WNT4 was upregulated in serum and tissue of CRC patients
We first analyzed the expression of WNT4 in CRC tissues and normal tissues from Oncomine Database, and found an elevated levels of WNT4 in CRC patients (Fig 1A, P<0.05).What’s more, CRC patients with high WNT4 expression had lower survival rate and higher recurrence rate (Fig 1B, 1C, P<0.05). In addition, tissues and serum samples were collected from CRC patients and healthy donors. ELISA was employed to measure the level of WNT4 in serum from 40 CRC patients and 28 healthy donors, significantly higher WNT4 levels was found in CRC than healthy donors (Fig 1D, P<0.01). Interestingly, WNT4 level was decreased after radical surgery in 21/23 (91.30%) of CRC patients who accept surgery treatment to remove the tumor (Fig 1D, P<0.05). Subsequently, the conditioned media from fresh tumor and adjacent normal tissues were collected to identify the source of WNT4 hypersecretion. The results showed that the WNT4 levels in conditioned medium from fresh tumors were significantly higher than those from adjacent tissues, which strongly identified WNT4 may be derived from CRC tissue (Fig 1E, P<0.05). This result may indicate that the aberrantly raised WNT4 in serum was secreted by CRC tumor tissues, which may also explain the decrease of WNT4 in serum after tumor resection. Also, those results suggested that the serum WNT4 level may be a potential biomarker for CRC.
We next measured the expression of WNT4 in human CRC tissues and paired adjacent normal tissues by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Compared with adjacent normal tissues, WNT4 was significantly increased in CRC (Fig 1F). IHC analysis of WNT4 in tumor tissue arrays indicated that the level of WNT4 was elevated in 45/63 (71.43%) of tumors (Fig 1G). The expression of WNT4 in 4 paired of fresh frozen CRC tissues and adjacent normal tissues were evaluated by using western blot analysis, we found that WNT4 was upregulated in CRC tissue (Fig 1H, P<0.05).
These results suggested that WNT4 was upregulated in CRC serum and tissue, which may play a role in progression of CRC. Combined with the above finding that WNT4 level decreased after tumor resection, we could speculate that the aberrantly raised WNT4 in serum may be secreted by CRC tumor tissues.
WNT4 level correlated with metastasis of CRC
Next, we analyzed the relationships between the elevated WNT4 in serum and clinicopathological characteristics of CRC patients. As shown in Table 1, significantly different WNT4 expression were observed when comparing advanced late TNM T stage with early stage (88.08 pg/mL vs. 55.94 pg/mL; P = 0.0293), and advanced TNM stage with early stage (94.57 pg/mL vs. 66.35 pg/mL; P = 0.0464). In addition, higher levels of WNT4 were found in large tumor size (96.60 pg/mL vs. 59.38 pg/mL; P = 0.0087) and tumor with metastasis (111.1 pg/mL vs. 71.73 pg/mL; P = 0.0428), while no relationship was observed between the WNT4 expression and age, sex, lymph node metastasis, and differentiation(P > 0.05). Remarkably, WNT4 showed a potential ability to differentiate different stages of CRC when compared with CA199 and CEA in our samples, for WNT4 levels were different at TNM stages and tumor size while CA199 and CEA were not (Table 1). These results indicated that high expression of WNT4 is associated with faster CRC enlarging and spreading, suggesting that WNT4 level correlated with metastasis of CRC.
WNT4 promotes invasion and migration of CRC through β-catenin-dependent pathway in vitro
Since we found that WNT4 is related to the clinical characteristics of CRC, we further explored the effect of WNT4 on CRC. Migration and invasion effects of WNT4 on CRC were measured when exogenous WNT4 added. Exogenous WNT4 at the concentration of 100 ng/mL greatly enhanced the migration and invasion ability of LoVo and HCT 116 cells (Fig 2A, 2B, P < 0.05).
