Directional scattering from the RPE layer.
Directional retinal OCT imaging was performed in both mouse strains at a similar retinal eccentricity (distance from ONH) as depicted in en face OCT fundus images shown in Fig. 1(a) and (b). The SSOCT system (axial resolution ~ 7.5 µm in air) visualized major retinal boundaries/layers of two mouse strains such as ILM/NFL, outer plexiform layer (OPL), ELM, IS/OS junction, and RPE/BrM (Fig. 1(c) and (d)). Imaging distal tips of the photoreceptors outer segment was not possible with the system due to the limited axial resolution.
DOCT images of retinas of both mouse strains were acquired by varying beam entry positions at the pupil (varying angles of incidence) on the retina along vertical (V) and horizontal (H) directions (Fig. 2). This movement of the pupil entry position results in tilt in the B-scans. The average tilt of the B-scan was measured to be approximately 3 degrees for every 100 µm of lateral displacement at the entrance pupil position. Acquired dOCT images showed that the reflectivity of many retinal layers depends on the angle of incidence, and visibility of these structures varies as a function of the angle of illumination.
The reflectivity of the retinal layers was quantitatively measured from the averaged A-scan profile extracted from the dOCT images (Fig. 3). The multiple peaks that appeared in the A-scan profiles provided the position and magnitude of the reflectivity of hyperreflective layers such as ILM, OPL, ELM, IS/OS junction, and RPE/BrM complex. The RPE/BrM complex showed the highest peak (reflectivity) among all layers and varied most with angle of incidence.
The incident angle-dependent reflectivity of RPE/BrM complex and other three layers (ILM, ELM, IS/OS) of both strains were measured from A-scan profiles and fitted with a Gaussian function (Fig. 4). The directionality parameter (ρ) of different retinal layers was obtained from Gaussian function using Eq. (1). Table 1 lists the mean and standard error of the directionality parameter measured for different retinal layers in both strains. A large value of the directionality parameter represents a narrow reflectivity profile, which implies a highly directional scattering. Consistent with our previous observations, scattering from the ILM/NFL and ELM was highly directional, whereas the IS/OS junction in both strains exhibited a wider reflectivity profile (Fig. 4 (a) and (b). Furthermore, the directionality parameters measured for ILM/NFL, ELM and IS/OS (which lack melanosomes) are similar and do not statistically differ between the two mouse strains (p = 0.27). However, the directional reflectivity profile of the RPEs of the two strains showed a significant difference (p = 0.01). The Gaussian profile obtained from WT is wider than Abca4−/− mice. The average directionality parameter of RPE/BrM complex measured for Abca4−/− mice is nearly 4-fold higher than for WT.
Table 1
Mean value of directionality (ρ) with standard error
Layers | Abca4−/− WT |
| H V H V |
ILM/NFL | 0.240 0.232 0.265 0.274 (± 0.025) (± 0.022) (± 0.018) (± 0.014) |
ELM | 0.222 0.219 0.247 0.263 (± 0.025) (± 0.057) (± 0.015) (± 0.011) |
IS/OS | 0.018 0.023 0.026 0.039 (± 0.010) (± 0.004) (± 0.005) (± 0.008) |
RPE/BrM | 0.171 0.184 0.041 0.052 (± 0.013) (± 0.025) (± 0.015) (± 0.012) |
Fundus Af Images And Emission Spectra
FAF images and emission spectra acquired in vivo from WT and Abca4−/− are shown in Fig. 5. Figures 5(a) and (b) are the representative FAF images obtained from the WT and Abca4−/−, respectively. Figures 5(c) and 5(d) represent the in vivo recorded AF spectra from the fundus area (shown in red dashed box) of the WT and Abca4−/−, respectively. There was a notably increased intensity (brightness) of the AF from Abca4−/− mice compared to WT, approximately 3.4-fold higher. Additionally, a significant “red” shift in the fluorescence emission spectrum was observed in the Abca4−/− relative to the WT.
