Predictive Parameters for the Worsening Clinical Course of Mild COVID-19 Pneumonia
Background: This study aimed to determine parameters for worsening oxygenation in mild COVID-19 pneumonia.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study included confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia in a single public hospital in South Korea from January to April 2020. Parameters were compared between the two groups on the basis of clinical course: the desaturation group was defined as those with oxygen saturation ≤ 94% on ambient air, or received oxygen or mechanical ventilation (MV) throughout the clinical course versus the nonevent group who were without any respiratory event up to 28 days. The severity and extent of viral pneumonia from an initial single chest CT were calculated using artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms and measured visually by a radiologist.
Results: We included 136 patients with 32 (23.5%) in the desaturation group, of whom two needed MV and one died. Initial vital signs and duration of symptoms showed no difference between the two groups, however, univariate logistic regression analysis revealed that a variety of parameters at admission were associated with an increased risk of a desaturation event. In a sex-, age-, and comorbid illness-matched case-control study, ferritin ≥ 280 μg/L (OR 3.600, 95% CI 1.142-11.346; p=0.029), LDH≥ 240 U/L (OR 3.600, 95% CI 1.142-11.346; p=0.029), pneumonia burden (OR 1.010, 95% CI 1.002-1.019; p=0.021), and extent (OR 1.194, 95% CI 1.017-1.401; p=0.030) by AI, and visual severity scores (OR 1.146, 95% CI 1.005-1.307; p=0.042) were the predictive parameters for worsening clinical course with desaturation.
Conclusion: Our study presents initial CT parameters measured by AI or visual severity scoring as well as serum markers of inflammation at admission as the best parameters for predicting worsening oxygenation in the COVID-19 pneumonia cohort. Initial chest CT scans may help clinicians diagnose viral pneumonia and evaluate the prognosis in mild COVID-19.
Figure 1
Figure 2
This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.
A warning message on Null Hypothesis Significance Test: “stop using the term ‘statistically significant’ entirely and moving to a world beyond ‘p < 0.05’” : “…, no p-value can reveal the plausibility, presence, truth, or importance of an association or effect. Therefore, a label of statistical significance does not mean or imply that an association or effect is highly probable, real, true, or important. Nor does a label of statistical nonsignificance lead to the association or effect being improbable, absent, false, or unimportant. Yet the dichotomization into ‘significant’ and ‘not significant’ is taken as an imprimatur of authority on these characteristics.” “To be clear, the problem is not that of having only two labels. Results should not be trichotomized, or indeed categorized into any number of groups, based on arbitrary p-value thresholds. Similarly, we need to stop using confidence intervals as another means of dichotomizing (based, on whether a null value falls within the interval). And, to preclude a reappearance of this problem elsewhere, we must not begin arbitrarily categorizing other statistical measures (such as Bayes factors).” Citation from: Ronald L. Wasserstein, Allen L. Schirm & Nicole A. Lazar, Moving to a World Beyond “p<0.05”, The American Statistician(2019), Vol. 73, No. S1, 1-19: Editorial.
Posted 07 Aug, 2020
Predictive Parameters for the Worsening Clinical Course of Mild COVID-19 Pneumonia
Posted 07 Aug, 2020
Background: This study aimed to determine parameters for worsening oxygenation in mild COVID-19 pneumonia.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study included confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia in a single public hospital in South Korea from January to April 2020. Parameters were compared between the two groups on the basis of clinical course: the desaturation group was defined as those with oxygen saturation ≤ 94% on ambient air, or received oxygen or mechanical ventilation (MV) throughout the clinical course versus the nonevent group who were without any respiratory event up to 28 days. The severity and extent of viral pneumonia from an initial single chest CT were calculated using artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms and measured visually by a radiologist.
Results: We included 136 patients with 32 (23.5%) in the desaturation group, of whom two needed MV and one died. Initial vital signs and duration of symptoms showed no difference between the two groups, however, univariate logistic regression analysis revealed that a variety of parameters at admission were associated with an increased risk of a desaturation event. In a sex-, age-, and comorbid illness-matched case-control study, ferritin ≥ 280 μg/L (OR 3.600, 95% CI 1.142-11.346; p=0.029), LDH≥ 240 U/L (OR 3.600, 95% CI 1.142-11.346; p=0.029), pneumonia burden (OR 1.010, 95% CI 1.002-1.019; p=0.021), and extent (OR 1.194, 95% CI 1.017-1.401; p=0.030) by AI, and visual severity scores (OR 1.146, 95% CI 1.005-1.307; p=0.042) were the predictive parameters for worsening clinical course with desaturation.
Conclusion: Our study presents initial CT parameters measured by AI or visual severity scoring as well as serum markers of inflammation at admission as the best parameters for predicting worsening oxygenation in the COVID-19 pneumonia cohort. Initial chest CT scans may help clinicians diagnose viral pneumonia and evaluate the prognosis in mild COVID-19.
Figure 1
Figure 2
A warning message on Null Hypothesis Significance Test: “stop using the term ‘statistically significant’ entirely and moving to a world beyond ‘p < 0.05’” : “…, no p-value can reveal the plausibility, presence, truth, or importance of an association or effect. Therefore, a label of statistical significance does not mean or imply that an association or effect is highly probable, real, true, or important. Nor does a label of statistical nonsignificance lead to the association or effect being improbable, absent, false, or unimportant. Yet the dichotomization into ‘significant’ and ‘not significant’ is taken as an imprimatur of authority on these characteristics.” “To be clear, the problem is not that of having only two labels. Results should not be trichotomized, or indeed categorized into any number of groups, based on arbitrary p-value thresholds. Similarly, we need to stop using confidence intervals as another means of dichotomizing (based, on whether a null value falls within the interval). And, to preclude a reappearance of this problem elsewhere, we must not begin arbitrarily categorizing other statistical measures (such as Bayes factors).” Citation from: Ronald L. Wasserstein, Allen L. Schirm & Nicole A. Lazar, Moving to a World Beyond “p<0.05”, The American Statistician(2019), Vol. 73, No. S1, 1-19: Editorial.