To further analyzed the mechanism of WNT4 promoting invasion and migration, TOP/FOP Flash assays were applied for testing the effect of WNT4 on Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in CRC cells, as TOP/FOP Flash assays are a direct proof to test β-catenin-mediated transcriptional activity. E-cadherin and ZO-1 are two known markers involved in EMT were also measured [19, 20]. The TCF/LEF transcription activity is significantly enhanced after treatment with WNT4 (100 ng/mL) for 2 h (Fig 2C, P < 0.05), indicating that Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway was activated. Next, we found that the total β–catenin and AXIN2, a downstream target gene of β–catenin, were increased, while the levels of E-cadherin and ZO-1 were decreased in LoVo and HCT 116 cells treated with exogenous WNT4 (100 ng/mL) for 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 6, and 24 h, (Fig 2D, P < 0.05). What’s more, the level of β-catenin in the nucleus also increased (Fig 2D, P < 0.05), while AXIN2 was highest at one hour after treatment. The fluorescence microscopy also demonstrated that CRC cells treated with WNT4 raised β–catenin and AXIN2 accumulation and remarkably induced nuclear translocation of β–catenin and AXIN2 (Fig 2E). In order to further verify that WNT4 activates downstream pathways through canonical Wnt/β–catenin pathways, an inhibitor of transcription mediated by β-catenin/TCF, ICG-001 was used. As shown in Fig 2F and 2G, 25 μM ICG-001 completely inhibited activation of β-catenin signaling caused by WNT4 (P < 0.05).
In addition, CRC cells expressed different levels of WNT4 were also constructed. LoVo and HCT 116 highly expressed WNT4 while only low levels of WNT4 found in SW480. Therefore, LoVo, HCT 116 and SW480 were chosen to carry out the following related experiments. HCT 116 and LoVo cells transfected with WNT4-siRNA1, WNT4-siRNA2 and normal control siRNA(normal control)were constructed, respectively (Fig 3A, P < 0.05). After validating the knockdown effects of WNT4-siRNAs in LoVo and HCT 116 cells, we successfully constructed stablely transfected WNT4-vector and WNT4-HA in SW480 cells (Fig 3B, P < 0.05). We found that the total β–catenin and AXIN2 in these cells decreased notably, while the levels of E-cadherin and ZO-1 increased in both loVo and HCT 116 cells transfected WNT4-siRNA1 and WNT4-siRNA2 (Fig 3C, P < 0.05). Meanwhile, the level of β-catenin and AXIN2 in the nucleus also decreased (Fig 3C, P < 0.05). Next, the TCF/LEF transcription activity in SW480 cells overexpressed WNT4 (WNT4-HA) significantly enhanced (Fig 3D, P < 0.05). Those results may suggest that WNT4 promote migration and invasion of CRC through by promoting EMT, which through β-catenin-dependent pathway.
WNT4 promotes invasion and migration of CRC through β-catenin-dependent pathway in vivo
Next, to confirm our results in vitro, we then conducted a series of in vivo experiments. LoVo cells (1× 106) stablely transfected with negative control shRNA (Scramble) or WNT4-shRNA were injected into the caudal vein of nude mice (n=7), respectively. Since liver metastasis is the most common distant metastasis of CRC, we checked the number of metastasis sites in the liver of those mice. Finally, liver metastasis occured in four mice for each group. The ratio of liver weight to body weight and the number of liver metastases in the Scramble group are much higher than the WNT4-shRNA group (Fig 3E, 3F, P < 0.05). These results suggested that WNT4 may be a key player in promoting CRC metastasis.
