1 Houk, K. N. & Liu, F. Holy grails for computational organic chemistry and biochemistry. Acc. Chem. Res. 50, 539-543 (2017).
2 Krska, S. W., DiRocco, D. A., Dreher, S. D. & Shevlin, M. The evolution of chemical high-throughput experimentation to address challenging problems in pharmaceutical synthesis. Acc. Chem. Res. 50, 2976-2985 (2017).
3 Patrascu, M. B. et al. From desktop to benchtop with automated computational workflows for computer-aided design in asymmetric catalysis. Nature Catalysis 3, 574-584 (2020).
4 Trost, B. M. & Van Vranken, D. L. Asymmetric transition metal-catalyzed allylic alkylations. Chem. Rev. 96, 395-422 (1996).
5 Diéguez, M. & Pàmies, O. Biaryl phosphites: New efficient adaptative ligands for Pd-catalyzed asymmetric allylic substitution reactions. Acc. Chem. Res. 43, 312-322 (2010).
6 Pàmies, O. et al. Recent Advances in Enantioselective Pd-Catalyzed Allylic Substitution: From Design to Applications. Chemical Reviews 121, 4373-4505 (2021).
7 Vitaku, E., Smith, D. T. & Njardarson, J. T. Analysis of the structural diversity, substitution patterns, and frequency of nitrogen heterocycles among U.S. FDA approved pharmaceuticals: miniperspective. J. Med. Chem. 57, 10257-10274 (2014).
8 Hu, L., Cai, A., Wu, Z., Kleij, A. W. & Huang, G. A Mechanistic Analysis of the Palladium‐Catalyzed Formation of Branched Allylic Amines Reveals the Origin of the Regio‐and Enantioselectivity through a Unique Inner‐Sphere Pathway. Angew. Chem. Intl. Ed. 58, 14694-14702 (2019).
9 Johannsen, M. & Jørgensen, K. A. Allylic amination. Chem. Rev. 98, 1689-1708 (1998).
10 Trost, B. M. Asymmetric allylic alkylation, an enabling methodology. J. Org. Chem. 69, 5813-5837 (2004).
11 Lu, Z. & Ma, S. Metal‐catalyzed enantioselective allylation in asymmetric synthesis. Angew. Chem. Intl. Ed. Engl. 47, 258-297 (2008).
12 Hansson, S. et al. Effects of phenanthroline type ligands on the dynamic processes of (h3-allyl) palladium complexes. Molecular structure of (2,9-dimethyl-1,10-phenanthroline)[(1, 2, 3-h)-3-methyl-2-butenyl]-chloropalladium. Organometallics 12, 4940-4948 (1993).
13 Cusumano, A. Q., Stoltz, B. M. & Goddard III, W. A. Reaction Mechanism, Origins of Enantioselectivity, and Reactivity Trends in Asymmetric Allylic Alkylation: A Comprehensive Quantum Mechanics Investigation of a C (sp3)–C (sp3) Cross-Coupling. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 13917-13933 (2020).
14 Trost, B. M., Machacek, M. R. & Aponick, A. Predicting the stereochemistry of diphenylphosphino benzoic acid (DPPBA)-based palladium-catalyzed asymmetric allylic alkylation reactions: a working model. Acc. Chem. Res. 39, 747-760 (2006).
15 McPherson, K. E., Croatt, M. P., Morehead Jr, A. T. & Sargent, A. L. DFT Mechanistic Investigation of an Enantioselective Tsuji–Trost Allylation Reaction. Organometallics 37, 3791-3802 (2018).
16 Helmchen, G. & Pfaltz, A. Phosphinooxazolines—a new class of versatile, modular P, N-ligands for asymmetric catalysis. Acc. Chem. Res. 33, 336-345 (2000).
17 Holtzman, B. S. et al. Ligand and base additive effects on the reversibility of nucleophilic addition in palladium-catalyzed allylic aminations monitored by nucleophile crossover. Tetrahedron Lett. 58, 432-436 (2017).
18 Császár, Z. et al. Aminoalkyl-phosphine (P, N) ligands with pentane-2, 4-diyl backbone in asymmetric allylic substitution reactions. Monatshefte f. Chemie 148, 2069-2077 (2017).
19 Biosca, M. et al. An improved class of phosphite-oxazoline ligands for Pd-catalyzed allylic substitution reactions. ACS Catalysis 9, 6033-6048 (2019).
20 Caminiti, N. S. et al. Reversible nucleophilic addition can lower the observed enantioselectivity in palladium-catalyzed allylic amination reactions with a variety of chiral ligands. Tetrahedron Lett. 56, 5445-5448 (2015).
21 Jaillet, A. et al. Design of P-Chirogenic Aminophosphine–Phosphinite Ligands at Both Phosphorus Centers: Origin of Enantioselectivities in Pd-Catalyzed Allylic Reactions. J. Org. Chem. 85, 14391-14410 (2020).
22 Zahrt, A. F., Athavale, S. V. & Denmark, S. E. Quantitative Structure–Selectivity Relationships in Enantioselective Catalysis: Past, Present, and Future. Chemical Reviews 120, 1620-1689, doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00425 (2020).
23 Jorner, K., Tomberg, A., Bauer, C., Sköld, C. & Norrby, P.-O. Organic reactivity from mechanism to machine learning. Nature Reviews Chemistry 5, 240-255, doi:10.1038/s41570-021-00260-x (2021).
24 Lam, Y.-H., Grayson, M. N., Holland, M. C., Simon, A. & Houk, K. N. Theory and modeling of asymmetric catalytic reactions. Acc. Chem. Res. 49, 750-762 (2016).
