1. Coccolini, F. et al. Pelvic trauma: WSES classification and guidelines. World J Emerg Surg12, 5, doi:10.1186/s13017-017-0117-6 (2017).
2. Balogh, Z. et al. The epidemiology of pelvic ring fractures: a population-based study. J Trauma63, 1066-1073; discussion 1072-1063, doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e3181589fa4 (2007).
3. Hermans, E., Biert, J. & Edwards, M. J. R. Epidemiology of Pelvic Ring Fractures in a Level 1 Trauma Center in the Netherlands. Hip Pelvis29, 253-261, doi:10.5371/hp.2017.29.4.253 (2017).
4. Chou, C. H. et al. Hemostasis as soon as possible? The role of the time to angioembolization in the management of pelvic fracture. World J Emerg Surg14, 28, doi:10.1186/s13017-019-0248-z (2019).
5. Costantini, T. W. et al. Current management of hemorrhage from severe pelvic fractures: Results of an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma multi-institutional trial. J Trauma Acute Care Surg80, 717-723; discussion 723-715, doi:10.1097/TA.0000000000001034 (2016).
6. Cullinane, D. C. et al. Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management guidelines for hemorrhage in pelvic fracture--update and systematic review. J Trauma71, 1850-1868, doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e31823dca9a (2011).
7. Burlew, C. C. et al. Preperitoneal pelvic packing reduces mortality in patients with life-threatening hemorrhage due to unstable pelvic fractures. J Trauma Acute Care Surg82, 233-242, doi:10.1097/TA.0000000000001324 (2017).
8. Suzuki, T., Smith, W. R. & Moore, E. E. Pelvic packing or angiography: competitive or complementary? Injury40, 343-353, doi:10.1016/j.injury.2008.12.006 (2009).
9. Osborn, P. M. et al. Direct retroperitoneal pelvic packing versus pelvic angiography: A comparison of two management protocols for haemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures. Injury40, 54-60, doi:10.1016/j.injury.2008.08.038 (2009).
10. Li, Q. et al. Retroperitoneal packing or angioembolization for haemorrhage control of pelvic fractures--Quasi-randomized clinical trial of 56 haemodynamically unstable patients with Injury Severity Score >/=33. Injury47, 395-401, doi:10.1016/j.injury.2015.10.008 (2016).
11. Tai, D. K. et al. Retroperitoneal pelvic packing in the management of hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures: a level I trauma center experience. J Trauma71, E79-86, doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e31820cede0 (2011).
12. Vaidya, R., Waldron, J., Scott, A. & Nasr, K. Angiography and Embolization in the Management of Bleeding Pelvic Fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg26, e68-e76, doi:10.5435/JAAOS-D-16-00600 (2018).
13. Tanizaki, S. et al. Time to pelvic embolization for hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures may affect the survival for delays up to 60 min. Injury45, 738-741, doi:10.1016/j.injury.2013.11.007 (2014).
14. Matsushima, K. et al. Effect of door-to-angioembolization time on mortality in pelvic fracture: Every hour of delay counts. J Trauma Acute Care Surg84, 685-692, doi:10.1097/TA.0000000000001803 (2018).
15. Lustenberger, T. et al. Secondary Angio-Embolization After Emergent Pelvic Stabilization and Pelvic Packing Is a Safe Option for Patients With Persistent Hemorrhage From Unstable Pelvic Ring Injuries. Front Surg7, 601140, doi:10.3389/fsurg.2020.601140 (2020).
16. Marzi, I. & Lustenberger, T. Management of Bleeding Pelvic Fractures. Scand J Surg103, 104-111, doi:10.1177/1457496914525604 (2014).
17. Burlew, C. C. et al. Preperitoneal pelvic packing/external fixation with secondary angioembolization: optimal care for life-threatening hemorrhage from unstable pelvic fractures. J Am Coll Surg212, 628-635; discussion 635-627, doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.12.020 (2011).
18. Tesoriero, R. B. et al. Angiographic embolization for hemorrhage following pelvic fracture: Is it "time" for a paradigm shift? J Trauma Acute Care Surg82, 18-26, doi:10.1097/TA.0000000000001259 (2017).
19. Jarvis, S. et al. The effect of orthopaedic surgeons' and interventional radiologists' availability on the priority treatment sequence for hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures: a survey of US Level I trauma centers. J Orthop Surg Res14, 411, doi:10.1186/s13018-019-1417-1 (2019).
20. Magid, D. J. et al. Relationship between time of day, day of week, timeliness of reperfusion, and in-hospital mortality for patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. JAMA294, 803-812, doi:10.1001/jama.294.7.803 (2005).
21. Lorenzano, S. et al. Within-day and weekly variations of thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: results from safe implementation of treatments in stroke-international stroke thrombolysis register. Stroke45, 176-184, doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.002133 (2014).
22. Umemura, Y. et al. Hybrid emergency room shows maximum effect on trauma resuscitation when used in patients with higher severity. J Trauma Acute Care Surg90, 232-239, doi:10.1097/TA.0000000000003020 (2021).
23. Kinoshita, T. et al. Cost-effectiveness of a hybrid emergency room system for severe trauma: a health technology assessment from the perspective of the third-party payer in Japan. World J Emerg Surg16, 2, doi:10.1186/s13017-020-00344-x (2021).
24. Kirkpatrick, A. W. et al. The evolution of a purpose designed hybrid trauma operating room from the trauma service perspective: the RAPTOR (Resuscitation with Angiography Percutaneous Treatments and Operative Resuscitations). Injury45, 1413-1421, doi:10.1016/j.injury.2014.01.021 (2014).
25. Morozumi, J. et al. Impact of mobile angiography in the emergency department for controlling pelvic fracture hemorrhage with hemodynamic instability. J Trauma68, 90-95, doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e3181c40061 (2010).
26. Peduzzi, P., Concato, J., Feinstein, A. R. & Holford, T. R. Importance of events per independent variable in proportional hazards regression analysis. II. Accuracy and precision of regression estimates. J Clin Epidemiol48, 1503-1510, doi:10.1016/0895-4356(95)00048-8 (1995).