This preprint is under consideration at Scientific Reports. A preprint is a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research Article
Leonidas Brikiatis
Unaffiliated
Corresponding Author
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
The exact age of the final formation of the Isthmus of Panama is a critical reference point for oceanographic, climatic, biogeographic, and evolutionary hypotheses. Geotectonic evidence suggests that the isthmus was completed between 12 Mya and 3 Mya, and an age of 3–4 Mya has been used as a benchmark in hundreds of studies over the past 30 years. Phylogeographic data indicate the existence of marine connections across the isthmus much more recently, however. I reconsider the available geotectonic, biostratigraphic, oceanographic, and paleoclimatic data and show that multiple lines of indirect evidence suggest that four transisthmian seaways may have persisted until as recently as the onset of the Middle Pleistocene (~ 0.6 Mya). Subduction of the Cocos Plate beneath one transisthmian seaway (the only seaway featuring a deep sill) caused rapid tectonic shoaling and reorganisation of oceanic currents, which coincided with a major glacioeustatic sea level fall ~ 950–917 Mya that led to a temporary closing of the Bering Strait. This resulted in unusual and contrasting climate phenomena, including the “900-Kyr (cold) event” and the “greening” of South Greenland during the MIS 22 glacial maximum. The concurrence of the final formation of the Isthmus of Panama with the mid-Pleistocene Transition of glacial/interglacial periodicity suggests a tight relationship between these events.
Keywords
Isthmus , Panama , oceanographic, climatic, biogeographic, evolutionary hypotheses
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
No competing interests reported.
This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.
- Supplementaryinformation.pdf
Supplementary Tables 1 to 3. Supplementary Figures 1 to 3. Supplementary Appendix: Phylogeographic maps of the taxa listed in Supplementary Table 3.
Loading...
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Under Review
Version 1
Posted 07 Jul, 2021
No community comments so far
Reviews received
Received 30 Jun, 2021
Reviewers agreed
On 23 Jun, 2021
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 23 Jun, 2021
Editor assigned
On 23 Jun, 2021
Editor invited
On 10 Jun, 2021
Submission checks complete
On 10 Jun, 2021
First submitted
On 09 Jun, 2021
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Learn more about our company.
This preprint is under consideration at Scientific Reports. A preprint is a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research Article
Leonidas Brikiatis
Unaffiliated
Corresponding Author
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Under Review
Version 1
Posted 07 Jul, 2021
No community comments so far
Reviews received
Received 30 Jun, 2021
Reviewers agreed
On 23 Jun, 2021
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 23 Jun, 2021
Editor assigned
On 23 Jun, 2021
Editor invited
On 10 Jun, 2021
Submission checks complete
On 10 Jun, 2021
First submitted
On 09 Jun, 2021
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
The exact age of the final formation of the Isthmus of Panama is a critical reference point for oceanographic, climatic, biogeographic, and evolutionary hypotheses. Geotectonic evidence suggests that the isthmus was completed between 12 Mya and 3 Mya, and an age of 3–4 Mya has been used as a benchmark in hundreds of studies over the past 30 years. Phylogeographic data indicate the existence of marine connections across the isthmus much more recently, however. I reconsider the available geotectonic, biostratigraphic, oceanographic, and paleoclimatic data and show that multiple lines of indirect evidence suggest that four transisthmian seaways may have persisted until as recently as the onset of the Middle Pleistocene (~ 0.6 Mya). Subduction of the Cocos Plate beneath one transisthmian seaway (the only seaway featuring a deep sill) caused rapid tectonic shoaling and reorganisation of oceanic currents, which coincided with a major glacioeustatic sea level fall ~ 950–917 Mya that led to a temporary closing of the Bering Strait. This resulted in unusual and contrasting climate phenomena, including the “900-Kyr (cold) event” and the “greening” of South Greenland during the MIS 22 glacial maximum. The concurrence of the final formation of the Isthmus of Panama with the mid-Pleistocene Transition of glacial/interglacial periodicity suggests a tight relationship between these events.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Loading...