25 Reid, J. P. & Sigman, M. S. Comparing quantitative prediction methods for the discovery of small-molecule chiral catalysts. Nature Rev. Chemistry 2, 290-305 (2018).
26 Zahrt, A. F. et al. Prediction of higher-selectivity catalysts by computer-driven workflow and machine learning. Science 363, eaau5631, doi:10.1126/science.aau5631 (2019).
27 Hansen, E., Rosales, A. R., Tutkowski, B., Norrby, P.-O. & Wiest, O. Prediction of Stereochemistry using Q2MM. Acc. Chem. Res. 49, 996-1005 (2016).
28 Rosales, A. R. et al. Application of Q2MM to predictions in stereoselective synthesis. Chem. Comm. 54, 8294-8311 (2018).
29 Rosales, A. R. et al. Transition State Force Field for the Asymmetric Redox-Relay Heck Reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 9700-9707 (2020).
30 Le, D. N. et al. Hydrogenation catalyst generates cyclic peptide stereocentres in sequence. Nature chemistry 10, 968-973 (2018).
31 Rosales, A. R. et al. Rapid virtual screening of enantioselective catalysts using CatVS. Nature Catalysis 2, 41-45 (2019).
32 Hagelin, H., Åkermark, B. & Norrby, P.-O. New Molecular Mechanics (MM3*) Force Field Parameters for Calculations on (η3-Allyl) palladium Complexes with Nitrogen and Phosphorus Ligands. Organometallics 18, 2884-2895 (1999).
33 Hagelin, H., Svensson, M., Åkermark, B. & Norrby, P.-O. Molecular mechanics (MM3*) force field parameters for calculations on palladium olefin complexes with phosphorus ligands. Organometallics 18, 4574-4583 (1999).
34 Norrby, P.-O., Åkermark, B., Haeffner, F., Hansson, S. & Blomberg, M. Molecular mechanics (MM2) parameters for the (h3-allyl) palladium moiety. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115, 4859-4867 (1993).
35 Donoghue, P. J., Helquist, P., Norrby, P.-O. & Wiest, O. Development of a Q2MM force field for the asymmetric rhodium catalyzed hydrogenation of enamides. J. Chem. Theor. Comp. 4, 1313-1323 (2008).
36 Limé, E. et al. Stereoselectivity in asymmetric catalysis: the case of ruthenium-catalyzed ketone hydrogenation. J. Chem. Theor. Comp. 10, 2427-2435 (2014).
37 Mazuela, J., Pàmies, O. & Diéguez, M. A New Modular Phosphite‐Pyridine Ligand Library for Asymmetric Pd‐Catalyzed Allylic Substitution Reactions: A Study of the Key Pd‐π‐Allyl Intermediates. Chem. Eur. J. 19, 2416-2432 (2013).
38 Diéguez, M. & Pàmies, O. Modular Phosphite–Oxazoline/Oxazine Ligand Library for Asymmetric Pd‐Catalyzed Allylic Substitution Reactions: Scope and Limitations—Origin of Enantioselectivity. Chem. Eur. J. 14, 3653-3669 (2008).
39 Liu, Q. L. et al. A D‐Camphor‐Based Schiff Base as a Highly Efficient N,P Ligand for Enantioselective Palladium‐Catalyzed Allylic Substitutions. ChemCatChem 8, 1495-1499 (2016).
40 Zhao, Q., Zhuo, C.-X. & You, S.-L. Enantioselective synthesis of N-allylindoles via palladium-catalyzed allylic amination/oxidation of indolines. RSC Advances 4, 10875-10878 (2014).
41 Magre, M., Biosca, M., Norrby, P. O., Pàmies, O. & Diéguez, M. Theoretical and Experimental Optimization of a New Amino Phosphite Ligand Library for Asymmetric Palladium‐Catalyzed Allylic Substitution. ChemCatChem 7, 4091-4107 (2015).
42 Popa, D., Marcos, R., Sayalero, S., Vidal‐Ferran, A. & Pericas, M. A. Towards continuous flow, highly enantioselective allylic amination: ligand design, optimization and supporting. Adv. Synth. Cat. 351, 1539-1556 (2009).
43 Borràs, C. et al. Amino-P Ligands from Iminosugars: New Readily Available and Modular Ligands for Enantioselective Pd-Catalyzed Allylic Substitutions. Organometallics 37, 1682-1694 (2018).
44 Wang, Y., Vaismaa, M. J. P., Hämäläinen, A. M., Tois, J. E. & Franzén, R. Utilization of IndPHOX-ligands in palladium-catalysed asymmetric allylic aminations. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 22, 524-529 (2011).
45 Dauber-Osguthorpe, P. & Hagler, A. T. Biomolecular force fields: where have we been, where are we now, where do we need to go and how do we get there? J. Comp. Aid. Des. 33, 133-203 (2019).
46 Gaussian 16 Rev. B.01 (Wallingford, CT, 2016).
47 Zhao, Y. & Truhlar, D. G. The M06 suite of density functionals for main group thermochemistry, thermochemical kinetics, noncovalent interactions, excited states, and transition elements: two new functionals and systematic testing of four M06-class functionals and 12 other functionals. Theoretical Chemistry Accounts 120, 215-241 (2008).
48 Grimme, S., Antony, J., Ehrlich, S. & Krieg, H. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys. 132, 154104 (2010).
49 Breneman, C. M. & Wiberg, K. B. Determining atom-centered monopoles from molecular electrostatic potentials. The need for high sampling density in formamide conformational analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 11, 361-373 (1990).
50 Allinger, N. L., Yuh, Y. H. & Lii, J. H. Molecular mechanics. The MM3 force field for hydrocarbons. 1. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 111, 8551-8566 (1989).
51 MacroModel Release 2018-3 (Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY, 2018).