Construction and identification of double-gene plasmids
The plasmids were purchased from Clontech Laboratories, Inc. (Mountainview, CA, USA). Construction, amplification and extraction of pIRES-CEACAM6-4-1BBL double gene plasmid were reported in our earlier reports [34, 35]. The selection of splicing enzymes and the identification of plasmid are very important since this is a double-gene combined vaccine. Enzyme contamination should be avoided in transformation, and the transformation and detection conditions should be optimized by housekeeping gene as positive control. The transformed bacteria E. Coli should be coated to a flat plate to disperse into single bacterium colonies, and cultured under suitable conditions. When a single bacterium grows into a colony, finally select the cloned bacteria for extraction and identification.
Transfection of genetically modified plasmids
Method for eukaryotic expression system transfection is as previously published methods [34, 35]. COS7 cell line was purchased from American Type Culture Collection Center (Manassas, VA, USA; ATCC Number: CRL-1651). The COS7 cells were transfected with liposome. COS7 cells were cultured in DMEM medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gibco, Grand Island, NY), taken in logarithmic growth phase, digested with trypsin, and inoculated into 6-well culture plate in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37 °C for 24 h (the cell growth density was 80%-90%). The extracted plasmids were transfected into COS7 cells with Lipofectamine2000 liposomes (Invitrogen), and the control group was treated with the same amount of blank liposomes. The transfection procedure was in accordance with the instructions of Lipofectamine2000 Reagent kit.
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
Reverse transcript (RT)-PCR identification of objective genes was performed. The total RNA was extracted with Trizol reagent, purified and the concentration was adjusted, then the cDNA was generated by reverse transcription. Reaction system: total RNA 2 μL, RNase inhibitor 0.5 μL, oligo-dT18 2 μL, cooling on ice after 65 °C for 5 min; then 5× RT buffer 4 μL, 10 mM dNTPs 2 μL, RNase inhibitor 0.5 μL, M-MLV reverse transcriptase 1 μL, and double distilled water were added to total volume of 20 μL; after 1 h at 37 °C and 10 min at 70 °C, the system was cooled on ice. All the used primers were synthesized by Shanghai Bioengineering Co., Ltd. CEACAM6 gene forward primer: 5-CAGAGCCAAACAACAGAT-3; reverse primer: 5-CATTATTACTTATGCTGACCT-3. 4-1BBL gene forward primer: 5-GCTCTAGAGCCACCATGGACCAGCACGCACTTG-3; reverse primer: 5-GGCGGCCGCGTCATCCCTGAGGGGGGTC-3. PCR reaction system: 10× buffer 5 μL, Mg2+ solution 4 μL, dNTP 1 μL, forward primer 1 μL, reverse primer 1 μL, Tag enzyme 0.3 μL, template cDNA 3 μL. Reaction conditions: pre-denaturation at 95 °C for 10 min; 95 °C for 20 s, 52 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 1 min, 35 cycles; more extension at 72 °C for 7 min, and 4 °C forever. Agarose gel electrophoresis was performed with PCR products 15 μL and DNA marker 5 μL, and the results were observed and analyzed by Gel imaging and analysis system (HUADIAN DH2000).
Protein expression and Western blot identification
After transfection with double-gene plasmids, COS7 cells were cultured at 37 °C for 4 h, and then changed to fresh DMEM containing 10% FBS. A plasmid-free negative control group was established. Cells were collected for test 48 h after transfection. The cells were mixed within ice-precooled protein lysates (l mM PMSF, pH7.4), broken up by ultrasonic cracker, centrifuged at 4 °C, 12000 rpm for 15 min, and the supernatant was taken for loading sample preparation and Western blotting assay. Antibodies used: anti-4-1BBL mouse monoclonal antibody (sc-398933, Santa cruz, 1:1000), CEACAM6 rabbit monoclonal antibody (ab235139, Abcam, 1:1000), anti-PD-L1 rabbit polyclonal antibody (ab233482, Abcam, 1:1000), and anti-GAPDH mouse monoclonal antibody (ab125247, Abcam, 1:5000), and secondary antibodies (Beyotime Biotechnology). The follow-up WB method was as reported [36].
Transformation of attenuated SL3261 with recombinant plasmids
Attenuated SL3261 was primarily provided from the laboratory of Professor Stocker of Stanford University (Stanford, CA, USA) and then on conserved in our laboratory. SL3261 bacteria in 10% glycerol stored at -80 °C was inoculated into non-resistant LB plate and cultured at 37 °C for 18 h. The selected single colony was cultured in 2 mL LB at 37 °C for 12 h with oscillation, and inoculated in 50 mL LB in 1:100 dilution and oscillated until the OD600 was about 0.4. The bacterial culture was transferred into a 50 mL aseptic centrifuge tube in ice for 20 min, centrifuged at 4 °C at 3000 rpm for 10 min, and the supernatant was discarded. Add pre-cooled sterile deionized water to resuspend the bacteria, centrifuge at 4 °C at 3000 rpm for 10 min and discard the supernatant; repeat this procedure twice to wash the bacteria fully. Ice-cold 10% glycerol was used to suspend the bacteria, and centrifuge at 4 °C at 3000 rpm for 10 min and discard the supernatant. The bacteria were suspended in 2 mL pre-cooled 10% glycerol and packed in pre-cooled EP tube (150 µL) for use or store at -80 °C. Susceptible Salmonella SL3261 150 µL was added into pre-cooled 2 mm electro-conversion cup, 1 µL empty carrier plasmids or recombinant expression plasmids were added and fully mixed, resting in ice-bath for 30 min. The parameters of the electro-converter were as follows: voltage 2500 V, resistance 200 Ω, capacitance 25 F. Take out the electro-conversion cup and dry the water on the outside before electro-transformation. After electro-transformation, 500 µL LB preheated at 37 °C was added immediately. The bacteria-containing liquid was transferred into EP tube, and cultured in a shaker at 37 °C and 100 r/min for 1 h. Centrifuge the culture at 4000 rpm for 5 min, discard the supernatant, resuspend the bacteria, coat them into LB plate with ampicillin, and incubate overnight at 37 °C. Positive clones were picked out and the bacteria were amplified. Three clones were inoculated into 4 mL LB medium containing ampicillin, incubated at 37 °C and 180 rpm in a shaker overnight, and plasmids were extracted and identified by PCR.
