The obtained biomass based plasticizers epoxidized EAEE and EAEE were characterized with FTIR and 1H NMR, and compared with raw materials eugenol and eleostearic acid. As seen froure 2(a), the peak at 3533cm-1 attributed to -OH of eugenol, the peak at 3010cm-1 corresponded to -CH=CH- , the peak at 1515cm-1 attributed to -CH2-O-CH2.[34,35] Figure 2(b) shows the FTIR of eleostearic acid, the strong peak at 1796cm-1 attributed to C=O group. In the Figure 2(c), the peaks at 6.8-6.9ppm attributed to protons of benzene ring, the peaks at 5.0-6.0ppm corresponded to protons of -CH2-CH2-, the other peaks at 3.43ppm and 3.91ppm attributed to other protons of -CH2-..[34,35] As seen from Figure 2(b), the peaks at around 5.4-5.9ppm corresponded to protons of conjugated double bond from eleostearic acid, the peak at 4.2-4.4ppm attributed to protons of -CH2- connecting to the conjugated double bond. The peak at 2.43ppm corresponded to protons of CH2- connecting to ester groups. The peak at 0.91ppm attributed to protons of -CH3.[36] After esterification, there is no peak at 3010cm-1 in the FTIR of EAEE, as seen from Figure 3, and new peak corresponding to ester group appeared at 1761ppm, which indicated that EAEE was obtained. When the epoxidation reaction finished, there is not peak at 3010cm-1 corresponding to -CH=CH- in the FTIR of epoxidized EAEE, indicating epoxidized EAEE was prepared.[36] 1H NMR of EAEE and epoxidized EAEE were also characterized to investigate their chemical structure, as seen from Figure 4, the peaks at 6.72-70ppm attributing to protons of benzene ring appeared in the 1H NMR of EAEE, the peaks corresponding to protons of conjugated double bond appeared at 5.31-5.5ppm,which indicated that EAEE was obtained. In the 1H NMR of epoxidized EAEE, there is not any peak at 5.31-5.5ppm corresponding to protons of conjugated double bond, which indicated that epoxidized EAEE was obtained.[36]
In the processing of PVC resin, epoxidized plasticizer not only has plasticizing effect on PVC, but also has the function of stabilizer, because the epoxy group in its structure can absorb the hydrogen chloride degraded by light and heat, which prevents the decomposition of PVC dehydrochlorination, thus prolongs the service life of PVC products.[37,38] In addition, epoxidized plasticizer has a cross-linking and toughening effect on PVC products, which can improve PVC's resistance to light, heat, aging, impact and lubrication. In this study, TGA was used to evaluate the thermal stability of PVC materials plasticized with epoxidized EAEE and EAEE. Figure 5 and Figure 6 show the TGA and DTG curves, and the related TGA data 5%, 60% mass loss temperatures (T-5%, and T-60%), and char yield at 600 °C are summarized in Table 2. With more epoxidized EAEE and EAEE added in PVC films, T-5% increased from 171.0°C to 237.3°C for PVC plasticized with EAEE, and T-5% increased from 171.0°C to 244.1°C for PVC plasticized with epoxidized EAEE. In addition, T-60% of PVC-50wt% EAEE and PVC-50wt% epoxidized EAEE reached 349.1°C and 372.9°C, respectively. The results showed that both epoxidized EAEE and EAEE improved the thermal stability of PVC films, and epoxidized EAEE was more effective to improve the thermal stability of PVC films than EAEE. This is mainly because the epoxy group of epoxidized EAEE can react with HCl, the epoxy group in its structure can absorb the hydrogen chloride degraded by heat, which prevented the decomposition of PVC dehydrochlorination. In addition, epoxidized EAEE has a cross-linking and toughening effect on PVC films, which can improve PVC's resistance.