Ex vivo fluorescence confocal images
High-resolution confocal images of RPE flat-mounts from WT and Abca4−/− mice were acquired with 488 nm excitation (Figs. 6). Confocal images of the RPE flat-mounts were obtained with and without an emission filter in the microscope detection path. Figures 6(a) and 6(c) show representative confocal images (depth projected) acquired from WT and Abca4−/− mice, respectively, without an emission filter. Lack of emission filter permitted the measurement of back-scattered light from RPE resulting in the visualization of both green-colored and spindle-shaped melanosomes (thick white solid arrows) and golden-yellow-colored spherical lipofuscin granules (white hollow arrows)32. Figures 6(b) and 6(d) represent the confocal images acquired with an emission filter inserted in the detection channel of the microscope. The melanosomes are not visible in these images because the scattered light from the melanosomes is fully blocked by the emission filter, so only AF signal reaches the spectral detector. The bottom panel of each confocal image represents the side view of the RPE confocal volume. Consistent with our previous observations, melanosomes were predominantly located at the apical side of the RPE (dashed white arrow) and lipofuscin granules occupied the basal region of the RPE (solid thin arrow)32.
Qualitative and quantitative analyses revealed material differences in the density of the melanosomes and lipofuscin granules (number of granules per picolitre) between Abca4−/− and WT controls. There is a reduction in the density of melanosomes in the RPE of Abca4−/− relative to WT. In contrast, the number of lipofuscin granules in the Abca4−/− is significantly greater than in the WT. The average density of the lipofuscin granules and melanosomes were calculated from the RPE confocal volumes (Fig. 6(e) and 6(f)). The density of lipofuscin granules is approximately 4.2 times higher in Abca4−/− than in WT mice, whereas the density of melanosomes declined in Abca4−/− mice by a factor 4.7 compared to WT mice.
The normalized average emission spectra from 50 lipofuscin granules from both strains were extracted from confocal data (Fig. 7(a)). No significant change in the emission peak or spectrum shape was found between the mouse strains. The average AF emission spectra from the confocal volume were acquired, and the emission spectrum from the Abca4−/− was elevated by a factor of ~ 3.9 relative to WT (Fig. 7(b)). The normalized spectra (Fig. 7(c)) from the confocal volume revealed that the peak emission wavelength and spectrum shape do not significantly differ between the two strains.
Electron Microscopy Images Of Rpe
Electron microscopy images of RPE cell layer from WT and Abca4−/− mice are shown in Figs. 8(a) and 8(b), respectively. These axial cross-section EM images visualized all major organelles of RPE cells (melanosomes, lipofuscin, melanolipofuscin, and phagocytosed outer segments), their morphology, and population in both strains35. Notable differences between strains were found regarding the morphology and the density of these RPE organelles. The bottom panel of each EM image represents the mapping of the locations of each type of RPE organelles. The density (mean and SE of granules per µm2 of imaged RPE) of lipofuscin and melanolipofuscin granules in the RPE of Abca4−/− was measured as 0.062 ± 0.011 and 0.053 ± 0.006, respectively. Conversely, a reduced density of lipofuscin (0.020 ± 0.009) and melanolipofuscin granules (0.006 ± 0.001) was measured in the WT (Figs. 8(c) and 8(d)). For calculating the area of RPE from EM images shown in 8(a) and (b), regions covering the photoreceptor outer segments were excluded. The densities of the melanosomes in the RPE of WT and Abca4−/− were found to be 0.131 ± 0.064 and 0.035 ± 0.018, respectively (Fig. 8(e)). Overall, there was a 4.7-fold increase in the number of lipofuscin/melanolipofuscin granules in Abca4−/− relative to WT, and a 3.7-fold decrease in the number of melanosomes in the Abca4−/− RPE as compared to the WT (Fig. 8(f)).