LC-MS analysis of S. minor hydro-ethanolic extract
In total, 26 compounds were identified in the hydro-ethanolic extract of S. minor using LC-MS analysis in its negative mode. These compounds were phenolic compounds, including quercetin, myricetin, kaempferol, kaempferol-3-glucuronide, quercetin − 3-glucuronide ellagic acid, catechin, and various gallic acid derivatives (consisting of galloyl glucoside, galloylquinic acid, methylgallate hexoside, and catechin gallate). Moreover, Ayoub (2003) isolated unique phenolic carboxylic acids, 4, 8-dimethoxy-7-hydroxy-2-oxo-2H-1-benzopyran-5,6-dicarboxylic acid, and 2-(4-carboxy-3-methoxystyryl)-2-methoxysuccinic acid in relatively high amounts in the hydro-ethanolic extract of S. minor. This extract also contained a high level of glucogallin, which is a phenolic compound formed from β-D-glucose and gallic acid. The compounds identified in the extract characterization are shown in Table 1 and total ion chromatograms obtained in ESI- mode are also shown in Fig. 1. The MS spectral data were compared with those that were available in the literature. Figures 1 indicates the examples of ion chromatograms from the total ion chromatogram and the related mass.
S. minor improved memory impairment induced by scopolamine
MWM test
Figures 2a and b illustrate the time spent and the distance traveled to reach the platform during the four-day training trials, respectively. The results showed that both the treatment and day affected the time during the 4-day period of learning (F (5, 936) = 64.11; p < 0.001 for the treatment and F (3, 936) = 63.49; p < 0.001 for the day). As well, an interaction was found between the treatment and the day (F (15, 936) = 2.84; p < 0.001).
The results also show that both the treatment and day affected the distance during the 4-day period of learning (F (5, 936) = 167.09; p < 0.001 for the treatment and F (3, 936) = 25.87; P < 0.001 for the day). As well, an interaction was found between the treatment and the day (F(15,936) = 3.07, p < 0.001). Correspondingly, escape latency time and traveled path were observed to be longer in the scopolamine-injected animals compared to the control group (p < 0.01-p < 0.001). However, the animals treated with both 50 and 100 mg/kg of the extract at the first day showed shorter latency time compared to the scopolamine group (p < 0.05-p < 0.001). Notably, no significant difference was found in terms of the latency time between the 200 mg/kg extract group or rivastigmine-treated group and the scopolamine group at the first day. Besides, the treatment with the extract (at all doses) and rivastigmine significantly reduced the escape latency time compared to that of the scopolamine group, on days 2–4 (p < 0.001). Additionally, it was observed that the administration of the extract (at all doses) and rivastigmine significantly decreased the traveled path compared to that of the scopolamine group (p < 0.001). Therefore, it can be stated that the treatment with rivastigmine and the extract significantly improved memory performance compared to the scopolamine group (p < 0.001).
According to the results of the probe test (Figs. 3a and b), both the time spent and the distance traveled in the target quadrant significantly decreased in the scopolamine group compared to the control group (p < 0.001). Moreover, the animals treated with rivastigmine and the extract (at all doses) exhibited longer time spent and distance traveled in the target quadrant than those of the scopolamine group (p < 0.001). Some significant differences were also found in terms of the time spent in the quadrant between the groups treated with 50 and 100 mg/kg of the extract as well as between the groups treated with 100 and 200 mg/kg of the extract (p < 0.001). Similarly, a significant difference was found in terms of the distance traveled in the quadrant between the two groups treated with 50 and 100 mg/kg of the extract (p < 0.001).
Passive avoidance test
As illustrated in Figs. 4a and b, in comparison to the control group, the scopolamine-injected animals exhibited lower time latency to enter the dark chamber 3, 24, and 48 h after the shock (p < 0.01, p < 0.001). Besides, no significant difference was observed in terms of the time latency 72 h after the shock between the scopolamine group and the control group.
In contrast, higher time latencies were observed 3, 24, 48, and 72h after the shock in those rats that were treated with rivastigmine compared to the rats in the scopolamine group (p < 0.05, p < 0.001). Moreover, the administration of the extract at both 100 and 200 mg/kg was found to be associated with a significant increase in the time latency 3, 24, 48, and 72h after the shock compared to the scopolamine group (p < 0.001). As well, some significant differences were observed in the time latency 3, 24, 48, and 72h after the shock between the two groups treated with 50 and 100 mg/kg of the extract as well as between the two groups treated with 50 and 200 mg/kg of the extract (p < 0.001).