Table 2. TGA dates of PVC and plasticized PVC films
Samples
|
T-5%/℃
|
T-60%/℃
|
char yield/%
|
PVC
|
171.0
|
302.8
|
11.4
|
PVC-25wt% EAEE
|
178.1
|
330.6
|
7.5
|
PVC-50wt% EAEE
|
237.3
|
349.1
|
9.3
|
PVC-25wt% epoxidized EAEE
|
198.2
|
347.8
|
14.5
|
PVC-50wt% epoxidized EAEE
|
244.1
|
372.9
|
14.6
|
It has been reported that plasticized PVC films with lower Tg will show more excellent plasticizing property and compatibility.[36] In this study, DSC was employed to investigate the Tg of plasticized PVC films. Figure 7 shows the DSC curves of PVC plasticized with epoxidized EAEE and EAEE. Tg value for PVC films is 82.5°C, which has been reported in our previous study. [36] Tg value for PVC-25wt% EAEE, PVC-50wt% EAEE, PVC-25wt% epoxidized EAEE and PVC-50wt% epoxidized EAEE was 36°C, 27°C, 24°C and 7°C, respectively, which showed that epoxidized EAEE and EAEE played efficient plasticizing effect on PVC, and the plasticizing effect of epoxidized EAEE was more efficient than EAEE. In addition, all of the plasticized PVC films showed only one endothermic peak, which illustrated that epoxidized EAEE and EAEE are all compatible with PVC, there is no free plasticizer in PVC films.
Figure 8 shows the stress-strain curves of all PVC films. With more epoxidized EAEE added in PVC films, PVC-50wt% EAEE showed increased elongation at break and decreased tensile stress than PVC-25wt% EAEE, and PVC-50wt% epoxidized EAEE showed increased elongation at break and decreased tensile stress than PVC-25wt% epoxidized EAEE. This indicates that epoxidized EAEE and EAEE improved the flexibility and movement ability of the PVC molecular chain to a certain extent. When PVC contained same mass of EAEE and epoxidized EAEE, PVC-50wt% epoxidized EAEE showed more flexible than PVC-50wt% EAEE, which indicated that epoxidized EAEE played more efficient plasticizing effect on PVC than EAEE.
Plasticizing mechanism was explored with optical microscope. As seen from Figure 9, it can be observed that rough and irregular microstructure on surface of PVC-25wt% EAEE, with more EAEE added in PVC film, PVC was dissolved in EAEE, which caused the surface of PVC-50wt% EAEE less rough and irregular than PVC-25wt% EAEE. For PVC-25wt% epoxidized EAEE and PVC-50wt% epoxidized EAEE, which showed less rough and more smooth microstructure compared with PVC-50wt% EAEE, which is attributed to the strong interaction of the polar groups of epoxidized EAEE (ester group and epoxy groups ) with polar groups of PVC. The plasticizing mechanism based on compatibility can be explained that epoxidized EAEE containing the flexible alkane chains and polar group (ester groups and epoxy groups) has stronger intermolecular interaction force than EAEE. PVC was easier to dissolve in epoxidized EAEE than EAEE, which caused that the microstructure of PVC-50wt% EAEE was more homogeneous and smooth than PVC-25wt% EAEE and PVC-50wt% EAEE.
The compatibility of PVC and plasticizer (epoxidized EAEE and EAEE) was investigated by FT-IR. It has been reported that FT-IR is a facile method to investigate the compatibility of PVC and plasticizers.[39,40] Dipole-dipole interaction of polar groups(ester carbonyl groups and epoxy groups) and α-hydrogen of PVC will lead to carbonyl group infrared absorption peak of plasticizer (epoxidized EAEE and EAEE) to lower position. As seen from Figure 10, with more plasticizer (epoxidized EAEE and EAEE) added in PVC films, the position shift of ester groups of EAEE shifted from 1758cm-1 to 1756cm-1, while the position shift of ester groups of EAEE shifted from 1757cm-1 to 1755cm-1, which indicated that the miscibility between epoxidized EAEE and PVC is better than EAEE.
The formation of hydrogen bond between plasticizer (epoxidized EAEE and EAEE) and PVC chains will reduce interaction between PVC macromolecule themselves, it can be observed in Figure 11, the distance of PVC chains will be increased due to the formation of hydrogen, which will promote the mobility of PVC chains easily. More hydrogen bonds were formed between PVC chains and epoxidized EAEE than that of PVC chains and EAEE due to more epoxy groups in the chemical structure of epoxidized EAEE, which caused the that epoxidized EAEE played more efficient plasticizing effect on PVC than EAEE.