Identification of DEFRlncRNAs
The study workflow is illustrated in Fig. 1. The co-expression analysis of ferroptosis-related genes and lncRNAs is shown in Fig. 2A. Following differential analysis, we obtained 126 DEFRlncRNAs, which included 105 upregulated genes and 21 downregulated genes (Fig. 2B and C).
Identification Of Prognostic Signature
Subsequently, univariate Cox, LASSO regression, and multivariate Cox regression analyses resulted in 18 DEFRlncRNA pairs being included in the prognostic signature (Fig. 3A–C). The risk value was calculated for each sample (Fig. 4A) and cut-off points were selected for high and low risks. The ROC curves at 1, 3, and 5 years were plotted, and all three curves had high area under the curve (AUC; Fig. 4B). The AUC values of the 5-year ROC curve were compared with other clinical characteristics, and the 5-year ROC AUC values were far higher than those of the other clinical features (Fig. 4C). Subsequently, we performed survival difference analysis for the high- and low-risk groups. We found survival in the low-risk group was significantly greater than that of the high-risk group (Fig. 5A–C).
Independent Prognostic Validation Of Defrlncrna Pairs Signature
We then performed univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses of risk scores, age, sex, tumor grade, and tumor stage. Age, tumor stage, and risk score had independent prognostic values (Fig. 6A and B). Therefore, we conducted a stratified analysis where samples of patients with bladder cancer into two age groups: young (age ≤ 65 years) and elderly (age > 65 years) and performed survival analysis of high- and low-risk patients within each age group. The survival rate of low-risk patients was higher than that of high-risk patients in both the young and elderly groups (p < 0.001, Fig. 6C and D). When patients were divided by tumor stage into early (stages I–II) and late (stages III–IV) and survival analysis was performed, low-risk patients had improved survival compared to high-risk patients (p < 0.001, Fig. 6E and F).
Correlation Between Defrlncrna Pairs Signature And Clinicopathological Features
The correlation between DEFRlncRNA pair signature and clinicopathological features was compared using the chi-square test (Fig. 7A) and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (Fig. 7B–F). Both tests showed that the risk score was significantly correlated with age, grade, clinical stage, T stage, and N stage.
Tumor immune infiltration in DEFRlncRNA pair signatures and analysis of ICI-related gene expression in different risk scores
Risk scores were then assessed by seven immune infiltration methods. Categorization in high-risk group was positively correlated with cancer-associated fibroblasts, macrophages, monocytes, neutrophils, NK cells, and CD8 + T cells, but negatively correlated with CD4 + naive T cells and B cell plasma (Fig. 8A).
We analyzed the association between several significant ICI-related genes and risk scores and found high risk correlated positively with the expression of PDL1 (Fig. 8B, p < 0.05), CTLA4 (Fig. 8C, p < 0.05), LAG3 (Fig. 8D, p < 0.05), and HAVCR2 (Fig. 8E, p < 0.001).
Correlation analysis between DEFRlncRNA pair signatures and sensitivity to chemotherapeutic drugs
We analyzed the association between commonly used chemotherapeutic agents and the risk scores calculated using DEFRlncRNA pair signature. High-risk score was negatively correlated sensitivity to cisplatin (Fig. 9A, p < 0.001), paclitaxel (Fig. 9B, p = 0.018), and docetaxel (Fig. 9C, p < 0.001). However, it was not significantly correlated with the IC50 of gemcitabine (Fig. 9D, p = 0.31). We speculate that this signature may have the ability to predict chemosensitivity.