On other hand, the animals in the scopolamine group were observed to spend longer times in the dark chamber than the control group at 3, 24, and 48 h time points (p < 0.001). However, no significant differences were observed in this regard between the scopolamine and control groups 72 h after the shock. Besides, the animals treated with rivastigmine were found to spend shorter times in the dark compartment 3, 24, 48, and 72 h after the shock compared to the scopolamine group (p < 0.01, 0.001). Furthermore, the administration of the extract (at all doses) caused a significant increase in the time spent in the dark at 3, 24, 48, and 72 h after the shock compared to the scopolamine group (p < 0.05 to p < 0.001). Moreover, the animals treated with the extract (50 mg/kg) indicated no significant difference in the time spent in the dark, 48h after the shock compared to the scopolamine group. However, some significant differences were reported in the time spent in the dark 3, 24, 48, and 72 h after the shock between the two groups treated with 50 and 100 mg/kg of the extract as well as between the two groups treated with 100 and 200 mg/kg of the extract (p < 0.001).
As illustrated in Fig. 4c, the time spent in the light chamber significantly decreased following the injection of scopolamine (p < 0.001) in comparison to the control group 3, 24, and 48h after the shock (p < 0.001). However, no significant difference was observed in this regard between the scopolamine and the control groups 72 h after the shock. However, a longer time was spent in the light room by the rats that received rivastigmine compared to the scopolamine group 3, 24, 48, and 72h after the shock (p < 0.01, p < 0.001). Notably, the spent time in the light chamber increased after the treatment with the extract (at all doses) 3, 24, 48, and 72 h after the shock compared to the scopolamine group (p < 0.05- p < 0.001). The animals treated with 50 mg/kg of the extract indicated no significant difference in terms of the time spent in the light 48 h after the shock compared to the scopolamine group. However, there were some significant differences in the time spent in the light 3, 24, 48, and 72 h after the shock between the two groups treated with 50 and 100 mg/kg of the extract and also between the two groups treated with 100 and 200 mg/kg of the extract (p < 0.001).
According to the results illustrated in Fig. 4d, although the frequencies of entry to the dark chamber were higher in the scopolamine group compared to that of the control group 3, 24, and 48h post-shock delivery, the differences were not significant. The groups that received the extract at 100 and 200 mg/kg demonstrated a significant decrease in the frequencies of dark chamber entry compared to those of the scopolamine group 24 (p < 0.05, p < 0.01) and 72 h (p < 0.05, p < 0.001) post-shock delivery. However, no significant decrease was found in the frequency of entry to the dark chamber in the rivastigmine group at either time point compared to the scopolamine group.
Biochemical estimation
S. minor restored MDA and thiol concentration in the brain
According to Fig. 5a, scopolamine-injected rats exhibited the elevated levels of MDA in their hippocampal and cortical tissues in comparison to the control group (p < 0.001). However, the rivastigmine administration significantly restored the elevated levels of MDA induced by scopolamine in the rats’ hippocampus and cortex, compared to the rats of the scopolamine group (p < 0.001). It is notable that the treatment with all doses of the extract significantly counteracted scopolamine-induced increase in MDA level in both the hippocampus (p < 0.001) and cortex (p < 0.01, p < 0.001) compared to the scopolamine group.
By determining thiol content in the hippocampal and cortical tissues, the non-enzymatic defense potential of the extract against the oxidative stress was indicated. Accordingly, the thiol concentrations in both the hippocampus and cortex of scopolamine-injected rats were significantly lower than those of the control group (p < 0.001). As well, the administration of rivastigmine effectively restored the scopolamine-induced decreases in thiol contents in both tissues compared to the scopolamine group (p < 0.001). All doses of the extract significantly restored the decreases in the concentrations of thiol caused by scopolamine in the hippocampus and cortex compared to the scopolamine group (p < 0.01, p < 0.001) (Fig. 4b).
S. minor enhanced the antioxidant defense in the brain
As shown in Figs. 5a and b, the antioxidant enzymes (SOD and CAT) activities were significantly attenuated in the hippocampus and cortex of the rats of the scopolamine group in comparison to those of the controls (p < 0.001). The treatment of these animals with rivastigmine and all doses of the administered extract resulted in a significant increase in the activities of the enzymes in the hippocampus and cortex (p < 0.001). More importantly, 200 mg/kg of the extract had the most marked effects on restoring the scopolamine-induced suppression of antioxidant enzymes (p < 0.001).
S. minor suppressed the activity of AChE in the brain
As shown in Fig. 7, AChE activity significantly increased in the hippocampal and cortical tissues of the scopolamine-injected rats compared to the control group (p < 0.005). However, the rivastigmine administration significantly reduced the AChE activity in the hippocampal and cortical tissues compared to the scopolamine group (p < 0.05, p < 0.001). An ameliorative effect on the AChE activity in the hippocampus was found in the animals treated with different doses (50, 100, and 200 mg/kg, p < 0.001) of the extract. Meanwhile, only the highest dose of the extract (i.e. 200 mg/kg) was observed to reduce the AChE activity in the cortex significantly compared to the scopolamine group (p < 0.05).