oliveira et al. 2012; Luz et al. 2013; Ávila et al. 2015). In Cuiabá, MT, Callejas (2012) and Santos (2012) reported that the thermal amplitude of the hot-dry period was higher than that of the wet period.
Global solar radiation exhibited a similar behaviour with maximum radiation values recorded between 11 a.m. and 12 p.m. (Fig. 6), when the hot-dry and hot-humid periods were analysed with their radiation values according to the daily photoperiod. The incidence of global solar radiation begins at sunrise, which increases until it reaches its peak between 11 a.m. and 12 p.m., and starts decreasing until sunset, around 6 p.m. and 7 p.m.. Maximum radiation values are observed during the hot-humid period.
Variations in global solar radiation across all the urban zones may have been influenced by the locations’ characteristics. For example, the Cuiabá River at station 1 favoured higher precipitation, and consequently increased cloudiness.
The minimum values of global solar radiation during the hot-dry period were in accordance with the studies carried out in Cuiabá, MT (Gomes 2010; Maciel et al. 2014), which can be explained by the low relative humidity causing the hot air masses, making it difficult for the global solar radiation to penetrate (Romero 2007).
3.3 Urban Heat Island (UHI) and Urban Cool Island (UCI)
The UHI and UCI intensities can be analysed through the warming and cooling rates in the local climate zones, where a positive ΔT indicates an average increase in the surface air temperature (warming) and negative ΔT indicates an average decrease in the surface air temperature (cooling).
To understand the behaviour of surface air temperature within a more urbanised area, it is important to analyse the hourly variation of ΔT in different seasons, while evaluating the processes that occur throughout the day.
In general, across all the three urban zones, ΔT reached its highest values after the sunrise, followed by a rapid change. In Urban Zone 1, the ΔT values tended to decrease after the morning period, and the results suggest existence of a ΔT with greater intensity within the urban green spaces during the hot-dry period.
This is because during the daytime, urban surfaces absorb more radiation than the urban edges (Monteiro et al. 2021), in this case, the rural areas. In Urban Zone 3, a higher ΔT value compared to Urban Zone 2 and Urban Zone 1 was recorded because of the confinement of the reflected radiation between the buildings in urbanised areas. However, in open spaces such as rural areas, a rapid radiative cooling is observed due to no confinement of warm air (Fig. 7, Table 2).
The results demonstrated presence of the UHI effect in all metropolitan areas, with intensities varying according to the period of the day. For example, the UHI intensity had a duration of 4 to 7 h/day during the hot-dry and hot-humid periods, respectively; however, in the urban zone, the UHI intensity had a duration of 15 to 24 h/day. The persistent effect of UCI in local green spaces can be explained by the fact that the monitoring weather station in Urban Zone 1 was installed in areas with high vegetation and surface water cover, leading to a cooling effect due to evapotranspiration and shadows cast by the trees.
In Urban Zone 1, the UCI values exhibited greater amplitude than that of the denser stations as urban configurations, varying between positive and negative values in relation to the average. Moreover, a substantial fraction of negative UHI intensity suggests the existence of a UCI effect.
The intensity of the UHI effect (during the day and night) was calculated considering the daytime from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. and night-time from 7 p.m. to 5 a.m.
During the daytime, among all the zones, Urban Zone 3 recorded the highest ΔT value (Fig. 7) during the hot-dry and hot-humid periods with an approximate average intensity of + 2.0°C and + 1.3°C, respectively; followed by Urban Zone 2 with an average intensity of + 1.35°C and + 1.0°C, indicating a UHI effect. In Urban Zone 1, a negative value of ΔT indicating a UCI effect was observed during the hot-dry and hot-humid periods, with an average intensity of -7.0°C and − 2.2°C, respectively. This reduction in ΔT value can possibly be attributed to occupation on the edge areas or greater afforestation in the zone. In general, during the daytime, the three areas presented different energy balances due to the environment’s urban characteristics, especially where concrete and asphalt contributed to heat retention. These materials heat up during the day, and then reradiate this heat during the night, making urban temperatures higher than the adjacent rural surroundings (Rizwan et al. 2008).