To further explore if WNT4 had a pro-proliferation effect on CRC in vivo, a subcutaneous xenograft model using nude mice was constructed. Results showed that tumors developed from mice incubated with LoVo cells (1×107 cells/200 μL) transfected with WNT4-shRNA were smaller and lighter than that incubated with LoVo cells transfected with negative control shRNA (Scramble), though the difference is not statistically significant (Fig 3G, P=0.0705, n=7). In mice incubated with SW480 cells (1×107 cells/200 μL) stablely transfected WNT4-vector and WNT4-HA, tumors developed from WNT4-HA were larger and heavier than those developed from WNT4-vector cells, while no significant difference was observed (Fig 3H, P=0.1028, n=5). Those results may indicate that WNT4 only has a slight effect on tumor proliferation.
WNT4 promotes fibroblast recruitment and activationvia β-catenin-dependent pathway
Despite secretive WNT4 initiating EMT, as clearly illustrated above, the effect of WNT4 being highly secreted in the CRC microenvironment remains largely unknown. Activated Wnt/β-catenin signaling has been implicated in fibrosis in a number of organs including the tumor stroma [21-23]. However, it is not clear whether WNT4 can also activate fibroblasts through β-catenin signaling. Strikingly, we found that α-SMA positive CAFs are more abundant in the samples from mice injected with the LoVo-Scramble (n=7) and SW480-WNT4-HA-transfected cells (n=5), compared to those from mice injected with the LoVo-shWNT4 and SW480-WNT4-vectors, respectively (Fig 4A, 4B, P=0.0005, P=0.0006, respectively). Those results indicating that WNT4 may contribute to CRC tumor progression by recruiting and activating fibroblasts.
To investigate whether WNT4 can recruit fibroblasts, normal fibroblasts (NF) and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAF) were isolated and identified from the tumor and adjacent tissues of CRC patients by an enzymatic dissociation method. The specific cell surface markers CD31, CD45, and CD329 were used to confirm the absence of endothelial, immune, and epithelial cell contamination by flow cytometry analysis (Supplementary Fig 1). We established a suspension coculture of CAFs and tumor cells with complete medium in ultra-low attachment plates. Intriguingly, fewer and smaller typical heterospheroids were formed in the WNT4-shRNA groups, supporting the hypothesis that WNT4 was related to the adhesive capacity of CRC cells and had the ability to recruit fibroblasts (Fig 4C, P=0.0069). Moreover, in the WNT4-HA group, more heterospheroids were found than WNT4-vector group, which further confirming our hypothesis (Fig 4D, P<0.0001).
In addition, exogenous WNT4 was added to the growth medium (without FBS) of normal fibroblasts (NF) at a final concentration of 0 (control) or 400 ng/mL for 24 h. Stronger gel contraction was observed after the NF#1 and NF#2 treated with WNT4, indicating increased extracellular matrix remodeling (Fig 4E, P=0.0139, P=0.00031, respectively). We also tested the related markers of CAFs, fibronectin (FN) and α-SMA, by immunofluorescence and western blotting to verify the recruitment and contraction ability of WNT4 towards fibroblasts. Increased expression of FN and α-SMA were observed after the NFs were stimulated with WNT4 (400 ng, 24 h) (Fig 4F, 4G, 4H, P<0.05). Together, these data highlight WNT4 as a novel and highly potent factor that could drive the conversion of NFs into CAFs within the tumor microenvironment. We next investigated the underlying mechanism of how WNT4 could activate NFs into CAFs.
The WNT/β-catenin pathway is known to play an important role in CRC-associated fibroblast [24, 25]. To interrogate the WNT4 signaling pathways operating in CAF activation, we first assessed the activation of the β-catenin-dependent pathway using immunofluorescence. As shown in Fig 5A, β-catenin nuclear translocation was observed in case of the NF#1 and NF#2 treated with WNT4 (400 ng/ml, 24 h). These data suggest that WNT4 could activate the classical WNT/β-catenin pathway in colorectal NFs. Subsequently, ICG-001 was used to block the canonical β-caten in pathway, we found that ICG-001 completely blocked elevation of α-SMA and FN at a concentration of 10 μM (Fig 5B, 5C, P<0.05). Additionally, the effects of the WNT4 protein on heterospheroid formation and gel contraction ability were also completely inhibited by ICG-001 (Fig 5D and 5E, P < 0.05).
