1. Williamson P, Altman D, Blazeby J, Clarke M, Gargon E. Driving up the quality and relevance of research through the use of agreed core outcomes. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2012;17(1):1-2.
2. Williamson PR, Altman DG, Bagley H, Barnes KL, Blazeby JM, Brookes ST, et al. The COMET Handbook: version 1.0. Trials. 2017;18(suppl 3):280.
3. Tyler N, Wright N, Grundy A, Waring J. Developing a core outcome set for interventions to improve discharge from mental health inpatient services: a survey, Delphi and consensus meeting with key stakeholder groups. BMJ Open. 2020;10(5):e034215.
4. Taylor J, Böhnke JR, Wright J, Kellar I, Alderson SL, Hughes T, et al. A core outcome set for evaluating self-management interventions in people with comorbid diabetes and severe mental illness: study protocol for a modified Delphi study and systematic review. Trials. 2017;18(1):70.
5. Retzer A, Sayers R, Pinfold V, Gibson J, Keeley T, Taylor G, et al. Development of a core outcome set for use in community-based bipolar trials-A qualitative study and modified Delphi. PLoS One. 2020;15(10):e0240518.
6. Dixon LB, Dickerson F, Bellack AS, Bennett M, Dickinson D, Goldberg RW, et al. The 2009 schizophrenia PORT psychosocial treatment recommendations and summary statements. Schizophr Bull. 2010;36(1):48-70.
7. Miyamoto Y, Hashimoto-Koichi R, Akiyama M, Takamura S. Mental health and social service needs for mental health service users in Japan: a cross-sectional survey of client- and staff-perceived needs. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2015;9:19.
8. Drake RE, Whitley R. Recovery and Severe Mental Illness: Description and Analysis. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. 2014;59(5):236-42.
9. Bunn F, Trivedi D, Alderson P, Hamilton L, Martin A, Pinkney E, et al. The impact of Cochrane Reviews: a mixed-methods evaluation of outputs from Cochrane Review Groups supported by the National Institute for Health Research. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2015.
10. Young AE, Brookes ST, Avery KNL, Davies A, Metcalfe C, Blazeby JM. A systematic review of core outcome set development studies demonstrates difficulties in defining unique outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019;115:14-24.
11. Dodd S, Clarke M, Becker L, Mavergames C, Fish R, Williamson PR. A taxonomy has been developed for outcomes in medical research to help improve knowledge discovery. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018;96:84-92.
12. Wuytack F, Smith V, Clarke M, Williamson P, Gargon E. Towards core outcome set (COS) development: a follow-up descriptive survey of outcomes in Cochrane reviews. Systematic reviews. 2015;4:73.
13. Peryer G, Golder S, Junqueira D, Vohra S, Loke YK. Chapter 19: Adverse effects. In: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.2 (updated February 2021). Cochrane. 2021. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-19. Accessed 18 May 2021.
14. Aluko P, Graybill E, Craig D, Henderson C, Drummond M, Wilson ECF, et al. Chapter 20: Economic evidence. In: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.2 (updated February 2021). Cochrane. 2021. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-20. Accessed 18 May 2021.
15. Mew EJ, Monsour A, Saeed L, Santos L, Patel S, Courtney DB, et al. Systematic scoping review identifies heterogeneity in outcomes measured in adolescent depression clinical trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020;126:71-79.