In the present study, Sphingomonas sp. YT1005 was identified as a cultivable pyrene degrader from soils at an abandoned steel plant site. Sphingomonas is a typical PAH-degrading microorganism (Zhao et al 2017). Sphingomonas LB126 is reported to use fluorene as the sole carbon or energy source and can co-metabolize phenanthrene, fluoranthene, anthracene and dibenzothiophene (van Herwijnen et al 2003). Sphingomonas sp. GY2B isolated from petroleum-contaminated soils could degrade phenanthrene through the salicylate pathway (Tao et al 2007). However, the isolated strain Sphingomonas sp. YT1005 in this study belongs to Sphingomonas echinoides, which is not previously linked with pyrene degradation, and our study brought direct evidence of their functions in metabolizing pyrene.
The dominant bacterial genera in soils (Sphingomonas, Arthrobacter, Lysobacter, Rhodococcus, Pedobacter, Aeromicrobium and Pseudonocardia) are abundant soil bacterial lineages (Delgado-Baquerizo et al 2018) and participate in soil carbon and nitrogen cycles (Schimel and Schaeffer 2012). After pyrene degradation, the relative abundance of Pseudonocardia, Streptomyces, Lysobacter and Thermomonas significantly increased. They are reported to be responsible for PAHs biodegradation by many previous studies. Lysobacter is linked to pyrene degradation (Wang et al 2018) and Thermomonas has the capacity of degrading anthracene (Nzila et al 2018). Our findings were consistent with these reports and indicated that predominant bacterial taxa in pyrene-contaminated soils were related to pyrene tolerance or degradation.
Both bacterial α-diversity and community composition were of no significant difference between OS_NC and MMI_NC treatments, indicating that MNP-functionalization had little impacts on soil bacterial community and did not affect pyrene biodegradation process (Wang et al 2016). During the pyrene degradation process, the active pyrene degraders utilized pyrene and lost magnetism gradually, resulting in their enrichment in the magnetic-free fractions of MFCs (Zhang et al 2015). Accordingly, the community structure of MFC_Pyr was different from MFC_NC and the enriched bacterial lineages were the potential active pyrene degraders (Fig. 2B).
The active pyrene degrading consortium isolated by MMI included Gp16, Streptomyces, Pseudonocardia, Panacagrimonas, Methylotenera and Nitrospira (Fig. 3C). Among them, the roles of Streptomyces and Pseudonocardia in PAH biodegradation have been previously reported (Chaudhary et al 2011, Chen et al 2018). Pseudonocardia could degrade pyrene in agricultural soils (Chen et al 2018) and Streptomyces rochei was capable of using anthracene, fluorene, phenanthrene and pyrene as the sole carbon source (Chaudhary et al 2011). As for other bacterial taxa, Gp16 is reported to tolerate toxic chemicals (De et al 2003, De and Ramaiah 2007), and Methylotenera is a methylamine- and methanol-utilizing bacterium with denitrification capability (Kalyuzhnaya et al 2010, Mustakhimov et al 2013). Panacagrimonas is newly isolated from soils (Im et al 2010) and enriched in the rhizosphere of pioneer plants in metal-contaminated soils (Navarro-Noya et al 2010). Nitrospira is normally viewed as key nitrifiers in soils (Li et al 2019, Wang et al 2019). However, no study has ever reported their involvement in pyrene degradation, and this work broadened our understanding on pyrene-degrading microbes, suggesting that numerous soil microbes have the capability to degrade pyrene.
The relative abundance of all pyrene dioxygenase genes was higher in OS_Pyr than OS_NC treatments, hinting the enrichment of pyrene degraders harboring dioxygenase genes with pyrene amendment. Additionally, their relative abundance was around 10–200 folds higher in MFC_Pyr than OS_Pyr, proving the successful isolation of the active pyrene degrading microbes in MFC fractions (Fig. 5A). Each pyrene dioxygenase gene exhibited a positive correlation with pyrene degradation efficiency (Table 1 and Fig. 5), suggesting their critical roles in pyrene degradation. nidA, nidA3 and PAH-RHDα-GP genes are reported as biomarkers for pyrene degradation in many previous studies. As a key gene for the initial hydroxylation of PAH aromatic ring, the α subunit of nidA-encoding dioxygenase was cloned in Mycobacterium sp. strain PYR-1 (Khan et al 2001, Hall et al 2005) and proved to be critical in pyrene degradation (Guo et al 2010). The relative abundance of nidA3 gene was linked to pyrene biodegradation efficiency by PAH-degrading communities (Chen et al 2016). PAH-RHDα-GP genes in the initial step of PAH aerobic metabolism demonstrated a positive correlation with PAH biodegradation potential in soils (Cebron et al 2008, Jurelevicius et al 2012). In addition, the relative abundance of all pyrene dioxygenase genes was also positively correlated with that of the potential active pyrene degraders in MFC_Pyr treatment (0.8611, p < 0.01), hinting that they might harbor these pyrene dioxygenase encoding genes.
