1. Scown CD, Baral NR, Yang M, Vora N, Huntington T. Techno economic analysis for biofuels and bioproducts. Curr Opin Biotech. 2021;67:58–64.
2. Rossi LM, Gallo JMR, Mattoso LHC, Buckeridge MS, Licence P, Allen DT. Ethanol from sugarcane and the brazilian biomass-based energy and chemicals sector. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2021;9 (12):4293–4295.
3. Lin CY, Lu C. Development perspectives of promising lignocellulose feedstocks for production of advanced generation biofuels: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2021;136:110445.
4. Barron C, Devaux MF, Foucat L, Falourd X, Guillon F. Looten R, et al. Enzymatic degradation of maize shoots: monitoring of chemical and physical changes reveals different saccharification behaviors. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2021;14(1):1–20.
5. Himmel ME, Ding SY, Johnson DK, Adney WS, Nimlos MR, Brady JW. Biomass recalcitrance: engineering plants and enzymes for biofuels production. Science. 2007;315(5813):804–807.
6. da Costa RMF, Pattathil S, Avci U, Lee SJ, Hazen SP, Winters A, et al. A cell wall reference profile for miscanthus bioenergy crops highlights compositional and structural variations associated with development and organ origin. New Phytol. 2017;213:1710–1725.
7. Jin K, Kong L, Liu X, Jiang Z, Tian G, Yang S, et al. Understanding the xylan content for enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis of individual bamboo fiber and farenchyma cells. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2019;7:18603−18611.
8. Devaux MF, Jamme F, André W, Bouchet B, Alvarado C, Durand S, et al. Synchrotron time-lapse imaging of lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysis: tracking enzyme localization by protein autofluorescence and biochemical modification of cell walls by microfluidic infrared microspectroscopy. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:200.
9. Ruthes AC, Rudjito RC, Rencoret J, Gutiérrez A, del Río JC, Jiménez-Quero A, et al. Comparative recalcitrance and extractability of cell wall polysaccharides from cereal (wheat, rye, and barley). ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2020;8(18):7192–7204.
10. Costa THF, Masarin F, Bonifácio TO, Milagres AMF, Ferraz A. The enzymatic recalcitrance of internodes of sugar cane hybrids with contrasting lignin contents. J Clean Prod. 2013;51:202–211.
11. Jung HG, Casler MD. Maize stem tissues: impact of development on cell wall degradability. Crop Sci. 2006;46(4):1801–1809.
12. Li D, Long L, Ding S. Alkaline organosolv pretreatment of different sorghum stem parts for enhancing the total reducing sugar yields and p-coumaric acid release. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2020;13(1):1–14.
13. Hodgson-Kratky K, Papa G, Rodriguez A, Stavila V, Simmons B, Botha F, et al. Relationship between sugarcane culm and leaf biomass composition and saccharification efficiency. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2019;12 (1):1–18.
14. Shah R, Bhagia S, Keum JK, Pingali SV, Ragauskas AJ, Davison BH, et al. Structural insights into low and high recalcitrance natural poplar variants using neutron and X‑ray scattering. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2020;8:13838−13849.
15. Silva LA, Gasparini K, Assis C, Ramos R, Kist V, Pereria-Barbosa MH, et al. Selection strategy for indication of crosses between potential sugarcane genotypes aiming at the production of bioenergy. Ind Crop Prod. 2017;104:62–67.
16. Arantes V, Saddler JN. Cellulose accessibility limits the effectiveness of minimum cellulase loading on the efficient hydrolysis of pretreated lignocellulosic substrates. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2011;4 (1):1–17.
17. Arantes V, Saddler JN. Access to cellulose limits the efficiency of enzymatic hydrolysis: the role of amorphogenesis. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2010;3 (1):1–11.
18. Ishizawa CI, Davis MF, Schell DF, Johnson DK. Porosity and its effect on the digestibility of dilute sulfuric acid pretreated corn stover. J Agr Food Chem. 2007; 55 (7):2575–2581.
19. Sun D, Alam A, Tu Y, Zhou S, Wang Y, Xia T, et al. Steam-exploded biomass saccharification is predominately affected by lignocellulose porosity and largely enhanced by tween-80 in miscanthus. Bioresour Technol. 2017;239:74–81.
20. Zhao JY, Chen HZ. Correlation of porous structure, mass transfer and enzymatic hydrolysis of steam exploded corn stover. Chem Eng Sci. 2013, 104, 1036-1044.
21 Wilson LA, Deligey F, Wang T, Cosgrove DJ. Saccharide analysis of onion outer epidermal walls. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2021;14 (1):1–14.
22. Ghose TK. Measurement of cellulase activities. Pure Appl Chem. 1987;59(2): 257–268.
23. Miller GL. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Biochem. 1959;31:426–428.
24. Van Soest PJ, Wine RH. Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. IV. Determination of plant cell-wall constituents. J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1967;50: 50–55.
25. Segal L, Creely JJ, Martin AE, Conrad CM. An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-Ray diffractometer. Text Res J. 1959;29:786–794.
26. Li GH, Chen HZ. Synergistic mechanism of steam explosion combined with fungal treatment by Phellinus baumii for the pretreatment of corn stalk. Biomass Bioenerg. 2014;67:1–7.
27. Yasui K, Goto S, Kinoshita H, Kamiunten S, Yuji T, Okamura Y, et al. Ceramic waste glass fiber reinforced plastic-containing filtering materials for turbid water treatment. Environ Earth Sci. 2016;75(1):1–11.
28. Li GH, Zhang Y, Zhao C, Xue HT, Yuan L. Chemical variation in cell wall of sugar beet pulp caused by aqueous ammonia pretreatment influence enzymatic digestibility of cellulose. Ind Crop Prod. 2020;155:112786.
29. Donaldson L, Vaidya A. Visualising recalcitrance by colocalisation of cellulase, lignin and cellulose in pretreated pine biomass using fluorescence microscopy. Sci rep-UK. 2017;7(1):44386.
30. Li GH, Sun YX, Guo WJ, Yuan L. Comparison of various pretreatment strategies and their effect on chemistry and structure of sugar beet pulp. J Clean Prod. 2018;181:217–223.