1.De Vries SI, Van Hirtum HW, Bakker I, et al. Validity and reproducibility of motion sensors in youth: a systematic update. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009;41:818–827. 2009/03/12. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31818e5819.
2.Baranowski T, Masse LC, Ragan B, et al. How many days was that? We’re still not sure, but we’re asking the question better! Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008;40:S544–549. 2008/07/17. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817c6651.
3.Bergman P. The number of repeated observations needed to estimate the habitual physical activity of an individual to a given level of precision. PLoS One 2018;13:e0192117. 2018/02/02. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192117.
4.Pedersen ES, Danquah IH, Petersen CB, et al. Intra-individual variability in day-to-day and month-to-month measurements of physical activity and sedentary behaviour at work and in leisure-time among Danish adults. BMC Public Health 2016;16:1222. 2016/12/05. DOI: 10.1186/s12889–016–3890–3.
5.Pedisic Z and Bauman A. Accelerometer-based measures in physical activity surveillance: current practices and issues. Brit J Sport Med 2015;49:219–223. 2014/11/06. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports–2013–093407.
6.Vanhelst J, Beghin L, Drumez E, et al. Awareness of wearing an accelerometer does not affect physical activity in youth. BMC Med Res Methodol 2017;17:99. 2017/07/12. DOI: 10.1186/s12874–017–0378–5.
7.Dossegger A, Ruch N, Jimmy G, et al. Reactivity to accelerometer measurement of children and adolescents. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2014;46:1140–1146. 2013/11/14. DOI: 10.1249/mss.0000000000000215.
8.Davis RE and Loprinzi PD. Examination of Accelerometer Reactivity Among a Population Sample of Children, Adolescents, and Adults. J Phys Act Health 2016;13:1325–1332. 2016/10/25. DOI: 10.1123/jpah.2015–0703.
9.van Sluijs EM, van Poppel MN, Twisk JW, et al. Physical activity measurements affected participants’ behavior in a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Epidemiol 2006;59:404–411. 2006/03/22. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.08.016.
10.Motl RW, McAuley E and Dlugonski D. Reactivity in baseline accelerometer data from a physical activity behavioral intervention. Health Psychol 2012;31:172–175. 2011/10/26. DOI: 10.1037/a0025965.
11.Behrens TK and Dinger MK. Motion sensor reactivity in physically active young adults. Res Q Exerc Sport 2007;78:1–8. 2007/05/08. DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2007.10762229.
12.Eisenberg MH, Phillips LA, Fowler L, et al. The Impact of E-diaries and Accelerometers on Young Adults’ Perceived and Objectively Assessed Physical Activity. Psychol Sport Exerc 2017;30:55–63. 2017/10/03. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2017.01.008.
13.Vandoni M, Correale L, Del Bianco M, et al. Does reactivity to accelerometers occur in a single trial? Brief report in a sample of young adults. J Health Psychol 2017;22:1458–1462. 2016/02/18. DOI: 10.1177/1359105316628758.
14.Baumann S, Gross S, Voigt L, et al. Pitfalls in accelerometer-based measurement of physical activity: The presence of reactivity in an adult population. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2018;28:1056–1063 2017/09/19. DOI: 10.1111/sms.12977.
15.Migueles JH, Cadenas-Sanchez C, Ekelund U, et al. Accelerometer Data Collection and Processing Criteria to Assess Physical Activity and Other Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Practical Considerations. Sports Med 2017;47:1821–1845. 2017/03/18. DOI: 10.1007/s40279–017–0716–0.
16.Kozey-Keadle S, Shiroma EJ, Kamada M, et al. Reproducibility of Accelerometer-Assessed Physical Activity and Sedentary Time. Am J Prev Med 2017;52:541–548. 2017/01/08. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.11.010.
17.Voigt L, Baumann S, Ullrich A, et al. The effect of mere measurement from a cardiovascular examination program on physical activity and sedentary time in an adult population. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil 2018;10:1. 2018/02/08. DOI: 10.1186/s13102–018–0090–8.
18.Troiano RP, Berrigan D, Dodd KW, et al. Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008;40:181–188. 2007/12/20. DOI: 10.1249/mss.0b013e31815a51b3.
19.McVeigh JA, Winkler EA, Howie EK, et al. Objectively measured patterns of sedentary time and physical activity in young adults of the Raine study cohort. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2016;13:41. 2016/03/25. DOI: 10.1186/s12966–016–0363–0.
20.Tucker P and Gilliland J. The effect of season and weather on physical activity: a systematic review. Public Health 2007;121:909–922. 2007/10/09. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2007.04.009.
21.Wang J and Wang X. Structural equation modeling: Applications using Mplus. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
22.Muthen LK and Muthen BO. Mplus User’s Guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén, 1998–2012.
23.Rosner B. Fundamentals of Biostatistics. 8th Edition ed.: Duxbury Press; Belmont, CA, 2016.
24.StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 14. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP, 2015.
25.Mansoubi M, Pearson N, Biddle SJH, et al. The relationship between sedentary behaviour and physical activity in adults: A systematic review. Prev Med 2014;69:28–35. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.08.028.
26.French DP and Sutton S. Reactivity of measurement in health psychology: how much of a problem is it? What can be done about it? Br J Health Psychol 2010;15:453–468. 2010/03/09. DOI: 10.1348/135910710x492341.
27.Aadland E and Ylvisaker E. Reliability of Objectively Measured Sedentary Time and Physical Activity in Adults. PLoS One 2015;10:e0133296. 2015/07/21. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133296.
28.Matthews CE, Hagstromer M, Pober DM, et al. Best practices for using physical activity monitors in population-based research. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2012;44:S68–76. 2011/12/23. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182399e5b.
29.Herrmann SD, Barreira TV, Kang M, et al. Impact of accelerometer wear time on physical activity data: a NHANES semisimulation data approach. Brit J Sport Med 2014;48:278–282. 2012/09/01. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports–2012–091410.
30.Heesch KC, Hill RL, Aguilar-Farias N, et al. Validity of objective methods for measuring sedentary behaviour in older adults: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2018;15:119. 2018/11/28. DOI: 10.1186/s12966–018–0749–2.