The study aims to comprehend the reality from the standpoint of the experts involved in that specific situation or environment. We interviewed the experts from different healthcare organizations regarding the readiness for National Unified Medical Record (NUMR) across UAE along with the standards and methodology currently being followed towards establishing NUMR to support the provision of high-quality healthcare.
EMR systems/vendors vs. paper-based system and its utilization in UAE
In this category, the interview data focusing on the existing use of EMR was analysed. The statements of the interviewees’ regarding the EMR systems that are being used in both public and private hospitals were discussed. Majority of the respondents avowed that Cerner is being used, and viewed by several independent entities including insurance companies, public hospitals, private hospitals and primary care physicians in Dubai, Abu-Dhabi and Northern Emirates. As one of the participants stated;
“In both the outpatient and inpatient settings, Cerner and Epic are the top choices, while vendors such as eClinicalWorks,Allscripts,Meditec, Health Insights are trailing much further behind” (P5)
A participant from the federal government stated:
“Cerner is used in public and other systems in private hospitals like Trakcare” (P8)
Another vendor added:
“In Dubai, we use Epic system in public sector that runs in 4 hospitals & 23 clinics; whereas, in private sectors, 32 private hospitals in Dubai uses many other systems such as Cerner, Meditec, and Sage etc.” (P4).
A participant from SEHA-Abu-Dhabi indicated that:
“At SEHA, all hospitals are utilizing an electronic medical record (Cerner).” (P9)
Moreover, participants also mentioned that electronic medical records are being increasingly used in almost every private and public hospitals to access and document the patient records along with online decision-making tools, medical information as well as prescribed medications. They have also altered the dynamics of the patient-clinician interaction through telemedicine, virtual consultations and clinician patient email. The participants also agreed on the fact that an EMR system helps to promote the development of health care transactions from a wasteful, paper-based system to a real-time, more reliable, non-paper-based system. The charge of transcription, manually taking of notes, the dictation time, and the writing of medical prescriptions are practically eradicated. It allows the doctor to be more competent as well as it helps to propose better services to more patients. For example, one of the participants stated that:
“All of them have a sort of system in place. EMR improves quality of care and increases levels of client satisfaction. It also reduces the use of paper, which has an impact on hospital expenses” (P5)
On the contrary, another participant from Dubai Health Authority reported that:
“Only small to medium healthcare provider facilities are partially manual in Dubai” (P4)
A participant from Sharjah added:
“Mainly most of the other hospitals are using electronic medical records but not totally used some are still dealing with papers especially with consent forms (both public and private).” (P7)
Hence, these responses sufficiently confirm that EMR systems are now much better, vibrant, embedded fully in the hospitals culture, and constitutes the core of a computerized health care system to promote greater quality and efficacy in the health care delivery.
Medical Devices Integration (MDI)
Some of the participants stressed upon the significance of Medical Devices Integration (MDI) solution that helps to establish a connection to transfer data between an information system and a medical device. Middle solutions are standard operating systems for Electronic health records to finally end the lack of interoperability along with bringing disruptive transformation, driving change, and innovation to solve EHR interoperability challenges.
One of the participants stated:
“MDIs and other medical devices in most of the facilities are all connected and seamlessly integrated to the EMR through the iBus solution. Cerner CareAware iBus solution will enable you to connect medical devices to the patient’s EMR, enabling patients and caregivers to access the right information at the right time.” (P5)
On the contrary, other participants reported some other devices currently being used in their facilities. For example, one of the participants revealed that:
“DHA is using Orion Rhapsody as an MDI solution to integrate EPIC with other” (P3)
Another participant added that multiple solutions are being used:
“There are multiple solutions that DHA is using as Middleware during the EPIC implementation.” (P4)
“All Lab devices are connected to Cerner EMR.” (P6)
“SEHA has the full complement of Cerner solutions for device connectivity and integration into the EMR” (P10)
These responses indicates that Rhapsody is a healthcare-focused interoperability platform that is being used by the health systems, public and private hospitals, vendors, health information exchanges, public health departments and while, open link is being used by federal government organizations that mainly helps to enhance healthcare ecosystems through seamless connectivity for the purpose of unlocking the potential of data, on-premises as well as in the cloud, paving the way towards a healthier society.