WNT4 promote angiogenesis in CRC via a WNT4/β-catenin/ANG2 pathway
Angiogenesis is very important in the development of tumor, therefore, we next studied whether WNT4 could promote angiogenesis in CRC. In subcutaneous xenograft mouse model, we found higher abundance of endothelial (CD31) were found in tumors from mice incubated with LoVo cells transfected Scramble and SW480 cells transfected WNT4-HA than that from mice incubated with LoVo cells transfected WNT4-shRNA and SW480 cells transfected WNT4-vector, respectively (Fig 6A, 6B, P<0.05). These results indicate that WNT4 may promote angiogenesis in CRC, while the detailed mechanism need to be elucidated.
To investigate the possible role of WNT4 in angiogenesis, HUVECs were treated with CMs from CRC cells with different WNT4 expression levels, and effects of WNT4 on the ability in generating tubular networks of HUVECs on Matrigel was evaluated. Our results showed that the tube formation was significantly promoted when the HUVECs treated with CM from SW480 transfected with WNT4-HA than that from SW480 transfected WNT4-vector (Fig 6C, P<0.05). These results indicate that angiogenesis could be promoted by WNT4.
To explore whether WNT4 promotes tumor angiogenesis via β-catenin pathway, TOP/FOP Flash assay was used to detect TCF/LEF transcription activity when HUVECs treated with CM from SW480 cells with different levels of WNT4 (as described above). HUVECs treated with CRC cells with high WNT4 expression resulted in upregulation of transcriptional activity (Fig 6D, P<0.05). Subsequently, we found that β-catenin transcriptional activity was downregulated, and tube formation was obviously abrogated after blocking by ICG-001 (10 μM) (Fig 6C, 6D, P<0.05). Those results demonstrated that WNT4 could promote angiogenesis via a β-catenin-dependent pathway.
We next measured the expression of ANG2 to investigate whether ANG2 could be regulated by WNT4/β-catenin pathway. RT-qPCR and ELISA were used to measure the expression of ANG2 from different treated HUVECs (Fig 6E, 6F, P < 0.05). We can infer that ANG2 was upregulated with high levels of WNT4, while it was downregulated after blocking by ICG-001 (10 μM) (Fig 6E, 6F, P < 0.05). In addition, HUVECs stablely transfected with negative control shRNA (Scramble) and sh-ANG2 were constructed and the expression of ANG2 were identified by RT-qPCR and ELISA (Fig 6G, 6H,P < 0.01). The tube formation promoted by high WNT4 expression were significantly inhibited due to low ANG2 expression (Fig 6I, P < 0.01). Those results could indicate that angiogenesis could be regulated by WNT4/β-catenin/ANG2 cascade.
WNT4 levels could be regulated by miR-497
MiR-497 has been well characterized as a tumor suppressor in previous work by our group [26]. For further study, we found that WNT4 expression were decreased at both mRNA and proteins levels in LoVo and HCT 116 CRC cell lines after transfecting with miR-497 mimics (Fig 7A, P<0.05). To further illustrate the relationship between miR-497 and WNT4, a Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay was conducted (Fig 7B). It was also found that miR-497 was able to suppress the reporter gene activity of WNT4 in LoVo cells (Fig 7C, P<0.05), whereas mutant plasmids showed no change in the reporter gene activity (Fig 7C, P>0.05). Next, the expression of miR-497 and WNT4 among 10 randomly selected CRC tissues and paired adjacent tissues were investigated by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). Significant downregulation of miR-497 and upregulation of WNT4 expression were found (Fig 7D, 7E). Moreover, a negative correlation was found between miR-497 and the WNT4 expression levels was also seen in those CRC cancer tissues and paired adjacent tissues (Fig 7F, P<0.01). These data suggested that miR-497 could downregulate the level of WNT4.