To our knowledge, this is the first study to report on the prevalence of ocular abnormalities in a large cohort of Western Chinese RP patients and to also investigate the relationship between BCVA with macular abnormalities demonstrated by OCT. Results revealed that the most common ocular abnormalities were cataracts (43.1%) and macular abnormalities (59.7%). For macular abnormalities, CME was significantly associated with poorer visual acuity in RP patients with clear lens.
Macular abnormality was the most common ocular abnormality in RP patients, and it accounted for 59.7% of all checked cases and was distributed in our study as follows: ERM (51.1%), CME (18.4%), VMT (2.4%), MH (2.3%), and CNVM (0.05%). ERM have been reported to be the second most frequent macular abnormality in RP patients, with a prevalence rate of 0.6–35.4% (Table 3). However, the prevalence of ERM in our study was much higher (51.1%) than that recorded in previous studies [4, 14, 15], which may be due to the application of SD-OCT with higher resolution, different genetic backgrounds, and diagnostic methods. We noted the presence of ERM when even a subtle, hyper-reflective lesion adhered to the inner retinal surface, regardless of other abnormalities being present. Testa et al performed a retrospective study investigating the prevalence of macular abnormalities in Usher syndrome patients [12] and found its prevalence to be at 45.1%, and they designated the most frequent abnormalities as CME (20.4% eyes), followed by ERM (15.6%), VMT (5%), and MHs (2%). The mechanisms of ERM formation remains unclear. However, it may include (1) idiopathic preretinal glial cell proliferation, (2) inflammation revealed by elevated aqueous flare, and (3) chronic macular-vitreous traction [15–17]. Our results demonstrated that CME was the second most common macular abnormality, and this coincided with results from an Italian population for which Testa et al investigated macular abnormalities in 581 RP subjects [1] and found that the most frequent abnormalities was CME (20.4% eyes), followed by ERM (15.6%), VMT (5%), and MH (2%). CME varies between 5.5% and 49% in RP patients [4, 14]. The exact mechanism of CME in RP remains unclear; however, it may include (1) the breakdown of the blood-retinal barrier secondary to the degeneration of RPE and/or Müller cells, (2) anti-retinal antibodies, and (3) traction from ERM and VMT. There is no consensus on the relationship between CME and visual acuity in RP patients [15–16]. Sandberg et al. believed that retinal thinning and thickening appeared to be associated with lower visual acuity in RP patients [18]. Yoshida et al. demonstrated that a normal preoperative ellipsoid zone (EZ), also called the inner/outer segment junction (IS/OS), was significantly related to better BCVA after cataracts in RP patients [19]. Because cataracts and PSCs were prevalent in RP subjects and were negatively correlated with BCVA, we analyzed the relationship between macular abnormalities and BCVA (logMAR) only in eyes with clear lens. CME appeared to be significantly associated with poor BCVA in our study. The exact relationship between maculopathy and visual acuity requires greater attention in future studies. CNVM are rare, and until recently, no data has shown the prevalence of CNVMs in RP patients. For several years, this information could only be attained through case reports [9, 20, 21]. In our study, a CNVM was observed in only one eye from one female patient (prevalence: approximately 0.09%). It has been proposed that photoreceptor cell degeneration and choriocapillaris damage may lead to the formation of CNVM [20].
Table 3
Comparison of the prevalence of ocular abnormalities in RP patients with previous studies
First author | Coun- try | Subjects/ Eyes(No.) | Macular abnormalities (Eyes / %) | Cataract (Eyes/%) | Glaucoma (Eyes/%) |
Total | CME | ERM | VMT | MH | | |
Hajali[6] | USA | 124/248 | | 115/46.4 | | | | | |
Testa[1] | Italy | 581/1161 | 524/45.1 | 237/20.4 | 181/15.6 | 58/5.0 | 23/2.0 | | |
Fujiwar- a[17] | Japan | 117/206 | 73/35.4 | | 73/35.4 | | | | |
Liew[5] | UK | 169/338 | | 172/50.9 | 77/22.8 | | | | |
Testa[12] | Italy | 134/268 | 126/47.0 | 42/15.7 | 51/19.0 | 38/14.2 | 8/3.0 | | |
Lee[22] | Korea | 365/365 | | | | | | 175/47.9 | |
Onakpo- ya OH[2] | Nigeria | 96/192 | 70/36.5% | 38/20 | 22/11.5 |
Our study | China | 1065/2127 | 829/59.7 | 255/18.4 | 709/51.1 | 33/2.4 | 32/2.3 | 917/43.1 | 35/1.6 |
CME cystoid macular oedema, ERM epiretinal membrane, VMT vitreomacular traction syndrome, MH macular hole |
Cataracts were the second most common ocular abnormality in our RP patients, and lens opacity developed at a relatively younger age than in the general population. The prevalence (43.1%) in our study was similar to the result of 47.9% reported by Lee et al. among Korean patients (Table 3) [22]. Posterior subcapsular cataracts (PSCs) are the most typical morphological abnormalities and occur in 63–83.9% of RP patients [19, 23, 24]. However, lens status was determined through medical records, and cataract type was unidentifiable in the study. Glaucoma is another ocular abnormality prevalent among RP subjects. There is some evidence to suggest similar genetic backgrounds for glaucoma and RP [13, 25]. Ko YC et al. reported a 3.64-fold greater odd of developing PACG in patients with RP than in the general population [26]. In our study, the prevalence of glaucoma was 2%, lower than the 11.5% reported by Onakpoya et al [2]. and the 7.5% reported in Eballe et al.[27], but similar to the prevalence in the general population (2–3%) [13]. The reason for the lower rate may be due to our larger sampled cohort and our study being retrospective study.
More than half of the RP patients in our study presented visual acuity deterioration at first clinical presentation, and the proportion of blindness and low vision defined by BCVA were 28.5% and 20.7%, respectively. We defined low vision or blindness according to central visual acuity and did not consider visual field defects and blindness. The low vision rates in the RP subjects were actually much higher than these results show.
This study had the advantage of a large sample size and assessed various ocular abnormality distributions and visual acuity simultaneously. However, it included several limitations. First, the study was retrospective, and other ocular abnormalities and details, such as corneal nebula, cataract and glaucoma types, and so on, remained unexplored. Secondly, some patients had no molecular diagnosis, and we could not sufficiently investigate ocular abnormalities in different genetic subtypes. Further studies including prospective investigations and more patients with genetic diagnoses, are needed to explore the relationship between the course of RP and BCVA or to clarify the relationship between the genetic phenotypes of RP and BCVA.