Other Clinical Information Systems
There are three ancillary systems that are the base of any electronic health records. These include pharmacy, radiology and laboratory systems. To capitalize fully, it is important to have these ancillary systems to be fully integrated or centralized across the integrated delivery system. Our results suggest that many providers have chosen ancillary systems being offered by their existing vendors to avoid the need for potentially costly and complex interfaces. As one of the participants stated:
“Different systems have been used at DHA and were integrated with EPIC during the implementation. For example, DHA uses AGFA Radiology Enterprise Solutions for PACS and Diagnostics Management.” (P4)
Another participant from Dubai added:
“Pharmacy: Epic Willow; Lab Information system: SunQuest; Radiology: Agfa” (P5)
A participant from Sharjah added:
“Pharmacy System is part of TrakCare system, and it includes inpatients and outpatient modules and integrated with Insurance systems of electronic approval.” (P7)
Our results suggest that most of UAE hospitals have transformed beyond stage 2 of the EMR Adoption Model. The above results also highlight that majority of the hospitals do have all 3 ancillary systems (radiology, laboratory, and pharmacy) installed.
Readiness for National Unified Medical Record
Respondents were further inquired about the state of organization’s readiness for National Unified Medical Record in UAE to explain why EMR initiatives may fail or succeed in future. Determining readiness of an organization is an initial step that a person needs to take in order to assure that EMR is being fully utilized. Most of the respondent agreed that the readiness level of UAE for national unified medical record is high because of several reasons like government sponsorship, availability of regulations and standards, compliance to the interoperability standards, availability of the hospital level EMRs that comply with international standards, infrastructure maturity as well as smart devices and smart services penetration. The participants unanimously stated,
“Yes! UAE and especially the emirate of Dubai is ready for implementing HIE due to the digital readiness of hospitals and the high demand for connected care to increase efficiency and improve quality of care.” (P3)
A participant from Sharjah quoted the example from Abu-Dhabi and added:
“Yes, because most of UAE hospitals are using the different electronic system and they are satisfied in this experience especially with government hospitals and moving to a unified medical record will access the government and the patient for better access and better communication system. It is challenging project as some providers are still using manual medical records, I feel such projects can go in stages, taking an example Abu Dhabi that has launched Malaffi project to unify the medical record in Abu Dhabi Emirate.” (P7)
While a participant from Abu-Dhabi clarified that:
“Not all public and private hospitals in Abu Dhabi emirate have moved to an electronic medical record system. Although with the upcoming implementation of Malaffi HIE there will be the need for all public and private hospitals and clinics to interface to the Patient Portal and Health Information Exchange. This will likely take several years to be fully realized but should get closer to a situation where all vital information for patients in Abu Dhabi will have some type of medical based information in the HIE system.” (P10)
Another respondent stated that a national policy on unified electronic medical record should be established to help its implementation. As mentioned below:
“Yes, the UAE is ready for NUMR. The main Public Health Providers in the UAE (i.e. SEHA, DHA and MOHAP) have implemented EMR solutions in their digital transformation journey. It is important that NUMR ensure vendor agnostic approach without any EMR monopoly. Also, the private sector needs to be allowed to choose their EMR according to their budgets and capabilities. The regulators will need to understand and implement a framework to certify Healthcare IT Applications, EMRs, Informatics solutions and other HIT systems.” (P4)
Interestingly, all participants confirmed that UAE will succeed in the system integration and improve interoperability. UAE will be capable to accumulate a large amount of health data for the entire patient population. Moreover, patients will be more apt to become involved actively in managing health in addition to taking part in shared decision making because of having easier access to their health information. Furthermore, the utilization of the electronic medical records can make office of physicians more efficient and it may also improve the quality care of the patients by making their medical history available for any physicians who are treating them. As one of the participants stated:
“The UAE is ready for the National Unified Medical record. This is becoming essential to control the population health and drive clinical programs with public/private sector to improve the health of the population, control the registries managing chronic diseases and predicting health outcomes.” (P6)
Upon digging deeper within the interviews and the argument on the perception of respondents about the readiness for NUMR, it was found that, Unified electronic health records were strongly supported by most of the respondents:
“A stronger system of health IT can often increase communication between patients and providers as well as may assist to foster enhanced patient engagement through the use of applications such as patient portals and interfaces with laboratory, radiology, and medical devices.” (P1)
Moreover, formalized plans should be established with detailed strategies for effective implementation of NUMR.