During the night-time, the Urban Zone 3 recorded the highest UHI value during hot-dry and hot-humid periods, with an average intensity of + 1.45°C and + 1.05°C, respectively. The UHI effect was still present in the zone during the night, possibly due to considerable concrete and asphalt areas.
Much research has been conducted to investigate the effect of increased air temperature on the energy demand of buildings in the urban areas (Kolokotroni 2007). The effect of vegetation cover reduces the heat island values (Kolokotroni et al. 2007; Watkins et al. 2007; Alves 2010) through photosynthesis; the solar energy is used to carry out evapotranspiration, thus avoiding this energy to heat the region (Gartland 2010), and by providing shade (Oliveira et al. 2012). Furthermore, in warmer and drier climates, the effect of vegetation cover is even greater (Lucena 2013).
In Tokyo, Dhakal and Hanaki (2002) reported the implications of anthropogenic heat discharge into the urban environment, and reported the maximum improvement of 0.47°C in mean temperature for the daytime as a result of greening the areas around the buildings.
In a tropical city, Wong and Yu (2005) reported difference between the urban and rural temperature of + 4 ºC. In Rio de Janeiro, Marques Filho et al. (2009) reported UCI value of approximately 4 to 5 ºC.
In a study conducted on the island of heat and its influence on the regional climate in the province of Gaungdong, South of China, Chen et al. (2006) found regions of bare land that were warmer than the other land covers. In Brazilian north-eastern cities, Bezerra et al. (2013) reported that the area with the highest urban density recorded higher UHI values, reaching up to + 7 ºC, compared to areas under vegetation cover.
Due to the high built-up density, verticalization, waterproof surfaces, and other characteristics, the warming effect generated in buildings and the manner in which this heat is exchanged with the ambient environment can play an important role in the urban climate (Krpo et al. 2010). Furthermore, the high demographic growth and urban expansion rates encroach on the last remnants of natural vegetation, contributing to thermal impacts (Oke and Maxwell 1984; Pongracz et al. 2006; Callejas 2012; Callejas et al. 2015).
The highest values of UHI in Cuiabá, MT occurred during the hot-wet period, according to Murphy et al. (2011), who recorded the difference of up to 1 ºC between UHI during the hot-humid and hot-dry periods in Puerto Rico.
According to the published UHI values from various tropical cities, the UHI effect is found to be more intense during the morning, reaching its maximum value only before mid-day (Marques et al. 2009; Murphy et al. 2011; Bezerra et al. 2013). This finding is not in agreement with the UHI values recorded in the temperate cities, where it reaches the maximum intensity at night (Oke 1982; Kolokotroni and Giridharan 2008; Van Hove et al. 2015).
A non-parametric t-test was performed to determine a statistically significant difference in UCI in urban zones 1, 2, and 3. The results suggest that the local conditions led to different UCI values with different variances, which proves the relationship between land cover and microclimates formed in each urban zone.
No significant relationship (R2 < 0.43, p < 0.05) was observed between the UHI intensity and global solar radiation during the hot-humid and hot-dry periods in urban zones 1, 2, and 3. These results demonstrate the importance of local cloud during a typical wet period and dry fog during the hot-dry period. During the hot-dry period, accumulated particles in the atmosphere are present due to the intense fire events that occur when the native vegetation is burnt in the state of Mato Grosso, Brazil (Dias et al. 2012). Both the effects reduce the incoming global solar radiation.
When the relationship between UHI intensity and air temperature in Urban Zones 2 and 3 was analysed, no significant relationship (R2 < 0.43, p < 0.05) during the hot-humid period and hot-dry period was observed. However, a significant relationship (R² = 0.808 during the hot-dry period and R² = 0.783 during the hot-humid period) was observed in Urban Zone 1.