Animals and HCT116 tumor model
SPF-grade C57BL/6 female mice, aged 6-8 weeks, were obtained from Beijing Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co., Ltd., and kept in clean animal room of the Jiangsu Institute of Parasitic Diseases. The temperature was maintained at 24±2 °C, the relative humidity was 60%±5%, and the light/dark cycle was 12/12 h. The bedding, drinking water and food were all sterilized. The feeding, body hair and activity of the animals were observed, and the body weights of the mice were measured weekly. All experiments with animals of this study were approved by the Animal Care and Research Ethics Committee of the Wuxi Hospital affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine. Culture and modeling injection of human colon cancer cell line HCT116 cells was based on reference [37]. HCT116 cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% PS (100 U/mL penicillin and 100 μg/mL streptomycin) at 37 °C and 5% CO2. HCT116 cells were injected subcutaneously into the medial left forelimb of mice. Briefly, 1×106 cells of HCT116 cells were injected for one mouse. The tumor growth of HCT116 xenograft was observed by microPET scans 1 week after model establishment.
Grouping and treatment
According to microPET scanning results, the model mice were equally divided into three groups, the control group, the pIRES-CEACAM6-4-1BBL/SL3261 group, and the pIRES-CEACAM6-4-1BBL/SL3261 + anti-PD1 antibody group. The control group mice were given vehicle, and the other two groups were given the prepared bivalent vaccine of pIRES-CEACAM6-4-1BBL/SL3261 0.2 mL (109 stable transformants/mL) per mouse. All the mice were deprived of water for 2 h before administration via gastric lavage. The PD1 antibody solution was administered by tail vein injection. All mice were therapeutically administrated according to grouping two weeks after the modeling transplantation injection. Then the mice were scanned with PET imaging, and after the last scanning, the mice were anesthetized with 2% pentobarbital sodium at 65 mg/kg intraperitoneally. After that, the mice were executed by dislocation of cervical vertebra and the tissues were harvested for analysis.
Immunohistochemical (IHC) assay
The tumor tissues (including the tumor and its surrounding normal tissue) were taken and immersed in 10% neutral formalin. After dehydration, diaphaneity, wax dipping and embedding, the specimens were sectioned to 5 μm slices. The IHC staining (with anti-PD-L1 rabbit polyclonal antibody and anti-PD1 rabbit monoclonal antibody, ab228857, Abcam, 1:100) and hematoxylin (AppliChem Inc.) re-staining were performed on the paraffin slices. The routine procedures were according to reports [35, 38]. After the slices were sealed with neutral gum, pathological examination was carried out under Olympus BX53 microscope (Olympus Co.).
MicroPET imaging
The preparation of PD-L1 antibody labeled with Zirconium-89 ([89Zr]KN035), and its purity and stability in vitro were studied by molecular weight exclusion and radioactive high-performance liquid chromatography (radio-HPLC). The in vitro stability of the labeled product [89Zr]KN035 was tested, and the radiochemical purity at each time point was used as the reference data of in vitro stability. About 400 μL purified [89Zr]KN035 was placed at 4 °C for different time, and its stability in buffer solution was determined by radioactive HPLC. The time points were 6, 24, 48 and 98 h. Then microPET scanning was conducted. Six tumor-bearing mice were selected according to the size and state of the tumor. The microPET scanning method was the same in each group, and the details were as follows: whole body was scanned at 6 different time points after tail vein injection of the tracer, the time points were 4, 24, 48, 72, 96 and 120 h after tracer injection. The animals were placed prone on the scanning bed and anesthetized with 2% isoflurane (oxygen flow rate: 300 mL/min) during the scanning.
In the process of microPET scanning, the detailed information such as animal weight, initial injection dose and measurement time, injection time, residual dose and measurement time, scan time at different time points were recorded accurately on the original recording form. The data of microPET scans were iteratively reconstructed by OSEM 3D method, iteration for twice. The thickness was 0.50 mm, the Matrix was 280×280, and the energy window was 350-650 keV. The reconstructed data were analyzed by PMOD software, and the regions of interest (ROIs) were delineated as tumor, heart, liver, kidney and brain. The following formula was used to calculate the percentage of injected dose per gram (%ID/g) values of each organ ROI at different time points.
Statistical analysis
SPSS 19.0 (SPSS Inc.) software was used for all statistical analysis. The quantitative data were expressed as “mean±SD”. One-way analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) was used for the comparison between groups. Nonparametric Wilcoxon test was used to evaluate the grade data. T-test was used for the difference comparison between two groups. The difference was considered statistically significant when P <0.05.