EMRAM assessment by HIMSS
EMRAM also known as “Electronic Medical Record Adoption Model” is a unique evaluation model and a strategic roadmap for effective EMR maturity and adoption developed by HIMSS Analytics. These 8 staged models aid to measure the utilisation and adoption of EMR functions needed to attain a paperless environment that harnesses technology for optimizing patient care along with enabling benchmarking and comparison with peers. Majority of the respondent addressed the use of EMRAM in their facilities. One of the participants from the Ministry of Health and prevention stated:
“MOHAP performed HIMSS EMRAM assessment in two hospitals, they both got level 6. There is a plan to perform the same assessment for the rest of the hospitals. EMRAM allows to track progress against other healthcare organizations across the globe.” (P2)
While, another respondent from DHA specified:
“Yes, DHA’s facilities, including Dubai and Rashid Hospital as well as 12 DHA primary healthcare facilities etched their mark on the hospital digital roadmap by obtaining EMRAM level 6 certification. DHA’s primary healthcare centres that received HIMSS Level 6 include Al Badaa, Al Barsha, Al Khawaneej, Al Lusaily, Al Mamzar, Al Mankhool, Al Mizhar, Al Towar Al Safa, Nad Al Hamar, Nad Al Sheba Health Center and Za’abeel health centre” (P4)
On the contrary, another respondent who witnessed a survey in Dubai stated:
“The last Dubai EMRAM survey was conducted in 2017 with a 100% participation of Dubai public and private hospitals. 33 hospitals participated in the survey in which 48.5% of them got stage 4 or above.” (P3)
A participant from Sharjah added:
“Our Hospital UHS is HIMSS Stage 6.” (P7)
These responses confirm that UAE continues to uphold its position as it has some of the most digitally mature healthcare organization, after magnificently accomplishing stage 6 level of the HIMSS Analytics Electronic Medical Record Adoption Model (EMRAM).
Recommended standards, methodology, models and system architecture
As soon as the third-party applications that were being utilized within EHRs increased in the past, there emerged a need to establish specific and additional interfaces. Therefore, it soon became apparent that standards were required. IEEE P1157 and Health Level Seven (HL7) were considered as the foremost interface standards internationally by the homegrown vendors or EHRs to interface with several different systems. The benefit of such a strategy was to lessen the ambiguity in definitions of the data element. As soon as the EHRs number and other applications started to be interfaced, the HL7 standard was expanded in addition of being refined into supplementary domains to turn into a most practical solution for aggregating ancillary systems like echocardiography, electrocardiogram, microbiology, laboratory, and other outcomes into a central EHR. Based on the participant response, most of them affirmed using HL7 and FHIR:
“There are international standards that could be customized in the UAE. HL7 and FHIR are important Health Information Exchange protocols that could be adopted. For an example, please visit the interoperability standards that was develop at DHA.” (P4)
The key focus of EMR systems is the secure, efficient storage and data retrieval. The government wanted to be sure that EMR systems are secure, the privacy of users is being maintained, and data is shared only between departments that are authorized. For achieving this, the federal government has established a set of standards for the system of EMR. As one of the participants stated:
“FHIR, CDA and LOINC. SNOMED can also be considered in HIE should capitalize on existing standards put forward by eclaims system e.g. ICD10, CPT4 and Pharmacy RX and promote the usage of HL7 in future (P3)”
These interview results confirm that to hasten the deployment of EMR, one should focus on the interfaces rather than the EMR system. We often possess the interface solutions in the form of standards: HL7/ASTM, IP, DICOM, LOINC, SNOMED, and others developed by the community of medical informatics. One may only need to embrace them.