Cultivable pyrene degrader Sphingomonas sp. YT1005 was found to degrade pyrene following the phthalate pathway. All the metabolites in CK_Sph treatments have been reported as key metabolites in the phthalate pathway by previous studies, e.g., cis-4,5-pyrene dihydrodiol (metabolite ①) (Luan et al 2006, Zhong et al 2006), dihydroxyphenanthrene (metabolite ②) (Zhong et al 2006), 2-hydroxy-2-H-benzo[h]chromene-2-carboxylic acid (metabolite ③) (Wu et al 2019, Zhou et al 2016), 2-methylnaphthalene (metabolite ④) (Wu et al 2019) and 1-hydroxy-2-naphthoic acid (metabolite ⑤). In contrast, metabolites of protocatechuic acid (metabolite ⑦) (Jin et al 2016a), 4-phenanthrenol (metabolite ⑧) (Wu et al 2019, Zhong et al 2006), trans-2'-carboxybenzalpyruvate (metabolite ⑨) and salicylic acid (metabolite ⑩) (Zhou et al 2016, Zhong et al 2017) are involved in the salicylate pathway of PAHs degradation. Thus, MMI-isolated pyrene degrading consortium metabolized pyrene through both phthalate and salicylate pathways (Fig. 6). Both phthalate and salicylate pathways are important in pyrene metabolism (Sun et al 2019) and previously reported for the degradation of other PAHs. Pyrene-degrading strains mainly exhibit the phthalate pathway for pyrene (Liang et al 2006, Jin et al 2016b). Only few studies suggested the involvement of salicylate pathway in pyrene degradation, such as Mycobacterium sp. WY10 which degrades pyrene predominantly in the phthalate pathway and minorly in the salicylate pathway (Sun et al 2019). The extra salicylate pathway imposed by MMI-isolated pyrene degrading consortium suggested a more complex pyrene degradation pathways in natural habitats than individual pyrene-degrading strains (Zafra et al 2017, Gallego et al 2014), hinting a underestimated diversity of pyrene degraders. MMI is therefore an effective approach to separate the active pyrene degraders from soil matrices, not only helping in building up high-efficient degrading consortiums for bioaugmentation but also contributing to our deeper understanding on the actual players and pathways for pyrene metabolism in soils.
Enhanced pyrene degradation performance by bioaugmentation with soil indigenous microbes has been reported in many previous studies (Chen et al 2016, Wang et al 2018). However, bioaugmentation postpone or even failure commonly occurs, generally explained by microbial acclimation to environment changes, e.g., morphological, physiological and behavioral adjustments (Ren et al 2018, Macleod and Semple 2006). In the present study, bioaugmentation with Sphingomonas sp. YT1005 in either sterile soils (CK_Sph) or original soils (BA_Sph) did not have satisfactory pyrene degradation performance (Fig. 1), attributing to the complex bacterial intra-correlations within the bacterial community. Pyrene degradation efficiency was consistent between OS_Pyr and CK_MFC treatments, proving that MMI-enriched bacterial consortium had the same pyrene degradation capability comparing to indigenous microbiota. Accordingly, the enriched bacterial consortium consisting of Gp16, Streptomyces, Pseudonocardia, Panacagrimonas, Methylotenera and Nitrospira was responsible for in-situ pyrene degradation. However, Sphingomonas sp. exhibited negative correlations with those active pyrene degraders (Fig. 4), and the introduction of Sphingomonas sp. in BA_Sph treatments therefore inhibited their activities and consequently resulted in bioaugmentation postpone. This explanation was consistent with some previous studies that the correlation between pure-cultivation isolated and indigenous degraders affected the bioaugmentation performance. Non-active degrader Marmoricola LJ-33 significantly enhanced biphenyl degradation efficiency in soils by changing bacterial diversity in biphenyl metabolism (Li et al 2020). Another bioaugmentation by PAH-degrader Acinetobacter tandoii LJ-5 produced a significant increased phenanthrene mineralization, attributing to the altered diversity of the active phenanthrene degraders, instead of Acinetobacter tandoii LJ-5 itself (Li et al 2018). We then propose the mechanism explaining bioaugmentation performance regarding intra-correlations between cultivable and active pyrene degraders (Fig. 7). Ehanced bioaugmentation is expected when these two groups of bacteria exhibit positive intra-correlations, whereas negative intra-correlations between cultivable and active pyrene degraders consequently result in bioagumentation postpone or failure. As for neutral intra-correlations, the effectiveness and performance of bioaugmentation is non-deterministric and potentially dependent on other environmental variables.