Our study showed that obesity is present in 62.3% of subjects with PH and was associated with a significant reduction in mortality among subjects with both precapillary PH as well as combined pre and postcapillary PH when compared with non-obese subjects. This finding was consistent in all included studies except the study by Weatherald et al., who found no effect of obesity on mortality [8].
The mechanism of the protective effect of obesity on mortality in cardiovascular disease is unknown but a few hypotheses have been explored. Adiponectin, a hormone derived from adipocytes, is thought to play a protective role in cardiovascular diseases by decreasing inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor α levels and inhibition of NF-κβ activity [10]. In a study by Kumada et al., low levels of adiponectin were associated with the development of coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction in humans [11]. Similarly, in animal models of PH, it has been shown that adiponectin is associated with reduced smooth muscle cell proliferation and decreasing levels of inflammatory cytokines [10]. Thus, patients who are normal or underweight may lose the protective effect of adiponectin. In addition, adipose tissue secretes apelin, an adipokine, which is known to promote vasodilation by activating nitric oxide synthase [12]. Whether the vasodilatory effect of apelin exits in obese PH patients remains unknown and is an area for further research.
While these findings are interesting, they should be interpreted with caution for several reasons. First, the hemodynamic variables between the two patient groups were different. In the three of the included studies [5, 6, 9], obese patients tended to have higher pulmonary artery wedge pressures suggesting that they may have occult left ventricular diastolic dysfunction despite meeting criteria for pre-capillary PH at the time of right heart catheterization [13]. In addition, obese patients in the same studies had higher cardiac output [5, 8] and lower PVR [5, 8] which could also contribute to improved outcomes in these patients[14]. Second, rather than obesity conferring a protective effect, it is also possible that low BMI may simply be a manifestation of declining health due to right ventricular dysfunction. This decline in right ventricular failure may manifest as cardiac cachexia; characterized by congestion of hepatic and splanchnic beds, intestinal dysmotility and protein malabsorption [15]. Third, BMI does not capture body composition accurately. The implication that higher BMI is related to higher fat mass is not necessarily true. Thus, a better predictor of mortality could be the total fat mass or the pattern of distribution of fat (central vs. peripheral). In a study of heart failure patients by Sutter et al., a J-shaped mortality curve was seen where patients with the lowest BMI and higher BMI (BMI > 35 kg/m2) had higher mortality compared to the overweight BMI 25–35 kg/m2 group [16]. On further analysis, it was found that having a higher lean body mass despite being overweight conferred a protective effect and that higher body fat percentage in the obese population was detrimental. A similar J-shaped mortality curve was also observed in patients with pre-capillary PH [8]. While these studies did not examine the body mass composition, it is possible that the morbidly obese PH patients who had a higher mortality had a higher fat mass percentage.
Our analysis is limited by its heterogeneity. Many potential reasons account for this. First, studies included used various definitions of PH. To minimize the impact of the variation, we only included studies that reported hemodynamics obtained by right heart catheterization and also performed a sub-group analysis for patients with pre-capillary PH. Second, three of the seven included studies were retrospective. Given that PH is a rare disease, data gathering is often limited to retrospective data from registries. Third, the confounding variables used in studies differed which could have affected the hazard ratios obtained when studying the impact of obesity in PH patients.
In summary, we found that obese PH patients had lower mortality compared to non-obese patients. This ‘obesity paradox’ in PH is a noteworthy finding and warrants further studies. Given the pathobiologic complexities of PH, it is possible that there are different phenotypes of obesity that confer either protective or pathologic effects on pulmonary vascular disease. Future studies examining the association between BMI and PH may help better define this relationship by studying the effect of body composition and body fat distribution on outcomes in PH. With the precise causal effects of obesity in PH being unknown, future registry-based studies could increase long term follow up of patients and closely track body composition to more precisely determine the effect of obesity in PH.