Respondent were further inquired about the models and system architecture recommended for the project. Majority of the participants agreed that FHIR resources (collection of information models) decisively fit within the domain of information architecture whereas, the FHIR APIs for data exchange address aspects of application architecture. As stated by one of the participants:
“Due to the federal/local setup of healthcare authorities in the UAE and federated architecture is the best option where every local regulator can govern data sharing in its jurisdiction and then exchange patient record throughout the regulator nodes. Open architecture must be adopted and FHIR web services should be the main approach for data exchange. (P3)”
Another participant further indicated that API based predictive modelling services is easy to implement across thin client applications, particularly in the mobile environment. FHIR outlines resources characterized as XML or JSON objects that often comprise of health ideas in addition to reference and searchable parameters. FHIR additionally defines RESTful API URL patterns for reading, creating, updating, and deleting (CRUD) operations.
“Web services through the FHIR standard as this architecture is standard and all EMR should be conforming to this healthcare integration API’s.” (P6)
Another respondent from the Ministry of Health and Prevention added;
“From operational point of view, the National unified medical record will be in partnership with the private sector on a PPP model (Public Private Partnership). The technical architecture will be hybrid (not fully centralized and not fully fragmented), to accommodate the local requirements of the local authorities as well as the federal requirements. Integration and communication will be using different standards like HL7, web services, XML, SOAP, DICOM, etc.” (P2)
A participant from SEHA stated:
“Follow the HIMSS model, JCIA and JAWDA requirements and this should encompass 95% of what is needed to accomplish the project and be certified or ready for certification on its deployment.” (P10)
In terms of system architecture, majority of the participant stated that a distributed electronic healthcare system founded on the service-oriented architecture (SOA) can help developers to integrate several different kinds of databases, software applications, and computing platforms within a certain health network along with state, community, and national health information exchanges.
“SOA will be suiting such project, managing technology dependency is required in such projects, and the load tolerance is a major aspect in such a project due to the high volume of transaction.” (P7)
“SOA should be used” (P8)
Addressing Challenges to Optimal Use and implementation of NUMR
Different government agencies and health organizations often recognize the values of information in electronic health records to examine the optimal care patterns. Staff (resistance, lack of training), costs, and concerns related to the technology (interoperability, issues during implementation, security and privacy) were among the most frequently mentioned barriers. IT issues for example, implementation not being available for all information systems and internet not reliable can exasperate an already stimulating condition.
One of the questions asked was about the concerns of the respondents with respect to the privacy and confidentiality of the electronic medical records. The results found out that the participants were concerned about it in general and some emerging issues facing privacy, healthcare coverage, and especially the EHR security remains to be a critical challenge for its acceptance. All participants stated their concerns for the security of personal health and patients’ safety concerns. One respondent stated:
“Some of the risk and challenges may include Information security and documentation completeness. Moreover, Data privacy and ownership became common issues whenever data exchange and storage through computer networks were planned” (P1)
In response to addressing further risk and challenges that may be faced while implementing this project, one of the respondents from the Ministry of Health and Prevention stated:
“There are few risks and mitigation actions identified for these risks such as Sustainability, that’s why PPP operating model is selected, adoption, private sector maturity, alignment between federal and local authorities, data quality, privacy and security, stakeholder’s engagement, and marketing and awareness” (P2)
Another respondent from the same organization added;
“Confidentiality, security, completeness, timing and validity of data” (P8)
These findings are consistent with Bramble et al. (2010) who argued that larger practices tend to have access to the potentially greater resources (human resources and financial) that is needed for unified health system adoption and delivery as well as it must include extensive training and internal IT assistance.
A proper structure for governance needs to be put in place for achieving transparency, independence with respect to decision making and other objectives. One of the participants indicated that for successful exchange of data to be possible, healthcare professional should follow similar documentation and information governance processes. As stated below:
“Governance will be important. A unified body of experts to make decisions that impact the course and direction of the project will be imperative. There must be senior cabinet level government officials that are helping support and drive the initiative and require and mandate what needs to be done. Otherwise, I fear there will be too many ways to interpret how the system should be used, causing confusion, mistrust and eventually non-use of the system.” (P10)
Thus, providers/ leadership buy-in and employee leading to resistance and hesitancy, resources, security and privacy, workforce, funding, and lack of technical guidance are some of the experienced challenges that keeps many organizations away from the benefits of NUMR mentioned above. The challenges for the health organizations have been too great to move beyond, although efforts are being made towards this goal.