Severe tibia plateau fractures (Schatzker V and VI) associated with extensive soft tissue injury are difficult to manage. Open tibia plateau fractures are rare because it was often the result of blunt trauma. In case of severe open tibia plateau fractures, treatments were usually even more difficult and the complication rate remained high (15), regardless of the treatment regimen used. Circular wire external fixation with/without limited internal fixation was used for the treatment of severe tibial plateau fractures (including small cases of open tibial plateau fractures). These techniques were appropriate for treatment of this kind of comminuted fracture with severe soft tissue injury, with low rate of complications (9, 16–22). Moreover, these techniques provided acceptable clinical and radiological outcome for severe open/closed tibial plateau fractures (5, 6, 8). For severe tibia plateau fractures, it suggested wire external fixation appropriate for open fractures and ORIF should be performed only for closed fractures with marked displacement (23). Although the using of external fixations avoid soft tissue injury, 20% rate of pin tract infection is present (24).
The goals of surgical treatment of tibial plateau fractures include the soft tissues protection, articular surface reduction and the anatomic limb alignment restoration to allow early knee motion. For severe tibia plateau fractures, optimal reduction of comminuted lateral and medial articular surfaces requires visualization through an open reduction. Circular wire external fixations with/without limited internal fixations were more difficulty to obtain accurate reduction of the articular surface than ORIF. In 1992, a study reported 14 cases of grade II or III (Gustilo) open tibial plateau fractures (Schatzker V and VI) were treated by immediate rigid internal fixation without severe complication, such as deep infection (10). And dual plating using anterolateral and posteromedial incisions were used for 11 open tibial plateau fractures after proper soft-tissue handling (1 Gustilo type II, 7 type III-A, 2 type III-B, and 1 type III-C, AO/OTA 41-C3). This technique associated with low incidence of soft tissues related complications (11). ORIF techniques provide good visualization of fractures sites, but they may result in a higher rate of soft tissue related complications. To produce much less damage to the soft tissues, the minimally invasive stabilization techniques were performed for 10 open tibial plateau fractures (8 Gustilo Type IIIA and 2 Type IIIB, AO/OTA 41-C ) (12). And a multicenter study indicated minimally invasive stabilization techniques is an acceptable alternative for treatment of open proximal tibia or tibial plateau fractures (13).
Wing external fixations produced less damage to the soft tissues but allowed little facility for reduction. ORIF provided optimal reduction of comminuted articular surfaces under visualization but associated higher rate of soft-tissue complications. In our study, we presented 11 cases of patients associated the comminuted articular surfaces fragments may be not permit adequate reduction and fixation by wing external fixations. And, the severe open soft-tissue injury with varying degrees of contamination affect primary internal fixation. The 11 patients with grade III (Gustilo) severe open tibial plateau fractures (Schatzker V and VI) were managed by staged protocol. Staged protocol involving temporizing knee-spanning external fixation and delayed definitive fixation had been reported for treatment of 57 cases of high-energy proximal tibia fractures (41 closed and 16 open fractures, 95% of Schatzker V and VI) (14). In this study, the articular surfaces fragments reduction and limb alignment correction were not mentioned during the first stage operation. We thought that it is very important for definitive internal fixation.
In our present study, during the first stage operation, the 11 cases of patients underwent radical debridement; the comminuted articular surfaces fragments were reduced and fixed by Kirschner wire through the open wounds and the auxiliary incision if necessary; and temporizing knee-spanning external fixation is used for providing primary stability of tibia plateau fractures and limb alignment correction. We fell that the first stage articular surfaces fragments reduction and fixation and limb alignment correction are very important for successful definitive internal fixation and satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes. For grade III (Gustilo) open tibial plateau fractures, 3–4 weeks are often required for adequate healing of the soft tissues injury. If the articular surfaces fragments reduction and anatomic limb alignment are not satisfactory achieved it will be a disaster for the definitive internal fixation. In our series, the mean time from first stage operation to the definitive internal fixation was 26 days. We obtained satisfactory articular surfaces fragments reduction and anatomic limb alignment at first stage operation. During the second stage, minimally invasive incision was used for definitive internal fixation in 8 cases of the patients. Only 3 cases of patients required one standard lateral or medial skin incisions for limb alignment correction since limb malalignment was happened after temporizing knee-spanning external fixation. After the definitive internal fixation, varying degrees of knee joint stiffness was noted in all of the 11 cases of patients. The mobilization of the knee joint achieved 90–100° by manual release. And the knee stability was confirmed by the physical examination. In our study, low rate of soft tissues complications were presented because of limited soft tissues detachment during the second stage operation. And these techniques achieved satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes.
Our study emphasizes the articular surfaces fragments reduction and limb alignment correction is very important during the first stage operation. And then, limited soft tissues detachment for the definitive internal fixation can be applied in the second stage operation. There were several limitations in our study. The limited size of the study sample was insufficient for clinical evaluation. Moreover, this was a retrospective study and not randomized.