Characterization of Ab-N,S-GQD@AuNP-PAni on the CSR
The AuNP-PAni nanocomposite was deposited on a finely electropolymerized polyaniline-coated CSR electrode to form a AuNP-PAni/PAni||CSR electrode. The Ab-N,S-GQDs were then bound to the AuNP-PAni to prepare Ab-N,S-GQD@AuNP-PAni/PAni/CSR as shown in Scheme 1. In the N,S-GQD@AuNP-PAni nanocomposite, the AuNPs play an anchoring role between the N,S-GQDs and the polyaniline wires via soft acid – soft base interactions between Au and S. According to the TEM analysis, the diameter of the AuNP-PAni nanowires was 50 – 70 nm. Additionally, the AuNPs dispersed evenly in the polymeric chain, and their size ranged from 6 – 14 nm (Fig. 1A). The HRTEM image of the N,S-GQD@AuNP-PAni nanocomposite shows two distinct fringe patterns (Fig. 1B) of two crystalized structures of N,S-GQDs, and the AuNPs are deciphered as shown in Fig. 1C. The characteristic fringe of 0.24 nm for AuNPs is deciphered as them being adjacent to the N,S-GQDs with a fringe distance of 0.21 nm, which is the distinctive fringe of the carbon lattice (Fig. 1C) [35, 36].
The structural properties of the N,S-GQD@AuNP-PAni nanocomposite were analyzed by XRD, as shown in Fig. 1D. AuNP peaks are observed in the nanocomposite along with the characteristic peaks at 2θ = 23.6°, 25.5°, 28.2°, 38.2°, 44.3°, 64.4°, and 78.2° corresponding to the (100), (110), (111), (200), (220), and (221) planes, respectively (Fig. 1D) [37, 38]. After the N,S-GQDs were bound, the nanocomposite showed similar peaks and intensities, which indicates that the attachment of GQDs does not induce any structural changes of the AuNPs [39]. The graphitic layer shows a hump at 24° in the XRD spectrum, which is completely masked by the high-intensity peaks of AuNPs. The conjugation of antibody on the N,S-GQDs was confirmed by ELISA. The absorbance value significantly increased after conjugation of the antibody, which confirms the conjugation of Ab-N,S-GQDs (Fig. 1E).
The electrochemical properties of the CSR electrode surface were measured by cyclic voltammetry. Despite the functional conducting matrix, the charge storage capacity of the bare CSR is very low, and the bare CSR shows a narrow curve, which significantly increases after the polyaniline coating (Fig. 1F). Additionally, a redox peak of polyaniline appears at + 0.8/+ 0.1 V, indicating the formation of the emeraldine salt of polyaniline [40]. After the formation of the nanocomposite, the conductivity of the disposable electrode shows an enhancement of the current density, indicating successful preparation of the sensor electrode for electrochemical analysis.
Optimization of the sensing performance of Ab-N,S-GQD@AuNP-PAni
The thickness of the nanocomposite layer on the CSR matrix is an essential parameter for maintaining the reproducibility of a disposable electrode. The thickness of the base matrix of polyaniline is directly proportional to the CV cycle number in the electropolymerization step. The resistance of the polyaniline-coated CSR becomes the lowest at 15 cycles and increases after 20 cycles (Fig. S1) due to overoxidation. This result indicates that a thick polyaniline layer can lead to a reverse effect on the conductivity of CSR. The stability of the 15 cycled PAni/CSR was tested over 50 cycles, showing excellent stability under the optimized polyaniline layer condition (Fig. S2). The thickness of the layer was characterized by SEM and AFM. The bare CSR with a smooth surface becomes rough with coating of polymerized polyaniline (Fig. 2A‒B). The roughness of the polyaniline layer-coated CSR becomes smoother again after drop-casting Ab-N,S-GQD@AuNP-PAni to microscale order (Fig. 2C). A similar observation was noted in the corresponding AFM images, as presented in Fig. 2D‒E. The rough surface of CSR becomes relatively smooth after the formation of nanoconjugates, following the same trend as the SEM images. The usefulness of AuNP-PAni as a highly conductive material was compared with that of CSR modified with AuNPs (Fig. S3). A standard layer method was used for AuNP modification. In this study, the electric resistance was used as an indicator, and it was shown that AuNPs are a suitable material for this purpose because they lead to higher conductivity by forming a complex with polyaniline nanowires.
After optimizing the PAni electropolymerization and thickness of the sensor electrode, the changes in the electrochemical properties were investigated by EIS. The conductivity and dielectric properties of the CSR surface gradually decreased after polyaniline and Ab-N,S-GQD-AuNP-PAni attachment (Fig. 2F), indicating successful formation of a sensor electrode suitable for virus detection.
Furthermore, the sensing area was optimized for virus detection. Electrodes with different sensor areas from 2 mm² to 25 mm² were prepared, and WSSV was detected by following the same procedure (Fig. S4). The larger the sensor area was, the more remarkable the change in the Rct value. The size of the sensing area indicates the size of the contact surface with the virus during the antigen-antibody reaction. It was suggested that the larger the area is, the more virus that binds to the sensor.
On the other hand, the sensor with a large area has a low correlation coefficient (R2 value) and a high error range, particularly in the high concentration range. As the area increases, it is difficult to obtain uniformity between electrodes with simple modification by only dropping nanomaterials, resulting in a low R2 value in virus detection. The electrode with a sensing area of 10 mm², which gave the most reliable result, was used as the optimum detection electrode.
Detection of WSSV
The Nyquist impedance plots of the disposable electrode after incubation of different concentrations of the virus from 102 –109 copies/ml are shown in Fig. 3A. The EIS responses of the sensor electrodes increase with the concentration of WSSV due to the high resistance accumulation between the virus-loaded nanocomposite and CSR. When WSSV binds to the sensing electrode, a large number of nonconducting virus particles cover the conducting surface of Ab-N,S-GQD@AuNP-PAni/CSR, increasing the charge transfer resistance (Rct). The percentage change of the signal difference between the Rct values of the corresponding virus-loaded electrode and the bare electrode was adopted as the measurement signal. The calibration plot displays an excellent linear relationship between Rct and the WSSV concentration (Fig. 3B). The LOD was 48.4 copies/ml, calculated by 3σ/S (S is the slope of the linear calibration plot, and σ is the unbiased standard deviation from the lowest signal of the detection result) [41]. This value is extremely low and sensitive enough to detect the real analyte [42]. After WSSV detection, the surface of the virus-loaded electrode exhibited a significantly increased roughness, indicating the presence of WSSV on the electrode (Fig. S5).
Selectivity and stability of the disposable electrode
As the antibody-conjugated nanocomposite governs the interaction between the analyte and the sensor electrode, the sensor should possess high selectivity. However, the specificity of the sensor for its real application is still significant for clarifying any possible cross-reactivity. To confirm the specificity for WSSV, various viruses were tested. The sensor responses, except for WSSV (Fig. 4A), were similar to that of the bare electrode, indicating the sensor specificity for the target virus.
The stability of the disposable electrode was tested for 8 weeks to observe its applicability for long-term usage. As depicted in Fig. 4B, the signal intensity of Rct after loading of 104 copies/ml virus remained at 86% until 35 d. However, it dropped to 73.4% after 56 d of storage. This result indicates that the performance of this electrode is 13.8% decreased after 5 weeks of storage. The sensing performance was significantly decreased after 5 weeks due to degradation of the antibody rather than deterioration of the nanocomposite, which was stable for 6 weeks.
In this work, a disposable electrode was fabricated on a CSR matrix using a Au-PAni-N,S-GQD nanocomposite conjugated with an anti-WSSV antibody for the detection of WSSV. The antigen-antibody interaction has been applied for specific target binding, which generates an EIS-based signal. To extend its application to other types of analytes, we prepared two different electrodes conjugated with different anti-HEV and anti-HA antibodies and detected their corresponding target viruses. The results demonstrate that the Nyquist impedance in both cases increases with increasing virus concentration (Fig. S6A and B), and their corresponding calibration lines show excellent linearity (Fig. S7A and B). The limit of detection was calculated as 34.6 DNA copies/ml for G3 HEV and 0.98 fg/ml for influenza virus A.
Real virus analysis
After successful detection of WSSV in a buffer medium, real samples were collected from 10 WSSV-infected shrimp and tested with the sensor. Their DNA copy numbers were measured by standard RT-PCR and then compared with the results obtained from this electrochemical detection technique. The detection results are summarized in Table 1 and Fig. 5A. According to the RT-PCR data, sample Nos. 2 and 4 do not contain any virus, showing 2.4 and 6.5 copies/ml according to our electrochemical method, and can be ignored. The electrochemical detection results for sample Nos. 8 and 9 significantly deviate from the RT-PCR results. However, the overall trend of the RT-PCR results for the samples shows excellent similarity to the trend of the electrochemical sensor results, confirming the reproducibility of the sensor. In the western blot analysis, the virus titer above 107 copies/ml shows VP-28 protein bands at approximately 22 kDa (Fig. 5B), but less than 107 copies/ml could not be detected (Table 1). This indicates that our sensing system shows a 6–7 order of magnitude higher sensitivity than western blot. Although the correlation coefficient between the two methods is 90%, the developed method can be used to judge WSSV infection in a short time with easy handling.
Table 1. Details of the detection results for real sample detection using the electrochemical method and RT-PCR.
Sample No
|
Rct value±SD
(n=3)
|
WSSV concentration (DNA copies/ml)
|
VP28 detection
|
Shrimp
|
by EIS*
|
by RT-PCR
|
Control
|
2680±146
|
0
|
–
|
|
|
1
|
7179±238
|
4.8×10³
|
1.2×10⁵
|
no
|
live
|
2
|
2797±72
|
2.4×10⁰
|
0
|
no
|
live
|
3
|
8988±108
|
2.0×10⁴
|
6.2×10⁵
|
no
|
dead
|
4
|
4572±143
|
6.5×10⁰
|
0
|
no
|
live
|
5
|
12101±490
|
2.6×10⁵
|
8.4×10⁷
|
no
|
dead
|
6
|
16946±406
|
1.4×10⁷
|
9.6×10⁸
|
yes
|
dead
|
7
|
26949±140
|
4.7×10¹⁰
|
2.2×10¹⁰
|
yes
|
dead
|
8
|
18946±893
|
6.9×10⁷
|
7.5×10⁹
|
yes
|
dead
|
9
|
22308±195
|
1.0×10⁹
|
3.5×10⁸
|
yes
|
dead
|
10
|
13988±406
|
1.2×10⁶
|
2.4×10⁸
|
yes
|
dead
|
* The copy number of WSSV was determined from the calibration line (Fig. 3C) using the measured Rct value.